The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 806252 |

Mohamed E. EL-Hefnawy, Elmetwaly M. Selim, Faiz F. Assaad, Ali I. Ismail, "The Effect of Chloride and Sulfate Ions on the Adsorption of Cd2+ on Clay and Sandy Loam Egyptian Soils", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 806252, 6 pages, 2014.

The Effect of Chloride and Sulfate Ions on the Adsorption of Cd2+ on Clay and Sandy Loam Egyptian Soils

Academic Editor: M. C. Yebra-Biurrun
Received15 Jan 2014
Accepted19 Mar 2014
Published02 Apr 2014


Adsorption of Cd2+ on two types of Egyptian soils: clay (alluvial) and sandy loam (calcareous), was studied. Effect of changing the matrix electrolyte type and concentration was used to mimic the natural soil salts. Kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of the adsorption were calculated at two different electrolyte concentrations: 0.05 N and 0.15 N. The adsorption was described by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. Results showed that lower concentration of the NaCl or Na2SO4 electrolytes (0.05 N) had higher adsorption capacity. Also, the maximum adsorption of cadmium when using sulfate counter ion is about two to three times higher than that when using chloride (544 μg/g for alluvial soil and 170 μg/g for calcareous soil when using 0.05 N). Using NaCl as matrix electrolyte, Freundlich isotherms showed bi-linear fits that probably mean a two energy level adsorption. This might be explained by either the competition of Cd2+ with Na+ or its complexation with Cl.

1. Introduction

Soil is known to hold heavy metals due to the existence of functional groups on the humic acid and other components of the soil [17]. Heavy metals of special interest have been studied as an environmental target on soil [2, 3]. In Egypt different types of soils were used to determine their capacity to hold several types of metals [816]. Addition of salts to the soil has been used to change the charge and general environment of the soil and to alter the adsorption characteristics toward heavy metals [1721]. Cadmium is a toxic metal occurring in the environment naturally and coming from different sources mainly from industrial and agricultural sources. The mobility mechanism of heavy metals is an important parameter to understand the strength of the adsorption of the metal ions by the soil components [22]. The occurrence of heavy metals in the soils can theoretically include many fractions of them, free, complexed ions in pore water, or adsorbed “bound” on soil component surfaces. Also, they can be precipitated or coprecipitated as chemical compounds (hydroxides, carbonates, and sulfides) [23]. It is thought that the binding between cadmium ions and corresponding ligands affects their chemical behavior and toxicity in soil environments [2428]. Cadmium is known to have a nephrotoxicity, initially causing kidney tubular damage which may lead to bone damage [2428].

A recent theoretical study done by Chang Chien et al. suggested that addition of chloride and sulfate leads to an increase in the ability of soil to adhere more cadmium ions through enhancing the complexation with the anions [29]. The mechanism of competitive complexation and/or chelation between Cd2+ free cations and preferential concentrations of Cl, anions results in significantly altering the adsorption behavior [29]. Addition of sulfate to Swiss chard showed an increase in the adsorption of cadmium ions [20]. Chloride was also used to increase the cadmium uptake, however, with less effect than sulfate [30].

The objective of this study is to investigate the adsorption of the cadmium ions on two Egyptian soils, alluvial and calcareous. The study will focus on the effect of addition of different types and concentration of electrolytes (like Cl and ). The aspects of cadmium mobility and the thermodynamic free energy of adsorption will be determined. These together might extend our knowledge about better understanding of the cadmium-soil binding and the effect of chloride and sulfate on this binding considering their competitive effect on the adsorption sites or on cadmium ions.

2. Materials and Methods

The chemical, physical, and mineralogical properties of the two soils used in this study, alluvial and calcareous, were summarized in Table 1. The adsorption isotherms were conducted at pH = 7.8. Duplicate samples of each soil were applied. To 100 mL polyethylene tube, 2.00 g of soil sample and 50 mL of 0.05 NaCl were added. Appropriate volume of stock solution containing 500 mg Cd2+/L was added to obtain cadmium concentrations of 1–15 μg/mL to each tube. The tubes were shaken in an end-over shaker (speed = 50 rpm) for 24 hours at room temperature. The pH was adjusted three times to be 7.8 during this period by adding very small amount of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. The slurry was separated using a centrifuge (speed = 500 rpm, 2 minutes). The supernatant was decanted and used to calculate the amount of remaining cadmium. The adsorbed cadmium was calculated by the difference between the concentrations of Cd2+ in the original solution and in the equilibrium solution (decanted solution). The cadmium concentration was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy (Shimadzu AA-6200) and the results are shown in Figure 1. The effect of changing the concentration of NaCl was studied by performing cadmium adsorption isotherms, with addition of 50 mL of 0.15 N NaCl instead of 0.05 N (see Figure 1). Also, 0.05 N and 0.15 N of Na2SO4 were used, instead of NaCl with same experimental procedure as above, to study the counter ion effect.

ParametersAlluvial soilCalcareous soil

Texture of <0.5 mm:
 % sand (0.02–0.5 mm)12.1062.70
 % silt (0–20 µm)31.6025.60
 % clay (2 µm)56.3011.70
% calcium carbonate2.1421.80
% organic matter1.750.30
CEC (meq/100 g soil)48.208.70
Specific surface area (m2/g) (O.P. method)233.8087.60
Cd content (µg/g) (hot 1 : 1 HNO3 for 6 hrs)0.360.06
Mineralogical analysis
 % montmorillonite51.5014.20
 % kaolinite 15.0017.20
 % mica7.5026.30
 % vermiculite5.00
 % attapulgite22.00
 % quartz4.004.00
 % feldspar3.003.50
 % free oxides14.0012.80

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cadmium Adsorption Isotherms

Two different types of soils from different regions of Egypt were selected for this study: alluvial and calcareous soils. The choice of these soils is for their big differences in the chemical and mineralogical properties, mainly in texture (% clay = 56.3 for alluvial soil and 11.7 for calcareous soil) and specific surface area (233.8 m2/g for alluvial and 87.6 m2/g for calcareous soil), as shown in Table 1. The big change in the characteristics between these soils may directly or indirectly affect the ability to adsorb heavy metals (or more specifically Cd2+ for the interest of this study).

The wide range of cadmium ion concentration used in this study produced curvilinear adsorption isotherms as shown in Figure 1(a) for adsorption of cadmium ion on alluvial soil and Figure 1(b) on calcareous soil. The results showed that the alluvial soil has 2 to 3 times higher adsorption ability toward cadmium ions than calcareous soil. In general, the lower the concentration of the counter ion (sulfate or chloride), the higher the adsorption capacity, of either soil used, to the cadmium ions. Also, the existence of sulfate ions significantly increases the adsorption ability of the soils toward cadmium ions compared to the chloride counter ion. To quantitatively determine the adsorption capacity, it is better to use the “Cd2+ adsorption Isotherm Gradients” as a reference. This reference can be calculated from the first linear parts of Figure 1, which will be used to obtain the main parameters for Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, using (1) and (2). The values of the extracted parameters were summarized for the two soils with different electrolytes in Table 2. The maximum adsorption parameter, “,” in Langmuir isotherm for alluvial soil (0.05 N Na2SO4) shows a value of 544 μg/g whereas it is 170 μg/g for calcareous soil (0.05 N Na2SO4).

Soil typeSalt matrixSalt matrix conc.Langmuir parameters Freundlich parameters
(µg/g) (ml/µg) (ml/µg)

AlluvialNa2SO40.05 N5440.2322.0516.511.270
0.15 N4480.2421.6914.091.297
NaCl0.05 N2550.1370.96 5.62
0.15 N1980.1900.75 5.21

CalcareousNa2SO40.05 N1700.3683.1215.312.026
0.15 N1630.2722.9912.921.984
NaCl0.05 N1160.2942.13 5.63
0.15 N850.3301.56 5.63

The adsorption of Cd2+ on these soils was fit into the linear form of Langmuir equation: where () is the amount of Cd2+ adsorbed by unit weight soil (μg/g), is the equilibrium Cd2+ concentration in solution (μg/mL), “” is the Langmuir adsorption maximum (μg/g), and “” is the Langmuir “bonding term” related to bonding energy. To determine the maximum adsorption “” and the bonding term “” for the two soils under different salt matrix conditions and different ionic strengths, was plotted against resulting in straight lines. The fitted lines of the Langmuir isotherms are shown in Figure 2.

Also, Freundlich equation was used to evaluate the results. It is expressed in terms of soil equilibrium concentration, (in µg/g), adsorption parameter, “” (in mL/g), and adsorption parameter, “” (dimensionless). The results of Freundlich isotherms were plotted in Figure 3, whereas the parameters were summarized in Table 2. The correlation coefficients for the linear relationship of (2) were fairly high. The -values obtained were comparable with those reported in the literature, 1.00–1.70. Using the sulfate as counter ion shows monolinear fits, whereas the chloride counter ion produced bilinear fits for any concentration (of the counter ion) and for both soils (see Figure 3). The two linear portions of the curve were considered separately with different slopes.

On the basis of the above results it can be seen that the cadmium concentration in the alluvial soil is highly influenced by its chemical and physical properties that are relevant to the adsorption ability (mainly clay composition and surface area) [31]. Also, the low contents of the calcareous soil in clay, organic matter, and the relatively low surface area may explain the lower adsorption capacity of the soil toward cadmium.

The formation of charged or uncharged complexes might be the reason for the differences in the ability of both soils to adsorb cadmium with changing the counter ion. Figure 1 shows that, for the same cadmium ion concentration in solution, the amounts of adsorbed Cd are appreciably lower in chloride systems than that in Na2SO4 systems. This observation can be attributed to the formation of various complexes of Cd2+ with Cl ligands (like , , , , etc.) where the Cl ion may coordinate with cadmium ions and be treated as an inner sphere complex with the surface [32]. On the other hand, from the previous chemistry studies, Na2SO4 tends to form an outer sphere complex in the alkaline conditions [32]. This observation agrees well with previous theoretical [29] and experimental [32] studies of the electrolyte effect on cadmium adsorption.

Also, Using NaCl produced two energy level sites for Cd adsorption in the Freundlich isotherms (Figure 3 where bilinear isotherms are produced for NaCl systems). This may account for the competition between Na+ from NaCl and Cd2+, to occupy some specific sites of the soil, given the fact that Cl has a tendency to make complex ions with Cd2+ making Na+ free in solution [32]. On the other hand, has no known complexation coordination with cadmium making Na+ in Na2SO4 less available for adsorption. This explanation agrees with our experimental results that suggest that lower concentration of the electrolyte (which means lower concentration of sodium ions) has higher adsorption ability (see Figure 1).

Several soil constituents are able to adsorb Cd2+. However, the high contents of clay, silt, organic matter, iron and manganese oxides, and calcium carbonate have always high capacity for adsorbing cadmium. However, no simple linear relationship should be expected. For example, the alluvial soil of this study exhibited three times higher capacity than the calcareous soil (see Table 2), although it contained five times more clay and six times more CEC than the calcareous soil (see Table 1). The higher capacity of the alluvial soil for Cd2+ adsorption is likely due in parts to the formation of an organo-clay complex with a higher affinity for Cd2+ or to the formation of a clay-Cd, organo-Cd bridge that increased the adsorption capacity of the system.

3.2. Gibbs Free Energy of Adsorption

The free energy of cadmium adsorption was calculated under different conditions of counter ion concentration. In this method the fractional surface coverage, , was fixed at  meq of cadmium adsorbed per cm2 of the surface area to provide the rational basis of comparing the surface of the soil. was calculated from the values of per gram taken from the adsorption isotherm at a specific level that reaches all the adsorption isotherms. Thereby the principle of this method depends on keeping constant value for the comparison between soils under their different experimental conditions. The corresponding values for divided by surface area of the electrolyte will be taken to calculate the free energy of adsorption .

The standard free energy of adsorption at fixed , , is determined from the following equation: where , , and are the molality, activity coefficient, and activity of cadmium ions at equilibrium conditions, respectively. The activity coefficient, , was calculated using Debye-Huckel theory for each equilibrium concentration and specific ionic strength, which eventually leads to calculating the Cd activity, , and so the free energy of adsorption .

Table 3 represents the summary of the Gibbs free energy of adsorption. All values were negative indicating spontaneous processes. The stronger the cadmium binding to the soil, the more negative the value of . In general the values of for the calcareous soil are higher than those for alluvial soil. At the same time, as seen previously (in Section 3.1 and Table 2), the maximum adsorption for the calcareous soil toward Cd2+ was lower. This means that calcareous soil provided less number of adsorption sites, though it exhibited stronger binding surfaces for cadmium ions. This might be explained by the fact that the mineral composition of the calcareous soil (see Table 1) with higher mica and attapulgite contents is high in this soil. It has been found by others [3335] that these clay minerals have higher tendency to adsorb cadmium ions.

SaltConcentrationFree energy (KCal/mole)
Alluvial soilCalcareous soil

NaCl0.05 N−6.70−7.14
0.15 N−6.62−6.91

Na2SO40.05 N−7.59−8.00
0.15 N−7.44−7.72

4. Conclusions

It appears likely that the existence of NaCl results in complexation of chloride and competition of sodium ions, with Cd2+. This accounts for the decrease of the maximum adsorption of cadmium on soil and also reduces the bonding energy coefficients compared to Na2SO4 systems. Due to this behavior, cadmium adsorption in case of NaCl salt matrix was about three times less than for Na2SO4. This effect is important since relatively moderate (to high) concentration of NaCl in soil solution will greatly reduce the adsorption of Cd2+ on soil surface. Thereby relatively high cadmium ion concentrations in soil solutions will be maintained especially under surface irrigation conditions, which increase the probability for ground water pollution with this harmful and toxic metal.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. Hizal and R. Apak, “Modeling of cadmium(II) adsorption on kaolinite-based clays in the absence and presence of humic acid,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 232–244, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. B. Bradl, “Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Dube, R. Zbytniewski, T. Kowalkowski, E. Cukrowska, and B. Buszewski, “Adsorption and migration of heavy metals in soil,” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. Kah and C. D. Brown, “Adsorption of ionisable pesticides in soils,” in Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, G. W. Ware, Ed., vol. 188, pp. 149–217, Springer, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. Kalbitz, S. Solinger, J.-H. Park, B. Michalzik, and E. Matzner, “Controls on the dynamics dissolved organic matter in soils: a review,” Soil Science, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 277–304, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. Ledin, “Accumulation of metals by microorganisms—processes and importance for soil systems,” Earth Science Reviews, vol. 51, no. 1–4, pp. 1–31, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Navarro, N. Vela, and G. Navarro, “Review. An overview on the environmental behaviour of pesticide residues in soils,” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 357–375, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. M. El-Bouseily, A. I. Arslan, M. F. Ghoneim, and H. Z. Harraz, “Mercury dispersion patterns around El Sid-Fawakhir gold mine, Eastern Desert, Egypt,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 465–469, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  9. G. S. ElShafei, I. N. Nasr, A. S. M. Hassan, and S. G. M. Mohammad, “Kinetics and thermodynamics of adsorption of cadusafos on soils,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 1608–1616, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. M. Ghaly, “Role of natural vegetation in improving salt affected soil in northern Egypt,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 64, no. 3-4, pp. 173–178, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. S. Ibrahim, T. S. Jamil, and E. Z. Hegazy, “Application of zeolite prepared from Egyptian kaolin for the removal of heavy metals: II. Isotherm models,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 182, no. 1–3, pp. 842–847, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. H. M. Kamel, “Adsorption models of 137Cs radionuclide and Sr (II) on some Egyptian soils,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 297–303, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. M. Shaheen, “Sorption and lability of cadmium and lead in different soils from Egypt and Greece,” Geoderma, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 61–68, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. R. A. Usman, “The relative adsorption selectivities of Pb, Cu, Zn, Cd and Ni by soils developed on shale in New Valley, Egypt,” Geoderma, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 334–343, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z.-L. He, H.-P. Xu, Y.-M. Zhu, X.-E. Yang, and G.-C. Chen, “Adsorption-desorption characteristics of cadmium in variable charge soils,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 805–822, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Soares, J. C. Casagrande, and E. R. Mouta, “Effect of ionic strength and pH on cadmium adsorption by Brazilian variable-charge soils,” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 40, no. 13-14, pp. 2132–2151, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. S. Kookana and R. Naidu, “Effect of soil solution composition on cadmium transport through variable charge soils,” Geoderma, vol. 84, no. 1–3, pp. 235–248, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Makino, K. Sugahara, Y. Sakurai et al., “Remediation of cadmium contamination in paddy soils by washing with chemicals: selection of washing chemicals,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Çavuş, G. Gürdaǧ, M. Yaşar, K. Güçlü, and M. A. Gürkaynak, “The competitive heavy metal removal by hydroxyethyl cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid) copolymer and its sodium salt: the effect of copper content on the adsorption capacity,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 445–456, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. J. McLaughlin, R. M. Lambrechts, E. Smolders, and M. K. Smart, “Effects of sulfate on cadmium uptake by swiss chard: II. Effects due to sulfate addition to soil,” Plant and Soil, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. V. Rujirawanich, S. Chavadej, J. H. O'Haver, and R. Rujiravanit, “Removal of trace Cd2+ using continuous multistage ion foam fractionation. Part III-Effect of salt addition,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 385, no. 1–3, pp. 171–180, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. B. McBride, Environmental Chemistry of Soils, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  23. D. L. P. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke et al., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3—Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisc, USA, 1996.
  24. L. Järup, “Hazards of heavy metal contamination,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 68, pp. 167–182, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Järup and A. Åkesson, “Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 201–208, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Navas-Acien, E. Selvin, A. R. Sharrett, E. Calderon-Aranda, E. Silbergeld, and E. Guallar, “Lead, cadmium, smoking, and increased risk of peripheral arterial disease,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 25, pp. 3196–3201, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. A. Oliver, “Soil and human health: a review,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 573–592, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. Satarug, S. H. Garrett, M. A. Sens, and D. A. Sens, “Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 182–190, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S.-W. Chang Chien, J.-H. Liao, M.-C. Wang, and M. R. Mannepalli, “Effect of Cl-, SO42-, and fulvate anions on Cd2+ free ion concentrations in simulated rhizosphere soil solutions,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, no. 2-3, pp. 809–817, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Weggler, M. J. McLaughlin, and R. D. Graham, “Effect of chloride in soil solution on the plant availability of biosolid-borne cadmium,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 496–504, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. T. De Matos, M. P. F. Fontes, L. M. Da Costa, and M. A. Martinez, “Mobility of heavy metals as related to soil chemical and mineralogical characteristics of Brazilian soils,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 429–435, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Hiemstra and W. H. Van Riemsdijk, “On the relationship between charge distribution, surface hydration, and the structure of the interface of metal hydroxides,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Davis, C. C. Fuller, and A. D. Cook, “A model for trace metal sorption processes at the calcite surface: adsorption of Cd2+ and subsequent solid solution formation,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1477–1490, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. C. Fuller and J. A. Davis, “Processes and kinetics of Cd2+ sorption by a calcareous aquifer sand,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1491–1502, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Martin-Garin, J. P. Gaudet, L. Charlet, and X. Vitart, “A dynamic study of the sorption and the transport processes of cadmium in calcareous sandy soils,” Waste Management, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 201–207, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Mohamed E. EL-Hefnawy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.