Review Article

Intelligent Screening Systems for Cervical Cancer

Table 4

The list of classifiers that are used by different studies.

Cellular-level based featuresTissue-level based features
CytologyFISHElectromagnetic spectraCervicographyColposcopyHSDI image

Artificial Neural network (3/1241/10/78.7) [56], (2/400/10/99) [72], (3/550/4/97.5) [73], (5/78/5/91.4) [75].(2/361/13/74.4) [84], (2/201/3/87) [82], (3/780/22/97.4) [78].(2/283/7/95.8) [80].

Support vector machine (3/63/10/72) [116]

Logistic regression(4/145/—/88) [12]

-nearest neighbors(2/283/7/68.9) [80], (2/48/10/76.5) [97].(7/371/5/95.96) [117]

Linear discriminant analysis(5/230/15/60.4) [85]. (2/324/—/78) [118], (2/275/8/96.4) [22], (2/150/5/99.5) [13], (4/800/7/90) [24], (2/92/3/97.6) [119](2/100/—/78.5) [88].(2/40/4/87.2) [61].

Decision trees(3/1241/10/77) [56],
(—/61/2/96.7) [120].
(2/325/—/93.6) [60](2/211/—/78) [94].(2/29/—/86) [121],
(2/99/—/88.5) [96].

The values given in bracket are number of classes/number of  data/number of features used/accuracy.