Dynamic Response and Optimal Design of Curved Metallic Sandwich Panels under Blast Loading

<table class="table-group" id="tab4"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">ANN metamodels</td><td align="center">MAX</td><td align="center">MAPE (%)</td><td align="center"><span style="width: 17.4px;"><svg height="15.975" id="M143" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 17.4 15.975" width="17.4" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,15.775)"><path d="M627 18l-10 -26q-79 6 -116 27t-69 76q-41 71 -71 138q-13 29 -27.5 39t-42.5 10h-46l-27 -145q-13 -74 -2.5 -88.5t78.5 -20.5l-6 -28h-271l5 28q66 6 82.5 21.5t30.5 87.5l71 387q12 66 2 78.5t-77 19.5l8 28h233q102 0 147 -29q65 -43 65 -129q0 -69 -45.5 -117
t-115.5 -72q40 -86 66 -133q39 -68 65 -101q28 -37 73 -51zM491 483q0 67 -33.5 101t-91.5 34q-35 0 -51 -10q-13 -8 -20 -48l-45 -245h49q71 0 113 28q79 52 79 140z" id="x1D445"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,11.013,7.613)"><path d="M412 140l28 -9q0 -2 -35 -131h-373v23q112 112 161 170q59 70 92 127t33 115q0 63 -31 98t-86 35q-75 0 -137 -93l-22 20l57 81q55 59 135 59q69 0 118.5 -46.5t49.5 -122.5q0 -62 -29.5 -114t-102.5 -130l-141 -149h186q42 0 58.5 10.5t38.5 56.5z" id="x32"></path></g>
</svg></span></td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">MaxD</td><td align="center"> 1.0748 mm</td><td align="center">4.2005</td><td align="center">0.9996</td></tr><tr><td align="left">Energy absorption</td><td align="center">0.2686 kJ</td><td align="center">0.4743</td><td align="center">0.9999</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Error analysis results of ANN metamodels for MaxD  and energy absorption.

The Scientific World Journal

tab4

Table 4

Table 4: Dynamic Response and Optimal Design of Curved Metallic Sandwich Panels under Blast Loading 