Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 918496, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/918496
Research Article

Examination of the Ovarian Reserve after Generation of Unilateral Rudimentary Uterine Horns in Rats

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adana Numune Education and Research Hospital, 01330 Adana, Turkey
2Department of Pharmacology, Çukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mersin University Medical School, Mersin, Turkey

Received 18 November 2013; Accepted 30 December 2013; Published 6 February 2014

Academic Editors: R. Abir and T. Levy

Copyright © 2014 Hasan Toyganözü et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. G. Nahum, “Uterine anomalies: how common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes?” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 877–887, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Zanetti, L. R. Ferrari, and G. Rossi, “Review article. Classification and radiographic features of uterine malformations: hysterosalpingographic study,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 51, no. 603, pp. 161–170, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Reichman, M. R. Laufer, and B. K. Robinson, “Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1886–1894, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. K. Heinonen, “Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. U. Hakverdi, C. E. Taner, A. C. Erden, and O. Satici, “Changes in ovarian function after tubal sterilization,” Advances in Contraception, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Wu, B. Xiao, W. Yan, H. Li, and B. Wu, “Hormonal profile of the menstrual cycle in Chinese women after tubal sterilization,” Contraception, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 583–593, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Radwanska, S. K. Headley, and P. Dmowski, “Evaluation of ovarian function after tubal sterilization,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 376–384, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Oldenhave, L. J. B. Jaszmann, W. T. A. M. Everaerd, and A. A. Haspels, “Hysterectomized women with ovarian conservation report more severe climacteric complaints than do normal climacteric women of similar age,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 765–771, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Chalmers, “Does hysterectomy in a premenopausal woman affect ovarian function?” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 573–575, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Z. Souza, A. M. Fonseca, and V. M. Izzo, “Ovarian histology and function after total abdominal hysterectomy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 847–849, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Vuorento, J. Maenpaa, and I. Huhtaniemi, “Follow-up of ovarian endocrine function in premenopausal women after hysterectomy by daily measurements of salivary progesterone,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 505–510, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. G. Derksen, H. A. Brölmann, M. A. Wiegerinck, H. L. Vader, and A. P. M. Heintz, “The effect of hysterectomy and endometrial ablation on follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels up to 1 year after surgery,” Maturitas, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Marana, M. Rizzi, L. Muzii, G. F. Catalano, P. Caruana, and S. Mancuso, “Correlation between the american fertility society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 924–929, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Tiras, V. Noyan, H. Ozdemir, H. Guner, A. Yildiz, and M. Yildirim, “The changes in ovarian hormone levels and ovarian artery blood flow rate after laparoscopic tubal sterilization,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 219–221, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. P. Gentile, S. C. Kaufman, and D. W. Heibig, “Is there any evidence for a post-tubal sterilization syndrome?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. S. Cevrioglu, B. Degirmenci, M. Acar et al., “Examination of changes caused by tubal sterilization in ovarian hormone secretion and uterine and ovarian artery blood flow rates,” Contraception, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 467–473, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Thranov, J. B. Hertz, J. J. Kjer et al., “Hormonal and menstrual changes after laparoscopic sterilization by Falope- rings or Filshie-clips,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 751–755, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Kelekci, B. Yilmaz, Y. Yakut, L. Yasar, K. Savan, and S. Sonmez, “Hormonal and ovarian stromal blood supply changes after laparoscopic tubal sterilization: a prospective controlled study,” Contraception, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 279–283, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. A. Simpson, R. J. MacInnis, D. R. English, D. M. Gertig, H. A. Morris, and G. G. Giles, “A comparison of estradiol levels between women with a hysterectomy and ovarian conservation and women with an intact uterus,” Climacteric, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 300–303, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Chalmers, M. Lindsay, D. Usher, P. Warner, D. Evans, and M. Ferguson, “Hysterectomy and ovarian function: levels of follicle stimulating hormone and incidence of menopausal symptoms are not affected by hysterectomy in women under age 45 years,” Climacteric, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 366–373, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Özdamar, H. Ülger, H. C. Sorkun, and I. Müderris, “Effects of hysterectomy on ovarian morphology and serum FSH level in rats,” Maturitas, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 60–64, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. L. Tapisiz, T. Gungor, H. Aytan et al., “Does hysterectomy affect ovarian function? Histopathologic evaluation and serum FSH, inhibin A, and inhibin B levels in an experimental rat model,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Fanchin, L. M. Schonäuer, C. Righini, J. Guibourdenche, R. Frydman, and J. Taieb, “Serum anti-Müllerian hormone is more strongly related to ovarian follicular status than serum inhibin B, estradiol, FSH and LH on day 3,” Human Reproduction, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 323–327, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. La Marca, G. Stabile, A. Carducci Artenisio, and A. Volpe, “Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3103–3107, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Atabekoğlu, S. Taşkin, K. Kahraman et al., “The effects of total abdominal hysterectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a pilot study,” Climacteric, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 393–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar