Clinical Study

Comparison of the Proseal, Supreme, and I-Gel SAD in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries

Table 2

Airway insertion characteristics, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and ventilatory parameters of each group.

Proseal Supreme I-gel value

SAD size number: 3/4/5 3/26/6 3/19/1316/19/0
SAD insertion attempts
 126 (74.3)30 (85.7)33 (94.3)
 28 (22.9)4 (11.4)2 (5.7)
 31 (2.9)1 (2.9)0 (0)
Reported ease of placement
 1: easy21 (60.0)27 (77.1)32 (91.4)
 2: not so easy11 (31.4)7 (20.0)3 (8.6)
 3: difficult3 (8.6)1 (2.9)0 (0)
 4: very difficult000
 5: impossible000
Successful SAD placement time (sec)12.2 ± 1.212.9 ± 1.06.7 ± 1.2<0.001*
Ease of gastric tube insertion
 1: easy27 (77.1)31 (88.6)32 (91.4)0.195
 2: difficult8 (22.9)4 (11.4)3 (8.6)0.208
 3: impossible0 0 0
Gastric aspiration (mL)4.03.23.2
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (cmH2O)
 Initial 23.9 ± 2.424.9 ± 2.921.0 ± 3.60.001*
 At 30 min25.0 ± 2.325.0 ± 1.928.3 ± 2.40.001*
 At 60 min24.2 ± 2.124.8 ± 2.229.5 ± 1.20.001*
Airway pressure: cmH2O
 Before pneumoperitoneum18.7 ± 0.818.9 ± 0.718.40 ± 0.70.106
 After pneumoperitoneum21.4 ± 0.921.3 ± 1.121.37 ± 1.10.081
 Intra-abdominal pressure: cmH2O13.4 ± 0.713.4 ± 0.813.0 ± 0.70.051
 respiratory rate: min11.7 ± 0.511.6 ± 0.411.4 ± 0.50.106
 Inspiration tidal volume: mL510.1 ± 66.5540.4 ± 94.0500.5 ± 66.70.081
 Expiration tidal volume: mL525.7 ± 66.0557.3 ± 102.5513.8 ± 69.70.072
 Inspiration-expiration tidal volume difference: mL15.6 ± 6.614.2 ± 4.313.2 ± 4.60.163
pH of the anterior face SAD6-7 (6.1)5–7 (6.1)5–7 (6.1)0.948
pH of the posterior face SAD5–7 (6.3)5–7 (6.1)5–7 (6.5)0.043

Data are presented as number, number (proportion), mean ± SD, or min–max (mean). (i-gel compared to proseal and supreme).