Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 690854, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/690854
Research Article

Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals

1University Ceuma, Rua Josué Montello No. 1, Renascença II, 65075-120 São Luís, MA, Brazil
2Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória, 187 Centro, 39100-000 Diamantina, MG, Brazil

Received 28 January 2015; Revised 19 March 2015; Accepted 26 March 2015

Academic Editor: Cornelis H. Pameijer

Copyright © 2015 Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the shaping effects, preservation of the original curvature, and transportation of the apical foramen of Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany), UnicOne (Medin, Nové Město na Moravě, Czech Republic), and Protaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in simulated root canals. Thirty resin blocks with simulated curved root canals were distributed into three groups and prepared using Reciproc (RCp), UnicOne (UnO) and the Protaper Universal (PTu). Standardized photographs were taken before and after the instrumentation, after which they were superimposed. Measurements were taken of the quantity of resin removed from the inner and outer walls of the curvature at 6 levels, the curvature angles before and after instrumentation, and the transportation of the apical foramen. RCp obtained the highest values for amount of resin removed from the inner wall while UnO demonstrated similar shaping on both the inner and outer walls. PTu produced the greatest transportation of foramen when compared to the reciprocating instruments. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the change in angle . All the instruments were capable of maintaining the original curvature of the root canal; however, the UnO, which used reciprocating movement, produced more conservative shapes with lower foramen transportation.