Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 690854, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/690854
Research Article

Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals

1University Ceuma, Rua Josué Montello No. 1, Renascença II, 65075-120 São Luís, MA, Brazil
2Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Rua da Glória, 187 Centro, 39100-000 Diamantina, MG, Brazil

Received 28 January 2015; Revised 19 March 2015; Accepted 26 March 2015

Academic Editor: Cornelis H. Pameijer

Copyright © 2015 Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. E. D. M. Saber, M. M. Nagy, and E. Schäfer, “Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of waveone, reciproc and oneshape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. Giuliani, L. Di Nasso, R. Pace, and G. Pagavino, “Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1468–1471, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Paqué, D. Ganahl, and O. A. Peters, “Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1056–1059, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. J. Fornari, Y. T. C. Silva-Sousa, J. R. Vanni, J. D. Pécora, M. A. Versiani, and M. D. Sousa-Neto, “Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 988–994, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Paqué, U. Musch, and M. Hülsmann, “Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Foschi, C. Nucci, L. Montebugnoli et al., “SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 832–839, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. M. Walia, W. A. Brantley, and H. Gerstein, “An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 346–351, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. A. Peters, “Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 559–567, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Yared, “Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 339–344, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. De-Deus, E. J. L. Moreira, H. P. Lopes, and C. N. Elias, “Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1063–1068, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Varela-Patiño, A. Ibañez-Párraga, B. Rivas-Mundiña, G. Cantatore, X. L. Otero, and B. Martin-Biedma, “Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–159, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S.-Y. You, K.-S. Bae, S.-H. Baek, K.-Y. Kum, W.-J. Shon, and W. Lee, “Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1991–1994, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Bürklein, K. Hinschitza, T. Dammaschke, and E. Schäfer, “Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 449–461, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. W. Schneider, “A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 271–275, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Stern, S. Patel, F. Foschi, M. Sherriff, and F. Mannocci, “Changes in centring and shaping ability using three nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT),” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 514–523, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Berutti, G. Chiandussi, D. S. Paolino et al., “Canal shaping with waveone primary reciprocating files and protaper system: a comparative study,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 505–509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. C. Lim and J. Webber, “The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 240–246, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Schilder, “Cleaning and shaping the root canal,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 269–296, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Nabavizadeh, A. Abbaszadegan, L. Khojastepour, M. Amirhosseini, and E. Kiani, “A comparison of apical transportation in severely curved canals induced by reciproc and BioRaCe systems,” Iranian Endodontic Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. S. Yoo and Y. B. Cho, “A comparison of the shaping ability of reciprocating NiTi instruments in simulated curved canals,” Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 220–227, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. K. Wu, P. R. Wesselink, and R. E. Walton, “Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 99–103, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. R. Burroughs, B. E. Bergeron, M. D. Roberts, J. L. Hagan, and V. T. Himel, “Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium endodontic file systems in simulated s-shaped root canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1618–1621, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus