Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 720193, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720193
Research Article

Measuring Psychological Trauma in the Workplace: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Psychological Injury Risk Indicator—A Cross-Sectional Study

1Department of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
2Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal-Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI) and Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy
3State Police Health Service Department, Ministry of the Interior, 00189 Roma, Italy
4School of Psychology, Social Work, and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

Received 9 October 2014; Revised 19 February 2015; Accepted 20 February 2015

Academic Editor: Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari

Copyright © 2015 Nicola Magnavita et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Magnavita, “Questionnaires for psychosocial risk assessment at work,” Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. A87–A97, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. C. Winwood, M. R. Tuckey, R. Peters, and M. F. Dollard, “Identification and measurement of work-related psychological injury: piloting the psychological injury risk indicator among frontline police,” Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1057–1065, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. C. Winwood, R. Peters, M. Peters, and M. Dollard, “Further validation of the psychological injury risk indicator scale,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 478–484, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. B. M. Wen, “Stress, adaptation, and disease allostasis and allostatic load,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 840, pp. 33–44, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Garbarino, G. Cuomo, C. Chiorri, and N. Magnavita, “Association of work-related stress with mental health problems in a special police force unit,” BMJ Open, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID e002791, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Magnavita and S. Garbarino, “Is absence related to work stress? A repeated cross-sectional study on a special police force,” The American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 765–775, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, F. Guillemin, and M. B. Ferraz, “Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 24, pp. 3186–3191, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Goldberg, The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire, Oxford University Press, London, UK, 1972.
  9. C. J. Cherpitel, “Screening for alcohol problems in the U.S. General population: comparison of the CAGE, RAPS4, and RAPS4-QF by gender, ethnicity, and service utilization,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1686–1691, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. P. Weir, “Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 231–240, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. J. Gaskin and B. Happell, “On exploratory factor analysis: a review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 511–521, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Lomas-Vega, F. Hita-Contreras, N. Mendoza, and A. Martínez-Amat, “Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International in Spanish postmenopausal women,” Menopause, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 904–908, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. L. Bandalos and M. R. Boehm-Kaufman, “Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis,” in Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, C. E. Lance and R. J. Vandenberg, Eds., pp. 61–87, Taylor & Francis, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. H. Zweig and G. Campbell, “Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 561–577, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Jackson, “The general health questionnaire,” Occupational Medicine, vol. 57, no. 1, p. 79, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. U. Werneke, D. P. Goldberg, I. Yalcin, and B. T. Üstün, “The stability of the factor structure of the general health questionnaire,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 823–829, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. C. Kessler, C. Barber, A. Beck et al., “The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ),” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 156–174, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Lerner, J. I. Reed, E. Massarotti et al., “The Work Limitations Questionnaire's validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 197–208, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. R. Gärtner, K. Nieuwenhuijsen, F. J. H. van Dijk, and J. K. Sluiter, “Impaired work functioning due to common mental disorders in nurses and allied health professionals: the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus