Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 724196, 15 pages
Research Article

A Novel Way to Relate Ontology Classes

Computer Engineering Department, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India

Received 14 December 2014; Accepted 12 March 2015

Academic Editor: Rafael Valencia-García

Copyright © 2015 Ami T. Choksi and Devesh C. Jinwala. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Semantic Web,
  2. B.-L. Tim, “What the semantic web can represent,” 2014,
  3. B.-L. Tim, Semantic web road map, 1998,
  4. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The semantic web,” Scientific American, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34–43, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Resource description framework, 2014,
  6. Resource description framework,
  7. Semantic owl, 2014,
  8. J. Bao, E. F. Kendall, D. L. McGuinness, and E. K. Wallace, “Owl 2 web ontology language: quick reference guide,” World Wide Web Consortium, Working Draft WD-owl2-quickreference-20081202, 2008.
  9. Wsdl,
  10. Uddi, 2014,
  11. C. Pautasso, O. Zimmermann, and F. Leymann, “Restful web services vs. ‘big’ web services: making the right architectural decision,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web 2008 (WWW '08), pp. 805–814, ACM, April 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Naseer and L. K. Stergioulas, “Resource discovery in grids and other distributed environments: states of the art,” Multiagent and Grid Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 163–182, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Garofalakis, Y. Panagis, E. Sakkopoulos, and A. Tsakalidis, “Web service discovery mechanisms: looking for a needle in a haystack?” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Web Engineering, 2004.
  14. L. Botelho, A. Fernández, B. Fries et al., “Service discovery,” in CASCOM: Intelligent Service Coordination in the Semantic Web, M. Schumacher, H. Schuldt, and H. Helin, Eds., Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies and Autonomic Computing, pp. 205–233, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Klusch, “Service discovery,” in Encyclopedia of Social Networks and Mining (ESNAM), 2014. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Hausenblas, W. Halb, Y. Raimond, and T. Heath, “What is the size of the semantic web,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-Semantics '08), pp. 9–16, Graz, Austria, 2008.
  17. Blank node, 2015,
  18. B.-L. Tim, Apache jena, 1998,
  19. Reasoners and rule engines: Jena inference support,
  20. E. Sirin, B. Parsia, B. C. Grau, A. Kalyanpur, and Y. Katz, “Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner,” Web Semantics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Alatrish, “Comparison some of ontology editors,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 18–24, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. J. Aroma and M. Kurian, “A survey on tools essential for semantic web research,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 26–29, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Heterogeneous conference dataset,
  24. Inheritance (object-oriented programming), #Subclasses_and_superclasses)
  25. Resource description framework, 2014,
  26. Recall and precision ratio, 2014,
  27. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. R. Payne, and K. P. Sycara, “Semantic matching of web services capabilities,” in The Semantic Web—ISWC 2002: First International Semantic Web Conference Sardinia, Italy, June 9–12, 2002 Proceedings, vol. 2342 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 333–347, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S. T. Selvi, R. A. Balachandar, K. Vijayakumar, N. Mohanram, and R. Raman, “Semantic matchmaking of grid services using parameter matchmaking algorithm,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Computational Intelligence (CI '06), pp. 42–47, November 2006. View at Scopus
  29. N. Srinivasan, M. Paolucci, and K. Sycara, “Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC '04), pp. 6–9, 2004.
  30. R. Thiagarajan, G. Manjunath, and M. Stumptner, “Computing semantic similarity using ontologies,” Tech. Rep., 2008. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. A. Rodríguez and M. J. Egenhofer, “Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 442–456, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Han and D. Berry, “Semantic-supported and agent-based decentralized grid resource discovery,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 806–812, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Andreasen, H. Bulskov, and R. Knappe, “From ontology over similarity to query evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 2nd CoLogNET-ElsNET Symposium—Questions and Answers: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, R. Bernardi and M. Moortgat, Eds., pp. 39–50, 2003.
  34. B. Hjørland, “Semantic distance,” 2013,
  35. Semantic distance, 2013,
  36. D. Ngo, Z. Bellahsene, and K. Todorov, “Opening the black box of ontology matching,” in The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data, P. Cimiano, Ó. Corcho, V. Presutti, L. Hollink, and S. Rudolph, Eds., vol. 7882 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 16–30, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Amrouch and S. Mostefai, “Survey on the literature of ontology mapping, alignment and merging,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and e-Services (ICITeS '12), pp. 1–5, March 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Euzenat, A. Mocan, and F. Scharffe, “Ontology alignments,” in Ontology Management, M. Hepp, P. Leenheer, A. Moor, and Y. Sure, Eds., vol. 7 of Computing for Human Experience, pp. 177–206, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. M. M. Romero, J. M. Vázquez-Naya, J. P. Loureiro, and N. Ezquerra, “Ontology alignment techniques,” in Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence (3 Volumes), J. R. Rabuñal, J. Dorado, and A. Pazos, Eds., pp. 1290–1295, IGI Global, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  40. Ontology based data integration, 2014,
  41. S. Abburu, “A survey on ontology reasoners and comparison,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 57, no. 17, pp. 33–39, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  42. What is the difference between the pellet and jena query engines?, 2015,
  43. A. T. Choksi and D. C. Jinwala, “Improving semantic matching of grid resources using refined ontology with complement class,” International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 129–139, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. Fedora project, 2013,
  45. Java language, 2013,
  46. J. Gosling and H. McGilton, The Java Language Environment: A White Paper, Sun Microsystems Computer Company, 1995.
  47. Netbeans, 2013,
  48. Apache Web Server,
  49. Reasonerbench, 2014,
  50. C. Beecks, M. S. Uysal, and T. Seidl, “Signature quadratic form distance,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval (CIVR '10), S. Li, X. Gao, and N. Sebe, Eds., pp. 438–445, ACM, 2010.