Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 728278, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/728278
Research Article

Bone Morphology in 46 BXD Recombinant Inbred Strains and Femur-Tibia Correlation

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Campbell Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
2Department of Medicine-Nephrology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
3Division of Nephrology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60208, USA
4Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
6Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA

Received 26 August 2014; Revised 24 December 2014; Accepted 29 December 2014

Academic Editor: Tianhua Niu

Copyright © 2015 Yueying Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. Kanis and S. Adami, “Bone loss in the elderly,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 4, supplement 1, pp. S59–S65, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. G. Beamer, L. R. Donahue, C. J. Rosen, and D. J. Baylink, “Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice,” Bone, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 397–403, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. E. Wergedal, M. H.-C. Sheng, C. L. Ackert-Bicknell, W. G. Beamer, and D. J. Baylink, “Genetic variation in femur extrinsic strength in 29 different inbred strains of mice is dependent on variations in femur cross-sectional geometry and bone density,” Bone, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. H. Turner, R. K. Roeder, A. Wieczorek, T. Foroud, G. Liu, and M. Peacock, “Variability in skeletal mass, structure, and biomechanical properties among inbred strains of rats,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1532–1539, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. F. Klein, “Genetic regulation of bone mineral density in mice,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 232–236, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. A. Drake, K. Hannani, J. Michael Kabo, V. Villa, K. Krass, and A. J. Lusis, “Genetic loci influencing natural variations in femoral bone morphometry in mice,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 511–517, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Peirce, L. Lu, J. Gu, L. M. Silver, and R. W. Williams, “A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice,” BMC Genetics, vol. 5, article 7, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Martin, V. David, L. Vico, and T. Thomas, “Impaired energetic metabolism after central leptin signaling leads to massive appendicular bone loss in hindlimb-suspended rats,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2040–2047, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Odgaard and H. J. G. Gundersen, “Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions,” Bone, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. J. Jepsen, C. Price, L. J. Silkman et al., “Genetic variation in the patterns of skeletal progenitor cell differentiation and progression during endochondral bone formation affects the rate of fracture healing,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1204–1216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Judex, R. Garman, M. Squire, L. R. Donahue, and C. Rubin, “Genetically based influences on the site-specific regulation of trabecular and cortical bone morphology,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 600–606, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. H. Turner, Y.-F. Hsieh, R. Müller et al., “Genetic regulation of cortical and trabecular bone strength and microstructure in inbred strains of mice,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1126–1131, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Schmidt, M. Priemel, T. Kohler et al., “Precision and accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in the mouse skeleton compared with histology and microcomputed tomography (μCT),” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1486–1496, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Voide, G. H. van Lenthe, and R. Müller, “Bone morphometry strongly predicts cortical bone stiffness and strength, but not toughness, in inbred mouse models of high and low bone mass,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1194–1203, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus