Research Article
A Heuristic Ranking Approach on Capacity Benefit Margin Determination Using Pareto-Based Evolutionary Programming Technique
Table 3
Initial population of EP technique for the assisting areas 2 and 3.
| Number of individuals | Assisting area 2 | Assisting area 3 | or CBM (MW) | LOLE (hrs/yr) | or CBM (MW) | LOLE (hrs/yr) |
| 1 | 474.61 | 52.67 | 47.96 | 1.89 | 2 | 237.57 | 5.22 | 71.63 | 3.44 | 3 | 147.71 | 2.29 | 165.24 | 37.63 | 4 | 246.18 | 5.46 | 4.08 | 0.70 | 5 | 59.55 | 1.03 | 9.60 | 0.80 | 6 | 81.11 | 1.25 | 34.80 | 1.43 | 7 | 572.83 | 137.47 | 130.82 | 15.57 | 8 | 581.37 | 148.06 | 147.35 | 23.20 | 9 | 350.15 | 15.24 | 130.55 | 15.57 | 10 | 37.29 | 0.85 | 91.19 | 5.62 |
|
|