Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 939045, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/939045
Research Article

Digital Radiography for Determination of Primary Tooth Length: In Vivo and Ex Vivo Studies

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Cascavel School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE), Rua Universitária 2069, 85819-110 Cascavel, PR, Brazil
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Humaitá 1680, 14801-903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil

Received 18 December 2014; Accepted 22 January 2015

Academic Editor: Dilsah Cogulu

Copyright © 2015 Maria D. Basso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Kielbassa, U. Muller, I. Munz, and J. S. Monting, “Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 94–100, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Mentes and N. Gencoglu, “Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 88–91, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. C. V. Mello-Moura, C. Moura-Netto, A. T. Araki, A. C. Guedes-Pinto, and F. M. Mendes, “Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 142–147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. M. Griffiths, J. E. Brown, A. T. Hyatt, and A. D. Linney, “Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 279–287, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. T. Hedrick, S. B. Dove, D. D. Peters, and W. D. McDavid, “Radiographic determination of canal length: direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 320–326, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Ellingsen, G. W. Harrington, L. G. Hollender, and D. Odont, “Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 326–331, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. Ellingsen, L. G. Hollender, D. Odont, and G. W. Harrington, “Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination II. In vivo evaluation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 516–520, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Lozano, L. Forner, and C. Llena, “In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 542–550, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Y. Ong and T. R. P. Ford, “Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. H. Versteeg, G. C. H. Sanderink, F. C. van Ginkel, and P. F. van der Stelt, “Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 439–443, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. T. Radel, G. G. Goodell, S. B. McClanahan, and M. E. Cohen, “In vitro radiographic determination of distances from working length files to root ends comparing Kodak RVG 6000, Schick CDR, and Kodak insight film,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 566–568, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. F. Ounsi, “In vitro evaluation of the reliability of the endex electronic apex locator,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 120–121, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Holan and A. B. Fuks, “A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 403–407, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. R. Leonardo, L. A. B. Silva, P. Nelson-Filho, R. A. B. Silva, and M. S. G. G. Raffaini, “Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 317–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. J. Loushine, R. N. Weller, W. F. Kimbrough et al., “Measurement of endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 779–781, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. T. Friedlander, R. M. Love, and N. P. Chandler, “A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. D. Rodd, P. J. Waterhouse, A. B. Fuks, S. A. Fayle, and M. A. Moffat, “Pulp therapy for primary molars,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, pp. 15–23, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. C. Sheaffer, P. D. Eleazer, J. P. Scheetz, S. J. Clark, and A. G. Farman, “Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 441–448, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. L. Burger, T. O. Mork, J. W. Hutter, and B. Nicoll, “Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 260–263, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Santos-Pinto, R. D. C. L. Cordeiro, A. C. C. Zuanon, M. D. Basso, and M. A. Gonçalves, “Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 470–474, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. E. Rushton, A. C. Shearer, K. Horner, and J. Czajka, “An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 149–153, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. P. Vieyra, J. Acosta, and J. M. Mondaca, “Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and two electronic apex locators,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. P. Vieyra and J. Acosta, “Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 510–518, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. F. Lim, E. E.-M. Loh, and Y. H. Hong, “Intra-oral computed radiography—an in vitro evaluation,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 359–364, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. H. Vandre, C. A. Cruz, and J. C. Pajak, “Comparison of four direct digital radiographic systems with film for endodontic length determination,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 92, 1995. View at Google Scholar