Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2015, Article ID 981520, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981520
Research Article

Identifying User Interaction Patterns in E-Textbooks

1TAUCHI, School of Information Sciences, University of Tampere, Kanslerinrinne 1, 33014 Tampere, Finland
2Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 5, 20500 Turku, Finland

Received 19 June 2015; Revised 27 September 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Academic Editor: Yi-Shun Wang

Copyright © 2015 Santeri Saarinen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. C. Murray and J. Perez, “E-Textbooks are coming: are we ready?” Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, vol. 8, pp. 49–60, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. J. Rockinson- Szapkiw, J. Courduff, K. Carter, and D. Bennett, “Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: a comparison study on the influence of university students' learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 63, pp. 259–266, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, I. Södervik, R. Raisamo et al., “E-textbook as a tool for promoting conceptual learning in science—looking for novel design and empirical evidence,” in Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 2092–2097, Tampere, Finland, June 2014.
  4. S. Saarinen, P. Hietala, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, P. Mäkiaho, T. Poranen, and M. Turunen, “Improving e-textbooks: effects of concept maps,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning (ICEL '14), pp. 77–82, 2014.
  5. J. D. Novak and A. L. Canas, “The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them,” Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Puntambekar, A. Stylianou, and J. Goldstein, “Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: lessons learned from two teachers,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 81–130, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Hay, I. Kinchin, and S. Lygo-Baker, “Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 295–311, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R.-S. Shaw, “A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps,” Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 253–264, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. B. Hay, C. Kehoe, M. E. Miquel et al., “Measuring the quality of e-learning,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1037–1056, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. H. Broughton, G. M. Sinatra, and R. E. Reynolds, “The nature of the refutation text effect: an investigation of attention allocation,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 407–423, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Vilppu, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, H. Vilppu, and I. Ahopelto, “The role of regulation strategies in understanding science text among students,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 246–262, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, “Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 241–257, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Vassiliou and J. Rowley, “Progressing the definition of ‘E-book’,” Library Hi Tech, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 355–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Tanhua-Piiroinen, J. Pystynen, and R. Raisamo, “Haptic applications as physics teaching tools,” in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Haptic Audio-Visual Environments and Games (HAVE '10), pp. 117–122, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, October 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Raisamo, S. Wallden, K. Suhonen et al., “Design and evaluation of Tamhattan: a multimodal game promoting awareness of health in a social and positive way,” in Handbook of Research on Serious Games as Educational, Business and Research Tools, M. M. Cruz-Cunha, Ed., pp. 90–107, IGI Global, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Villalon, R. Calvo, and R. Montenegro, “Analysis of a gold standard for concept map mining—how humans summarize text using concept maps,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Concept Mapping (CMC '10), pp. 14–22, Viña del Mar, Chile, 2010.
  17. K.-E. Chang, Y.-T. Sung, and I.-D. Chen, “The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization,” The Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 5–23, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Hauser, M. Nückles, and A. Renkl, “Supporting concept mapping for learning from text,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences (ICLS '06), pp. 243–249, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, Ind, USA, 2006.
  19. J. C. Nesbit and O. O. Adesope, “Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 413–448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G.-J. Hwang, L.-H. Yang, and S.-Y. Wang, “A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses,” Computers & Education, vol. 69, pp. 121–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. Ahopelto, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, E. Anto, and M. Penttinen, “Future elementary school teachers' conceptual change concerning photosynthesis,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 503–515, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Bostock, “D3—Data driven documents,” http://www.d3js.org/.
  23. M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. Penttinen, E. Anto, and E. Olkinuora, “Constructing mental models during learning from science text,” in Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Norbert M. Seel, P. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, and J. M. Spector, Eds., pp. 63–79, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. I. M. Kinchin, “Concept mapping in biology,” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 61–68, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Turunen, J. Hakulinen, A. Melto, T. Heimonen, T. Laivo, and J. Hella, “SUXES—User experience evaluation method for spoken and multimodal interaction,” in Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH '09), pp. 2567–2570, Brighton, UK, 2009.
  26. S. Bateman, C. Gutwin, N. Osgood, and G. McCalla, “Interactive usability instrumentation,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '09), pp. 45–54, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, July 2009.
  27. C. Fisher and P. Sanderson, “Exploratory sequential data analysis: exploring continuous observational data,” Interactions, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25–34, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. H. Kim, D. V. Gunn, E. Schuh, B. Phillips, R. J. Pagulayan, and D. Wixon, “Tracking realtime user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), pp. 443–452, Florence, Italy, 2008.
  29. K. Renaud and P. Gray, “Making sense of low-level usage data to understand user activities,” in Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries (SAICSIT '04), pp. 115–124, 2004.
  30. D. M. Hilbert and D. F. Redmiles, “Extracting usability information from user interface events,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 384–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Church and M. Cherubini, “Evaluating mobile user experience in-the-wild: prototypes, playgrounds and contextual experience sampling,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Research in the Large: Using App Stores, Markets and other Wide Distribution Channels in Ubiquitous Computing Research, pp. 29–32, September 2010.
  32. D. Akers, R. Jeffries, M. Simpson, and T. Winograd, “Backtracking events as indicators of usability problems in creation-oriented application,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 19, no. 2, article 16, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Harbich and M. Hassenzahl, “Using behavioral patterns to assess the interaction of users and product,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 69, no. 7-8, pp. 496–508, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Kort, M. G. D. Steen, H. de Poot, H. ter Hofte, and I. Mulder, “Studying usage of complex applications,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, pp. 266–269, Wageningen, The Netherlands, August-September 2005.
  35. X. Fern, C. Komireddy, V. Grigoreanu, and M. Burnett, “Mining problem-solving strategies from HCI data,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 17, no. 1, article 3, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. C. Mankowski, P. Bogunovich, A. Shokoufandeh, and D. D. Slvucci, “Finding canonical behaviors in user protocols,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), pp. 1323–1326, ACM, Boston, Mass, USA, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. D. Moura, M. Seif el-Nasr, and C. D. Shaw, “Visualizing and understanding players' behavior in video games: discovering patterns and supporting aggregation and comparison,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Sandbox '11), article 2, pp. 11–15, Vancouver, Canada, October 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. G. Wallner and S. Kriglstein, “A spatiotemporal visualization approach for the analysis of gameplay data,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), pp. 1115–1124, ACM, Austin, Tex, USA, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. A. Hurst, S. E. Hudson, and J. Mankoff, “Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model,” in Proceedings of the 25th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), pp. 271–280, San Jose, Calif , USA, May 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Huang, T. Zimmermann, N. Nagapan, C. Harrison, and B. C. Phillips, “Mastering the art of war: how patterns of gameplay influence skill in Halo,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 695–704, Paris, France, April-May 2013.
  41. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2011, http://www.R-project.org/.
  42. A. Gabadinho, G. Ritschard, N. S. Müller, and M. Studer, “Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR,” Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Maechler, P. Rousseeuw, A. Struyf, M. Hubert, and K. Hornik, “Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions,” R package version 1.15.3.
  44. J. H. Ward, “Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pp. 236–244, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar