Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1606013, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1606013
Research Article

Centering Ability of ProTaper Next and WaveOne Classic in J-Shape Simulated Root Canals

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University, Foggia, Italy

Received 15 August 2016; Accepted 13 November 2016

Academic Editor: Gianluca Plotino

Copyright © 2016 Giuseppe Troiano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Riitano, “Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)—a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 575–587, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. A. Thompson and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. A. Peters, “Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 559–567, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Plotino, L. Testarelli, D. Al-Sudani, G. Pongione, N. M. Grande, and G. Gambarini, “Fatigue resistance of rotary instruments manufactured using different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative study,” Odontology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. P. Jardine, R. A. Rosa, M. F. Santini, I. M. Zaccara, M. V. Só, and P. M. Kopper, “Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study,” Brazilian Oral Research, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Naseri, P. Paymanpour, A. Kangarloo, S. Haddadpur, O. Dianat, and M. Ketabi, “Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canals,” Dental Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Santa-Rosa, M. D. de Sousa-Neto, M. A. Versiani et al., “Shaping ability of single-file systems with different movements: a micro-computed tomographic study,” Iranian Endodontic Journal, vol. 11, pp. 228–233, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Troiano, M. Dioguardi, A. Cocco et al., “Influence of operator's experience on the shaping ability of protaper universal and waveone systems: a comparative study on simulated root canals,” The Open Dentistry Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 546–552, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Berutti, G. Chiandussi, D. S. Paolino et al., “Canal shaping with waveone primary reciprocating files and protaper system: A Comparative Study,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 505–509, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Dioguardi, G. Troiano, L. Laino et al., “Protaper and waveone systems three-dimensional comparison of device parameters after the shaping technique. A micro-CT study on simulated root canals,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 17830–17834, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Bürklein, K. Hinschitza, T. Dammaschke, and E. Schäfer, “Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 449–461, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. D. Shori, P. R. Shenoi, A. R. Baig, R. Kubde, C. Makade, and S. Pandey, “Stereomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal defects induced by new rotary system: “proTaper NEXT”,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 210–213, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Varghese, R. Pillai, U. Sujathen, S. Sainudeen, A. Antony, and S. Paul, “Resistance to torsional failure and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Mtwo files in continuous and reciprocating motion: An In Vitro Study,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 225, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Pedullà, F. Lo Savio, S. Boninelli et al., “Influence of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel—titanium instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1043–1050, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. B. Yang, X. D. Zhou, H. Zhang, and H. K. Wu, “Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 791–799, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Schäfer and D. Lohmann, “Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile—part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 505–513, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Montalvão, F. S. Alçada, F. M. Braz Fernandes, and S. de Vilaverde-Correia, “Structural characterisation and mechanical FE analysis of conventional and M-Wire Ni-Ti alloys used in endodontic rotary instruments,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 976459, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Ye and Y. Gao, “Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 105–107, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. d. Santos, P. D. Resende, M. G. Bahia, and V. T. Buono, “Effects of R-phase on mechanical responses of a nickel-titanium endodontic instrument: structural characterization and finite element analysis,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2016, Article ID 7617493, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Matos Maia Filho, C. De Castro Rizzi, M. Bandeca Coelho et al., “Shaping ability of reciproc, unicone, and protaper universal in simulated root canals,” Scientific World Journal, vol. 2015, Article ID 690854, 6 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M.-K. Wu, “Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 210–216, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. McRay, T. C. Cox, N. Cohenca, J. D. Johnson, and A. Paranjpe, “A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files,” Quintessence International, vol. 45, pp. 101–108, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Schäfer, M. Erler, and T. Dammaschke, “Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Berutti, D. S. Paolino, G. Chiandussi et al., “Root canal anatomy preservation of waveone reciprocating files with or without glide path,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 101–104, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. I. D. Çapar and H. Arslan, “A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Zhao, Y. Shen, B. Peng, and M. Haapasalo, “Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1860–1864, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. M. Gergi, N. E. Osta, and A. S. Naaman, “Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne instruments,” European Journal of Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 508–512, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S.-A. Türker and E. Uzunoğlu, “Apical root canal transportation of different pathfinding systems and their effects on shaping ability of ProTaper Next,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. e392–e395, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. D. Capar, H. Ertas, E. Ok, H. Arslan, and E. T. Ertas, “Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 852–856, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus