Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Comparison</td><td class="align_center">Kappa</td><td class="align_center">Average pairwise agreement</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Interrater</td><td class="align_center">.634</td><td class="align_center">82.9</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Intrarater</td><td class="align_center">.594</td><td class="align_center">81.2</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

The Scientific World Journal

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment 