Research Article

A Comparative Analysis of Tooth Size Discrepancy between Male and Female Subjects Presenting with a Class I Malocclusion

Table 2

Comparison of antimetric tooth size within the same gender by paired t-test.

Tooth pair MeanSD 95% Confidence Interval Cohen’s d Effect sizeClinical significance
differenceLowerUpper

Male
 T16-T260.010.34-0.060.070.01< 0.2
 T15-T250.030.22-0.010.080.14< 0.2
 T14-T240.020.18-0.050.020.08< 0.2
 T13-T230.100.260.050.150.39> 0.2
 T12-T220.050.210.010.090.24> 0.2
 T11-T210.060.200.020.100.29> 0.2
 T36-T460.000.26-0.050.060.01< 0.2
 T35-T450.040.24-0.010.080.16< 0.2
 T34-T440.010.21-0.050.040.03< 0.2
 T33-T430.010.21-0.060.030.07< 0.2
 T32-T420.020.17-0.020.050.11< 0.2
 T31-T410.010.17-0.030.040.04< 0.2
Female
 T16-T260.000.23-0.040.050.01< 0.2
 T15-T250.030.20-0.010.070.14< 0.2
 T14-T240.020.22-0.060.030.08< 0.2
 T13-T230.050.27-0.010.100.18< 0.2
 T12-T220.050.25-0.010.100.18< 0.2
 T11-T210.010.16-0.020.040.07< 0.2
 T36-T460.000.24-0.040.050.02< 0.2
 T35-T450.010.27-0.040.060.03< 0.2
 T34-T440.010.23-0.040.060.04< 0.2
 T33-T430.050.200.010.090.25> 0.2
 T32-T420.050.170.020.090.31> 0.2
 T31-T410.030.150.000.060.19< 0.2

Cohen's d > 0.2 = clinical significance; SD = standard deviation.