Research Article
Application of Multiple Unsupervised Models to Validate Clusters Robustness in Characterizing Smallholder Dairy Farmers
Table 10
Proportion of variance accounted for by cluster of production in Ethiopia.
| | Fitted model | Total Variance | Residual variance | -2log likelihood | P value | Variance accounted for by cluster |
| K-means | | Milk yield | Model with cluster | 1.015 | 0.239 | 1867.4 | <0.00001 | 73% | Model without cluster | 0.977 | 3718.4 | | Milk sales | Model with cluster | 0.988 | 0.222 | 1770.1 | <0.00001 | 54% | Model without cluster | 0.76 | 3388.6 |
| SOM | | Milk yield | Model with cluster | 1.015 | 0.283 | 2091.8 | <0.00001 | 68% | Model without cluster | 0.977 | 3718.4 | | Milk sales | Model with cluster | 0.988 | 0.258 | 1969.8 | <0.00001 | 51% | Model without cluster | 0.76 | 3388.6 |
| Fuzzy | | Milk yield | Model with cluster | 1.015 | 0.074 | 337 | <0.00001 | 89% | Model without cluster | 0.977 | 3718.4 | | Milk sales | Model with cluster | 0.988 | 0.073 | 319.4 | <0.00001 | 70% | Model without cluster | 0.76 | 3388.6 |
|
|
Data scaled to have unit variance and mean of zero. |