Review Article

Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Efficacy in the Vapor Lock Removal: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Application of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for case-control studies in order to evaluate the Risk of Bias between the three studies selected for the present systematic review.

SELECTIONCastelo-Baz P et al., 2012Castelo-Baz P et al., 2016Sáinz-Pardo M et al., 2014

(1) Is the case definition adequate?
 (a) yes, with independent validationAAA
 (b) yes, e.g. record linkage or based on self reports
 (c) no description
(2) Representativeness of the casesAAB
 (a) consecutive or obviously representative series
 of cases
 (b) potential for selection biases or not stated
(3) Selection of ControlsBBB
 (a) community controls
 (b) hospital controls
 (c) no description
(4) Definition of ControlsBBB
 (a) no history of disease (endpoint)
 (b) no description of source

COMPARABILITY

(1) Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis AAA
 (a) study controls for vapor lock removal
 (b) study controls for any additional factor(This criteria could be modified to indicate specific control for a second important factor.)

EXPOSURE

(1) Ascertainment of exposure
 (a) secure record (e.g. surgical records)EEE
 (b) structured interview where blind to
 case/control status
 (c) interview not blinded to case/control status
 (d) written self-report or medical record only
 (e) no description
(2) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controlsAAA
 (a) yes
 (b) no
(3) Non-Response rateAAA
 (a) same rate for both groups
 (b) non respondents described
 (c) rate different and no designation