Review Article

Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Included trials and their respective study designs.

TrialIMS IIIMR CLEANREVASCAT

Enrollment CriteriaPublication year201320152015
Time period2006-20122010-20142012-2014
LocationNorth America, Europe, AustraliaNetherlandsSpain
No. of Centers58164
No. of Patients656500206
Last known well to randomization, h≤5≤6≤8
Age, y≥18≥1818-85
NIHSS score≥10, or ≥8 with LVO≥2≥6
LVONAICA, MCA (M1/ M2) ACA (A1/ A2)ICA, MCA (M1)
ASPECTSNANA≥7, CT; ≥6, MRI
Endovascular interventionIA thrombectomy, IA-tPA, IV-tPAIA thrombectomy, IA-tPA, IV-tPAIA thrombectomy, IV-tPA
Control armIV-tPAIV-tPAStandard therapy

Primary endpointmRS ≤2 at 1 ymRS at 2 ymRS at 1 y

Follow-up duration1 y2 y1 y

ACA, anterior cerebral artery; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score; CTA, CT angiography; d, days; IA, intra-arterial; ICA, internal carotid artery; LVO, large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NA, not applicable; No., number; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator
After 284 patients enrolled, protocol altered to no upper limit for age, identification of occlusion with CTA was allowed for patients with NIHSS score of 8 or 9
ASPECTS <4 used as guideline when evaluating >1/3 region of territory involvement, but not exclusion criteria.
After enrollment of 160 patients, inclusion criterion was changed from 80 years old to up to 85 years old with >8 ASPECTS.