Review Article

Internet Addiction Effect on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Data extraction results from studies.

Author/yearCountryStudy populationAge mean (SD)Sample sizeQOL instrumentIA instrument

Fatehi et al. (2016)Iran7–4-year medical students22.57 ± 1.2174WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Li et al. (2018)ChinaHigh school students15.1 ± 1.91385WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Chern et al. (2018)TaiwanStudents20.51 ± 1.81452HRQOLIAT
Gupta et al. (2016)IndiaAdolescent (18–23 years)60WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Geisel et al. (2015)USA, UK, CanadaAdult social network gamers38:9 ± 13.4370WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Kamal Solati (2018)IranStudents of Islamic Azad university381WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Li et al. (2020)ChinaUniversity students20.3 ± 1.62312WHOQOL-BREFThe mobile phone addiction scale (MPAS)
Kelley and Gruber (2013)USAUndergraduate students (18 to 39 years old)19.6 ± 2.96133SF-36v2 health surveyProblematic internet use questionnaire (PIUQ)
Gupta et al. (2018)IndiaAdolescent (18–23 years old)23WHOQOL-BREFIAT
Gao et al. (2020)GermanyCollege students and highly educated adults.25.8 ± 11.6446WHOQOLISS-10 (short version of the ISS-20)
Tabak and Zawadzka (2017)PolishStudents16.04 ± 0.9376KIDSCREEN-10 indexYDQ (8 items)
Tran et al. (2017)VietnameseYoung (15–25 years old)21.5 ± 3.8566EuroQolIAT
Tran et al. (2017)Vietnameseyoung (15–25 years old)21.7 ± 1.7586EuroQolIAT
Buctot et al. (2020)FilipinoAdolescents (13–18 years old)15.22 ± 1.611447KIDSCREEN-27Smartphone addiction scale short version (SAS-SV)
Gao et al. (2017)ChineUniversity students20.50 ± 1.4722WHOQOL-BREFMobile phone addiction scale (MPAS)
Paolo Soraci et al. (2020)ItalianOnline survey via Google forms33.8 ± 16.2
18–99 years
205Quality of life measureSmartphone application based addiction scale (SABAS)
Karacic et al. (2017)GermanyStudents of primary and high school11–18 years149SF-36I IAT
Silvana Karacic et al. (2017)CroatianStudents of primary and high school11–18 years310SF-36I IAT