Review Article

Comparative Utilization of Dead and Live Fungal Biomass for the Removal of Heavy Metal: A Concise Review

Table 3

Comparison of some live and dead fungal biomass for heavy metal removal using optimal experimental conditions.

Fungal speciesHeavy metalBiomass typeOptimum parametersAdsorption capacity (mg/g)References
pHInitial concentration (mg/L)Temperature (°C)Bisorbent dose (mg/L)Agitation speed (rpm)Contact time (min)

Streptomyces ciscaucasicusZn (II)Live51502820009048042.75[37]
Dead51502820009048054

Pleurotus ostreatusCr (VI)Live5.628 + 2169.84648000[1]
Dead5.628 + 2368.2122

Pleurotus ostreatusCd (II)Dead61026 ± 150012510[47]

Mucor rouxiiPb (II)Live5105042035.69[48]
Dead6105012530053.75

Trametes versicolorCd (II)Live5.5600252540060102.3 ± 3.2[49]
Dead5.5600252540060120.6 ± 3.8

Aspergillus fumigatusPb (II)Live525028 ± 115015030021.579[50]
Dead51028 ± 10.041502803.651
Cd (II)Live525028 ± 11503006.286
Dead51028 ± 10.041502800.83

Rhizopus arrhizusNi (II)Live610025150360169.84[51]
Dead6100250.5150360368.21

Lentinus edodesHg (II)Live625–60015–45336.3 ± 3.7[52]
Dead625–60015–45403.0 ± 2.9
Cd (II)Live625–60015–4578.6 ± 2.6
Dead625–60015–45274.3 ± 3.6
Zn (II)Live625–60015–4533.7 ± 1.6
Dead625–60015–4557.1 ± 1.1

Aspergillus nigerPb (II)Live41202.25[34]
Dead41207.24
Cd (II)Live41201.31
Dead41203.43
Cu (II)Live41440.75
Dead41442.66
Ni (II)Live51921.75
Dead51920.96

Cladosporium resinaeCd (II)Live50281202304[14]
Dead5028120672

Paecilomyces variotiiCd (II)Live50281202304
Dead5028120792