Occurrence of Spot Blotch in Spring Barley Caused by <i>Bipolaris sorokiniana</i> Shoem. in South-Eastern Kazakhstan

Dutbayev, Yerlan; Kuldybayev, Nurlan; Daugaliyeva, Saule; Ismailova, Elvira; Sultanova, Nadira; Özer, Göksel; Slyamova, Ayana; Mukin, Kadyrzhan; Dababat, Abdelfattah; Yessimbekova, Minura

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3602996

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3602996 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3602996

Occurrence of Spot Blotch in Spring Barley Caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana Shoem. in South-Eastern Kazakhstan

Yerlan Dutbayev,¹Nurlan Kuldybayev,¹Saule Daugaliyeva,²Elvira Ismailova,²Nadira Sultanova,³Göksel Özer,⁴Ayana Slyamova,¹Kadyrzhan Mukin,⁵Abdelfattah Dababat,⁶and Minura Yessimbekova⁵

Academic Editor: Mehrbakhsh Nilashi

Received08 Apr 2022

Revised03 Aug 2022

Accepted04 Aug 2022

Published26 Aug 2022

Abstract

In Kazakhstan, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is the second most important cereal crop after wheat, with an annual production of approximately 1.9 million tons. The study aimed to characterize Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates obtained from barley fields surveyed. A total of 21 diseased leaves showing spot blotch symptoms were collected from experimental plots located close to the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Crop Production, where the spring barley Arna cultivar was planted in June 2020. The overall strategy for control of spring barley blotch in the Almaty region of Kazakhstan should include the determination of the aggressiveness of the pathogen isolates to better understand the biology of the diseases and ultimately proper control strategy. Pathogenicity of B. sorokiniana isolates was made on barley seedlings in vitro. Inoculated seedlings showed clear symptoms of B. sorokiniana, and therefore, Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by reisolating the pathogen from artificially inoculated seedlings and identifying it based on standard morphology criteria. Further investigation is needed to understand the impact of B. sorokiniana on barley production in Kazakhstan.

1. Introduction

In Kazakhstan, barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is the second most important cereal crop after wheat, with an annual production of approximately 1.9 million tons. The average yield on an area of more than 1.5 million ha is approximately 1.3 tons/ha, which is almost three times less than the global barley production average [1].

As with any grain crop, barley production is affected by soilborne pathogens. Cochliobolus sativus Drechsler ex Dastur, anamorph Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoemaker is a fungus in the Ascomycota division and one of the most important soilborne pathogens that causes root rot and spot blotch diseases in cereal crops, including wheat, barley, and triticale [2–6]. B. sorokiniana has wide geographic and host ranges [2, 3]. The low barley productivity in Kazakhstan is to a greater extent caused by the susceptibility of the cultivated varieties to spot blotch [7]. The pathogen infects barley crops and causes spot blotch, leaf spotting, ordinary stem and root rot, and “black seed,” and, ultimately, significantly reduces grain yield [8, 9].

Symptoms of B. sorokiniana in cereal rots include chlorosis and necrosis of cotyledons, water-soaked lesions on the crown and lower stem, stunting, preemergence and postemergence damping-off, wilting, and brown to black rot in the lower taproot and lateral roots with decay in the cortical region, and discoloration [10]. Estimating the impact of spot blotch on barley yield is not reliable because it frequently occurs in a disease complex, including numerous pathogens. The identification of the pathogenic species prevalent in a region is an important starting point for selecting an appropriate management strategy.

Recent studies devoted to studying B. sorokiniana in cereal diseases were carried out to reveal the population structure of leaf pathogens of spring wheat in Northern Kazakhstan [11] and the host compatibility of barley varieties to the pathogens of leaf spotting based on the artificial infectious background [6]. Most recently, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) conducted two intensive surveys on soilborne diseases in cereals in main cereal-growing areas in Kazakhstan [5, 12]. Their results showed that cereal-growing areas were severely infected with the soilborne disease and that B. sorokiniana was the most prevalent pathogen. Özer et al. [5] studied the biological characteristics of common root rot on triticale caused by B. sorokiniana and found that it caused growth retardation and internode necrosis on the roots. In another study carried out by Alkan et al. [13] in the Almaty region, the main pathogen isolates were identified as B. sorokiniana, while Fusarium culmorum and Microdochium bolleyi were also found to be less common, but pathogenic, through in vitro tests.

The best measure to control diseases is the use of resistant varieties, especially when these varieties are bred to have multidisease resistance to a complex of pathogens [14]. Crop rotation and presowing treatment of seeds with chemicals are still options where resistant varieties are unavailable [15]. In recent years, such disease symptoms have been frequently observed in barley in the Almaty region, with favorable conditions present earlier in the season.

This study aims to answer the following research question: how to characterize B. sorokiniana isolates obtained from barley fields surveyed? Therefore, the main objectives of the study were to isolate fungi from barley leaves showing spot blotch symptoms, identify obtained fungal isolates morphologically and by molecular techniques, and evaluate the pathogenicity of B. sorokiniana isolates on barley seeds associated with spot blotch of spring barley in the Almaty region of South-Eastern Kazakhstan. The study consists of five sections, namely, the Introduction, which includes the literature review, Materials and Methods, which include research design and stages of the study, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Design

To achieve the objectives of this study, the spring barley Arna cultivar was planted in early April 2020 on 10 m² experimental plots (three replications) (43.237589°N, 76.692629°E). A total of 21 diseased leaves showing spot blotch symptoms were randomly collected at the end of June 2020 in the laboratory of the gene fund of field crops of Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Crop Production. The sampled leaves were put into boxes placed in appropriate containers and immediately transferred to the laboratory of Kazakhstan-Japan Innovation Center of Kazakh National Agrarian Research University in Almaty. This condition was also done for the determination of pathogenicity test of the two isolates of B. sorokiniana according to Koch’s postulates. At the first stage of the study, we carried out pathogen isolation using generally accepted microbiological methods and identification using the ITS region sequencing method. In the second phase of the study, a pathogenicity test was performed using a modified method by Broders et al. [16]. At the last stage of the study, a statistical analysis of the results was carried out.

2.2. Stages of the Study

2.2.1. Pathogen Isolation and Identification

To isolate B. sorokiniana isolates, the pieces of barley leaves showing symptoms were surface sterilized in 90% ethanol for 1 min, followed by immersion in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 min and by three rinses in sterile water. The symptomatic leaf tissues of 5 mm² were excised from representative necrotic spots and placed on a 1/5 strength potato dextrose agar (PDA) amended with 0.01% streptomycin. After 5 days of incubation at 25°C in the dark, fungal colonies were observed and transferred to fresh PDA plates using the single-spore technique. Fungi were routinely grown on PDA at 25°C. All isolates were stored at 4°C on PDA stock plates and on filter papers in the microcentrifuge tubes at −20°C.

Morphological and cultural characteristics of the dematiaceous fungal isolates were identified by following the key of the Institute of Microbiology and Virology of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, using a light microscope (Premiere, Ningbo ZHANJING Optical Instrument Co., China) at 200× magnification [17, 18].

Isolates of B. sorokiniana were grown on Saburo agar, potato dextrose agar (PDA), and Czapek-Dox medium [3] and were kept in an incubator for 5 days at 25 ± 1°C [4]. The main morphological parameters, such as conidial length, width, and quantity of sept, were measured from 50 conidia for each isolate [19]. To obtain pure colonies, at least 10 spores were transferred and cultured at room temperature (about 25°C) [20]. In order to minimize the risk of loss of pathogenicity and to make the initial inoculum available for further subculturing, the pure culture was stored at 4°C on a PDA tilt.

Molecular identification of the fungal species was performed by sequencing the ITS region as per the Sanger method [21]. To extract DNA, mycelia were harvested from 3-day to 7-day PDA cultures, then frozen at −20°C, and grounded with a pestle in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube to a powder state and subjected to the Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Ontario, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA concentration in the samples was determined using a QubitTM dsDNA HS assay kit fluorimeter (Life Technologies, Oregon, USA) on a scale for dsDNA HS.

The universal primers ITS1/ITS4 were employed to amplify the ITS region of ribosomal RNA. The amplification reaction mixture was composed of 12.5 μl Q5® Hot Start High-Fidelity 2 × Master Mix (New England BioLabs, MA, USA), 1.25 μl of each primer (10 μM), 1.5 μl DNA (10 ng/μl), and 8.5 μl sterile distilled water. PCR amplification was carried out in an Eppendorf ProS amplifier (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). PCR amplification mode included an initial denaturation at 94°C for 10 min, 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°С for 1 min, 72°С for 40 s, and followed by a final extension step at 72°С for 10 min. The amplification results were analyzed on a 1.2% agarose gel and purified using CleanSweep™ PCR Purification reagent (Applied Biosystems, USA).

The sequencing reaction was carried out using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BigDye® Terminator v3.1, Cycle Sequencing Kit Protocol, Applied Biosystems, USA), followed by fragment separation, using the 3500 DNA Analyzer-automated genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequencing results were processed in the SeqA program (Applied Biosystems, USA). The obtained nucleotide sequences of the ITS region were compared with the data of the GenBank database using the BLAST program [22]. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA X software [21]. The alignment of nucleotide sequences was carried out using the ClustalW algorithm. To build phylogenetic trees, the neighbour-joining (NJ) method was used.

2.2.2. Pathogenicity Test

The determination of pathogenicity of the two isolates of B. sorokiniana was carried out at the Kazakhstan-Japan Innovation Center of Kazakh National Agrarian Research University in Almaty. The virulence assessment degree of the fungal isolates was fulfilled with the pathogenicity test according to the modified method of Broders et al. [16]. The Arna cultivar that adapted to the conditions of South-Eastern Kazakhstan was employed for pathogenicity assays. The seeds of the cultivars used in the pathogenicity test and leaves were not included.

Conidia were harvested by adding distilled water to the 5-day-old PDA plates and scraping the agar surface with a spatula. This conidial suspension was removed from mycelial fragments by filtering it through two layers of cheesecloth. The inoculum concentration was adjusted to 8 × 10³ conidia per ml with distilled water using a hemacytometer.

For inoculation, the seeds were immersed in the fungal suspension for 10 min and then left to dry. Evenly distributed seeds were laid out on Petri dishes of water agar in three replicates. The barley seeds were placed at a distance of 1.5–2 cm from each other in aseptic conditions in a moist chamber (high humidity). There was a total of 20 barley seeds in each chamber. Then, seeds were incubated at 25°C in a thermostat until the fungal mycelium was well grown after 7 days in the darkness. After this period, the germination of the disease was assessed according to a 0–3 scale as per Broders et al. [16], where 0 = 100% germination rate without disease symptoms of seeds (roots) infection; 1 = 70–99% germination with root-lesion formation; 2 = germination of 30–69% with coalesced lesions; and 3 = 0–29% germination, where all seed tissues were affected. During the experiment, all samples were regularly examined and fixed. Eight seeds were placed per Petri dish containing PDA supplemented with 0.01% tetracycline (PDAt). The agar plates were placed in an incubator for 7 days at 25°C [10].

2.2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical processing was performed using the RStudio-integrated development environment. The significance for all variables for parametric data was performed with a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance with the value [23]. We evaluated two work hypotheses: Hypothesis 1: H₀: the differences between length, width, and the number of septa of P-08 and P-15 isolates are equal; H_A: the differences between length, width, and the number of septa of P-08 and P-15 isolates are not equal. Hypothesis 2: H₀: the infection factor (the infection from P-08, P-15 B. sorokiniana isolates and control, without infection) cannot impact spot blotch development and incidence on barley seedlings; H_A: the infection factor (the infection from P-08, P-15 B. sorokiniana isolates and control, without infection) can impact to spot blotch development and incidence on barley seedlings.

3. Results

A total of 11 fungal isolates were obtained from symptomatic spring barley samples collected from experimental plots of the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing in the Almaty region in 2020. The field samples of barley leaves with symptoms of spot blotch are shown in Figure 1.

Species identification based on morphological keys and the sequencing of the ITS region showed that two isolates (P-08 and P-15) were B. sorokiniana. The remaining nine isolates were identified as Alternaria alternata (three isolates), A. tenuissima (one isolate), A. infectoria (two isolates), Lecanicillium aphanocladii (two isolates), and Cladosporium sp. (one isolate).

The growth of the P-08 and P-15 isolates of B. sorokiniana was evaluated on Saburo, PDA, and Czapek artificial cultural media at 25°C. The fungal isolate growth on Saburo at 25°C media colony was fast, rounded, and outstretched, at first olive-colored and later turning black. The consistency was fluffy and woolly with a slightly raised color. The growth of colonies on Czapek media was fast, rounded, and outstretched, at first olive-colored and later turning black. The consistency was fluffy and woolly with a slightly raised color. The isolate colonies were grown quickly on PDA with rounded and outstretched, at first olive-colored and later becoming dark grey with an almost black core. The mycelium was fluffy and woolly. The edges were slightly wavy (Figure 2).

Five days after incubation at 25°C in the dark, fungal colonies were observed, and those with similar morphological features were cultured on new PDA plates, using the single-spore isolation technique. The mean conidium length, width dimensions, and the number of septa (n = 50) for B. sorokiniana isolates: isolates were formed at the end, olive-brown, elliptical, with pointed ends-11–28 × 58–142 μm with 4–9 septa slightly curved, the conidial wall was smooth with thickenings on the septa. The conidiophores were mostly single or grouped, simple, cloisonne, erect, 3–9 × 100–142 μm. There were no significant differences between the isolates (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

The phylogenetic tree of P-08 and P-15 isolates of B. sorokiniana was constructed by comparing the ITS region of the sample under study with the sequences of reference strains derived from GenBank [22]. The degree of homology with the closest strain MN444781: 2–512 and B. sorokiniana isolate 1–3 F was 100% (Figure 4).

The two isolates caused symptoms on spring barley seedlings, including necrosis and discoloration of plant roots and seedlings (Figure 5, Table 1). Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by reisolating and identifying the B. sorokiniana pathogen based on the morphology described above. The mean disease incidence was 100% for both the isolates. The germination scores ranged at 71.5% for the P-08 isolate and 48.5% for the P-15 isolate and were significantly different (<0.0001) in terms of their development (Table 2). No disease symptoms developed on control barley seedlings.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

The current study focused on isolates of B. sorokiniana obtained from spring barley associated with spot blotch in the Almaty region of Kazakhstan. Eleven isolates from diseased leaves of barley were identified as B. sorokiniana (two isolates), Alternaria alternata (three isolates), A. tenuissima (one isolate), A. infectoria (two isolates), L. aphanocladii (two isolates), and Cladosporium sp. (one isolate).

B. sorokiniana was obtained from the leaf tissues of barley. Based on the traditional methods of fungal isolation from leaf spot-affected tissues of spring barley [5], two isolates P-08 and P-15 demonstrating the external signs of mycelium characteristic of these media and differing in the time of their growth were identified. The most distinctive growing medium for the pathogen was potato dextrose agar, where it exhibited its rounded/outstretched characteristic, olive-colored at the beginning and then becoming dark grey with an almost black core. Similar signs of mycelium were noted in Verma et al. [24], where some patterns were blackish grey with a whitish fluffy area. A feature of the PDA medium is also the ability to form the largest number of B. sorokiniana spores/ml [20].

The conidium sizes of the B. sorokiniana in barley examined in this study were consistent with that description from Sivanesan [18] and showed similar results to those obtained in previous studies by Samuels and Sivanesan [25], Agrios [2], and Özer et al. [5, 6]. The conidium characteristics were useful criteria for the discrimination of B. sorokiniana isolates from other isolates due to their morphological similarities [5, 6, 25].

In the current study, the ITS sequences of the isolates were matched with reference sequences of B. sorokiniana in GenBank. The species specificity of B. sorokiniana, supported by their morphological parameters, has allowed researchers to apply PCR-based molecular techniques, such as microsatellite analysis [26], RAPD [27], and ITS regions [24]. The latter method made it possible to accurately determine the most aggressive isolate of spot blotch pathogen from the infected leaf and seed samples of wheat [28]. However, some authors [29] questioned the accuracy of this method in terms of phylogenetic information content within the genus Gibberella and the lack of species. However, according to a phylogenetic tree, the identified isolates P-08 and P-15 are part of the Bipolaris clade that clustered with other nine Bipolaris isolates including some related species as Actinomucor elegans strain ZZZJ18 and Bipolaris victoriae isolate on maize. Also, Meng et al. [30] found that this technique of identifying and orthologous clustering allows classifying and assigning some core and single-copy genes of Bipolaris genomes.

In the present work, the infective nature of both B. sorokiniana isolates obtained from diseased spring barley leaves was confirmed by means of a pathogenicity test on barley seedlings with distinct symptoms of necrosis and discoloration. However, in terms of having a mean disease index of pathogen development, the P-15 isolate showed greater aggressiveness (71.5%) compared to that of the P-08 isolate (48.5%) in the artificial background. Barley seeds without infection (not inoculated) showed no symptoms of the disease.

The aggressive nature of this pathogen can vary significantly. Kumar et al. [31] found that 22 conidial descendants of the 25 most aggressive conidia of B. sorokiniana inoculated on barley caused necrotic lesions on the third day, while the remaining three conidia caused necrotic lesions on the fourth day. The demonstration of varying degrees of B. sorokiniana aggressiveness is directly related to the environment, especially in hot and humid climates [32]. Knight et al. [33] assessed 31 B. sorokiniana isolates for their ability to cause spot blotch infections on barley leaves using a differential set of 15 barley genotypes and three other cereal species. The 14 isolates are from crown root rot infections of either wheat or barley and 14 isolates from spot blotch infections of barley. Phenotypic experiments revealed that isolates of B. sorokiniana collected from barley spot blotch infections had a high level of pathogenic variability on inoculated barley seeds.

This study also is the first report of B. sorokiniana causing spot blotch on spring barley in South-Eastern Kazakhstan.

5. Conclusion

This study aimed to isolate, identify, and evaluate the pathogenicity of B. sorokiniana isolates associated with spot blotch in a spring barley cultivar in the Almaty region of South-Eastern Kazakhstan. The two isolates of B. sorokiniana were identified as agents for spot blotch in barley. Saburo, PDA, and Czapek artificial cultural media were used for the culturing of P-08 and P-15 isolates of B. sorokiniana and were optimal for their growth. The biological features of P-08 and P-15 conidia, including the length, width, and the number of septa, were described. In addition, several fungal species were obtained from single-spore cultures (monosporous cultures) and were identified as Alternaria alternata, A. tenuissima, A. infectoria, Lecanicillium aphanocladii, and Cladosporium sp.

Isolates of B. sorokiniana were able to infect and colonize barley seedlings to a high degree. The pathogenicity assays fulfilled Koch’s postulates. The isolates without infection did not demonstrate disease symptoms. Further investigation is needed to understand the impact of B. sorokiniana on barley production in Kazakhstan. Future research needs to focus on studying B. sorokiniana isolates in barley photosynthesis processes.

Data Availability

The data used to support this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The work has been written based on the results obtained from the project funded by Ministry of Science and Education of Kazakhstan Republic (AP 08957333): Biological characteristics of spotted leaf barley pathogens (Hordeum vulgare) in South-East Kazakhstan.

References

A. Rsaliyev, Z. Pahratdinova, and S. Rsaliyev, “Characterizing the pathotype structure of barley powdery mildew and effectiveness of resistance genes to this pathogen in Kazakhstan,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 17, no. S1, p. 178, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. N. Agrios, Plant Pathology, London, UK, 2005.
M. C. McDonald, D. Ahren, S. Simpfendorfer, A. Milgate, and P. S. Solomon, “The discovery of the virulence gene ToxA in the wheat and barley pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 432–439, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Singh, H. Singh, A. Sharma et al., “Inheritance of spot blotch resistance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.),” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 1203–1209, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Özer, M. İmren, F. Özdemir, A. Morgounov, and A. A. Dababat, “First report of common root rot on triticale caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana in Kazakhstan,” Plant Disease, vol. 104, no. 10, p. 2735, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Özer, M. Imren, M. Alkan et al., “Molecular and pathogenic characterization of Cochliobolus anamorphs associated with common root rot of wheat in Azerbaijan,” Phytopathologia Mediterranea, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 147–158, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nauanova, “Resistance of barley varieties to the pathogens of leaf spotting on the artificial infectious background,” Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1589–1592, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cegiełko, I. Kiecana, E. Mielniczuk, A. Waśkiewicz, and J. Bocianowski, “The influence of spring barley grain (Hordeum vulgare L.) infection by Bipolaris sorokiniana (Sacc.) Shoem. on the leaf infection and grain contamination by sterigmatocystin,” Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 149–166, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cegiełko, M. Wit, I. Kiecana, W. Wakuliński, and E. Mielniczuk, “Structure of polish isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana and effect of different pathotypes on spot blotch severity of selected spring barley cultivars,” Cereal Research Communications, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 314–323, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Haas, M. Mascher, C. Castell-Miller, and B. Steffenson, “RNA-seq reveals few differences in resistant and susceptible responses of barley to infection by the spot blotch pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana,” BioRxiv, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. I. Gultyaeva and I. A. Kazartsev, “Molecular-genetic approaches to studying wheat leaf rust populations,” Plant Protection News, vol. 2, no. 96, pp. 5–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dababat, M. Imren, M. Pridannikov et al., “Plant-parasitic nematodes on cereals in northern Kazakhstan,” Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 641–649, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alkan, G. Özer, M. İmren, F. Ozdemir, A. Morgounov, and A. A. Dababat, “First report of Fusarium culmorum and Microdochium bolleyi causing root rot on triticale in Kazakhstan,” Plant Disease, vol. 105, no. 7, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Morgounov, A. Abugalieva, K. Akan et al., “High-yielding winter synthetic hexaploid wheats resistant to multiple diseases and pests,” Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 273–278, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Parikh, S. Kodati, M. J. Eskelson, and A. O. Adesemoye, “Identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium spp. in row crops in Nebraska,” Crop Protection, vol. 108, pp. 120–127, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Broders, P. E. Lipps, P. A. Paul, and A. E. Dorrance, “Evaluation of Fusarium graminearum associated with corn and soybean seed and seedling disease in Ohio,” Plant Disease, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1155–1160, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Ellis, Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Richmond, UK, 1971.
A. Sivanesan, Graminicolous Species of Bipolaris, Curvularia, Drechslera, Exserohilum and Their Teleomorphs, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1987.
P. Kumar and R. C. Rai, “Effect of different growth media on radial growth, dry mycelial weight and sporulation of Bipolaris sorokiniana,” Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, vol. 6, pp. 266–268, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Zhang, S. Yuan-Ying, and L. Cai, “An optimized protocol of single spore isolation for fungi,” Cryptogamie Mycologie, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 349–356, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tedersoo, R. H. Nilsson, K. Abarenkov et al., “454 Pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing of tropical mycorrhizal fungi provide similar results but reveal substantial methodological biases,” New Phytologist, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 291–301, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), “Basic local alignment search tool,” 2021, https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Aphalo, “Openintro statistics,” Plants Bull, vol. 2016, no. 2, pp. 51–53, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Verma, S. K. Chaurasia, Y. K. Pankaj, and R. Kumar, “Study on the genetic variability and pathogenicity assessment among isolates of spot blotch causing fungi (Bipolaris sorokiniana) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Plant Physiology Reports, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 255–267, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Samuels and A. Sivanesan, Graminicolous Species of Bipolaris, Curvularia, Drechslera, Exserohilum and their Teleomorphs, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1987.
U. Kumar, A. K. Joshi, S. Kumar, R. Chand, and M. S. Röder, “Mapping of resistance to spot blotch disease caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana in spring wheat,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 783–792, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Jaiswal, L. C. Prasad, L. C. Prasad et al., “Identification of molecular marker and aggressiveness for different groups of Bipolaris sorokiniana isolates causing spot blotch disease in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Current Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 135–141, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhang, G. Guo, Q. Wu et al., “Identification and fine mapping of spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) resistance gene Sb4 in wheat,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 2451–2459, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Visentin, G. Tamietti, D. Valentino et al., “The ITS region as a taxonomic discriminator between Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium proliferatum,” Mycological Research, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 1137–1145, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Meng, J. Wang, B. Bai et al., “Genome sequence resource for pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana shoemaker GN1 causing spot blotch of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.),” Plant Disease, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1574–1577, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kumar, R. Chand, L. C. Prasad, and A. K. Joshi, “A new technique for monoconidial culture of the most aggressive isolate in a given population of Bipolaris sorokiniana, cause of foliar spot blotch in wheat and barley,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1647–1651, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Joshi, R. Chand, S. Kumar, and R. P. Singh, “Leaf tip necrosis: a phenotypic marker associated with resistance to spot blotch disease in wheat,” Crop Science, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 792–796, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. L. Knight, G. J. Platz, A. Lehmensiek, and M. W. Sutherland, “An investigation of genetic variation among Australian isolates of Bipolaris sorokiniana from different cereal tissues and comparison of their abilities to cause spot blotch on barley,” Australasian Plant Pathology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 207–216, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Yerlan Dutbayev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

783

Downloads

443

Citations