A Bibliometric Perspective on AI Research for Job-Résumé Matching

Table 2

Most cited papers.

(a) Overall
(Authors, year)	Citations
	Collection	Overall
(Yi et al. 2007) [8]	9	49
(Malinowski et al. 2006) [9]	9	169
(Al-Otaibi et al. 2012) [10]	8	144
(Hong et al. 2013) [11]	5	97
(Senthil and Sankar 2013) [12]	5	46
(Singh et al. 2010) [13]	4	62
(Yan et al. 2019) [14]	3	9
(Guo et al. 2016) [15]	3	26
(Maheshwary and Misra 2018) [16]	2	14
(Celik et al. 2013) [17]	2	9
(Harris 2017) [18]	2	8
(Siting et al. 2012) [19]	2	75
(Schmitt et al. 2016) [20]	2	17
(Cabrera-Diego et al. 2019)[21]	1	2
(b) Within collection
(Authors, year)	Citations	Average year
(Malinowski et al. 2006) [9]	169	10.6
(Al-Otaibi et al. 2012) [10]	144	14.4
(Debortoli et al. 2014) [22]	112	14.0
(Hong et al. 2013) [11]	97	10.8
(Siting et al. 2012) [19]	75	7.5
(Singh et al. 2010) [13]	62	5.2
(Yi et al. 2007) [8]	49	3.3
(Senthil and Sankar 2013) [12]	46	5.1
(Keim 2007) [23]	45	3.0
(Kucel et al. 2016) [24]	31	5.2
(Guo et al. 2016) [15]	26	4.3
(Kopparapu 2010) [25]	25	2.1
(Al-Otaibi et al. 2012)[26]	25	2.5
(Deepak et al. 2020) [27]	24	12.0
(Almalis et al. 2015) [28]	21	3.0