Research Article
Water Hyacinth’s Extent and Its Implication on Water Quality in Lake Victoria, Uganda
Table 3
Mean rating, standard deviation, and Pearson’s chi-square results showing the relationship between the water hyacinth determinants and landing site.
| Factors | Mean rating | Standard deviation | Pearson value | Likelihood ratio | value |
| Morphology of the Bay | 3.2 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 0.598 | Strong winds | 3.2 | 1.1 | 39.4 | 39.6 | ≤0.001 | Water level changes | 2.7 | 1.9 | 20.7 | 20.3 | 0.002 | Speed of water currents | 3.0 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 0.633 | Hyacinth species genetics | 1.4 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 0.580 | Water depth | 1.5 | 0.8 | 14.1 | 16.0 | 0.29 | Biotic colonization | 1.3 | 0.6 | 12.6 | 16.4 | 0.049 | Temperature | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.935 | Humidity | 1.2 | 0.5 | 15.7 | 17.5 | 0.015 | Discharge of effluent | 3.2 | 0.9 | 13.5 | 11.3 | 0.35 | Construction at the shore | 2.5 | 1.1 | 23.7 | 24.5 | ≤0.001 | Fish hatcheries | 1.8 | 0.2 | 17.8 | 18.7 | 0.007 | Proximity to botanic gardens | 1.9 | 1.0 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 0.216 | Fishing boats and nets | 1.8 | 1.1 | 33.1 | 40.3 | ≤0.001 | Herbaria | 1.5 | 0.9 | 29.1 | 28.1 | ≤0.001 | Ferry navigation | 2.5 | 1.2 | 19.5 | 23.4 | 0.012 |
|
|