Table of Contents
Ulcers
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 361586, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/361586
Review Article

Herbal Remedy: An Alternate Therapy of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Induced Gastric Ulcer Healing

Department of Biochemistry, KPC Medical College & Hospital, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, India

Received 27 October 2013; Revised 1 April 2014; Accepted 15 April 2014; Published 6 May 2014

Academic Editor: Tomasz Brzozowski

Copyright © 2014 Ananya Chatterjee and Sandip K. Bandyopadhyay. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used therapeutic drug groups used worldwide for curing an array of health problems like pain, inflammation, cardiovascular complications, and many other diseases, but they may cause different side effects including gastroduodenal disorders. So, there is a growing interest and need to search for nontoxic, antiulcer formulations from medicinal plants to treat NSAIDs induced gastric ulcer. Extensive research has reported on many natural plants like Camellia sinensis, Phyllanthus emblica, Myristica malabarica, Piper betle, Picrorhiza kurroa, and so forth, and their active constituents reduced NSAIDs induced gastric ulcer via their antioxidative as well as immunomodulatory activity. Therefore, use of herbal formulations in daily life may prevent NSAIDs induced gastric ulceration and other side effects.

1. Introduction

India has immeasurable varieties of tropical plants. Native Indians possess a long tradition of Kabiraji medicine utilizing such medicinal plants. The Indian Medicine Central Council Act 1970 recognizes Ayurvedic medicine. The World Health Organization also sponsors and encourages research in Ayurvedic treatments [1]. The use of herbal medicine can be traced back to China about 5000 years ago. Extracts of several plants have been used as therapeutic agents for many diseases by virtue of their antioxidant actions. Spices and herbs are recognized sources of natural antioxidants, many of which are phenols and aromatic amines. These can act at different levels by decreasing local oxygen concentrations, decreasing superoxide formation, preventing chain initiation, metal-induced free radical generation, and lipid peroxidation. However, despite the large varieties of such plants grown in India, a minimal number has been thoroughly studied for all aspects of their potential therapeutic value in medicine. A growing body of evidence suggests that at least part of the therapeutic values may be contributed by their antioxidative property. These natural antioxidants may therefore contribute to protect the human body from several diseases [2] including gastric ulcer.

Clinical research has confirmed the efficacy of several medicinal plants for the treatment of gastric disorders, and basic scientific research has uncovered many of the mechanisms to explain their therapeutic effects [3, 4].

Gastric ulcer is a common disease, where the gastric mucosa get damaged and perforations lead to bleeding. A report of the Indian Council of Medical Research on the epidemiology of gastric ulcer in India showed that the overall prevalence rate of the disease ranged from 1 to 6.5 per thousand in the age group of 15 years and above in a selected urban population. Mahadeva and Goh have extensively studied and reported the epidemiology of this disease [5].

A number of factors are responsible for this gastric ulcer disease of which 70% to 80% are due to infection of Helicobactor pylori, a spiral shaped, gram negative bacteria [68]. However, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) accounts for approximately 25% of gastric ulcer cases with an upward trend [9]. The NSAIDs are one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the world and are extensively used to alleviate clinical cases specially for pain and inflammation [10]. However, these drugs are well-known to induce stomach ulceration and delay ulcer healing [11]. Despite recent advances, an adequate remedy for the NSAID-induced gastropathy remains elusive. The World Health Organization has stressed the need to develop drugs from plant origin, which will be inexpensive, accessible particularly to the rural people in the developing countries, and show less/no side effects.

Therefore, development of a drug having antiulcerogenic property from plant sources without compromising the efficacy and safety would be expected to benefit millions of suffering humanity.

2. Review of the Literature

In the first century A.D., Dioscorides wrote De Materia Medica, a medicinal plant catalog which became the prototype for modern pharmacopoeias. Of the estimated 250,000 to 500,000 species of plants on Earth, merely 10% are used for medicinal purposes [12]. However, not all medicinal plants are devoid of side effects. In this context, Holmes wrote, “If the whole materia medica as now used could be sunk to the bottom of the sea, it would be all the better for mankind—and all the worse for the fishes.”

Application of herbal medicine dates back to China for almost about 5000 years ago. Extracts of various plants have applications as therapeutic agents for certain diseases because they possess antioxidant activities. Spices and herbs are well-known for their natural antioxidants properties, most of which happen to be phenols and aromatic amines. Their activities may vary at different levels by decreasing local oxygen concentrations, decreasing superoxide formation, preventing chain initiation, metal-induced free radical generation as well as lipid peroxidation. These antioxidants may therefore protect the human body from several diseases [2].

The importance of ethnopharmacological studies is emphasized by the observation that the first effective drug against gastric ulcer was carbenoxolone, isolated from the plant, Glycyrrhiza glabra. Likewise, gefarnate is also developed from cabbage, which has been employed as an antiulcer agent in folk medicine [13, 14]. Hence, a search among medicinal plants has become imperative despite the progress and approaches in conventional chemistry and pharmacology in producing effective drugs.

3. Brief Note on NSAIDs and Gastric Ulcer

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well-known analgesic and antipyretic drugs.

NSAIDs like aspirin, indomethacin, ibuprofen, naproxen, and so forth are usually used for the treatment of pain, inflammation, colorectal cancer, cancer, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthropathies (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and Reiter’s syndrome), and so many cases. Some of the commonly used anti-inflammatory drugs and their mechanism of action are listed in Table 1 [15, 16].

tab1
Table 1: The common nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their mechanism of action [15, 16].

But long term use of such pain killers ultimately causes a significant gastroduodenal risk. Among the total gastric ulcer patients, 25% are suffering from NSAID induced gastric ulcer and this account increased day by day.

NSAIDs have an effect on the gastroduodenal barrier at the epithelial level, intraepithelial level, and subepithelial level. At the epithelial level, it reduces the synthesis and the secretion of mucus and makes the proteolytic action of pepsins. This changes the viscosity and electric capacity of the mucus, favoring the back diffusion of ions. At the intraepithelial level, it causes epithelial denudation due to direct cellular damage, since ionized NSAIDs stay trapped inside the epithelium. At the subepithelial level, it leads to thrombosis in the microcirculation and vasoconstriction of the arterioles of the submucosa.

4. Mechanism of Action of NSAIDs in the GI Tract (Figure 1)

361586.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic presentation of mode of action of NSAIDs.
4.1. Oxidative Stress

NSAIDs mediated gastric lesions accompanied by oxidative damage. Oxidative stress refers to a situation of serious imbalance between production of reactive oxygen/reactive nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and antioxidant defence. This is manifested from diminished antioxidants, mutations affecting antioxidant defence enzymes, or increased production of ROS/RNS and is induced by various endogenous and exogenous factors. This leads to extensive damage to key biomacromolecules leading to various diseases including gastric ulceration. It is now established that neutrophil infiltration, generation of ROS [17], cytokine imbalance, and initiation of lipid peroxidation play significant roles in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer.

4.2. Prostaglandin Synthesis Inhibition

Prostaglandins (PGs) are 20-carbon fatty acids produced by the cyclooxygenase (COX)-catalyzed reaction of arachidonic acid. But most of the NSAIDs are nonspecific cyclooxygenase blockers. They block both constitutive COX-1 and inducible COX-2, ultimately hampering the synthesis of PGs. PGs generally act in an autocrine or paracrine manner. These appear to exert their cytoprotective action by stimulating mucus and bicarbonate secretion, maintaining mucosal blood flow and enhancing the resistance of epithelial cells to injury induced by cytotoxins [18]. PGs can suppress the generation of reactive oxygen metabolites produced by neutrophils thereby reducing inflammation and tissue injury [19]. Further, PGs also contribute to ulcer healing by inducing angiogenesis [20]. There has been accumulating evidence that PG might contribute to ulcer healing by maintaining the balance between the proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors [21].

4.3. Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes

Nitric oxide (NO) is one of the main mediators of gastrointestinal mucosal defense but, in contradiction, it also contributes to mucosal damage depending upon the concentration of NO [22].

It is seen that endothelial nitric oxide synthase (e-NOS) isoform of constitutive NOS produces low amounts of NO. In contrast, the inducible form of NOS (iNOS) produces NO in higher quantities [23]. Piotrowski et al. showed that indomethacin induced gastric ulceration gives a 12-fold increase in gastric epithelial expression of iNOS activity compared with controls which is correlated with the damage of epithelium [24], whereas Wallace and Miller showed that NO mediates a critical role in modulation of several components of mucosal defense, including increased gastric blood flow, reduced neutrophil adhesion, and increased mucus secretion [25].

4.4. Inhibition of Angiogenesis

Besides causing gastric ulceration [26], NSAIDs often delay healing of existing ulcers [2729]. Based on the experimental data and the literature, the mechanisms by which NSAIDs inhibit angiogenesis appear to be multifactorial and likely include local changes in angiogenic growth factor expression, alteration in key regulators and mediators, increased endothelial cell apoptosis, inhibition of endothelial cell migration, recruitment of inflammatory cells and platelets, and/or thromboxane A2 mediated effects as well as activation of endostatin [30]. It has been observed that inhibition of angiogenesis by NSAIDs involves interference with MAP kinase activity and its nuclear translocation [31].

4.5. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and NSAIDS

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and NSAIDs both are the most common causative factors of gastroduodenal ulcer in animals and humans. Their relationship in ulcerogenesis has been little studied [32]. According to some reports, their synergistic or antagonistic action on the gastric mucosa has been a subject of controversy [33]. Accumulated evidence in humans and animals shows that both NSAID (aspirin) and H. pylori upregulate the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 both at mRNA and protein levels at the ulcer margin but failed to influence significantly that of COX-1 [33]. It was, therefore, proposed that H. pylori may in fact antagonize aspirin-induced delay of ulcer healing due to suppression of acid secretion, enhancement of PGE2 synthesis and overexpression of growth factors such as TGF-α and VEGF [33].

5. Therapy of Gastric Ulcer

Specific treatment for stomach and duodenal ulcers is decided by the physician on the basis of patient’s age, overall health, medical history, extent of the pathogenesis, tolerance for medications, procedures, or therapies, and expectations or preference. Besides, personal factors such as smoking, caffeine, alcohol, stress, secretion of acid and pepsin, and so forth are suspected to play a role in the development of stomach or duodenal ulcers. Hence, the simplest treatment involving lifestyle changes namely abstinence from smoking and alcohol and over stress in many cases.

Earlier, the major approach towards therapy was targeted to reduce the secretion of gastric acids, which were considered as the sole cause of ulcer formation. Now, the treatment modality has changed to potentiating of the mucosal defense along with reduction of acid secretion [21]. The treatment of peptic ulcer is often designed with single or combination drugs. The medical support is designed either singly or in combination by blocking the receptor sites, for example, with a H2 receptor antagonist, inhibition of intracellular mechanism involving calcium and/or c-AMP, protection of gastric mucosa (cytoprotective function) from chemically induced injury, H+K+-ATPase, inhibition of terminal step of acid secretion, and eradication of H. pylori infection. For very severe conditions, standard open surgery is the only method available at present.

The most commonly used drugs include antibiotics to kill H. pylori (triple therapy), acid blockers (cimetidine, ranitidine, or famotidine), proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole), and tissue lining protecting agents (sucralfate). A brief account of these is presented in Table 2.

tab2
Table 2: Some of the market available synthetic antiulcer drugs and their mode of action are summarized in Table 2 (http://www.wikipedia.com).

The commonly available synthetic antiulcer drugs are associated with various side effects as described in Table 2. These drugs have decreased the morbidity rates but produce many adverse effects including relapse of the disease and are often expensive for the poor populations. Different studies have confirmed that all the NSAIDs do not have the same capacity to induce gastric ulcer. Thus, a mechanistic approach of drug development might provide new NSAIDs that are clinically effective and safer to use. In recent days, NO-NSAIDs and H2S-NSAIDs are investigated as potential alternative to NSAIDs. Nitric oxide (NO)-NSAIDS is a new class of compounds. They are synthesized by ester linkage of an NO-releasing moiety to conventional NSAIDS, such as aspirin (NO-aspirin), flurbiprofen (NO-flurbiprofen), naproxen (NO-naproxen), diclofenac (Nitrofenac), lbuprofen (NO-lbuprofen), and indomethacin (NO-indomethacin) [34]. NO-NSAID unlike classic NSAIDs does not affect gastric mucosa and fails to delay the healing of preexisting ulcers [35]. This novel group of compounds reduced gastrointestinal toxicity by enhancing vasodilatation of the gastric vasculature, inhibition of leukocyte adhesion, and inactivation of caspase activity [34]. Like the NO-NSAIDs, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) releasing NSAIDs is another newly synthesized compound. H2S is potent vasodilatory agent that couples with NSAIDs to generate new classes of anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents with the potential to spare the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular system [36]. Either naproxen or diclofenac coupled with an H2S releasing moiety has been reported to cause less gastrointestinal and cardiovascular injury than parent NSAIDs in preclinical models [36]. On the other hand, some reports also showed that coupling of H2S releasing moiety with NSAID may not be safe because H2S also acts as a proinflammatory agent [37] and the dose of H2S is very critical, a higher dose may even cause death [38].

Therefore, the search for non- or less-toxic yet equally efficacious drugs sourced from nature is an area of intense research. Moreover, in view of the recent global economic liberalization and compulsion under GATT, a new initiative for the development of phytomedicine of Indian origin has now been taken.

India is a megadiverse country possessing a wide variety of plants with their medicinal properties well documented in ancient Indian literature. Many compounds derived from natural sources have pharmacological activities and may thus have immense potential for future drug development. Plant-derived products are an attractive option because they are cheap, easily available, and relatively less toxic.

6. Antiulcer Drugs of Herbal Origin

The herbal and other indigenous sources have not adequately been explored for the presence of safe and effective antiulcer drugs. Though certain plants and their purified constituents have been reported to possess significant antiulcer potential during the last three decades, the studies have not been carried forward to a logical conclusion for establishing their clinical usefulness as has been done for various modern drugs like H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors.

An attempt has therefore been made to summarize some important studies on the antiulcer potential of herbal drugs which may provide some clues in undertaking this challenging task of finding out a safe and promising drug from natural sources. This review includes the studies of some of plants which have a beneficial role against NSAID induced gastric ulceration and are listed as follows.

6.1. Anthocyanosides

Anthocyanosides, obtained from Vaccinium myrtillus, exert a significant preventive and curative antiulcer activity. It influences biosynthesis of the mucopolysaccharides, thus improving the efficiency of the mucus barrier at the gastric level [39, 40].

6.2. Apium graveolens

It is a plant species in the family Apiaceae commonly known as celery. An ethanol extract of celery is also used as a drug against gastric ulcer on rats. It was shown by Al-Howiriny et al., at the dose of 250 and 500 mg/kg body weight, that ethanolic extract of celery showed antigastric ulcer activity against indomethacin, cytodestructive agents (80% ethanol, 0.2 M NaOH, and 25% NaCl), and cold restraint stress induced ulceration on rats. Apium graveolens extract significantly protects the gastric mucosa and suppresses the basal gastric secretion in rats, through its antioxidant potential [41]. In animals, bilberry decreased the incidence and severity of experimentally induced ulcers [40].

6.3. Bupleurum falcatum

B. falcatum is a species of flowering plant in the Apiaceae family. The roots of B. falcatum have been used clinically in Chinese and Japanese herbal medicine (kampo medicine). Shibata et al. [42] have reported that a crude saponin fraction of B. falcatum showed weak antiulcerogenic activity in pylorus ligated ulcer model. Yamada et al. [43] found that the polysaccharide fraction of B. falcatum possesses potent antiulcer activity against HCl/ethanol-induced lesions in mice.

6.4. Curcuma longa

Itis a perennial herb from Zingiberaceae family, distributed native to India and Southeast Asia. It has extensively been used in medicine. Curcumin, an active component of Curcuma, showsanti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. On the basis of its antioxidant property it scavenges reactive oxygen species and regulates MMP activity to exert antiulcer activity [44]. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a yellow pigment in turmeric Curcuma longa, is used widely as a spice in Indian and Thai cuisine. It exhibits a number of pharmacological effects including anti-inflammatory activity, induced by suppression of PG synthesis [45]. Turmeric root extract has been found to relieve pain from biliary dyskinesia during a double-blinded study [46] and improve endoscopic healing of peptic ulcers as well as symptoms of patients with nonulcer dyspepsia [47]. There is currently much interest in its potential as a selective COX-2 inhibitory agent [48].

6.5. Camellia sinensis

It is the most popular nonalcoholic beverage worldwide. Extensive work has been carried out regarding various medicinal attributes of green tea. The prophylactic action of the tea seed-derived triterpene saponins against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal lesions [49, 50] and black tea extract against various ulcerogens [51, 52] has been reported in rat models. Theaflavin (TF) is a major active component of black tea. TF healed indomethacin induced gastric ulcer by its antioxidative properties, synthesis of PGE2 and enhancement of mucin secretion. TF also helps to suppress various inflammatory modulators in ulcer margin [53]. eNOS modulation may be another possible pathway of gastric ulcer healing by TF [53].

6.6. Glycyrrhiza glabra

Liquorice or licorice is the root of Glycyrrhiza glabra from which a somewhat sweet flavour can be extracted. The liquorice plant is a legume (related to beans and peas) that is native to southern Europe and parts of Asia. It is placed under the family Fabaceae. It is a herbaceous perennial, growing to 1 m in height. In north India it is known as “Mulaithi.” The root of G. glabra is known as licorice used for the treatment of gastric ulcer in Europe. It had been reported that licorice derived compounds elevate the prostaglandin level and promote the mucus secretion from the stomach, increase the life span of surface cell of stomach, and had an antipepsin activity which ultimately leads to ulcer healing [54]. Extracts of licorice have demonstrated the ability to accelerate the healing of gastrointestinal ulceration (especially in the stomach and esophagus) possibly due to its antioxidant effect. The antiulcer drug carbenoxolone, a succinate derivative of glycerrhetinic acid, was developed in London in the early 1960s and has become the preferred form of licorice used to promote healing of ulcers [5557].

6.7. Kochia scoparia

Saponins isolated from the fruit of Kochia scoparia have been demonstrated to possess gastroprotective properties [58]. Its gastroprotective action is believed to be via activation of mucous membrane protective factors [59] rather than inhibition of gastric acid secretion.

6.8. Lagenaria vulgaris

Lagenaria vulgaris is a popular vegetable, placed under the family Cucurbitaceae. This plant shows antiulcer activity through an antioxidative pathway by modulation of glutathione level [60].

6.9. Myristica malabarica

It is popularly known as rampatri, placed under the family Myristicaceae. It is used as an exotic spice in various Indian cuisines. This is credited with hepatoprotective, anticarcinogenic, and antithrombotic properties and is found as a constituent in many Ayurvedic preparations. However, most of the medicinal attributes of the spice have not been substantiated adequately. Recently, the superoxide-scavenging and prolyl-endopeptidase inhibitory activities of the methanol extract of rampatrihave been reported [61]. On the basis of its antioxidative activity it shows NSAID induced gastric ulcer healing [62]. The active constituents of M. malabarica are Malabaricone B (MalB) and Malabaricone C (MalC). MalB and MalC, both two consituents, healed gastric ulceration by their antioxidative properties and modulation of EGFR expression, PGE2 synthesis and mucin secretion [63]. Mal B and C also accelerate healing of gastric ulcer by enhancing the level of VGEF, vWF factor VIII, and endostatin level [64].

6.10. Panax ginseng

The root of P. ginseng is a well-known Chinese drug widely used clinically for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders as well as an erythropoietic and a tonic. Sun et al. [65] have recently compared the antiulcer activity of water soluble and alkali soluble crude polysaccharides which were separated from the roots or leaves of P. ginseng.

6.11. Phyllanthus emblica

Phyllanthus emblica L. or Emblica officinalis Gaertn, also known as Indian gooseberry, is a medium size deciduous tree of the Euphorbiaceae family. The fruits of P. emblica L. known as amla are consumed as fruit or in the form of food products. Ayurveda and Siddha systems of medicine have recognized the importance of this plant. It is one of the strongest rejuvenatives among Indian medicinal plants due to its anticancer [66, 67], anti-inflammatory [68], and antioxidative properties [69].

A clinical study has also found that amla showed a significant healing effect on gastric syndrome [70]. Our previous report presents that ethanolic extract of fruits of P. emblica showed antiulcer activity at a dose dependent manner mainly through its antioxidative properties by modulation of IL-10 level [71]. We have also reported that a fraction of the active component of ethanolic extract of fruits of P. emblica showed antiulcer activity by modulation of COX [72] or NOS pathway [73].

6.12. Picrorhiza kurroa

It is a small hairy perennial herb from Scrophulariaceae family, distributed in the alpine Himalayan tract and in some tropical parts of India. P. kurroa forms a major ingredient of many indigenous medicinal preparations and is traditionally used for dyspepsia, bilious fever, chronic dysentery, and scorpion sting. The most important active constituents of the roots and rhizomes of P. kurroa are the iridoid glycosides, picrosides I, II, III, and kutkoside, Picroside I and kutkoside has been shown to possess potent hepatoprotective [74] and gastroprotective properties mainly through their antioxidative activity [75].

6.13. Piper betle

It is a medium sized shrub, placed under the family Piperaceae. It is commonly known as pan grows widely in the tropical humid climate of South East Asia. Its leaves have a strong pungent and aromatic flavor and are widely consumed as a mouth freshener. The leaves are credited with diverse medicinal attributes in the indigenous Ayurvedic system of medicine. The P. betle leaf oil is known to contain primarily a class of allylbenzene compounds such as chevibetol, chavicol, hydroxychavicol (allylpyrocatechol, APC), estragole, eugenol, methyl eugenol, monoterpenes, para-cymene and terpinene, monoterpenoids, eucalyptol, and carvacrol, as well as sesquiterpenes, cadinene, and caryophyllene. However, the presence of all these compounds depends on the region where it grows; the oil has been used in respiratory troubles, cataract, and also as an antiseptic [76]. Its antiulcerogenic [77, 78] activity has been reported. One of its active components, the allylpyrocatechol, shows the best antiulcer activity mainly by modulation of arginase metabolism and shift of cytokine balance [79].

6.14. Pistacia lentiscus

Mastic is the concrete resinous exudates obtained from the tree Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae) which is activated in the Mediterranean areas. It has been used there by traditional healers for the relief of upper abdominal discomfort, gastralgia, dyspepsia, and peptic ulcer [80]. The experiment showed a significant reduction in the intensity of gastric mucosal damage induced by pyloric ligation, aspirin, phenylbutazone, reserpine, and restraint cold stress.

6.15. Pteleopsis suberosa

In clinical trials, P. suberosa showed protective action against ethanol- and indomethacin-induced gastric mucosa damage due to the stimulation of PG synthesis, the most likely active principle being a saponin fraction [81, 82].

6.16. Shilajit

Shilajit is the most important drug of Ayurvedic and folk-medicine systems. In the raw form it is a bituminous substance, which is a compact mass of vegetable organic matter composed of a dark red gummy matrix. It is bitter in taste and its smell resembles cow’s stale urine. The botanical name of Shilajit is Asphaltum (mineral pitch). It has been used for ages in traditional medicine in the treatment of bronchial asthma, diabetes, genitourinary infections, wound healing, and stomach ulcer [83]. Antiulcer activity of 4-methoxy-6-carbomethoxy biphenyl (MCB) was studied on the basis of its effect on mucin content, gastric juice carbohydrate and carbohydrate protein ratio, and on the concentration of DNA and protein in the gastric tissue. The MCB induced changes in the mucosa and provided resistance against the effect of ulcerogens and also against shedding of mucosal cells. Further studies are however required to establish their therapeutic value and rationale for use in peptic ulcer disease.

6.17. Silybum marianum

Silymarin is a flavonolignan complex present in the milk thistle, Silybum marianum, which has been found effective in some types of experimentally induced gastric ulcers. The antiulcerogenic effect of silymarin could be related to its inhibitory mechanism on the lipoxygenase pathway, avoiding leukotriene synthesis [84, 85].

6.18. Sophora subprostrata

Sophora subprostrata is a plant used in China for the treatment of digestive diseases [86]. Flavonoids derived from sophoradin, isolated from the root of Sophora subprostrata, are known to exhibit gastroprotective and ulcer healing properties.

6.19. Spinacia oleracea

Spinach is an edible flowering plant in the family of Amaranthaceae. It is native to central and southwestern Asia. Spinach is a nitrate rich green vegetable. Petersson et al. observed that spinach, which gives a thicker layer of mucus lining of the gastric wall thus gives the protection from the hydrochloric acid secreted in gastric juice and reduces the risk of ulcers on rats [87, 88].

6.20. Tectona grandis

Parts of the common teak tree Tectona grandis have been used in formulations to treat peptic ulcer in Indian medicine. Its action appears to be associated with an effect on the protein content of gastric juice and it reversed aspirin induced changes in peptic activity, protein, and sialic acid [89].

6.21. The Unripe Plantain Banana

The medicinal properties of plantain banana are part of the tradition of folk medicine. Sanyal et al., [90, 91] for the first time, associated the plantain banana with antiulcer activity of banana against ulcer induced by phenyl butazone prednisolone and restraint stress. Later, Best et al. [92, 93] described the antiulcer activity of a variety of preparation of dried unripe plantain banana against aspirin induced ulcer in rats. They showed that only unripe plantain banana was effective both as a prophylactic treatment and also in healing the ulcers already induced by aspirin. Further studies reveal that banana increases the mucosal defence by promoting mucus secretion increasing mucoprotein content of mucosa, decreasing the shedding of cells and leakage of protein in gastric secretion in response to ulcerogenous agents, and promotes healing, as shown by the increase in thymidin uptake by gastric mucosal cells and by causing a concentration dependent increase in the eicosanoid stimulation in the incubates of human gastric and colonic mucosa [94, 95]. 70% endoscopically proved duodenal ulcer healed after 12 weeks of treatment with banana powder as compared to about 16% with placebo.

6.22. Zingiber officinale

It is widely used as a condiment and therapeutic agent in many countries [96]. In Saudi Arabian traditional medicine, it is used as antiemetic, stomachic, and carminative [97]. In Chinese medicine it is employed in colic and in atonic dyspepsia and is used as a stimulant [98]. Mowrey and Clayson found that it is highly effective in motion sickness and significantly reduces gastrointestinal distress in human subjects [99]. It has also marked antiulcer activity [100].

7. Discussion

Amongst the various factors known to cause gastric ulcer, widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is another major cause. NSAID is a “catch all” name for a large number of chemically distinct drugs. Functionally gastrointestinal tract is a complex organ. Drug induced functional modification of stomach could affect the normal physiology and lead to gastric lesions followed by generation of ulcer. The NSAID-induced stomach ulceration ranks fourth amongst the diseases causing morbidity and mortality. The solution of the NSAID-induced gastropathy has so far been elusive, despite recent advances, and continues to be of concern for both clinical practitioners and researchers.

Many drugs like H2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and antacids are currently being used for the treatment of NSAID induced gastric ulcer. But their long term use ultimately causes significant side effects and they are expensive for the less wealthy rural population [101]. India is among the most wealthy countries for medicinal plants and plant based Ayurvedic system of medicine is the oldest system of medicine in this part of the world. A search among medicinal plants is still important in producing effective antiulcer drugs mostly devoid of these factors [102].

7.1. Phytomedicine, a Better and Alternative Therapy of Gastric Ulcer

The term “nutraceutical” was coined from “nutrition” and “pharmaceutical” in 1989 by Stephen DeFelice. According to him, nutraceutical can be defined as “a food (or part of a food) that provides medical or health benefits, including the prevention and/or treatment of a disease” [103]. In recent years, many studies have shown that diet containing high content of phytochemicals can provide protection against various diseases. Approximately 90% of diseases are avoidable by changing dietary habits only [104, 105]. These inventions have rapidly amplified the consumer awareness of the potential benefits of naturally occurring compounds from plants in health promotion and maintenance. Hence, researches in nutraceuticals and natural health products have become the hot topics in the last few years [106108].

Hence, a search of nutraceuticals has become essential for the development of nontoxic, inexpensive, and easily available drugs to protect different diseases including gastric ulcer.

Various pure phytochemicals have also been tested for their antiulcerogenic actions. Some of these are segregated into their chemical classes and their efficacy discussed below.

7.1.1. Flavonoids

Flavonoids are a group of about 4000 naturally occurring compounds with a wide range of biological effects, including antiulcer activity. They are important constituents of the human diet and are also found in several medicinal plants used in folk medicine around the world [109]. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain their gastroprotective effect; these include increase of mucosal PG content [110], decrease of histamine secretion from mast cells by inhibition of histidine decarboxylase [111], and inhibition of H. pylori growth [112]. In addition, they are excellent free radical scavengers [113115].

Quercetin is one of the most abundant flavonoids, found in many medicinal botanicals, including Thea sinensis, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Hypericum perforatum, Ginkgo biloba, and many others. It increases the amount of neutral glycoproteins in the gastric mucosa [109], stimulates COX [116], and inhibits the gastric proton pump [109], the lipoxygenase pathway [116], platelet activating factor synthesis [117], and lipid peroxidation [118]. Further, it scavenges various free radicals effectively while enhancing glutathione peroxidase activity significantly [119]. Interestingly, it also inhibits the growth of H. pylori in vitro [112].

Naringin, a flavonoid glycoside has been shown to prevent chronic gastric ulceration caused by restraint stress, pyloric occlusion, and ethanol [120123]. Its gastroprotective action is mediated through a complex PG-independent mechanism that involves an increase in the glycoprotein content and viscosity of the gastric mucosa. Its antioxidant property might also [124126] contribute to its gastroprotective effect.

In India, like other parts of the world, market available medicines are widely used for the prevention of different diseases, like inflammation, hypertension, pain sensation, gastritis, cancer, and so forth. But long term use of such synthetic medicines ultimately causes gastroduodenal risks. So, there is a growing need to find naturally synthesized plant based medicines which are devoid of this side effect.

The healing potential of the plants is due to their ability to synthesize the aromatic substances such as phenols and flavonoids, which serves as defense mechanism against different diseases. These substances scavenge the free radicals generated on administration of NSAIDs and increase the cellular defense activity.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exert both their therapeutic and toxic effects mainly through the control of the activity of cyclooxygenase. But long term use of such painkillers inhibits the cyclooxygenases (COX) activity and decreases the levels of circulating prostaglandin (PG) at the gastric mucosa causing gastric ulceration and also exacerbating preexisting gastric ulcers in rodents and humans [28, 127].

The antiulcerogenic potential of the natural polyphenols (drugs) could be attributed to their divergent effects on angiogenesis. Gastric ulcer healing is a complex process involving angiogenesis and cell proliferation. All these eventually help in wound retraction and reepithelization by regulation of proangiogenic factors as well as antiangiogenic factors. Clinical and other experimental data consider the role of angiogenesis during NSAID induced gastropathy; the effect of the plant drugs may augment the growth of new blood vessels and decrease their ulcer healing action.

So, addition of neutraceuticals in daily habit is the alternate therapy to protect from different diseases by preventing oxidative stress and improving the stores of critical elements such as antioxidants, vitamins, and so forth.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. H. Zaman, “The Southeast Asia region,” in Traditional Medicine, R. H. Bannerman, Ed., pp. 231–239, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. Nakatani, “Phenolic antioxidants from herbs and spices,” BioFactors, vol. 13, no. 1–4, pp. 141–146, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Kanner and T. Lapidot, “The stomach as a bioreactor: dietary lipid peroxidation in the gastric fluid and the effects of plant-derived antioxidants,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1388–1395, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Gurbuz, C. Akyuz, E. Yesilada, and B. Sener, “Anti-ulcerogenic effect of Momordica charantia L. fruits on various ulcer models in rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 77–82, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Mahadeva and K.-L. Goh, “Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia: a global perspective,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 2661–2666, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Z. Ge and D. E. Taylor, “Contributions of genome sequencing to understanding the biology of Helicobacter pylori,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 53, pp. 353–387, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. R. Cave, “Transmission and epidemiology of Helicobactor pylori,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “H. pylori-induced gastric ulcer: pathophysiology and herbal remedy,” International Journal of Biological & Medical Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1461–1465, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. S. Tarnawski and M. K. Jones, “Inhibition of angiogenesis by NSAIDs: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 627–636, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Brooks, P. Emery, J. F. Evans et al., “Interpreting the clinical significance of the differential inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2,” Rheumatology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 779–788, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Lanas, M. A. Perez-Aisa, F. Feu et al., “A nationwide study of mortality associated with hospital admission due to severe gastrointestinal events and those associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1685–1693, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. E. Moerman, “An analysis of the food plants and drug plants of native North America,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Hossenbocus and D. G. Colin-Jones, “Proceedings: the effects of aspirin, carbenoxolone, and gefarnate on the gastric mucosal potential difference in man,” Gut, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 335–336, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Katoh, M. Tanaka, and H. Kawashima, “Protective effects of teprenone and gefarnate against taurocholate/hydrochloric acid-induced acute gastric mucosal lesions in rats,” Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 323–331, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. G. Payan and B. G. Katzung, “Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; nonopoid analgesics; drugs used in gout,” Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 6, pp. 536–559, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Brunton, B. Chabner, and B. Knollman, “Anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic agents: pharmacotherapy of gout,” in The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, W. H. Freeman, Ed., Goodman and Gilman’s, pp. 959–1004, Mcgraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 12th edition, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Yoshikawa, Y. Naito, A. Kishi et al., “Role of active oxygen, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidants in the pathogenesis of gastric mucosal injury induced by indomethacin in rats,” Gut, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 732–737, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. J. Hawkey and D. S. Rampton, “Prostaglandins and the gastrointestinal mucosa: are they important in its function, disease, or treatment?” Gastroenterology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1162–1188, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Wong and K. Freund, “Inhibition of the n-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine induced respiratory burst in human neutrophils by adrenergic agonists and prostaglandins of the E series,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 915–920, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. K. Jones, H. Wang, B. M. Peskar et al., “Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1418–1423, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. L. Wallace, “Recent advances in gastric ulcer therapeutics,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 573–577, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. N. Muscara and J. L. Wallace, “Nitric oxide. V. therapeutic potential of nitric oxide donors and inhibitors,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 276, no. 6, part 1, pp. G1313–G1316, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. L. Wallace, C. M. Keenan, and D. N. Granger, “Gastric ulceration induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a neutrophil-dependent process,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 259, no. 3, part 1, pp. G462–G467, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Piotrowski, A. Slomiany, and B. L. Slomiany, “Activation of apoptotic caspase-3 and nitric oxide synthase-2 in gastric mucosal injury induced by indomethacin,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 129–134, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. L. Wallace and M. J. Miller, “Nitric oxide in mucosal defense: a little goes a long way,” Gastroenterology, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 512–520, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. J. Hawkey, “Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peptic ulcers. Facts and figures multiply, but do they add up?” British Medical Journal, vol. 300, no. 6720, pp. 278–284, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. J. Lancaster-Smith, M. R. Jaderberg, and D. A. Jackson, “Ranitidine in the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug associated gastric and duodenal ulcers,” Gut, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 252–256, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Halter, A. S. Tarnawski, A. Schmassmann, and B. M. Peskar, “Cyclooxygenase 2—implications on maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity and ulcer healing: controversial issues and perspectives,” Gut, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 443–453, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Baatar, M. K. Jones, R. Pai et al., “Selective COX-2 blocker delays healing of experimental esophageal ulcers and inhibits ulceration-triggered c-Met/HGF receptor induction and ERK2 activation,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, pp. 542–553, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. L. Ma, P. D. Soldato, and J. L. Wallace, “Divergent effects of new cyclooxygenase inhibitors on gastric ulcer healing: shifting the angiogenic balance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 20, pp. 13243–13247, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. K. Jones, H. Wang, B. M. Peskar et al., “Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1418–1423, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Pawlik, P. C. Konturek, J. W. Konturek et al., “Impact of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on gastric ulcerogenesis in experimental animals and in humans,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 449, no. 1-2, pp. 1–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Brzozowski, P. C. Konturek, Z. Liwowski et al., “Interaction of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) with Helicobacter pylori in the stomach of humans and experimental animals,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 67–79, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Karthikeyan and K. Deepa, “Therapeutic applications of nitric oxide releasing non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,” Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  35. K. Takeuchi, H. Ukawa, A. Konaka, M. Kitamura, and Y. Sugawa, “Effect of nitric oxide-releasing aspirin derivative on gastric functional and ulcerogenic responses in rats: comparison with plain aspirin,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Fiorucci and L. Santucci, “Hydrogen sulfide-based therapies: focus on H2S releasing NSAIDs,” Inflammation & Allergy Drug Targets, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–140, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Zhi, A. D. Ang, H. Zhang, P. K. Moore, and M. Bhatia, “Hydrogen sulfide induces the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocyte cell line U937 via the ERK-NF-κB pathway,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1322–1332, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. Caliendo, G. Cirino, V. Santagada, and J. L. Wallace, “Synthesis and biological effects of hydrogen sulfide (H2S): development of H2S-releasing drugs as pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 17, pp. 6275–6286, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Cristoni and M. J. Magistretti, “Antiulcer and healing activity of Vaccinium myrtillus anthocyandosides,” Il Farmaco, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 29–43, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. J. Magistretti, M. Conti, and A. Cristoni, “Antiulcer activity of an anthocyanidin from Vaccinium myrtillus,” Arzneimittel Forschung, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 686–690, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Al-Howiriny, A. Alsheikh, S. Alqasoumi, M. Al-Yahya, K. Eltahir, and S. Rafatullah, “Gastric antiulcer, antisecretory and cytoprotective properties of celery (Apium graveolens) in rats,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 786–793, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Shibata, R. Yoshida, S. Motohashi, and M. Fukushima, “Pharmacologic studies on Bupleurum falcatum L. IV. Some pharmacologic effects of crude saikosides, saikogenin A and syrupy residue,” Yakugaku Zasshi, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1660–1667, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Yamada, K.-S. Ra, H. Kiyohara, J.-C. Cyong, and Y. Otsuka, “Structural characterisation of an anti-complementary pectic polysaccharide from the roots of Bupleurum falcatum L,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 189, pp. 209–226, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Swarnakar, K. Ganguly, P. Kundu, A. Banerjee, P. Maity, and A. V. Sharma, “Curcumin regulates expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 2 during prevention and healing of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 10, pp. 9409–9415, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M.-T. Huang, T. Lysz, T. Ferraro, T. F. Abidi, J. D. Laskin, and A. H. Conney, “Inhibitory effects of curcumin on in vitro lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activities in mouse epidermis,” Cancer Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 813–819, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Niederau and E. Gopfert, “The effect of chelidonium- and turmeric root extract on upper abdominal pain due to functional disorders of the biliary system. Results from a placebo-controlled double-blind study,” Medizinische Klinik, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 425–430, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. Prucksunand, B. Indrasukhsri, M. Leethochawalit, and K. Hungspreugs, “Phase II clinical trial on effect of the long turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn) on healing of peptic ulcer,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 208–215, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. F. Zhang, N. K. Altorki, J. R. Mestre, K. Subbaramaiah, and A. J. Dannenberg, “Curcumin inhibits cyclooxygenase-2 transcription in bile acid- and phorbol ester-treated human gastrointestinal epithelial cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 445–451, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Yoshikawa, T. Morikawa, N. Li, A. Nagatomo, X. Li, and H. Matsuda, “Bioactive saponins and glycosides. XXIII. Triterpene saponins with gastroprotective effect from the seeds of Camellia sinensis—theasaponins E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1559–1564, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. Morikawa, N. Li, A. Nagatomo, H. Matsuda, X. Li, and M. Yoshikawa, “Triterpene saponins with gastroprotective effects from tea seed (the seeds of Camellia sinensis),” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Maity, J. R. Vedasiromoni, L. Chaudhuri, and D. K. Ganguly, “Role of reduced glutathione and nitric oxide in the black tea extract-mediated protection against ulcerogen-induced changes in motility and gastric emptying in rats,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 358–364, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Maity, J. R. Vedasiromoni, and D. K. Ganguly, “Anti-ulcer effect of the hot water extract of black tea (Camellia sinensis),” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 167–174, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. Adhikary, S. K. Yadav, K. Roy, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Black tea and theaflavins assist healing of indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration in mice by antioxidative action,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 546560, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. A. Duke, Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1985.
  55. A. G. Turpie, J. Runcie, and T. J. Thomson, “Clinical trial of deglydyrrhizinized liquorice in gastric ulcer,” Gut, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 299–302, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. P. A. Bafna and R. Balaraman, “Anti-ulcer and anti-oxidant activity of Pepticare, a herbomineral formulation,” Phytomedicine, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 264–270, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. R. Dehpour, M. E. Zolfaghari, T. Samadian, and Y. Vahedi, “The protective effect of liquorice components and their derivatives against gastric ulcer induced by aspirin in rats,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 148–149, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. H. Matsuda, Y. Li, T. Murakami, J. Yamahara, and M. Yoshikawa, “Protective effects of oleanolic acid oligoglycosides on ethanol- or indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesions in rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 63, no. 17, pp. PL245–PL250, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. H. Saito, Y. M. Lee, K. Takagi, S. Shoji, and N. Kondo, “Pharmacological studies of Panacis japonici rhizoma,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1017–1025, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  60. V. B. Mehta, V. J. Sharma, M. F. Shaikh, P. D. Amin, and S. Sathaye, “Evaluation of antioxidant and immunomodulatory activity of Lagenaria vulgaris,” International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 393–398, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. F. Khanom, H. Kayahara, and K. Tadasa, “Superoxide-scavenging and prolyl endopeptidase inhibitory activities of Bangladeshi indigenous medicinal plants,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 837–840, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. D. Banerjee, A. K. Bauri, R. K. Guha, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Healing properties of malabaricone B and malabaricone C, against indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration and mechanism of action,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 578, no. 2-3, pp. 300–312, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. Banerjee, B. Maity, A. K. Bauri, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Gastroprotective properties of Myristica malabarica against indometacin-induced stomach ulceration: a mechanistic exploration,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1555–1565, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. B. Maity and S. Chattopadhyay, “Natural antiulcerogenic agents: an overview,” Current Bioactive Compounds, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 225–244, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. X.-B. Sun, T. Matsumoto, and H. Yamada, “Purification of an anti-ulcer polysaccharide from the leaves of Panax ginseng,” Planta Medica, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 445–448, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. T. Khan, I. Lampronti, D. Martello et al., “Identification of pyrogallol as an antiproliferative compound present in extracts from the medicinal plant Emblica officinalis: effects on in vitro cell growth of human tumor cell lines,” International journal of oncology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 187–192, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. E. Lambertini, R. Piva, M. T. Khan et al., “Effects of extracts from Bangladeshi medicinal plants on in vitro proliferation of human breast cancer cell lines and expression of estrogen receptor alpha gene,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 419–423, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Ihantola-Vormisto, J. Summanen, H. Kankaanranta, H. Vuorela, Z. M. Asmawi, and E. Moilanen, “Anti-inflammatory activity of extracts from leaves of Phyllanthus emblica,” Planta Medica, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 518–524, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. K. Bandyopadhyay, S. C. Pakrashi, and A. Pakrashi, “The role of antioxidant activity of Phyllanthus emblica fruits on prevention from indomethacin induced gastric ulcer,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Singh and Sharma, “Acid balancing effect on digestive system: clinical studies were conducted to investigate the effect of amalaki in amlapitta (Gastritis syndrome),” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 34, pp. 98–99, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  71. A. Chatterjee, S. Chattopadhyay, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “Biphasic effect of Phyllanthus emblica L. extract on NSAID-induced ulcer: an antioxidative trail weaved with immunomodulatory effect,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 146808, 13 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. A. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee, S. Das, A. Saha, S. Chattopadhyay, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “Ellagic acid facilitates indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer healing via COX-2 up-regulation,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 565–576, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. A. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee, A. Biswas, S. Bhattecharya, S. Chattopadhyay, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “Gallic acid enriched fraction of Phyllanthus emblica potentiates indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer healing via e-NOS-dependent pathway,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 487380, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. Y. Dwivedi, R. Rastogi, N. K. Garg, and B. N. Dhawan, “Picroliv and its components kutkoside and picroside I protect liver against galactosamine-induced damage in rats,” Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 383–387, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. D. Banerjee, S. Bhattacharya, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Chattopadhyay, “Picrorhiza kurroa—phytochemical and pharmacological evaluation,” in Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants, J. N. Govil, Ed., vol. 24, pp. 69–89, Stadium Press, Houston, Tex, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  76. H. Panda, Herbs Cultivation and Medicinal Uses, National Institute of Industrial Re, Delhi, India, 2004.
  77. S. Bhattacharya, D. Banerjee, A. K. Bauri, S. Chattopadhyay, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “Healing property of the Piper betel phenol, allylpyrocatechol against indomethacin-induced stomach ulceration and mechanism of action,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 27, pp. 3705–3713, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. B. Majumdar, S. R. Chaudhuri, A. Ray, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, “Potent antiulcerogenic activity of ethanol extract of leaf of Piper betle linn by antioxidative mechanism,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. K. Yadav, B. Adhikary, B. Maity, S. K. Bandyopadhyay, and S. Chattopadhyay, “The gastric ulcer-healing action of allylpyrocatechol is mediated by modulation of arginase metabolism and shift of cytokine balance,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 614, no. 1–3, pp. 106–113, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Al-Said, A. Ageel, N. S. Parmar, and M. Tariq, “Evaluation of mastic, a crude drug obtained from Pistacia lentiscus for gastric and duodenal anti-ulcer activity,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. R. de Pasquale, M. P. Germano, A. Keita, R. Sanogo, and L. Iauk, “Antiulcer activity of Pteleopsis suberosa,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 55–58, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. P. Germanò, R. Sanogo, M. Guglielmo, R. de Pasquale, G. Crisafi, and G. Bisignano, “Effects of Pteleopsis suberosa extracts on experimental gastric ulcers and Helicobacter pylori growth,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 167–172, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. R. K. Goel, R. S. Banerjee, and S. B. Acharya, “Antiulcerogenic and antiinflammatory studies with shilajit,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. A. Bindoli, S. Cavallini, and N. Siliprandi, “Accion inhibidora de la silimarina sobre la peroxidacion lipidica en los microsomas y mitocondrias hepaticos de la rata,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 26, pp. 2405–2409, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  85. C. Alarcon de la Lastra, M. J. Martin, and E. Marhuenda, “Gastric anti-ulcer activity of silymarin, a lipoxygenase inhibitor, in rats,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 929–931, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. K. Kyogoku, K. Hatayama, S. Yokomori et al., “Anti-ulcer effect of isoprenyl flavonoids. Synthesis and anti-ulcer activity of new chalone related to sophoradain,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2943–2948, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  87. J. Petersson, M. Phillipson, E. A. Jansson, A. Patzak, J. O. Lundberg, and L. Holm, “Dietary nitrate increases gastric mucosal blood flow and mucosal defense,” American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 292, no. 3, pp. G718–G724, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. H. Bjorne, J. Petersson, M. Phillipson, E. Weitzberg, L. Holm, and J. O. Lundberg, “Nitrite in saliva increases gastric mucosal blood flow and mucus thickness,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. K. Goel, N. K. R. Pathak, and M. Biswas, “Effect of lapachol, a naphthaquinone isolated from Tectona grandis, on experimental peptic ulcer and gastric secretion,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 138–140, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. K. Sanyal, P. K. Das, S. Sinha, and Y. K. Sinha, “Banana and gastric secretion,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 318–319, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. A. K. Sanyal, K. K. Gupta, and N. K. Chowdhury, “Banana and experimental peptic ulcer,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 283–284, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. R. Best, D. A. Lewis, and N. Nasser, “The anti-ulcerogenic activity of the unripe plantain banana (Musa species),” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. R. C. Elliott and G. J. F. Heward, “The influence of a banana supplemented diet on gastric ulcers in mice,” Pharmacological Research Communications, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 167–171, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. K. Goel, S. Gupta, R. K. Shankar, and A. K. Sanyal, “Anti-ulcerogenic effect of banana powder (Musa sapientum varpara paradisiaca) and its effect on mucosal resistance,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–44, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  95. R. K. Goel, I. A. Tavares, and A. Bennett, “Stimulation of gastric and colonic mucosal eicosanoid synthesis by plantain banana,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 747–750, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. M. Stuart, The Encyclopedia of Herbs and Herbalism, Orbis, London, UK, 1979.
  97. A. M. Ageel, J. S. Mossa, M. Tariq, M. A. Al-Yahya, and M. S. Al-Said, Plants Used in Saudi Folk Medicine, King Saud University Press, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 1987.
  98. J. D. Keys, Chinese Herbs, Tuttle Company, Tokyo, Japan, 3rd edition, 1985.
  99. D. B. Mowrey and D. E. Clayson, “Motion sickness, ginger, and psychophysics,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8273, pp. 655–657, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. A. Al-Yahya, S. Rafatullah, J. S. Mossa, A. M. Ageel, N. S. Parmar, and M. Tariq, “Gastroprotective activity of ginger Zingiber officinale rose, in albino rats,” American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 51–56, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. W. Toma, J. R. Trigo, A. C. B. Paula, and A. R. M. S. Brito, “Preventive activity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Senecio brasiliensis (Asteraceae) on gastric and duodenal induced ulcer on mice and rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 95, no. 2-3, pp. 345–351, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. F. Borrelli and A. A. Izzo, “The plant kingdom as a source of anti-ulcer remedies,” Phytotherapy Ressearch, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 581–591, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  103. P. Toniolo, A. L. van Kappel, A. Akhmedkhanov et al., “Serum carotenoids and breast cancer,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 153, no. 12, pp. 1142–1147, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. A. Swanson, “Vegetables, fruits, and cander risk: the role of phytochemicals,” in Phytochemicals: A New Paradigm, W. R. Bidlack, S. T. Omaye, M. S. Meskin, and D. Johner, Eds., pp. 1–12, Technomic, Lancaster, Pa, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  105. V. Brower, “Nutraceuticals: poised for a healthy slice of the healthcare market?” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 728–731, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. G. Block, B. Patterson, and A. Subar, “Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. D. Trichopoulos and W. C. Willett, “Introduction: nutrition and cancer,” Cancer Causes & Control, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–4, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. K. A. Steinmetz and J. D. Potter, “Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms,” Cancer Causes & Control, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 427–442, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. G. di Carlo, N. Mascolo, A. A. Izzo, and F. Capasso, “Flavonoids: old and new aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs,” Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 337–353, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. M. J. Alcaraz and J. R. Hoult, “Actions of flavonoids and the novel anti-inflammatory flavone, hypolaetin-8-glucoside, on prostaglandin biosynthesis and inactivation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 2477–2482, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. C. Bronner and Y. Landry, “Kinetics of the inhibitory effect of flavonoids on histamine secretion from mast cells,” Agents and Actions, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 147–151, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. W. Beil, C. Birkholz, and K.-F. Sewing, “Effects of flavonoids on parietal cell acid secretion, gastric mucosal prostaglandin production and Helicobacter pylori growth,” Arzneimittel Forschung, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 697–700, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. J. Baumann, G. Wurm, and F. Bruchhausen, “Prostaglandin synthetase inhibition by flavonoids and phenolic compounds in relation to their oxygen-scavenging properties,” Archiv der Pharmazie, vol. 313, no. 4, pp. 330–337, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  114. L. Cavallini, A. Bindoli, and N. Siliprandi, “Comparative evaluation of antiperoxidative action of silymarin and other flavonoids,” Pharmacological Research Communications, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. R. Salvayre, P. Braquet, L. Perruchot, and L. Douste-Blazy, “Comparison of the scavenger effect of bilberry anthocyanosides with various favonoids,” Flavonoids Bioflavonoids, vol. 11, pp. 437–442, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  116. M.-A. Moroney, M. J. Alcaraz, R. A. Forder, F. Carey, and S. R. S. Hoult, “Selectivity of neutrophil 5-lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase inhibition by an anti-inflammatory flavonoid glycoside and related aglycone flavonoids,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 787–792, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  117. A. A. Izzo, G. di Carlo, N. Mascolo, G. Autore, and F. Capasso, “Antiulcer effect of flavonoids. Role of endogenous PAF,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 179–181, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. C. Alarcon de la Lastra, M. J. Martin, and V. Motilva, “Antiulcer and gastroprotective effects of quercetin: a gross and histologic study,” Pharmacology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. M. J. Martin, C. la Casa, C. Alarcon de la Lastra, J. Cabeza, I. Villegas, and V. Motilva, “Anti-oxidant mechanisms involved in gastroprotective effects of quercetin,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 53, no. 1-2, pp. 82–88, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. N. S. Parmar, “The gastric anti-ulcer activity of naringenin, a specific histidine decarboxylase inhibitor,” International Journal of Tissue Reactions, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 415–420, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. M. J. Martin, V. Motilva, and C. Alarcon de la Lastra, “Quercetin and naringenin: effects on ulcer formation and gastric secretion in rats,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 150–153, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. V. Motilva, C. Alarcon de la Lastra, M. J. Martin, and J. Torreblanca, “Effects of naringenin and quercetin on experimental chronic gastric ulcer in rat. Studies on the histological findings,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 168–170, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. V. Motilva, C. Alarcon de la Lastra, and M. J. Martin, “Ulcer-protecting effects of naringenin on gastric lesions induced by ethanol in rat: role of endogenous prostaglandins,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 91–94, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. J. Robak and R. Gryglewski, “Flavonoids are scavengers of superoxide anions,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 837–841, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. J. Robak, F. Shridi, M. Wolbis, and M. Kerolikowska, “Screening of the influence of flavonoids on lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activity, as well as on nonenzymic lipid oxidation,” Polish Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 451–458, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. M. J. Martin, E. Marhuenda, C. Perez-Guerrero, and J. M. Franco, “Antiulcer effect of naringin on gastric lesions induced by ethanol in rats,” Pharmacology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 144–150, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. J. L. Wallace, “Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroenteropathy: the second hundred years,” Gastroenterology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 1000–1016, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus