Research Article

Ultrasonographic Imaging of Normal and Impacted Omasum in Indian Crossbred Cows

Table 1

The size and extent of omasal margins as measured ultrasonographically in the 7th to 11th intercostal spaces of clinically healthy cows and cows with omasal impaction.

GroupMeasurement (cm) in each intercostal space indicated as mean ± SD, (minimum-maximum)

Healthy cows ( 𝑛 = 1 0 )Dorsal margin11th10th9th8th7th
3 0 . 3 ± 2 . 3 1 3 1 . 3 ± 2 . 7 5 3 7 . 5 ± 3 . 1 4 4 3 . 9 ± 2 . 9 5 5 0 . 3 ± 3 . 4 9
( 2 5 . 3 3 5 . 3 ) ( 2 6 . 2 3 5 . 4 ) ( 2 9 . 6 9 4 1 . 3 2 ) ( 3 7 . 5 4 8 . 8 ) ( 4 2 . 4 5 6 . 7 )
Ventral margin 5 5 . 3 ± 3 . 4 4 6 1 . 8 ± 3 . 1 3 6 8 . 6 ± 3 . 5 3 5 9 . 4 ± 3 . 2 6 1 ± 3 . 7 3
( 4 5 . 5 5 8 . 2 ) ( 5 6 . 4 7 2 . 6 ) ( 6 0 . 3 7 9 . 5 ) ( 5 4 . 4 6 4 . 8 ) ( 5 6 . 6 6 3 . 3 )
Mean dorso-ventral extent§25.030.531.115.510.7

Cows with omasal impaction ( 𝑛 = 5 )Dorsal margin 3 2 . 1 4 ± 2 . 8 4 3 2 . 2 2 ± 2 . 6 3 3 8 . 3 2 ± 2 . 8 9 4 2 . 4 6 ± 2 . 6 2 5 2 . 2 1 ± 2 . 4 9
( 2 6 . 2 3 6 . 3 ) ( 2 6 . 1 3 6 . 4 ) ( 2 8 . 8 4 2 . 7 ) ( 3 4 . 4 4 6 . 2 ) ( 4 5 . 4 5 5 . 3 )
Ventral margin 5 4 . 1 8 ± 2 . 9 7 6 2 . 4 3 ± 2 . 5 1 7 0 . 4 3 ± 2 . 6 6 6 0 . 3 1 ± 2 . 8 3 6 2 . 2 6 ± 2 . 7 3
( 4 6 . 7 5 6 . 3 ) ( 5 6 . 8 7 3 . 9 ) ( 5 9 . 8 7 7 . 4 ) ( 5 2 . 1 6 6 . 3 ) ( 5 7 . 3 6 4 . 5 )
Mean dorso-ventral extent§22.030.232.117.810.1

§Significant differences were not observed in the results from cows with omasal impaction compared with healthy cows ( 𝑃 > . 0 5 , unpaired t-test).