Veterinary Medicine International

Veterinary Medicine International / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 4868797 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4868797

Haben Fesseha, Mesfin Mathewos, Friat Kidanemariam, "Anthelmintic Efficacy of Strongyle Nematodes to Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on Working Donkeys (Equus asinus) in and around Hosaena Town, Southern Ethiopia", Veterinary Medicine International, vol. 2020, Article ID 4868797, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4868797

Anthelmintic Efficacy of Strongyle Nematodes to Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on Working Donkeys (Equus asinus) in and around Hosaena Town, Southern Ethiopia

Academic Editor: Carlos Gonz lez Rey
Received27 Jan 2020
Revised13 Aug 2020
Accepted15 Sep 2020
Published24 Sep 2020

Abstract

Background. Gastrointestinal helminth parasite infection is a major influencing factor against profitability of working equines all over the world. Objectives. A study was conducted from October 2016 to May 2017 in and around Hosaena to determine the efficacy of benzimidazole (BZ) and avermectin (AVM) chemical groups against strongyle nematodes in working donkeys. Methods. A total of 230 donkeys from Hosaena, Soro, Anlemo, and Gombora were randomly allocated into 5 groups of 46 donkeys in each group. All groups, except group 1 (control), were treated with ivermectin 1%, ivertong 10%, fenbendazole, and Fenacure 750 mg, respectively. Fecal samples were collected perrectally before treatment (day 0) and after treatment (day 14), and an egg per gram (EPG) value of >200 was used as a cutoff for inclusion to assess the efficacy of anthelmintics. Results. Accordingly, the study revealed that AVM was effective against strongyle nematodes of donkeys with the mean fecal egg count reduction (FECR) of 100% in three study areas and 97.2% in one study area, respectively, whereas BZ resistance was suspected in the areas where the drug was tested, with the mean FECR of less than 94% in the three study areas. The study also revealed that 73% of the donkeys were affected with a severe degree of strongyle infection as determined by EPG, while 10.4% of donkeys were affected with a mild degree of Parascaris equorum infection. Conclusions. The findings of the present study are expected to serve as baseline data for future investigations and control actions to design realistic control programs to minimize factors that favor emergence of anthelmintic resistance and improve the overall health of the donkeys. Thus, further detailed studies are needed to determine the factors that reduce anthelmintic efficacy and increase anthelmintic resistance in donkeys.

1. Introduction

Helminth parasite infection especially gastrointestinal helminth parasite infection is a major influencing factor against profitable animal production especially equine all over the world [1]. An apparently healthy donkey can harbor over half a million gastrointestinal parasites such as protozoans, trematodes, cestodes, and nematodes. This is because the gastrointestinal tract provides a suitable environment for the survival and proliferation of many of these parasites [24]. Moreover, equids including donkeys, horses, and ponies are hosts to a large population of helminths belonging to 28 genera and 75 species of nematodes, 2 genera and 5 species of trematodes as well as 3 genera and 24 species of cestodes [5, 6].

Strategic parasitic control is necessary for the health of donkeys. There are several methods to control different internal parasites of donkeys, and the use of antiparasitic drugs is a widespread practice and has been the major form of control of internal and external parasites [7]. Among these drugs, phenothiazine, piperazine, organophosphates, benzimidazoles, and probenzimidazoles, imidothiazoles (levamisole), tetrahydropyrimidines (pyrantel), and avermectins are the major class of antihelmintic group used in most parts of the world. Benzimidazoles and probenzimidazoles interfere with energy metabolism within the parasite; imidothiazoles, tetrahydropyrimidines, piperazine, organophosphates, and avermectins interfere with parasites’ neuromuscular coordination [810].

Several types of anthelmintics with different modes of action are available in the market for the control of helminthosis. Nevertheless, the prevalence of anthelmintic-resistant intestinal parasites is a rapidly growing problem in the equine industry [8]. Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum anthelmintic drug which is an analogue of avermectin that belongs to a family of 16-membered macrocyclic lactones and known to increase membrane permeability to chloride ions, possibly as a result of their interaction with chloride ion channels. Besides, it has a wide safety margin that has made it the drug of choice for nematode and arthropod parasitism in cattle, sheep, goats, swine, donkeys, and horses [9].

In equine, according to different published reports, there is an increase in the resistance of strongyles, especially of those belonging to the subfamily Cyathostominae, which is a worldwide phenomenon. They are resistant to the benzimidazole derivatives (thiabendazole, mebendazole, cambendazole, fenbendazole, and oxfendazole), probenzimidazoles, and tetrahydropyrimidines (pyrantel embonate) [1, 11]. Ivermectin has been used for more than 20 years in equids, but up to now, there are no data about the appearance of resistance to this product in equid worms [9, 12]. Ivermectin has a high efficacy (>90% efficacy against adult strongyles and migrating larvae), and a residual effect is not seen with the benzimidazoles and pyrantel embonate [2, 13, 14].

Anthelmintic resistance develops when the parasites survive treatment and pass this ability of resistance to their offspring, resulting in the contamination of the premises with resistant strains. As this continues, the number of resistant worms increases and eventually the product is no longer useful in the treatment of these parasites. The use of anthelmintics and the biology of the parasite are two important factors that influence parasite selection for resistance. Anthelmintic usage includes dosage and route of administration, frequency of treatment, and mechanism of action. The frequency of treatment is regarded as the main factor in selection for resistance. The more frequently a compound is used, the more likely resistance may occur [9, 15].

There are various methods to determine parasite load and identification in the horse industry [16]. Fecal egg counts (FEC) and fecal egg reduction counts (FECR) are considered the simplest and least expensive options to determine the parasite load and how effectively the anthelmintic class being used is reducing the infestation. Several studies have suggested that the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) is the gold standard in in vivo screening tests to detect anthelmintic resistance [1, 16, 17].

The prevalence and impact of gastrointestinal parasites especially strongyle parasites have been studied in many parts of our country [1, 18]. However, the problem of anthelmintic resistance of strongyle parasites in donkeys has not been investigated yet. Moreover, there are limited data about its fecal egg count (FEC) reduction in donkeys following parenteral administration. Consequently, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two commonly used chemical groups of anthelmintics (benzimidazoles (BZ) and avermectins (AVM)) against gastrointestinal parasites of donkeys in Hosaena town, southern Ethiopia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted from October 2016 to May 2017 in and around Hosaena, the capital of Hadiya zone in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People’s Regional State, Ethiopia. Hosaena is the administrative center of the Hadiya zone at a distance of 232 km away from Addis Ababa and 168 km away from Hawassa, the regional capital. It has a latitude and longitude of 7°33′N and 37°51′E, respectively, with an elevation of 2177 meters above sea level. The mean annual temperature and rainfall are 16.9°C and 1071 mm, respectively. The area exhibits a bimodal rainfall system (long and short rainy seasons). The long rainy season extends from June to September, whereas the short rainy season ranges from mid-February to the end of April [7, 19].

2.2. Study Animals

The study animals were working donkeys kept by different peasant associations in and around Hosaena, Hadiya zone, Southern Regional State. The study includes donkeys of all age groups, both sexes, and kept under extensive management systems. The age of the selected working donkeys was determined by the dentition pattern as described in [20] and grouped as young (<5 years), adult (5–10 years), and old (>10 years). Body condition scoring (BCS) of the donkeys was estimated based on the guides described by Elisabeth [21].

2.3. Study Design and Sampling Techniques

A field experimental study design was conducted to assess the anthelmintic efficacy of two commonly used chemical groups of anthelmintics (benzimidazoles and avermectins) against gastrointestinal parasites of the donkey in Hosaena town. For this purpose, all fecal specimens were collected from the donkeys and subjected to flotation analysis using the McMaster method [22]. Initially, a total of 230 donkeys were examined for gastrointestinal parasites by using the McMaster technique, and the species of the helminths parasites were determined according to the technique described by Hendrix and Robinson [23]. This is the modified McMaster technique that was also used to determine the eggs of gastrointestinal helminths in horses.

Moreover, the donkeys were classified into different levels based on strongyle egg shedding or egg per gram of feces (EPG) according to the guidelines of Nielsen et al. [24] and Kaplan and Nielsen [25]. Accordingly, the donkeys are categorized into mild if the egg count level is within the range of 0–200 EPG, moderate if the egg count level is 200–500 EPG, and severe if the egg count level is greater than 500 EPG.

Helminth-infected donkeys were treated with four different brands of drugs (ivertong 10%, Fenacure, fenbendazole, and ivermectin) available in the market. Moreover, the donkeys were treated with these four different brands of antihelmintic drugs based on the presence of strongyle eggs in their feces (EPG ≥ 200 eggs/gram of feces) according to the previous work of Kaplan and Nielsen [25].

The doses of each drug were determined according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. Then, the donkeys were grouped into five experimental groups (46 donkeys per group). Accordingly, the donkeys in group I were left untreated as a control group, group II donkeys were treated with ivertong 10%, group III donkeys were treated with fenbendazole, group IV donkeys were treated with ivermectin, and group V donkeys were treated with Fenacure. The fecal egg count was determined before (at day 0) and after treatment (at day 14). Thus, the anthelmintic efficacy of the tested drugs was determined using a fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) [26].

2.4. Study Methodology
2.4.1. Sample Collection and Handling

All samples were taken at approximately the same time of the day, that is, in the morning, and processed within 24 hours of collection. Fecal samples were collected directly from the rectum or sometimes from freshly passed feces. Along with sampling, date, name, identification number, age, assigned group, and trial drug were recorded. Then, all fecal samples were transported from the selected site by using iceboxes and analyzed in the regional laboratory.

2.4.2. Anthelmintic Drugs Used in the Study for Assessing Anthelmintic Efficacy

All anthelmintic drugs used in the study were imported into the country by registered companies that are licensed to distribute veterinary drugs. The dosage and route of the application of all drugs used were based on the manufacturers’ recommendations (Table 1). Fecal samples were collected again 14 days posttreatment from all donkeys included in the experiment. All the drugs were within their expiry date and stored as per the instructions of the manufacturers.


Trade nameGeneric nameManufacturerDose per kg body weightRoute of administration

Granule FebendaFenbendazole 20%China7.5 mg/kgWith grain feed
Fenacure 750Fenacure 750 mgIndia10 mg/kgWith grain feed
IvervicIvermectin 1%China0.2 mg/kgOrally
FangtongIvertong 10%China0.2 mg/kgOrally

2.5. Data Management and Statistical Analysis

Data collected were stored in Microsoft Excel 2013. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13. The chi-square test was used to compare and measure the association between the prevalence of strongyle infections and age groups. A fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was used to determine the anthelmintic efficacy. The resistance of the drugs was tested according to the formula by Coles et al. [26] and World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) recommendations for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in equine and ruminants. Thus, the arithmetic mean of the egg count and nematode burden was calculated by the percentage reduction in mean egg excretion on the 14-day posttreatment.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Helminths in Donkeys

According to the present study, strongyles were highly prevalent in the donkeys of the study areas. Out of 230, all working donkeys (100%) in the study areas were found to shed nematode eggs while the Parascaris equorum (10.4%) is less prevalent in the study areas. Furthermore, the study on the degree of infection of strongyles as indicated by EPG revealed that 73% of the donkeys were with a severe degree of strongyle infection, while there was a 10.4% mild degree of P. equorum infection recorded in the donkeys of the study sites (Table 2).


Helminths (EPG)Total examinedDegree of infection (%)95% CIOverall proportion
MildModerateSevere

Strongyle egg2307 (3.04)55 (23.9)168 (73.04)2.49–2.68100
P. equorum egg24 (10.4)000.12–0.3210.4

3.2. Donkey Age and Fecal Egg Output

In the present study, the association between different age groups and fecal egg output was determined. Out of the total examined, young donkeys (<5 years old) were shedding more strongyles than the adult ones. Besides, there was a statistically significant association between the average number of eggs per gram of feces (EPG) and the age group of the donkeys (Figure 1).

3.3. Efficacy of Anthelmintics against Nematodes of Donkeys

A fecal egg count reduction test was performed in 230 donkeys. The EPG value of >200 was used as a cut-off for inclusion in the study to evaluate the efficacy of four anthelmintics (ivermectin 1%, ivertong 10%, fenbendazole, and Fenacure 750 mg) against strongyles and Parascaris equorum, in donkeys from four selected sites (Hosaena, Soro, Anlemo, and Gombora). The mean percentage efficacy of the four drugs in each site surveyed is reported in Table 3 together with the mean EPG value of pre- and posttreatment for each donkey group. Fourteen days posttreatment, ivermectin 1% and ivertong 10% were evaluated to be fully efficacious in all four areas, with the mean FECR of 100% in Soro, Anlemo, and Gombora and 97.2% in Hosaena, respectively, whereas reduced efficacy in fenbendazole and Fenacure 750 mg was suspected in all the areas where the drug was tested, with the mean FECR of less than 95% (Table 3).


Study siteTreatment groupNumber of animalsMean EPGFECR (%)Status of resistance
Before treatmentAfter treatment

HosaenaIvertong 10%111063.6360100Very susceptible
Ivermectin12991.72597.5Susceptible
Fenbendazole 20%111350142.889.4Resistant
Fenacure 750 mg121212.5112.590.7Resistant

SoroIvertong 10%121690030098.22Susceptible
Ivermectin11140000100Very susceptible
Fenbendazole 20%118900110087.6Resistant
Fenacure 750 mg1216200130091.9Resistant

AnlemoIvertong 10%112740040098.5Very susceptible
Ivermectin12159000100Susceptible
Fenbendazole 20%1227100330087.8Resistant
Fenacure 750 mg1118200100094.5Resistant

GomboraIvertong 10%121620040097.5Susceptible
Ivermectin11145000100Very susceptible
Fenbendazole 20%12133000100Very susceptible
Fenacure 750 mg11141000100Very susceptible

4. Discussion

In the current study, out of a total of 230 donkeys, 100% of animals were positive for the strongyles which indicate that these nematodes are the most predominant and widespread in the study areas. Parascaris equorum (10.4%) was the second most common parasite in the areas. This observation was comparable with the previous report by Hutchison and Mfitlidoze [27] in Australia, where 80% of horses were infected with gastrointestinal parasites. This study has shown that strongyles are highly prevalent in donkeys residing in study areas since all (100%) of the donkeys exceeded the cutoff value (200 EPG). One of the basic principles of selective anthelmintic treatment is a consistency of the relative magnitude of strongyle FECs of individual donkeys over time [6].

One possible explanation for higher EPG values in young donkeys could be that young donkeys generally harbor a greater number of mucosal larval stages than do older individuals, young (61.4%) and adult (38.6%), respectively [5, 28]. The development of an age-related immunity, which results in lower worm burdens in old individuals compared to the young, has been demonstrated in experimental studies using ponies of different ages [12, 29].

The decreased worm fecundity is another manifestation of immunity that could explain the age differences observed in mean EPG values. For example, it has been shown that immunity to strongyles in foals results in a reduction in worm fecundity [30, 31]. An additional reason for higher EPG values in young donkeys could be that the anthelmintic treatments performed previously were less effective in young donkeys compared to adult animals. This suggestion is based on the interactions that were found between anthelmintic treatment and donkey age.

According to the present study, there was a reduction in the efficacy of benzimidazole drugs against the strongyle of donkeys. Similar observations were recently reported by Lind et al. [32] in Sweden and Cernea et al. [33] in Romania. The reduction in efficacy recorded in benzimidazole drugs in the present study could be associated with a low frequency of anthelmintic treatment, poor quality of the drug compared to other anthelmintics, or the animal that develops acquired resistance through time, or the parasite which itself can mutate and develop resistance gene against the drug. The fact that anthelmintics can easily be accessed from illegal sources implies that this risk factor for antihelmintic resistance must be addressed through the expansion of veterinary extension programs. This finding supports the reports of previous studies [12, 31, 34]. This could potentially result in selective perpetuation of resistant isolates of the parasite, consequently posing the future risk of drug resistance as anthelmintic resistance is mostly inherited [1, 35].

In three of the study sites, namely, Hosaena, Soro, and Anlemo, fenbendazole (FBZ) had lower (<95%) fecal egg count reduction percentage which indicated that strongyle nematodes are resistant to fenbendazole. This may be due to frequent usage, species of the parasite, and poor management system. This report is in agreement with a field study conducted by Lind et al. [32] in Sweden and Cernea et al. [33] in Romania; the FBZ-treated groups met the criteria for resistance. However, studies carried out in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Germany by Traversa et al. [17] showed the effectiveness of fenbendazole against horse strongyles (99.49%). They reported that horses have been dewormed once per year or less or never. This may probably be the reason why the resistance against fenbendazole was not found in these reports.

All brands of avermectins had a fecal egg count reduction percentage greater than 95% in all study areas. This is in accordance with the result of Traversa et al. [17] in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Germany, Lyons et al. [36] in the USA, and von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. [37] in Germany from different horse farms. They reported that reduction in activity of ivermectin and moxidectin against small strongyles seems to be due to the survival of some of the luminal immature stages in the large intestines after treatment. This might be due to the absence of resistance which could also be explained by the low sensitivity of the FECRT to detect levels of resistance below 99% [2, 13]. Nevertheless, it is known that the FECRT is not a very sensitive method for the early diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance, and owners, as well as veterinary practitioners, need to consider how to use effective anthelmintics for donkeys.

Accordingly, based on the analysis, resistance to fenbendazole anthelmintics has been suspected that could be associated with a low frequency of anthelmintic treatment, poor quality of the drug compared to other anthelmintics, or the animal that develops acquired resistance through time, or the parasite which itself can mutate and is able to develop resistance gene against the drug. However, in the present study, based on the analysis, ivermectin was effective in the study areas. This was in contrast with the report of Papadopoulos et al. [38] who explained that fecal egg reduction following ivermectin treatment was reported to be significantly reduced and resistance was not detected in Greece. This was due to the fact that the monitoring activity applied to the efficacy of ivermectin against intestinal strongyles was very high. This difference in reduced efficacy in this study area may be due to drug usage strategies, the biology of the parasite, and the quality of the available anthelmintic drugs.

5. Conclusion and Recommendations

Both benzimidazoles (BZ) and avermectins (AVM) were the two commonly used chemical groups of anthelmintic drugs in and around Hosaena town to control the parasitic infestation. The present study showed that strongyles are highly prevalent (100%) in donkeys in Hosaena town, southern Ethiopia. The study reported a reduction in the efficacy of benzimidazoles used to treat nematodes of donkeys of the study areas. However, a single oral dose (14 days apart) of ivermectin drench formulation administered at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg body mass was highly efficient against naturally acquired infections of adult strongyle species and Parascaris equorum, nematodes in donkeys. In conclusion, control and preventive treatments with anthelmintics should be more integrated with other measures, such as supplementation of feed and good management, awareness creation to donkey owners by continuous veterinary extension about the importance of wise and smart use of anthelmintics including the effectiveness of these drugs, avoidance of frequent dosing and underdosing, and monitor drugs for resistance every two to three years. Besides, further detailed studies have to be planned and conducted to investigate the extension of this phenomenon in horse parasites covering wider study areas and different horse establishments in Ethiopia.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Z. Seyoum, A. Zewdu, S. Dagnachew, and B. Bogale, “Anthelmintic resistance of strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and fenbendazole on cart horses in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 5163968, 6 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. V. F. Martins, G. G. Verocai, T. R. Correia et al., “Survey on control and management practices of equine helminthes infection,” Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 253–257, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Y. Grisi, “Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in horses and donkeys in al diwaniyah governorate,” Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Veterinary Medicine Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 148–155, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Gelaye and H. Fesseha, “Assessment of socio-economic importance and major constraints of working equines in and around Debre Berhan Town, Central Ethiopia,” Medicine—Open Journal, vol. 5, pp. 30–38, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. M. Imam, H. I. Seri, T. Hassan, T. A. Tigani, H. B. Zolain, and A. D. Abakar, “Therapeutic efficacy evaluation of anthelmintics activity of albendazole and ivermectin drench formulations in donkeys in Darfur, Sudan,” Veterinarski arhiv, vol. 80, pp. 585–595, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. L. Duncan and S. Love, “Preliminary observations on an alternative strategy for the control of horse strongyles,” Equine Veterinary Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 226–228, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Moltumo, M. Mathewos, H. Fesseha, and M. Yirgalem, “Assessment of welfare problems on working donkeys in Hosaena district, Hadiya zone, southern Ethiopia,” Veterinary Medicine—Open Journal, vol. 5, pp. 14–20, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. P. Herd, “Equine parasite control—solutions to anthelmintic associated problems,” Equine Veterinary Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 86–91, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. M. Kaplan and A. N. Vidyashankar, “An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 186, no. 1-2, pp. 70–78, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. D. Perry and T. F. Randolph, “Improving the assessment of the economic impact of parasitic diseases and of their control in production animals,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 145–168, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. J. Bartram, D. M. Leathwick, M. A. Taylor, T. Geurden, and S. J. Maeder, “The role of combination anthelmintic formulations in the sustainable control of sheep nematodes,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 186, no. 3-4, pp. 151–158, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. B. Matthews, “Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes,” International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 310–315, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Martin, N. Anderson, and R. Jarrett, “Detecting benzimidazole resistance with faecal egg count reduction tests and in vitro assays,” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 236–240, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. Kirkova, K. Stojanchev, T. Hristov et al., “Efficacy of parenteral administration of ivermectin in the control of strongylidosis in donkeys,” Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, vol. 76, pp. 214–216, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. M. Kaplan, “Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 477–481, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Craven, H. Bjørn, E. H. Barnes, S. A. Henriksen, and P. Nansen, “A comparison of in vitro tests and a faecal egg count reduction test in detecting anthelmintic resistance in horse strongyles,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Traversa, G. von Samson-Himmelstjerna, J. Demeler et al., “Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin populations from horse yards in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany,” Parasites & Vectors, p. S2, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Sultan, G. Ayele, B. Tadesse, and A. Ahmed, “Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of horses and donkeys in kurfa chale district, east hararghe, Ethiopia,” Livestock Research for Rural Development, vol. 26, pp. 23–27, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  19. Hadiya Zone Statistical Agency, Basic Geographic Information, Report on Department of Hadiya Zone Finance and Development, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Regional State (SNNRS), Hadiya Zone Statistical Agency Hossana, Ethiopia, 2010.
  20. M. Crane and A. Svendsen, The Professional Hand Books of the Donkey, Whittet Books Limited, London, UK, 3rd edition, 1997.
  21. D. S. Elisabeth, The Professional Hand Books of the Donkey, Whittet Books Limited, London, UK, 4th. edition, 2008.
  22. B. Craven, “The role of extenso efficacy in the evaluation of anthelmintic resistance in horse strongyles,” Helminthologia, vol. 41, pp. 73–79, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. M. Hendrix and E. Robinson, Diagnostic Parasitology for Veterinary Technicians-E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4th edition, 2016.
  24. M. K. Nielsen, N. Haaning, and S. N. Olsen, “Strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses on farms using selective therapy in Denmark,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 135, no. 3-4, pp. 333–335, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. M. Kaplan and M. K. Nielsen, “An evidence—based approach to equine parasite control: it ain’t the 60 s anymore,” Equine Veterinary Education, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 306–316, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. C. Coles, C. Bauer, F. H. M. Borgsteede et al., “World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 35–44, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. Waller and S. Mfitlidoze, “Prevalence of GIT nematodes in Australian horses,” The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 64, pp. 104-105, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. M. A. Imam, Clinical and pharmacological investigation of a benzimidazole anthelmintic against donkeys’ worm infestation, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan, 2009.
  29. C. M. Monahan, M. R. Chapman, H. W. Taylor, D. D. French, and T. R. Klei, “Foals raised on pasture with or without daily pyrantel tartrate feed additive: comparison of parasite burdens and host responses following experimental challenge with large and small strongyle larvae,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 73, no. 3-4, pp. 277–289, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. E. Claerebout and J. Vercruysse, “The immune response and the evaluation of acquired immunity against gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle: a review,” Parasitology, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 25–42, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. B. Molento, M. K. Nielsen, and R. M. Kaplan, “Resistance to avermectin/milbemycin anthelmintics in equine cyathostomins—current situation,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. O. Lind, T. Kuzmina, A. Uggla, P. J. Waller, and J. Höglund, “A field mean fecal egg count reduction study on the effect of some anthelmintics on cyathostomins of horses in Sweden,” Veterinary Research Communications, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Cernea, R. T. Cristina, L. C. Stefanut, L. M. Madeira de Carvalho, M. A. Taulescu, and V. Cozma, “Screening for anthelmintic resistance in equid strongyles (Nematoda) in Romania,” Folia Parasitologica, vol. 62, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. A. Álvarez-Sánchez, J. Pérez-García, M. A. Cruz-Rojo, and F. A. Rojo-Vázquez, “Anthelmintic resistance in trichostrongylid nematodes of sheep farms in Northwest Spain,” Parasitology Research, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Silvestre and J. Cabaret, “Mutation in position 167 of isotype 1 β-tubulin gene of Trichostrongylid nematodes: role in benzimidazole resistance?” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 297–300, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. T. Lyons, S. C. Tolliver, M. Ionita, A. Lewellen, and S. S. Collins, “Field studies indicating reduced activity of ivermectin on small strongyles in horses on a farm in Central Kentucky,” Parasitology Research, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 209–215, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. von Samson-Himmelstjerna, B. Fritzen, J. Demeler et al., “Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 74–80, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Papadopoulos, K. Hamhougias, C. Himonas, and P. Dorchies, “Strongyle anthelmintic resistance in horses and cattle from Greece,” Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, vol. 151, pp. 1139–1142, 2000. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Haben Fesseha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views662
Downloads383
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.