Phylogenetic Analysis and Antibiotics Resistance of <i>Listeria Monocytogenes</i> Contaminating Chicken Meat in Surabaya, Indonesia

Aksono, Eduardus Bimo; Riwu, Katty Hendriana Priscilla; Estoepangestie, A. T. Soelih; Pertiwi, Herinda

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9761812

Veterinary Medicine International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 9761812 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9761812

Phylogenetic Analysis and Antibiotics Resistance of Listeria Monocytogenes Contaminating Chicken Meat in Surabaya, Indonesia

Eduardus Bimo Aksono,¹Katty Hendriana Priscilla Riwu,¹A. T. Soelih Estoepangestie,¹and Herinda Pertiwi¹

Academic Editor: Antonio Ortega-Pacheco

Received14 Nov 2019

Revised19 Jan 2020

Accepted05 Feb 2020

Published01 Mar 2020

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the phylogenetic analysis and antibiotic resistance of Listeria monocytogenes contaminating chicken meat in Surabaya. 60 chicken meat samples were collected from supermarkets, mobile vendors, and traditional markets in Surabaya. A selective medium is used for isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes by chopping 25 grams of the chicken meat and to put it into the sterilized Erlenmeyer flasks. Some methods were used for the identification procedures, such as biochemical and morphological tests, antibiotic resistance test, PCR, and sequencing; also a phylogenetic analysis was conducted by a neighbor-joining analysis using Genetix Mac ver 8.0 with hlyA genes of Listeria monocytogenes recorded in GenBank, such as Lineage I (KC808543), Lineage II (AY229462, AY229346, AY229499, and AY229404), Lineage III (KJ504139, HQ686043, KJ504116, and DQ988349), and Lineage IV (EU840690, EF030606). The result shows that the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in Surabaya contaminating the chicken meat samples from the supermarkets was 10% (2/20), from the mobile vendors was 0/20 (0%), and from the traditional markets was 5% (1/20). It was seen from the band at 456 bp fragment. Furthermore, three isolates found in Surabaya were included in the new lineages which were resistant to old-generation antibiotics such as sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim (SXT) and amoxyllin sulbactam (MAS), but they were still sensitive to new-generation antibiotics such as cefotaxime (CTX) and meropenem (MEM).

1. Introduction

The most popular animal protein source in Indonesia is chicken meat. It is cheap, delicious, and easy to cook; also, various dishes can be made of it. In 2018, Indonesia produced 2,144,013 tons of broiler meat; it increased then on 2016 by only 1,905,497.28 tons and the demand grows fast every year [1]. One of the biggest producers of broiler chicken in Indonesia is the East Java province. The harvest was collected in Surabaya as the capital city of East Java and also the biggest city in Indonesia after Jakarta before it is distributed to other cities and widely bought by customers from supermarkets, traditional markets, and mobile vendors.

With the increasing demand for chicken meat, people’s anxiety for food-borne diseases also arises. One of the agents causing it is Listeria monocytogenes [2]. This bacterium can be found anywhere in food, water, soil, vegetables, animals, and humans. In addition, it also has high potential to infect humans and animals with high mortality rates [3]. Human listeriosis has been reported in the USA being caused by consuming cantaloupe, smoked fish, marinated products, meat products, and vegetables which are contaminated with L. monocytogenes [4, 5].

According to Janzten et al. [6], Listeria genus is categorized as gram-positive bacterium that contains 6 species of Listeria: Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria ivanovii, and Listeria grayi. One of them known as the most pathogenic to humans is L. monocytogenes which consists of 4 lineages (lineages I, II, III, and IV) [7]. These bacteria can grow at the temperature of 1°C–45°C and they can proliferate at cold or freezing temperatures.

Fast food such as nonpasteurized meat and milk products stored for a long time at 4°C is a potential source of L. monocytogenes infection. Sometimes, L. monocytogenes can also be found in processed food products. L. monocytogenes contamination after food being processed is a critical point for human health. Therefore, considerable knowledge is needed so that the prevention of L. monocytogenes bacteria transmission in the environment or in food products from livestock and its dairy products can be done appropriately. Furthermore, a fast and accurate detection technique for the presence of L. monocytogenes in food is needed so that the infected individuals can be immediately treated [8]. Rodriguez et al. [9] also reported that the products most infected with L. monocytogenes are poultry and beef meat stored in refrigerator; smoked and fresh meat. Human listeriosis caused by L. monocytogenes is an intermittent disease with mild-to-severe flu symptoms as well as meningitis and septicemia manifestation. The group at risk are pregnant women and immunocompromised people. In pregnant women, it can lead to abortion, premature birth, and birth defects.

In Indonesia, food poisoning due to Listeria sp. infection, especially L. monocytogenes, is less frequent than from E. Coli and Salmonella bacteria. L. monocytogenes contamination in Indonesia has not been widely reported as in developed countries [10]. In Malaysia, it is reported that various local food sold by street vendors is ready-to-eat (RTE) food. High prevalence of pathogens is found in this kind of food. It is also found in raw food and RTE products sold in hypermarkets, although their hygiene is assumed to be better, but pathogens of foodborne disease and L. monocytogenes are also identified [11].

Typically, L. monocytogenes is susceptible to a wide range of antibiotics, although some isolates have been reported resistant to many antibiotics [12]. Some of the virulence markers of L. monocytogenes such as listeriolysin O (encoded by the hlyA gene) have a role in regulating virulence and pathogenicity [13]. Even in food, bacteria originated from environment can result in the expression of varied virulence genes that will result in different infection levels [16].

According to Harsoyo and Andini [10], Indonesian National Standards have actually established that food products of animal origin in Indonesia should not contain Listeria sp. bacteria, as well as in US and Europe. The Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) guidelines also emphasize proactive and risk-based modern food security system. Therefore, it is necessary to identify diseases affecting the population and the presence of pathogens in food and to establish risk mitigation measures [15].

The objective of this study was to identify phylogenetic analysis and the antibiotic resistance of L. monocytogenes contaminating chicken meat in Surabaya, Indonesia, especially for Ampicillin, amoxylin sulbactam, cefotaxime, meropenem, and sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim which are commonly used by broiler farmers as antibiotic growth promoters and therapeutic antibiotics in Indonesia [16].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Study Area, and Sampling

A cross-sectional prospective study was carried out in Surabaya metropolitan city. 60 raw chicken meat samples were collected from supermarkets, traditional markets, and mobile vendors as the main meat suppliers for Surabaya people, which included 20 samples from each place. Simple random sampling technique was employed for all the samples that were collected aseptically from randomly selected supermarkets, traditional markets, and mobile vendors in Surabaya. The meats were placed in sterile leakproof container in cold chain box. The samples were transported to the Tropical Disease Diagnosis Center (TDDC), Institute of Tropical Disease, Airlangga University.

2.2. Biochemical and Morphological Test

A selective medium is used for isolation and identification of L. monocytogenes. 25 grams of the chicken meat was put into the sterilized Erlenmeyer flasks, and 225 ml Buffered Listeria Enrichment was added and then homogenized using a vortex mixer for 2 minutes and incubated at 30°C for 24–28 hours [17]. After incubation, identification was conducted by taking bacterial suspension from the Erlenmeyer flasks with a transfer loop and then grazing it to PALCAM medium and then it was incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hours. The colony of L. monocytogenes on green PALCAM agar medium was surrounded by black zone [17]. The positive samples undergone blood medium hemolysis test at 37°C for 24 hours. It was conducted to see the forming β-hemolysis. Gram staining processing showed purple or violet color in the microscopic observation [17]. And then, Sulfide Indole Motility (SIM) test was done to identify sulfide, indole, and bacterial movement after being incubated for at 37°C for 24 hours [17]. Triple sugar iron test (TSIA) and glucose test were conducted to identify fermentation of glucose, lactose, and sucrose [17]. Methyl Red-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP) was performed to show pink color and the formation of acetyl-methyl carbinol [17]. The confirmation test (CAMP test) was used to identify umbrella-like bacterial growth due to excessive hemolytic zone around the grazed Staphylococcus aureus and Rhodococcus equi [17].

2.3. Antibiotics Resistance Test

The prepared pure culture was taken by sterilized cotton swab and spread over the surface of Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) and left for 5 minutes. Paper disc containing antibiotics was put on MHA with pure culture separated 25–30 nm and then incubated at 35°C for 24 hours [18]. The antibiotics sensitivity test was measured based on the inhibition diameter used vernier calipers. The antibiotics tested were Ampicillin, amoxylin sulbactam, Cefotaxime, Meropenem, and sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim and then the result was interpreted using the inhibition zone table from the National Community for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS) [17].

2.4. Listeria monocytogenes Detection with PCR

DNA extraction of L. monocytogenes was conducted with Kit Qiagen. 5 μl suspension from the extraction was used directly as template for CR amplification of hlyA gene fragments. 20 μl PCR reaction consisted of 12.5 μl master mix, 0.5 μl distilled water, 0,5 μl forward primer (F), 0.5 μl reverse primer (R), and 5 μl DNA template. The primers used were F: 5′-GCAGTTGCAAGCGCTTGGAGTGAA-3′ and R: 5′-GCA-ACGTATCCTCCAGAGTGATCG-3′ [19]. PCR conditions included predenaturation 95°C for 5 minutes, denaturation 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing 54.6°C for 30 seconds, extension 72°C for 1 minute 30 seconds, and final extension 72°C for 5 minutes. There were 35 cycles of PCR process. 5 μl PCR product was put into 2% electrophoresis gel and then used in electrophoresis medium of 100 volts for 60 minutes. After the electrophoresis, gel was then taken for observation with UV light. DNA target fragments’ visualization was shown at 456 bp with UV transilluminator [19].

2.5. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

2.5.1. PCR Product Purifying Result Using Low-Melting Agarose Methods

PCR product was acquired and then purified. The steps were as follows: (1) 2% agarose gel was prepared for L Agarose (Low-Melting Agarose) using ethidium bromide 1 mg/ml; (2) DNA from the PCR result about 5 μl was added with loading buffer for 1 μl. During application, the mixture was poured into every other slot. After the electrophoresis, the result was seen with UV light with 365 nm wavelength. The DNA band was then cut with a cutter (while being beamed with UV light, the cutter must always be washed after cutting every DNA band); (3) the piece of Agarose gel mixed with a DNA slice was inserted into 2 ml microtube; (4) the DNA in the gel was then purified with reagent QIAquick PCR purification kit from Qiagen by following the instructions attached in the kit.

2.5.2. Pure DNA Labelling

The result of the purifying was then labelled through prosequencing PCR process using hlyA gene primers (forward). In this procedure, the labelling was done using labelled dideoxynucleotide triphosphate dye, BigDye Termination Kit V.1.1 from Applied Biosystems. The condition of prosequencing PCR was 1 cycle of predenaturation at 96°C for 3 minutes, followed by 25 cycles which covered denaturation phase at 96°C for 10 seconds, annealing phase at 50°C for 5 seconds, and extension phase at 60°C for 4 minutes.

2.5.3. Labelled DNA Precipitation

DNA product from the prosequencing PCR was then precipitated with these steps: (1) 150–200 μl labelled DNA was put into the new microtube and then precipitated using ethanol with addition of 1/10x NaAc 3M (pH 5.2) volume for 15 μl and 2X ethanol 100% volume for 300 μl, mixed with the vortex mixer and kept at –20°C for 30 minutes; (2) centrifugation was done at 14,000 rpm for 10 minutes; then the supernatant was discarded carefully; (3) the pellet was washed with 550 μl 70% ethanol and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatant was discarded carefully; (4) the pellet was dried with vacuum pump for 10 minutes and resuspended with 10 μl of TE pH 8 solution; and (5) the DNA was kept at –20°C and ready for sequencing procedures.

2.5.4. Nucleotide Sequencing

After the DNA was purified using low-melting Agarose and labelled with hlyA primer gene, there was a sequencing procedure to get the nucleotide formation. The nucleotide sequence was determined with BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit, EDTA Hi-Di formamide, and special 0.5 ml tube from Applied Biosystems and also an automatic sequencing device, ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer.

2.5.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

Nucleotide model profile acquired from L. monocytogenes isolates in Surabaya was then analyzed phylogenetically using a neighbor-joining analysis using Genetix Mac Ver 8.0 with hlyA genes from L. monocytogenes recorded in GenBank: Lineage I (KC808543), Lineage II (AY229462, AY229346, AY229499, and AY229404), Lineage III (KJ504139, HQ686043, KJ504116, and DQ988349), and Lineage IV (EU840690, EF030606).

3. Results and Discussion

In Figure 1, the overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes in Surabaya contaminating the chicken meat samples from the supermarkets was 10% (2/20), from the mobile vendors was 0/20 (0%), and from the traditional markets was 5% (1/20). It was seen from the band at 456 bp fragment.

In Figure 2, from the phylogenetic analysis, compared to the 4 lineages recorded in GenBank, there were 3 isolates from Surabaya, Indonesia, which showed distinct lineages.

From Table 1, we can see 3 isolates of L. monocytogenes contaminating the chicken meat collected from the supermarkets or traditional markets in Surabaya, Indonesia, have been resistant to sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim (SXT) and amoxyllin sulbactam (MAS), but they were still sensitive to cefotaxime (CTX) and meropenem (MEM).

This study was not linear with that of Sugiri et al. [20] that showed that L. monocytogenes contamination found in supermarket was about 10% and traditional markets about and mobile vendors was 0% in Bandung City, Indonesia. However, it was also in line with the previous study which reported that L. monocytogenes prevalence found in chicken meat ranged between 15 and 35%, where the bacteria grew well in chicken meat which was kept at 0–8°C temperature without having been vacuumed and in 10 days the bacteria reached 10⁸–10⁹ cells/gram [8, 18, 21].

Ampicillin, amoxyllin sulbactam, cefotaxime, meropenem, and sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim are the most widely used antibiotic drugs in broiler farms in Indonesia as feed additive and growth promoter; they increase production and increase the efficiency of feed use [16]. This is associated with a high prevalence of respiratory infections, paratyphoid fever, pharyngitis, tonsillitis, varicella, typhoid fever, and tuberculosis during the 2008–2009 period in human case due to antibiotic resistance reaction [22].

The presence of antibiotics residues in chicken meat beyond maximum permissible limits is a matter of serious concern. Heat treatments can decrease the risk of some antibiotics groups but do not guarantee the complete degradation of these antibiotic residues present in meat. Some of the developed countries, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the European Union, have restricted the application of antibiotics for growth-promoting purposes. Training farmers to monitor withdrawal periods, banning the use of antibiotics as preventive treatment, and adopting the veterinary feed and drugs regulation are important parameters to mitigate the emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria related to broiler production [23].

Personal hygiene of chicken meat seller in mobile vendors and traditional markets in Surabaya is very poor because none of them wear masks and gloves. Rafikah et al. [24] explain that all personnel who work in the food processing should maintain hygiene; for example, they must wear clean clothes and equipment, apron, cap, masks, and gloves to minimize bacterial contamination of food product.

Although meat storage in supermarkets is better and cleaner than traditional markets in Surabaya, the condition of ready-to-eat foods (RTE) storage and display in supermarkets allows L. monocytogenes to grow and thrive in food even at frozen temperatures. Chen et al. [25] reported that L. monocytogenes was found in the food storage refrigerators, either edible food with little or no preheating process, so it can be a harmful threat for consumer. The presence of L. monocytogenes in chicken meat in traditional markets, mobile vendors, and supermarkets in Surabaya showed that during the production process, from the cutting to storage, L. monocytogenes contamination occurred; therefore, strict monitoring and preventive procedures are needed minimize it.

Antunes et al. [26] and Srinivasan et al. [27] explained that L. monocytogenes isolates from poultry meat and dairy product exhibited resistance to one or more antibiotics, indicating that animal products are potential carrier for antibiotic-resistant foodborne diseases. Listeria monocytogenes is naturally susceptible to β-lactams group antibiotic such as penicillin amoxicillin, meropenem, and ampicillin, or combined with an aminoglycoside (gentamicin) as standard therapy for human listeriosis [28, 29]. β-lactams against L. monocytogenes inhibit the synthesis of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan [30]. For patients who are allergic to lactams antibiotic, sulfamethoxazoletrimethoprim can be used [31]; however, Srinivasan et al. [27] and Yucel et al. [32] have reported that this antibiotic is resistant to L. monocytogenes isolated from meat and dairy farm product.

Resistant microbes strains that emerged owing to antibiotic misdose can tolerate the effect of antibiotics at inhibitory concentration levels [33]. Consumption of meat contaminated with such resistant strains after improper processing or mismanagement enhances the chances of their transmission in humans [34]. L. monocytogenes may transfer resistant genes to human natural microbes through mutation, plasmid mediation (self-transferable plasmids and mobilizable plasmids), conjugative transposons, and efflux pumps [35–38]. The presence of such resistant strains can reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics used to treat infected individuals [39].

Vazquez-Boland et al. [40] proved that there was correlation between the virulence level and the strain type from the bacteria isolated; the clinical origin has a lower virulence than the origin of the food. To ensure the presence of L. monocytogenes in the original environment, identification for one major virulence factor is a better choice. Among the various virulence factors, LLO (58 kDa hemolysin protein encoded by the hlyA gene) is a major virulence factor and pathogenic marker for detecting Listeria sp. The phylogenetic study of L. monocytogenes is essential to improve our understanding on how L. monocytogenes is transmitted from animals or the environment through food to humans. The results showed that all three isolates contaminating chicken meat in Surabaya formed distinctive lineages, as they were not included in 4 previously reported lineages [7].

In the present study, the result of antibiotic resistance test showed that the three isolates from Surabaya, Indonesia, that contaminated chicken meat in supermarkets, mobile vendors, and traditional markets were resistant to some old-generation antibiotics such as sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim (SXT) and amoxyllin sulbactam (MAS), but they were still sensitive to new-generation antibiotics such as cefotaxime (CTX) and meropenem (MEM).

Meropenem in monotherapy has been found active against intracellular L. monocytogenes infection on meningitis case in the experimental study; it was 10-fold more potent than ampicillin and ertapenem [41]. Meropenem has bacteriostatic effect after 5 hours of treatment and starts bactericidal effect after 24 hours [42]; it could initiate bacterial severe cell damages [41].

Cefotaxime is a bactericidal derived from cephalosporin; it has a broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive microorganisms and exceptional activity against most gram-negative microorganisms by interfering with synthesis of their cell walls. It is widely considered to be the antibiotic of choice for the management of neonatal meningitis and sepsis caused by gram-negative bacteria including L. monocytogenes [43]. Cefotaxime has received wide acceptance as a first-line antibiotic for many infections in neonates, infants, and children. Cefotaxime caused a significant enhancement of IL-2 production by cells and increased the secretion of TNF-αby peripheral blood mononuclear cells; it is also suggested that it may modify the host immune response. Cefotaxime is a safe and effective antibiotic in treating meningitis bacterial infections, of which 80% of these microorganisms are resistant to ampicillin [43].

This result was different from previous studies showing that Listeria sp. is generally still sensitive to all antibiotics [44]. It cannot be separated from the habit of inappropriate use of antibiotics in livestock industry and communities in some developing countries including Indonesia. Therefore, efforts to raise awareness on the importance of the correct use of antibiotics regarding the dose and duration should be a concern of both government and communities.

4. Conclusion

The contamination of L. monocytogenes in chicken meat in supermarkets, mobile vendors, and traditional markets in Surabaya indicates the potential listeriosis distribution. Moreover, the three isolates found were included as distinctive lineages and already resistant to old-generation antibiotics such as sulfamethonazole-trimetophrim (SXT) and amoxyllin sulbactam (MAS). Therefore, surveillance policies for potential food contamination and antibiotic sensitivity of L. monocytogenes are required, while also ensuring effective antibiotic treatment.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia, for providing the financial support of this study.

References

BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik), “National meat production Indonesia 2019,” in Central Bureau of National Statistic 2019, Central Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Jamali, L. C. Chai, and K. L. Thong, “Detection and isolation of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods with various selective culture media,” Food Control, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Liu, “Epidemiology,” in Handbook of Listeria Monocytogenes, D. Liu, Ed., pp. 27–30, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
CDC-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with jensen farms cantaloupe. United States, August-September 2011,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 60, no. 39, pp. 1357-1358, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Meloni, P. Galluzzo, A. Mureddu, F. Piras, M. Griffiths, and R. Mazzette, “Listeria monocytogenes in RTE foods marketed in Italy: prevalence and automated EcoRI ribotyping of the isolates,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 166–173, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Janzten, J. Navas, J. Mreno, Lpoez, and J. V. Suarez, “Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food using commercial methods: chromogen media-PCR,” Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 235–247, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Mohamed, W. W. Reda, K. Abdel-Moein et al., “Prevalence and phylogenetic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from processed meat marketed in Egypt,” Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ariyanti, “Bacteria Listeria monocytogenes as food contaminants from animal origin (foodborne disease),” Wartazoa, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
C. S. Rodrigues, C. V. G. C. de Sa, and C. B. de Melo, “An overview of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in ready to eat meat, dairy and fishery foods,” Ciencia Rural, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Harsoyo and L. Andini, Effect of Irradiation and Storage of Listeria Monocytogenes Inoculated in Goat Meat. Pros. Nas. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology. Bogor, 30 September-1 October 2002, Center for Animal Husbandry, Bogor, Indonesia, 2002.
J. Ponniah, T. Robin, M. S. Paie et al., “Listeria monocytogenes in raw salad vegetables sold at retail level in Malaysia,” Food Control, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 774–778, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Nwachukwu, F. A. Orji, I. Iheukwumere, and U. G. Ekeleme, “Antibiotic resistant environmental isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from anthropogenic lakes in Lokpa-Ukwu, Abia State of Nigeria,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 1571–1576, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
D. K. Soni and S. K. Dubey, “Phylogenetic analysis of the Listeria monocytogenes based on sequencing of 16S rRNA and hlyA genes,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 8219–8229, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Chatterjee, H. Hossain, S. Otten et al., “Intracellular gene expression profile of Listeria monocytogenes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 1323–1338, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. B. Dubugras and E. Perez-Gutierrez, “Perspectiva sobre a análise de risco na segurança dos alimentos,” in Curso de Sensibilização. Rio de Janeiro: Área de Vigilância Sanitária, Prevençãoe Controle de Doenças, 160 pages, OPAS/OMS, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Etikaningrum, “Study of antibiotics residue on poultry produscts in Indonesia,” Journal of Animal Husbandry Production and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–33.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Standardization Board, Indonesian National Standard (SNI). SNI No. 2897: 2008 Concerning Methods of Testing Microbial Contamination in Meat, Eggs and Milk, and Their Processed Products, BSN, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2008.
K. H. P. Riwu, “Identification of Listeria monocytogenes bacteria in chicken meat in several supermarkets and traditional markets in the city of Surabaya by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method,” Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 2018, Thesis. Master of Science Disease and Veterinary Health Study Program.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Paziak-Domanska, E. Bogulawska, M. Wiekowska-Szakiel et al., “Evaluation of the API test, phathylinlinositol-specific phospholipase C activity and PCR method in identification of Listeria monocytogenes in meat foods,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 171, pp. 209–214, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. D. Sugiri, G. Gölz, T. Meeyam et al., “Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes on chicken carcasses in Bandung, Indonesia,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1407–1410, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rivoal, S. Quéguiner, E. Boscher et al., “Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in raw and pasteurized liquid whole eggs and characterization by PFGE,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 138, no. 1-2, pp. 56–62, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. S. Pradipta, H. Hartanto, A. D. Kartikawati et al., “Three years of antibacterial consumption in Indonesian Community Health Centers: the application of anatomical therapeutic chemical/defined daily doses and drug utilization 90% method to monitor antibacterial use,” Journal of Family and Community Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Muaz, M. Riaz, S. Akhtar, S. Park, and A. Ismail, “Antibiotic residues in chicken meat: global prevalence, threats, and decontamination strategies: a review,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 619–627, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rafikah, Irmawaty, and K. Kiramang, “The level of contamination of Escherichia coli bacteria in chicken meat sold in Makassar traditional markets,” in Proceedings of the Indonesian National Megabiodiversity Seminar, Makasar, Indonesia, April 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-Q. Chen, P. Regan, P. Laksanalamai, S. Healey, and Z. Hu, “Prevalence and methodologies for detection, characterization and subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes and L. ivanovii in foods and environmental sources,” Food Science and Human Wellness, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 97–120, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Antunes, C. Réu, J. C. Sousa, N. Pestana, and L. Peixe, “Incidence and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes isolated from poultry carcasses in porto, Portugal,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1888–1893, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Srinivasan, H. M. Nam, L. T. Nguyen, B. Tamilselvam, S. E. Murinda, and S. P. Oliver, “Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes in Listeria monocytogenesIsolated from dairy farms,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 201–211, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sanlibaba, G. A. Cakmak, and B. U. Tezel, “Prevalence and antibiotic resistantce of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from ready-to-eat food in Turkey,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 2018, Article ID 7693782, 9 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Al-Nabulsi, T. M. Osaili, R. R. Shaker et al., “Effects of osmotic pressure, acid, or cold stresses on antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria monocytogenes,” Food Microbiology, vol. 46, pp. 154–160.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Miller, J. M. Munita, and C. A. Arias, “Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in enterococci,” Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1221–1236, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Swaminathan and P. Gerner-Smidt, “The epidemiology of human listeriosis,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1236–1243, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Yücel, S. Çıtak, and M. Önder, “Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Listeria species in meat products in Ankara, Turkey,” Food Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 2-3, pp. 241–245, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
CDC-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Get Smart: Know when Antibiotics Work, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, 2010.
A. Van Den Bogaard and E. E. Stobberingh, “Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics Links between animals and humans,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 327–335, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hershberger, S. F. Oprea, S. M. Donabedian et al., “Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 127–130, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Gould, “The epidemiology of antibiotic resistance,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 32, pp. S2–S9, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Charpentier, G. Gerbaud, C. Jacquet, J. Rocourt, and P. Courvalin, “Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Listeria species,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 277–281, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Godreuil, M. Galimand, G. Gerbaud, C. Jacquet, and P. Courvalin, “Efflux pump Lde is associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Listeria monocytogenes,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 704–708, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chastre, “Evolving problems with resistant pathogens,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 14, pp. 3–14, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Vazquez-Boland, M. Kuhn, P. Berche et al., “Listeria pathogenesis and molecular virulence determinants,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 584–640, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lemaire, F. V. Bambeke, P. Tulkens, and M. P. Mingeot-Leclercq, “Activity of three β-lactams (ertapenem, meropenem, and ampicillin) against intraphagocytic Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Carryn, F. Van Bambeke, M. P. Mingeot-Leclercq et al., “Activity of beta-lactams (ampicillin, meropenem), gentamicin, azithromycin and moxifloxacin against intracellular Listeria monocytogenes in a 24 h THP-1 human macrophage model,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1051-1052, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Pacifici and G. Marchini, “Clinical pharmacology of cefotaxime in neonates and infants: effects and pharmacokinetics,” International Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 6111–6138, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Jamali, M. Paydar, S. Ismail et al., “Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulotyping of Listeria species and Listeria monocytogenes isolated from open- water fish markets,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 15, p. 144, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Eduardus Bimo Aksono et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1467

Downloads

1211

Citations