Research Article
Evaluation of In-House ELISA for Antirabies Antibodies Detection in Domestic Canine
Table 7
Interassay agreement among three ELISA kits with RFFIT.
| Methods | Pusvetma vs. RFFIT | Platelia II vs. RFFIT | BukTi-Vet vs. RFFIT | Coeff. | 95% C.I | Coeff. | 95% CI | Coeff. | 95% CI |
| Cohen’s kappa | 0.64 | 0.35–0.93 | 0.72 | 0.49–0.95 | 0.80 | 0.58–1 | Scott’s pi | 0.64 | 0.35–0.94 | 0.71 | 0.47–0.95 | 0.80 | 0.58–1 | Krippendorff’s alpha | 0.64 | 0.35–0.94 | 0.72 | 0.47–0.96 | 0.80 | 0.58–1 | Gwet’s AC1 | 0.84 | 0.69–0.99 | 0.83 | 0.68–0.99 | 0.91 | 0.79–1 | Brennan–Prediger | 0.78 | 0.59–0.97 | 0.79 | 0.61–0.97 | 0.87 | 0.73–1 | Percent agreement | 0.89 | 0.79–0.98 | 0.89 | 0.80–0.90 | 0.94 | 0.86–1 |
|
|
Note. Altman benchmark for agreement coefficients [ 21]: very good (0.8–1), good (0.6–0.8), moderate (0.4–0.6), fair (0.2–0.4), and poor (<0.2). |