Spatial and Seasonal Patterns of Tick Infestations in Kassena-Nankana Livestock

Offei Addo, Seth; Essah Bentil, Ronald; Olivia Ama Baako, Bernice; Ansah-Owusu, Jane; Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah, Christopher; Behene, Eric; Asoala, Victor; Dunford, James C.; Asiedu Larbi, John; Kweku Baidoo, Philip; David Wilson, Michael; Diclaro, Joseph W.; Dadzie, Samuel K.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8889907

Veterinary Medicine International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 8889907 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8889907

Spatial and Seasonal Patterns of Tick Infestations in Kassena-Nankana Livestock

Seth Offei Addo,^1,2Ronald Essah Bentil,¹Bernice Olivia Ama Baako,³Jane Ansah-Owusu,¹Christopher Nii Laryea Tawiah-Mensah,¹Eric Behene,¹Victor Asoala,³James C. Dunford,^4,5John Asiedu Larbi,²Philip Kweku Baidoo,²Michael David Wilson,¹and Joseph W. Diclaro⁶ et al.

Academic Editor: Nora Mestorino

Received06 Jul 2023

Revised07 Sept 2023

Accepted09 Dec 2023

Published09 Jan 2024

Abstract

The ability of ticks to adapt to different ecological zones, coupled with the spread of infectious pathogens negatively affects livestock production and thus, there is a need for better control strategies. However, control measures within a geographical region can only be effective if there is available information on tick population dynamics and ecology. This study focused on ticks infesting livestock in the Kassena-Nankana Districts of the Upper East Region of Ghana. The ticks were morphologically identified, variables such as season, animal host, and predilection sites were recorded, and the data were analyzed using STATA version 13. Out of 448 livestock examined, tick infestation in cattle was (78.60%), followed by sheep (25%) and goats (5.88%). A total of 1,550 ticks including nymphs (303) and adults (1,247) were collected. Adult ticks were found to be significantly associated with season (), with a high burden in the wet season. The nymph burden and body parts of livestock hosts were significantly associated with more nymphs collected from male animals than females (). Three genera of ticks, Amblyomma (62.97%), Hyalomma (18.71%), and Rhipicephalus (18.32%) were morphologically identified with the most predominant tick species recorded as Amblyomma variegatum (62.97%). Matured A. variegatum was sampled primarily in the wet season with their predilection site as the udder/scrotum (). However, adult Hyalomma truncatum was observed to have a significant association with the anal region (). Findings from this study are essential for formulating tick control measures to prevent the spread of infectious pathogens.

1. Introduction

Ticks play a significant role in the transmission of infectious pathogens, acting as obligate blood-sucking vectors that cause not only skin damage but also facilitate the spread of diseases [1]. Although a majority of the tick-borne pathogens primarily affect livestock health, there are some zoonotic pathogens responsible for human disease [2, 3]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have reported a notable increase in tick-borne infections, a trend expected to continue [4]. This has raised much concern as control measures are ineffective and vaccines are limited [5]. In Africa, tick-borne diseases are particularly problematic, leading to livestock mortalities ranging from 10 to 80%, profoundly impacting farmers’ livelihoods [6, 7]. Complex interactions between humans, environmental conditions, and biological factors make the management of these diseases challenging [8]. Also, these factors influence the tick burden on hosts [9], thus affecting the efficacy of tick control [10, 11]. With the level of tick infestation in animals serving as a focal point for controlling tick-borne diseases [7], it is essential to determine the animal hosts that are mostly infested [12] and their preferred resting sites on livestock.

Tick species’ predilection for unique ecological conditions affects both their spread and the likelihood of tick-borne diseases that are connected with it [13]. Furthermore, ticks multiply and spread throughout an area by adjusting to animal and bird migratory patterns [14]. In Africa, livestock are mostly infested by hard ticks of the genera Amblyomma, Hyalomma, and Rhipicephalus [15]. These ticks have been identified in Ghana to harbour pathogens including Dugbe Virus [16] and Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHFV) [17]. To control these tick species in Ghana, chemical control methods are often employed. However, there is very little information on the bionomics of ticks, seasonal variations in their distribution, and predilection sites on livestock.

The majority of people in Ghana’s Upper East Region raise livestock for both food and profit. Some of these livestock are imported from Burkina Faso, increasing the risk of tick species invasion and the spread of infectious pathogens. The continuous trade of livestock which could be amplifying hosts for infectious zoonotic pathogens [18], coupled with potential tick vectors suggests the need to control prevailing tick populations. Again, increasing levels of tick infestation would negatively affect livestock production in the Kassena-Nankana Districts, leading to significant economic loss for small-scale farmers. In order to provide a baseline for the development and administration of effective tick control strategies, this study set out to evaluate the distribution of tick species and their site of preference on hosts.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Sites

Sites in the Upper East Regions’ Kassena-Nankana Districts were chosen for this investigation. Livestock is emphasised as a significant economic activity in these sites. The districts’ vegetation is Guinea Savannah, with two distinct seasons: the wet season, which runs from May to October, and the dry season, which runs from November to April. The majority of people living in the district engages in agriculture and raises livestock for both food and profit [19].

2.2. Ethical Approval

The University of Ghana Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee gave its approval to this study (UG-IACUC; UG-IACUC 001/19-20).

2.3. Sample Size and Tick Collection

Using Epi Info version 6, a required sample size of a minimum of 248 livestock was calculated.

The following criteria were used to calculate sample size: according to estimates from a local veterinarian, the livestock population was 5,000, with a predicted prevalence rate of 21.6% [20], a 5% error margin, and a 95% confidence level. The collection of ticks was done between February and December 2020, covering the wet and dry seasons. Three collections each were done in the wet and dry seasons. Ticks were manually removed from randomly chosen livestock, such as sheep, goats, and cattle, at each sampling location. Each animal was restrained and ticks were removed using blunt forceps from various sites of attachments on the host. Following their sorting according to the host’s collecting site, the ticks were transferred to the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research and preserved in correctly labelled 2 ml Eppendorf tubes containing RNA. Using the given taxonomic keys, the ticks were identified morphologically in the laboratory [21].

2.4. Data Analysis

STATA version 13 was used to perform the statistical analysis. The relationship between tick burden and animal traits as well as season was examined using a univariate and multiple variable mixed effect negative binomial regression model. The negative binomial regression model was used to avoid overdispersion. The significance level was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics and Distribution of Ticks Collected

A total of 448 livestock were screened for tick infestation out of which 54.24% were cattle, 26.79% were sheep, and 18.97% were goats. The majority of the livestock were females (69.87%) and were below 4 years old (Table 1). In total, 1,550 ticks consisting of 303 nymphs and 1,247 adults were collected and identified. Nymphs were collected from only cattle with the majority infesting males (80.53%, ) and cattle that were 3 years and younger (50.17%). From the risk analysis, male cattle () were at an increased risk of nymph infestation with the udder/scrotum () and chest () as the most preferred sites of attachment (Table 2).

Adult ticks were collected from mostly cattle (84.36%), followed by sheep (14.60%) and then goats (1.04%). It was observed that adult tick infestation was more common in female livestock (64.39%), livestock ≤3 years old (51.64%), and the ticks were often attached to the udder/scrotum (42.26%). It was observed that season is a risk factor for adult tick infestation with an increased burden in the wet season () (Table 3).

3.2. Seasonal Distribution of Tick Species

The ticks identified were Amblyomma variegatum (62.98%), Hyalomma rufipes (10.9%), Hyalomma truncatum (7.81%), Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi (12%), Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) sp. (5.35%), Rhipicephalus geigyi (0.9%), and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (s.l.) (0.06%).

Generally, more ticks were collected in the wet season (n = 837, 54%) compared to the dry season (n = 713, 46%). There was a significant difference in the distribution of adult A. variegatum in the wet season as compared to the dry season (). No significant differences were seen for the other identified tick species (Table 4). All the nymphs were collected in the dry season.

4. Predilection Sites of Tick Species

Out of the 1,550 ticks collected, the preferred sites of attachment on livestock were; udder/scrotum (n = 704, 45.42%), anal (n = 489, 31.55%), chest (n = 335, 21.61%), limbs (n = 18, 1.16%), and head (n = 4, 0.26%). Adult A. variegatum had a significant association with the udder/scrotum of sampled livestock (). However, adult H. truncatum was observed to have a significant association with the anal region (). There was no significant association between the other identified tick species and their preferred sites of attachment on the livestock host (Table 5).

5. Discussion

This study reports the occurrence of diverse tick species in the Kassena-Nankana Districts with A. variegatum as the predominant species. Cattle were found to be a suitable host for the majority of the tick species with the risk of adult tick infestation in the wet season. Furthermore, it was observed that generally, ticks preferred to attach and feed on the udder/scrotum of the livestock.

Tick infestation in the livestock from this study was recorded as 18.97% in goats, 26.79% in sheep, and 54.24% in cattle. This can be compared to a study in Pakistan that reported tick infestation to be 57.11% in cattle, 51.97% in sheep, and 46.94% in goats [22]. Again, it can be compared to a study in Senegal that reported tick infestation in cattle (92%), sheep (55%), and goats (13%) [23]. In this study, cattle were the most infested with diverse tick species amongst the sampled livestock. During the process of grazing, which often covers long distances, cattle within the study area are likely to be exposed to questing ticks [24] and subsequently infest other livestock when they return to their kraals. Findings from this study suggest that tick species have adapted to cattle as suitable hosts. The abundance and constant movement of cattle to new locations to graze allows ticks to complete their life cycle and disperse. There was no statistically significant correlation found between the adult tick burden and livestock sex, despite the fact that typically more females than males were tested. It was however observed that the tick nymph burden on male cattle was significantly high compared to the female cattle. This could be due to the extensive use of male cattle for farming activities and grazing over long distances which expose them to tick infestation [25, 26]. It was also observed that ticks did not have a preference for any specific age group of livestock although other studies have reported a low tick burden in younger livestock [27, 28].

Overall, A. variegatum was the predominant tick species found in this study infesting mostly cattle as has been shown in previous studies in Ghana [29–31]. It was further observed in this study that, whereas adult A. variegatum was found primarily in the wet/rainy season, nymphs were collected only in the dry season. This pattern has been observed in another study [32]. This finding suggests that matured A. variegatum often infest cattle during the rainy season [33], thus, cattle in the study areas are at an increased risk of tick infestation during this season. This would negatively affect livestock production in the Kassena-Nankana Districts; hence, there is a need to control A. variegatum populations. In Africa, A. variegatum has been reported in over 30 countries [21] and is the primary vector of Ehrlichia ruminantium [34, 35] and the spread of dermatophilosis [36] in livestock. In humans, these ticks transmit Rickettsia africae which causes African tick bite fever [37, 38]. Amblyomma variegatum, in addition to transmitting disease, can cause substantial blood loss from its hosts [39]. In severe infestations, the host may experience a decrease in appetite and weight, which puts them at risk for various diseases [40]. It is not uncommon for hundreds of ticks to be found on a single host [41].

Rhipicephalus evertsi evertsi, the most predominant Rhipicephalus species infesting sheep in this study are known to transmit Babesia, Ehrlichia, Theileria, Anaplasma, and CCHFV [42]. Previous studies have reported the distribution of this species in Ghana [29, 31], putting infested areas at risk of pathogen transmission. Furthermore, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) sp. which prefers to feed on cattle [21] and R. sanguineus (s.l.), also known as brown dog tick [12] were identified although in low numbers. Nonetheless, these ticks spread pathogens including Ehrlichia, Babesia, and Rickettsia [43–45].

Only cattle were discovered to be infested by Hyalomma rufipes and H. truncatum, which were more common during the dry season than the wet one. This suggests an increased Hyalomma activity during periods of increased temperatures since these species actively chase suitable hosts [46]. The dry season in the study area is associated with less grass and vegetation, forcing cattle to spend more time and move over longer distances to graze. This creates the opportunity for tick species to locate hosts and attach for blood-feeding. Species of the genus Hyalomma maintain and transmit infectious pathogens like CCHFV in humans [47, 48] and Theileria annulata in cattle [49], especially within the tropical and subtropical regions [50]. In Ghana, CCHFV has been detected in Hyalomma with abattoir workers having been exposed to the virus indicating the public health importance of these tick species [17].

Generally, it was observed that tick species in the study area had a preference for mostly the udder/scrotum, followed by the anal and chest regions of hosts. The udder/scrotum is the safest and most conducive site for blood feeding as described by previous studies [51, 52]. The head region was the least preferred site of attachment probably due to high temperatures in the study area that can cause desiccation and death to ticks. In this study, goats and sheep were predominantly infected with R. evertsi evertsi attached to the anal region. This is consistent with a report from South Africa indicating that adult R. evertsi evertsi has a high preference for the perianal region or the groin of animal hosts [53]. The most predominant tick species infesting cattle, A. variegatum, had the udder/scrotum as a strong predilection site. This can be compared to studies in Cameroon and Burkina Faso where A. variegatum has a preference for the udder, reducing milk production and hindering animal growth [33, 35]. Furthermore, it conforms to a report that A. variegatum is found on the comparatively hairless regions of the host such as the ventral surface, genitalia, or underneath the tail [32]. Hunter species H. rufipes and H. truncatum had a preference for the anal region of cattle. Knowledge of the tick population within a region and their preferred attachment sites is essential in the formulation of efficient control strategies to curb the burden of infestation and disease transmission [52].

In tropical and subtropical regions, ticks are the most significant ectoparasites of livestock and cause significant economic losses both directly through bloodsucking and indirectly through their role as vectors of infectious pathogens [54]. This study also reaffirms that ticks continue to be a major concern and cause considerable obstacles to the production of livestock [55].

The current study did not analyze the distribution and predilection sites of ticks relative to the livestock breed or strain. This is recommended in future studies. It is also recommended that tick species such as A. variegatum, H. rufipes, and H. truncatum which show definite sites of predilection in attachment to cattle during one or more of their developmental stages, a local treatment targeting their preferred predilection sites could well offer a more suitable and economic means of control rather than dipping the entire livestock or treating the whole body with acaricides.

6. Conclusion

In this study, A. variegatum was the most predominant tick species infesting mostly cattle in the study area and had a preference for resting and feeding around the udder/scrotum. The study also indicated that the wet season was the period when adult tick infestation was high with the nymphal stages occurring in the dry season. Chemical control strategies should be designed based on knowledge of the bionomics, seasonal variation in species compositions, and the species-specific predilection sites on livestock.

Data Availability

All the data supporting this study are included in the article.

Disclosure

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the US Army. Joseph W. Diclaro II and James C. Dunford are military service members or employees of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 USC §105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 USC §101 defines US Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Navrongo Health Research Centre and the Parasitology Department of Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research for their support and contribution. This study was supported by the Uniformed Services University Center for Global Health Engagement (CGHE) through the Global Health Engagement Research Initiative (Grant number: GRANT12767296).

References

M. Gondard, A. Cabezas-Cruz, R. A. Charles, M. Vayssier-Taussat, E. Albina, and S. Moutailler, “Ticks and tick-borne pathogens of the caribbean: current understanding and future directions for more comprehensive surveillance,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 7, p. 490, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rochlin and A. Toledo, “Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: a mini-review,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 781–791, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Springer, A. Glass, J. Probst, and C. Strube, “Tick-borne zoonoses and commonly used diagnostic methods in human and veterinary medicine,” Parasitology Research, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 4075–4090, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Rosenberg, N. P. Lindsey, M. Fischer et al., “Vital signs: trends in reported vectorborne disease cases— United States and territories, 2004–2016,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 67, no. 17, pp. 496–501, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. I. Paules, H. D. Marston, M. E. Bloom, and A. S. Fauci, “Tickborne diseases— confronting a growing threat,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 379, no. 8, pp. 701–703, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cleaveland, M. K. Laurenson, and L. H. Taylor, “Diseases of humans and their domestic mammals: pathogen characteristics, host range and the risk of emergence,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London- Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 356, no. 1411, pp. 991–999, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Medlock, K. M. Hansford, A. Bormane et al., “Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 6, pp. 1–11, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Cumming, “Comparing climate and vegetation as limiting factors for species ranges of African ticks,” Ecology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 255–268, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Estrada-Peña and J. De La Fuente, “The ecology of ticks and epidemiology of tick-borne viral diseases,” Antiviral Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 104–128, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Awa, H. Adakal, N. D. D. Luogbou, K. H. Wachong, I. Leinyuy, and M. D. Achukwi, “Cattle ticks in Cameroon: is Rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus absent in Cameroon and the central african region?” Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ghosh, P. Azhahianambi, and J. De La Fuente, “Control of ticks of ruminants, with special emphasis on livestock farming systems in India: present and future possibilities for integrated control- a review,” Experimental & Applied Acarology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Dantas-Torres, “The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: ixodidae): from taxonomy to control,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 152, no. 3–4, pp. 173–185, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Parola and D. Raoult, “Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: an emerging infectious threat,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 897–928, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Madder, E. Thys, L. Achi, A. Touré, and R. De Deken, “Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: a most successful invasive tick species in West-Africa,” Experimental & Applied Acarology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Reye, O. G. Arinola, J. M. Hübschen, and C. P. Muller, “Pathogen prevalence in ticks collected from the vegetation and livestock in Nigeria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 2562–2568, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kobayashi, M. Ohashi, J. H. N. Osei et al., “Detection of a novel putative phlebovirus and first isolation of Dugbe virus from ticks in Accra, Ghana,” Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 640–645, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Akuffo, J. A. M. Brandful, A. Zayed et al., “Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in livestock ticks and animal handler seroprevalence at an abattoir in Ghana,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 324-325, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Al-Tayib, “An overview of the most significant zoonotic viral pathogens transmitted from animal to human in Saudi Arabia,” Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 25, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mensah and B. Y. Fosu-Mensah, “Agriculture and gender roles in the semi-arid region of Ghana,” West African Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 144–157, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. M. Johnson, J. B. Kaneene, K. Asare-Dompreh et al., “Seroprevalence of Q fever in cattle, sheep and goats in the Volta region of Ghana,” Veterinary Medicine and Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 402–411, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Walker, A. Bouattour, J. Camicas et al., in Ticks of Domestic Animals in Africa: A Guide to Identification of Species, Bioscience Reports University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2003.
S. S. Khan, H. Ahmed, M. S. Afzal, M. R. Khan, R. J. Birtles, and J. D. Oliver, “Epidemiology, distribution and identification of ticks on livestock in Pakistan,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 3024, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Badji, M. Ndiaye, A. Gaye et al., “Detection of crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever virus from livestock ticks in northern, central and southern Senegal in 2021,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 317, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Kasaija, A. Estrada-Peña, M. Contreras, H. Kirunda, and J. de la Fuente, “Cattle ticks and tick-borne diseases: a review of Uganda’s situation,” Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, Article ID 101756, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. I. Musa, S. M. Jajere, N. B. Adamu et al., “Prevalence of tick infestation in different breeds of cattle in maiduguri, northeastern Nigeria,” Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Opara and O. N. Ezeh, “Ixodid ticks of cattle in Borno and Yours truly, Obe states of northeastern Nigeria: breed and coat colour preference,” Animal Research International, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1365, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Lorusso, K. Picozzi, B. M. C. D. Bronsvoort, A. Majekodunmi, and C. Dongkum, “Ixodid ticks of traditionally managed cattle in central Nigeria: where Rhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplus does not dare(yet?),” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rehman, A. M. Nijhof, C. Sauter-Louis, B. Schauer, C. Staubach, and F. J. Conraths, “Distribution of ticks infesting ruminants and risk factors associated with high tick prevalence in livestock farms in the semi-arid and arid agro-ecological zones of Pakistan,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 190–215, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bell-Sakyi, E. B. Koney, O. Dogbey, and K. J. Sumption, “Heartwater in Ghana: implications for control of ticks,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 59–64, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Nimo-Paintsil, M. Mosore, S. O. Addo et al., “Ticks and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens from domestic animals in Ghana,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. A. R. R. Walker and E. B. M. B. M. E. B. M. Koney, “Distribution of ticks (Acari: ixodida) infesting domestic ruminants in Ghana,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 473–479, 1999a.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Spickler, Amblyomma Variegatum (Tropical Bont Tick, Tropical African Bont Tick) (Issue September), 2009.
F. Stachurski, “Attachment kinetics of the adult tick Amblyomma variegatum to cattle,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 317–324, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Esemu, W. O. Besong, R. N. Ndip, and L. M. Ndip, “Prevalence of Ehrlichia ruminantium in adult Amblyomma variegatum collected from cattle in Cameroon,” Experimental & Applied Acarology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 377–387, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Stachurski, “Invasion of West African cattle by the tick Amblyomma variegatum,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 391–399, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Olaogun and K. J. Onwuzuruike, “Incidence and biochemical parameters of dermatophilosis in Nigerian cattle breeds from livestock markets, Oyo state, Nigeria,” Open Veterinary Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Kelly, L. Beati, P. R. Mason, L. A. Matthewman, V. Roux, and D. Raoult, “Rickettsia africae sp. nov., the etiological agent of african tick bite fever,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 611–614, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tomassone, A. Portillo, M. Nováková, R. De Sousa, and J. A. Oteo, “Neglected aspects of tick-borne rickettsioses,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 263–311, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Ndumu, J. B. D. George, and M. K. Choudhury, “Toxicity of neem seed oil (Azadiracta indica) against the larvae of Amblyomma variegatum, a three-host tick in cattle,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 532–534, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Walker, “Amblyomma tick feeding in relation to host health,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 28, no. S2, pp. 26S–28S, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Popham, G. I. Garris, and N. Barré, “Development of a computer model of the population dynamics of Amblyomma variegatum and simulations of eradication strategies for use in the Caribbean,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 791, no. 1, pp. 452–465, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. G. Horak, A. M. Spickett, L. E. Braack, and E. J. Williams, “Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XXVII. Ticks on helmeted guineafowls in the Eastern Cape Province and eastern Transvaal Lowveld,” Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Harrus, T. Waner, H. Bark, F. Jongejan, and A. W. C. A. Cornelissen, “Recent advances in determining the pathogenesis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2745–2749, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tavassoli, M. Tabatabaei, M. Mohammadi, B. Esmaeilnejad, and H. Mohamadpour, “PCR-Based detection of Babesia spp. infection in collected ticks from cattle in west and north-west of Iran,” Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 132–138, 2013, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409438.
View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Wikswo, R. Hu, M. E. Metzger, and M. E. Eremeeva, “Detection of Rickettsia rickettsii and Bartonella henselae in Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from California,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 158–162, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Marchiondo and R. G. Endris, in Arachnida, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019.
M. Aktas, Z. Vatansever, and S. Ozubek, “Molecular evidence for trans-stadial and transovarial transmission of Babesia occultans in Hyalomma marginatum and Rhipicephalus turanicus in Turkey,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 204, no. 3–4, pp. 369–371, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gargili, A. Estrada-Peña, J. R. Spengler, A. Lukashev, P. A. Nuttall, and D. A. Bente, “The role of ticks in the maintenance and transmission of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus: a review of published field and laboratory studies,” Antiviral Research, vol. 144, pp. 93–119, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Mamman, V. Lorusso, B. M. Adam, A. G. Dogo, K. J. Bown, and R. J. Birtles, “First report of theileria annulata in Nigeria: findings from cattle ticks in Zamfara and Sokoto states,” BioRxiv, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Bakheit, A. A. Latif, Z. Vatansever, U. Seitzer, and J. Ahmed, “The huge risks due to Hyalomma ticks,” in Arthropods as Vectors of Emerging Diseases, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Huruma, M. Abdurhaman, S. Gebre, and B. Deresa, “Identification of bovine tick species and their prevalence in and around Sebeta Town, Ethiopia,” Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology, vol. 7, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tadesse, G. Abadfaji, S. Girma, B. Kumsa, and T. Jibat, “Identification of tick species and their preferred site on cattle’s body in and around Miza n Teferi, Southwestern,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. G. Horak, H. Heyne, A. Halajian, S. Booysen, and W. J. Smit, “Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. L. Ixodid ticks infesting horses and donkeys,” Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Sh Hassan, K. Jimale, S. Dirie et al., “Prevalence and species identification of ixodid ticks of small ruminants in benadir region, Somalia,” Veterinary Medicine International, vol. 2022, Article ID 9224737, 6 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chanie, T. Negash, and A. Sirak, “Ectoparasites are the major causes of various types of skin lesions in small ruminants in Ethiopia,” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1103–1109, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Seth Offei Addo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

193

Downloads

184

Citations