Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Volume 2017, Article ID 7439361, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7439361
Review Article

Minding the Gap: Reconciling Human and Technical Perspectives on the IoT for Healthy Ageing

Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St., 4000 Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to Alessandro Soro; ua.ude.tuq@oros.ordnassela

Received 23 June 2017; Revised 25 September 2017; Accepted 8 October 2017; Published 12 November 2017

Academic Editor: Luigi Patrono

Copyright © 2017 Alessandro Soro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. H. Ambe, M. Brereton, A. Soro, and P. Roe, “Technology Individuation,” in Proceedings of the the 2017 CHI Conference, pp. 6632–6644, Denver, Colorado, USA, May 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. López Gómez, “Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 93, pp. 91–101, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Vaisutis, M. Brereton, T. Robertson et al., “Invisible connections: Investigating older people's emotions and social relations around objects,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014, pp. 1937–1940, can, May 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Brereton, “Habituated objects: Everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman,” Interactions, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 20–24, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Ashton, “That 'internet of things' thing,” RFID Journal, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 97–114, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Soro, M. Brereton, and P. Roe, “The Messaging Kettle: It’s IoTea time,” Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The internet of things: a survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Weiser, R. Gold, and J. S. Brown, “Origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 693–695, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Weiser, “Ubiquitous computing,” The Computer Journal, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 71-72, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Weiser and J. Seely Brown, “The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond calculation: The next fifty years of computing,” in Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown, P. J. Denning and R. M. Metcalfe, Eds., pp. 75–86, Copernicus - Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Weiser, “The computer for the 21st century,” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 3–11, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Ishii, “Tangible bits: Beyond pixels,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, TEI 2008, pp. xv–xxv, deu, February 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Ishii and B. Ullmer, “Tangible bits,” in Proceedings of the the SIGCHI conference, pp. 234–241, Atlanta, Georgia, United States, March 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Aarts and R. Wichert, “Ambient intelligence,” in Technology Guide, pp. 244–249, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. D. Abowd, A. K. Dey, P. J. Brown, N. Davies, M. Smith, and P. Steggles, “Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness,” in Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing: First International Symposium, HUC '99 Karlsruhe, Germany, September 27–29, 1999 Proceedings, vol. 1707 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 304–307, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Mann, “Wearable computing: a first step toward personal imaging,” The Computer Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 25–32, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Starner, S. Mann, B. Rhodes et al., “Augmented reality through wearable computing,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 386–398, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Mattern and C. Floerkemeier, “From the internet of computers to the Internet of Things,” in From Active Data Management to Event-Based Systems and More, vol. 6462 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 242–259, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Swan, “Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 217–253, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Miorandi, S. Sicari, F. de Pellegrini, and I. Chlamtac, “Internet of things: vision, applications and research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1497–1516, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. L. Koreshoff, T. W. Leong, and T. Robertson, “Approaching a human-centred internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, OzCHI 2013, pp. 363–366, aus, November 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Tan and N. Wang, “Future internet: the internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE '10), pp. V5376–V5380, IEEE, Chengdu, China, August 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Durick, T. Robertson, M. Brereton, F. Vetere, and B. Nansen, “Dispelling ageing myths in technology design,” in Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, OzCHI 2013, pp. 467–476, aus, November 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Zanella, N. Bui, A. P. Castellani, L. Vangelista, and M. Zorzi, “Internet of things for smart cities,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Sundmaeker, P. Guillemin, P. Friess, and S. Woelfflé, Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things, Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things, European Commision, 2010.
  28. A. J. Stankovic, “Research directions for the internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. T. L. Koreshoff, T. Robertson, and T. W. Leong, “Internet of things: A review of literature and products,” in Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, OzCHI 2013, pp. 335–344, aus, November 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Nansen, L. Van Ryn, F. Vetere, T. Robertson, M. Brereton, and P. Douish, “An internet of social things,” in Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2014, pp. 87–96, aus, December 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Brereton, A. Soro, K. Vaisutis, and P. Roe, “The messaging kettle: Prototyping connection over a distance between adult children and older parents,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, pp. 713–716, kor, April 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Nassir, T. W. Leong, and T. Robertson, “Positive Ageing: Elements and factors for design,” in Proceedings of the 27th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2015, pp. 264–268, aus, December 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. L. Bowen and C. S. Atwood, “Living and Dying for Sex,” Gerontology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 265–290, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Gorman, “Development and the rights of older people,” in The ageing and development report. Poverty, independence and the world’s older people, J. Randel, T. German, and D. Ewing, Eds., pp. 3–21, Earthscan Publications, London, England, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  35. C. Kramarae and A. G. Miller, “In the Eye of the Beholder: Contemporary Issues in Stereotyping.,” Contemporary Sociology, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 453, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. P. J. Stearns, “Old age family conflict: The perspective of the past,” in Elder Abuse: Conflict in The Family, K. A. Pillemer and R. S. Wolf, Eds., pp. 3–24, Auburn House Publishing, Dover, MA, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  37. T. D. Nelson, “Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 207–221, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. F. Streib, E. Cumming, W. E. Henry, and T. Parsons, “Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement.,” American Sociological Review, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 561, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision (ESA/P/WP.241), 2015.
  40. A. Light, W. Tuck Leong, and T. Robertson, “Ageing well with CSCW,” in ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 295–304, Oslo , Norway, 2015.
  41. World Health Organization, Active Aging: A Policy Framework, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
  42. E. Giaccardi, S. C. Kuijer, and L. Neven, “Design for resourceful ageing: intervening in the ethics of gerontechnology,” in Proceedings of DRS 2016, Design + Research + Society Future-Future-Focused Thinking, 2016.
  43. E. Brandt, T. Binder, L. Malmborg, and T. Sokoler, “Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction,” in Proceedings of the the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia, p. 400, Brisbane, Australia, November 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. S. E. Lindley, R. Harper, and A. Sellen, “Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life,” in Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, BCS HCI 2008, pp. 77–86, Singapore, September 2008. View at Scopus
  45. J. L. Wiles, A. Leibing, N. Guberman, J. Reeve, and R. E. S. Allen, “The meaning of ‘aging in place’ to older people,” The Gerontologist, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 357–366, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. M. Boulton-Lewis, L. Buys, J. Lovie-Kitchin, K. Barnett, and L. N. David, “Ageing, learning, and computer technology in Australia,” Educational Gerontology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 253–270, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Austin, H. H. Dodge, T. Riley, P. G. Jacobs, S. Thielke, and J. Kaye, “A Smart-Home System to Unobtrusively and Continuously Assess Loneliness in Older Adults,” IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, vol. 4, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. Harley and G. Fitzpatrick, “YouTube and intergenerational communication: The case of Geriatric1927,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. Milligan, C. Roberts, and M. Mort, “Telecare and older people: Who cares where?” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 347–354, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. Wyche, P. Sengers, and R. E. Grinter, “Historical analysis: Using the past to design the future,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Preface, vol. 4206, pp. 35–51, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. E. Fischer, A. Crabtree, T. Rodden et al., ““Just whack it on until it gets hot”: Working with IoT data in the home,” in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016, pp. 5933–5944, usa, May 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Rogers, “Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences,” in UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 4206 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 404–421, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. P. Dourish, “What we talk about when we talk about context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Birnholtz and M. Jones-Rounds, “Independence and interaction: Understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 143–152, usa, April 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. V. Claes, E. Devriendt, J. Tournoy, and K. Milisen, “Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: An explorative study,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 134–148, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. Dupuy, C. Consel, and H. Sauzéon, “Self determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 65, pp. 508–521, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. Newe, “Delivering the Internet of Things,” Network Security, vol. 2015, no. 3, pp. 18–20, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. R. Want, B. N. Schilit, and S. Jenson, “Enabling the internet of things,” The Computer Journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. F. Coughlin, L. Jasmin, L. A. D’Ambrosio, and B. Reimer, “Adult childrens perceptions of intelligent home systems in the care of elderly parents,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology, ACM, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. E. Grönvall and N. Verdezoto, “Beyond self-monitoring: Understanding non-functional aspects of home-based healthcare technology,” in Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2013, pp. 587–596, che, September 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. F. Nunes, N. Verdezoto, G. Fitzpatrick, M. Kyng, E. Grönvall, and C. Storni, “Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI), vol. 22, no. 6, article no. 33, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. C. Sas, K. Brahney, C. Oechsner et al., “Communication Needs of Elderly at Risk of Falls and their Remote Family,” in Proceedings of the the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts, pp. 2900–2908, Denver, Colorado, USA, May 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. G. Graffigna, S. Barello, B. K. Wiederhold, A. C. Bosio, and G. Riva, “Positive technology as a driver for health engagement,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pp. 9–17. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. B. Nansen, F. Vetere, T. Robertson, J. Downs, M. Brereton, and J. Durick, “Reciprocal habituation: a study of older people and the Kinect,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI), vol. 21, no. 3, article 18, 20 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J. Rowan and E. D. Mynatt, “Digital Family Portrait Field Trial,” in Proceedings of the the SIGCHI conference, p. 521, Portland, Oregon, USA, April 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. Marilyn, Marjorie S., S. Miller, and J. Krampe, “Using Technology to Enhance Aging in Place,” in International Conference On Smart homes and health Telematics, pp. 169–176, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. L. Lee and A. K. Dey, “Sensor-based observations of daily living for aging in place,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. Doyle, N. Caprani, and R. Bond, “Older adults' attitudes to self-management of health and wellness through smart home data,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2015, pp. 129–136, tur, May 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. C. Aceros, J. Pols, and M. Domènech, “Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life,” Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 93, pp. 102–111, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. R. C. Atchley, “Activity theory,” in The Encyclopedia of Aging, Springer Publishing, 4th edition, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  71. R. C. Atchley, “A Continuity Theory of Normal Aging,” The Gerontologist, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 183–190, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. de Moustier, “The story of odile,” Gratiane de Moustier, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  73. A. Costall and O. Dreir, Eds., Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Everyday Objects, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, England, 2006.
  74. J. Carroll, Completing Design in Use: Closing the Appropriation Cycle, European Conference of Information Systems, January 2004, http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2004.
  75. B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn, and J. Hagman, “Hardware companions?” in Proceedings of the the conference, p. 273, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, April 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. J. Pols and I. Moser, “Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies,” Alter, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159–178, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. Light, “Digital interdependence and how to design for it,” Interactions, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 34, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, “Fog computing and its role in the internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM Mobile Cloud Computing Workshop, MCC 2012, pp. 13–15, fin, August 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. H. Baharin and S. Khalidi, “Fyro: A symbolic-based phatic technology,” in Proceedings of the 27th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2015, pp. 304–308, aus, December 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Z. Chai, A. Soro, P. Roe, and M. Brereton, “Cooking Together at a Distance,” in Proceedings of the the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts, pp. 2437–2444, Denver, Colorado, USA, May 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. C. Leonardi, C. Mennecozzi, E. Not et al., “Knocking on elders' door: Investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, pp. 1703–1711, usa, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Elsevier, 1994.
  83. Constantine Stephanidis, User interfaces for all: concepts, methods, and tools, CRC Press, 2000.
  84. A. Dillon, “Beyond usability: Process, outcome, and affect in Human Computer Interactions,” Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 67–69, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. S. Gaul and M. Ziefle, “Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives,” in HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion, vol. 5889 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 312–332, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. R. Steele, A. Lo, C. Secombe, and Y. K. Wong, “Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 788–801, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. M. Rothensee, “User Acceptance of the Intelligent Fridge: Empirical Results from a Simulation,” in The Internet of Things SE - 8, C. Floerkemeier, L. Marc, F. Elgar et al., Eds., pp. 123–139, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  88. K. Renaud and J. Van Biljon, “Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study,” in Proceedings of the SAICSIT 2008: riding the wave of technology - 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, pp. 210–219, zaf, October 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. H. van der Heijden, “User acceptance of hedonic information systems,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 695–704, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. K. Riemer and R. B. Johnstone, “Place-making: A phenomenological theory of technology appropriation,” in Proceedings of the Proc. of 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, 2012, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2012/proceedings/SocialImpacts/5/.
  92. P. Ehn, “DOC and the power of things and representatives,” in Proceedings of the the 26th annual ACM international conference, p. 31, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. A. Soro, M. Brereton, and P. Roe, “Towards an analysis framework of technology habituation by older users,” in Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2016, pp. 1021–1033, aus, June 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. L. R. Ackoff, “From data to wisdom,” Journal of applied systems analysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  95. G. Kortuem, F. Kawsar, V. Sundramoorthy, and D. Fitton, “Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. P. Dourish, Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, MIT Press, 2004, http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/where-action.
  97. C. Nicholas, “Is Google making us stupid?” Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 89–94, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  98. G. Leshed, T. Velden, O. Rieger, B. Kot, and P. Sengers, “In-car GPS navigation: Engagement with and disengagement from the environment,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, pp. 1675–1684, ita, April 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. G. Marx and V. Steeves, “From the beginning: Children as subjects and agents of surveillance,” Surveillance & Society, vol. 7, no. 3/4, pp. 192–230, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  100. A. S. Taylor, R. Harper, L. Swan, S. Izadi, A. Sellen, and M. Perry, “Homes that make us smart,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 383–393, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. N. Jeremijenko, “A futureproofed power meter,” Whole Earth, Summer, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  102. S. David Kirk, D. Chatting, Y. Paulina, and J. Bichard, “Ritual Machines I & #38; II: Making Technology at Home,” in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. M. Blythe, J. Steane, J. Roe, and C. Oliver, “Solutionism, the game: Design fictions for positive aging,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, pp. 3849–3858, kor, April 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. V. Venkatesh, S. A. Brown, and H. Bala, “Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems,” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. B. Matthews and M. Brereton, Navigating the methodological mire: practical epistemology in design research, 2015.
  106. J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan, “The weirdest people in the world?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 61–83, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. E. Morozov, To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist, Penguin UK, 2013.
  108. A. Maturo, “Fatism, self-monitoring and the pursuit of healthiness in the time of technological solutionism,” Italian Sociological Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. L. Suchman, “Sociotechnologies of care: Visions and realities,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Technology in Health Care: Socio-Technical Approaches, ITHC 2007, pp. 1-2, aus, August 2007. View at Scopus
  110. F. Henwood, R. Harris, and S. Philippa, “Informing health? Negotiating the logics of choice and care in everyday practices of, healthy living,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 2026–2032, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. A. Pichelstorfer, “Mol, Annemarie (2008): The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice, London: Routledge Mol, Annemarie (2008): The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice, London: Routledge,” Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 533–535, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. B. Buxton, “The long nose of innovation,” Insight, vol. 11, p. 27, 2008. View at Google Scholar