Research Article
Analysis of Nonstationary Characteristics for High-Speed Railway Scenarios
Table 3
Analysis results of the SI in different scenarios.
| Scenario | Method | Statistics | SI (m) | | | |
| Rural | LRS | Mean value | 14.3 | 6.46 | 2.84 | 60% of CCDF | 8.22 | 4.29 | 1.65 | 80% of CCDF | 4.74 | 2.64 | 0.99 |
| Station | LRS | Mean value | 7.27 | 3.84 | 1.87 | 60% of CCDF | 5.02 | 2.55 | 1.17 | 80% of CCDF | 3.07 | 1.25 | 0.37 |
| Suburban | LRS | Mean value | 7.62 | 3.74 | 1.37 | 60% of CCDF | 5.43 | 2.33 | 0.86 | 80% of CCDF | 3.54 | 1.25 | 0.35 |
| Viaduct [26] | LRS | 60% of CCDF | - | 1.8 | - | 80% of CCDF | - | 0.81 | - |
| Standard models [26] | LRS | 60% of CCDF | - | 3.4 | - |
| Station [25] | RUN test | 80% of CCDF | 4 |
|
|