Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Volume 2018, Article ID 1949835, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1949835
Research Article

Definition of Technological Solutions Based on the Internet of Things and Smart Cities Paradigms for Active and Healthy Ageing through Cocreation

Life Supporting Technologies, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Alejandro Martín Medrano-Gil; se.mpu.oft.tsl@onardema

Received 1 August 2017; Revised 5 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 30 January 2018

Academic Editor: Aitor Almeida

Copyright © 2018 Alejandro Martín Medrano-Gil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. WHO., World Health Statistics 2014: A Wealth of Information on Global Public Health, 2014.
  2. M. Illario, M. Vollenbroek-Hutten, D. W. Molloy, E. Menditto, G. Iaccarino, and P. Eklund, “Active and healthy ageing and independent living,” Journal of Aging Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 542183, 3 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Farrell and M. Nogues, “Operational Definition of Active and Healthy Aging (AHA): The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on AHA Reference Site Questionnaire: Montpellier October 20-21, 2014, Lisbon July 2, 2015,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1020–1026, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Q. Yang and Z. Shen, “Active aging in the workplace and the role of intelligent technologies,” in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology Workshops, WI-IAT Workshops 2015, pp. 391–394, December 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Parra, P. Silveira, I. K. Far et al., “Information technology for active ageing: A review of theory and practice,” Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 351–448, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. European Commission, European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, 2017.
  7. B. Rechel, E. Grundy, J.-M. Robine et al., “Ageing in the European Union,” The Lancet, vol. 381, no. 9874, pp. 1312–1322, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Sixsmith and G. M. Gutman, Technologies for Active Aging, Springer, 2013.
  9. M. Satyanarayanan, “Pervasive computing: vision and challenges,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 10–17, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Costa, D. Carneiro, P. Novais et al., “Ambient assisted living,” Advances in Soft Computing, vol. 51, pp. 86–94, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Pieper, M. Antona, and U. Cortés, “Ambient Assisted Living,” Ercim News, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Bonaccorsi, L. Fiorini, F. Cavallo, A. Saffiotti, and P. Dario, “A Cloud Robotics Solution to Improve Social Assistive Robots for Active and Healthy Aging,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 393–408, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Drobics and S. Smith, Game-Based IT Solutions for Active and Healthy Aging, Springer, Cham, Germany, 2014.
  14. H. Chourabi, T. Nam, S. Walker et al., “Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework,” in Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '12), pp. 2289–2297, January 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. G. Fitzgerald and F. G. Caro, “An Overview of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Around the World,” Journal of Aging & Social Policy, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. European Commission, European Innovation Partnership - Smart Cities and Communities, 2017.
  17. A. Ramaswami, A. G. Russell, P. J. Culligan, K. Rahul Sharma, and E. Kumar, “Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6288, pp. 940–943, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Buffel, P. McGarry, C. Phillipson et al., Developing Age-Friendly Cities: Case Studies from Brussels and Manchester and Implications for Policy and Practice, Springer, Cham, Germany, 2016.
  19. R. Das, “A Survey on the internet of things solutions for the elderly and disabled: applications, prospects, and challenges,” International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Fico, J. Montalva, A. Medrano et al., “Co-creating with consumers and stakeholders to understand the benefit of internet of things in smart living environments for ageing well: The approach adopted in the madrid deployment site of the activage large scale pilot,” in Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, EMBEC 2017 and Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, NBC 2107, pp. 1089–1092, June 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. I. Konstantinidis, G. Bamparopoulos, A. Billis, and P. D. Bamidis, “Internet of Things for an Age-Friendly Healthcare,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 210, pp. 587–591, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. AIOTI, Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation, 2017.
  23. I. Arbel, K. Baker, T. Bailey, M. Bouraoui, and I. Chartier, AIOTI WG5-Smart Living Environment for Ageing Well, 2015.
  24. D. Wortley, J.-Y. An, and A. Heshmati, “Tackling the challenge of the aging society: Detecting and preventing cognitive and physical decline through games and consumer technologies,” Health Informatics Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Zallio, D. Berry, and N. Casiddu, “Adaptive environments for enabling senior citizens: An holistic assessment tool for housing design and IoT-based technologies,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things, WF-IoT 2016, pp. 419–424, December 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Melis, M. Prandini, L. Sartori, and F. Callegati, “Public Transportation, IoT, Trust And Urban Habits,” in Internet Science, F. Bagnoli, A. Satsiou, and I. Stavrakakis, Eds., vol. 9934 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 318–325, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Shibata and G. Sato, “‘IoT Based Mobility Information Infrastructure in Challenged Network Environment toward Aging Society,” in Proceedings of the 31st IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, WAINA 2017, pp. 645–648, March 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Kulczycki, R. Genoe, H. Marston, S. Freeman, and C. Musselwhite, If I Want to Know Anything I Just Google It”: Older Adults’ Functional and Social Leisure Activities And Technology, 2016.
  29. P. J. McCullagh and J. C. Augusto, “The Internet of Things: The Potential to Facilitate Health and Wellness,” CEPIS Upgrad, vol. XII, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. N. Kamel Boulos, A. D. Tsouros, and A. Holopainen, “'Social, innovative and smart cities are happy and resilient': insights from the WHO EURO 2014 International healthy cities conference,” International Journal of Health Geographics, vol. 14, article 3, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. N. K. Boulos and N. M. Al-Shorbaji, “On the internet of things, smart cities and the WHO healthy cities,” International Journal of Health Geographics, vol. 13, no. 1, article 10, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Carmena, “La alcaldesa Manuela Carmena presenta Madrid, ciudad amigable con las personas mayores,” QMAYOR MAGAZINE, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  33. http://www.city4ageproject.eu.
  34. P. Paolini, N. Di Blas, S. Copelli, and F. Mercalli, “City4Age: Smart cities for health prevention,” in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Smart Cities Conference, ISC2 2016, pp. 1–4, September 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Camacho, L. Cámara, R. Cascante, and H. Sainz, ‘The Logical Framework Approach: 10 Case Studies, 2001.
  36. H. Camacho, L. Camara, R. Cascante et al., Fundación de Cooperación, El Enfoque del marco lógico, 10 casos prácticos: cuaderno para la identificación y diseño de proyectos de desarrollo, Fundación CIDEAL, 2001.
  37. K. Örtengren, The Logical Framework Approach: A Summary of The Theory behind the LFA Method, 2004.
  38. W. J. Jackson, “Designing Projects and Project Evaluations Using The Logical Framework Approach,” 1997, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/William_Jackson12/publication/265012218_Designing_Projects_and_Project_Evaluations_Using_The_Logical_Framework_Approach/links/565e604708ae4988a7bd5818.pdf.
  39. D. Salvi, J. B. Montalvá Colomer, M. T. Arredondo, B. Prazak-Aram, and C. Mayer, “A framework for evaluating Ambient Assisted Living technologies and the experience of the universAAL project,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 329–352, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. B. Montalvá Colomer, D. Salvi, M. F. Cabrera-Umpierrez et al., “Experience in evaluating AAL solutions in living labs,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 7277–7311, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. W. W. Royce, “Managing the development of large software systems,” IEEE WESCON, vol. 26, pp. 1–9, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  42. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch, The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, Addison-Wesley, 2005.
  43. K. Bittner and I. Spence, Use Case Modeling, Addison Wesley, 2003.
  44. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679.
  45. L. P. Fried, C. M. Tangen, J. Walston et al., “Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype,” The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. M146–M156, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. https://consultgeri.org/try-this/general-assessment/issue-23.
  47. https://www.lst.tfo.upm.es/smart-house.
  48. http://www.campusmoncloa.es/.
  49. https://decide.madrid.es/.
  50. https://sites.google.com/a/tcd.ie/share-frailty-instrument-calculators/.
  51. https://www.alz.org/documents_custom/minicog.pdf.
  52. J. Martínez de la Iglesiaa, R. DueñasHerrerob, M. Carmen Onís Vilchesa, C. Aguado Tabernéa, C. Albert Colomerc, and R. Luque Luquec, “Adaptación y validación al castellano del cuestionario de Pfeiffer (SPMSQ) para detectar la existencia de deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores e 65 años,” Medicina Clínica, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 129–134, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. Nielsen, Ten Usability Heuristics, 2005.
  54. J. Brooke, “evaluation in industry and undefined 1996,” in SUS-A Quick And Dirty Usability Scale, 1996, https://books.google.com/?hl=ar.
  55. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. http://www.madrid.es/portales/munimadrid/es/Inicio/El-Ayuntamiento?vgnextfmt=default&vgnextchannel=ce069e242ab26010VgnVCM100000dc0ca8c0RCRD.
  57. A. Mantelero, “The EU Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation and the roots of the right to be forgotten,” Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 229–235, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus