Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Volume 2018, Article ID 2354603, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2354603
Research Article

Enhancing Mobile Military Surveillance Based on Video Streaming by Employing Software Defined Networks

1Informatics Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91509–900, Brazil
2Brazilian Army, Brasília, DF 70630–901, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Iulisloi Zacarias; rb.sgrfu.fni@sairacazi

Received 28 June 2018; Accepted 10 September 2018; Published 2 October 2018

Academic Editor: Pierre-Martin Tardif

Copyright © 2018 Iulisloi Zacarias et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Bekmezci, O. K. Sahingoz, and Ş. Temel, “Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1254–1270, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Gupta, R. Jain, and G. Vaszkun, “Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1123–1152, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Nightingale, Q. Wang, J. M. A. Calero et al., “Reliable full motion video services in disadvantaged tactical radio networks,” in Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems, ICMCIS 2016, Belgium, May 2016. View at Scopus
  4. V. Joseph, S. Borst, and M. I. Reiman, “Optimal rate allocation for video streaming in wireless networks with user dynamics,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 820–835, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Department of the Army, Long range unit surveillance operations: Field manual No. 3-55.93, Washington, DC, 2009.
  6. P. Juluri, V. Tamarapalli, and D. Medhi, “Measurement of quality of experience of video-on-demand services: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 401–418, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Liu, J. Liu, Z. Xu, and S. Ci, “Choquet integral based QoS-to-QoE mapping for mobile VoD applications,” in Proceedings of the 24th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Quality of Service, IWQoS 2016, China, June 2016. View at Scopus
  8. International Telecommunication Union, “Recommendation P.800.1: Mean opinion score (MOS) terminology,” Recommendations of the ITU, Rev. 4.0, Jul., 2016.
  9. H. Nam, K.-H. Kim, J. Y. Kim, and H. Schulzrinne, “Towards QoE-aware video streaming using SDN,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2014, pp. 1317–1322, USA, December 2014. View at Scopus
  10. R. M. Abuteir, A. Fladenmuller, and O. Fourmaux, “SDN based architecture to improve video streaming in home networks,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 220–226, Crans-Montana, Switzerland, March 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan et al., “OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks,” Computer Communication Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. B. A. A. Nunes, M. Mendonca, X.-N. Nguyen, K. Obraczka, and T. Turletti, “A survey of software-defined networking: past, present, and future of programmable networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1617–1634, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Taimur Bakhshi, “State of the art and recent research advances in software defined networking,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2017, Article ID 7191647, 35 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Orfanus, E. P. De Freitas, and F. Eliassen, “Self-organization as a supporting paradigm for military uav relay networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 804–807, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Tortonesi, A. Morelli, C. Stefanelli, R. Kohler Jr., N. Suri, and S. Watson, “Enabling the deployment of COTS applications in tactical edge networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 66–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Zacarias, J. Schwarzrock, L. P. Gaspary et al., “Employing SDN to control video streaming applications in military mobile networks,” in Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), pp. 1–4, Cambridge, MA, October 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Tortonesi, C. Stefanelli, E. Benvegnu, K. Ford, N. Suri, and M. Linderman, “Multiple-UAV coordination and communications in tactical edge networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 48–55, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. H. Motlagh, M. Bagaa, and T. Taleb, “UAV-Based IoT Platform: A crowd surveillance use case,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Nobre, D. Rosario, C. Both, E. Cerqueira, and M. Gerla, “Toward software-defined battlefield networking,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 152–157, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. W. Kleinrouweler, S. Cabrero, and P. Cesar, “Delivering stable high-quality video: An SDN architecture with DASH assisting network elements,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Multimedia Systems, MMSys 2016, pp. 36–45, Austria, May 2016. View at Scopus
  21. M. Seufert, S. Egger, M. Slanina, T. Zinner, T. Hoßfeld, and P. Tran-Gia, “A survey on quality of experience of HTTP adaptive streaming,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 469–492, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Hossfeld, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Fiedler, K. Masuch, and C. Lorentzen, “Initial delay vs. interruptions: between the devil and the deep blue sea,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX '12), pp. 1–6, July 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. K. Singh, T. Das, and A. Jukan, “A survey on internet multipath routing and provisioning,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2157–2175, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, and O. Bonaventure, “TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses,” RFC Editor RFC6824, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. R. Brannsten, F. T. Johnsen, T. H. Bloebaum, and K. Lund, “Toward federated mission networking in the tactical domain,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 52–58, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Kreutz, F. M. V. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Department of the Army, Army Unmanned Aircraft System Operations, Washington, DC, 2006.
  28. L-3 WESCAM, WESCAM’s MX-15: EO IR ISR Systems, p. 2, 2015.
  29. Stark Aerospace Inc, POP200 Specs, p. 2, 2015, http://starkaerospace.com/products-services/sensors/pop200/.
  30. Department of the Army, Tactics, techniques, and procedures for reconnaissance and surveillance and intelligence support to counterreconnaissance: Field manual No. 34-02.1, Washington, DC, 1991.
  31. R. K. Mok, E. W. Chan, and R. K. Chang, “Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011), pp. 485–492, Dublin, Ireland, May 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. R. I. T. Da Costa Filho, W. Lautenschlager, N. Kagami, V. Roesler, and L. P. Gaspary, “Network fortune cookie: Using network measurements to predict video streaming performance and QoE,” in Proceedings of the 59th IEEE Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2016, USA, December 2016. View at Scopus
  33. P. Casas, R. Schatz, and T. Hossfeld, “Monitoring YouTube QoE: Is your mobile network delivering the right experience to your customers?” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC 2013, pp. 1609–1614, China, April 2013. View at Scopus
  34. F. Bellard, “FFMpeg,” 2000, Available: http://ffmpeg.org/.
  35. Standardisation Agreement: NATO digital motion imagery standard, Brussels, 3rd edition, 2009.
  36. Motion Imagery Standards Board, Motion Imagery Standards Profile (MISP), Springfield, VA, 2nd edition, 2018.
  37. R. R. Fontes, S. Afzal, S. H. B. Brito, M. A. S. Santos, and C. E. Rothenberg, “Mininet-WiFi: emulating software-defined wireless networks,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM '15), pp. 384–389, Barcelona, Spain, November 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Lantz, B. Heller, and N. McKeown, “A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (Hotnets '10), pp. 19:1–19:6, ACM, October 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Bai and A. Helmy, “A Survey of Mobility Models in Wireless Adhoc Networks,” Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, vol. 30, p. 1, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  40. Ryu SDN Framework Community, Ryu SDN Framework, 2015, Available: http://osrg.github.io/ryu.