Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Volume 2018, Article ID 7906957, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7906957
Research Article

Power-Splitting Scheme for Nonlinear Energy Harvesting AF Relaying with Direct Link

1School of Management, Xi’an Polytechnic University, Xi’an, China
2Army Academy of Border and Coastal Defence, Department of Information and Arms, Xi’an, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Liqin Shi; moc.621@niqiltcennoc

Received 3 May 2018; Revised 6 June 2018; Accepted 10 June 2018; Published 2 July 2018

Academic Editor: Fuhui Zhou

Copyright © 2018 Xiaobo Bai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) is a promising technique to prolong the lifetime of energy-constrained relay systems. Most previous works optimize power-splitting (PS) scheme based on a linear or a simple two-piecewise linear energy harvesting (EH) model, while the employed EH model may not characterize the properties of practical EH harvesters well. This leads to a mismatch between the existing PS scheme and the practical EH harvester available for relay systems. Motivated by this, this paper is devoted to the design of PS scheme in a nonlinear EH amplify-and-forward energy-constrained relay system in the presence of a direct link between the source and the destination. In particular, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize the system capacity according to the instantaneous channel state information, subject to a nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function. The objective function of the formulated problem is proven to be unimodal and there is no closed-form expression for the optimal PS ratio due to the complexity of logistic function. In order to reduce overhead cost of optimizing PS ratio, a simpler nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function is employed to replace the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function and we further derive the closed-form expression for the optimal PS ratio. Simulation results reveal that a higher system capacity can be achieved when the PS scheme is optimized based on nonlinear EH models instead of the linear EH model, and that there is only a marginal difference between the capacity under the two optimal PS schemes optimized for two different nonlinear EH models.

1. Introduction

The aim of Internet of Things (IoT) is to enable people and things to be connected anytime, anyplace, with anything and anyone, ideally using any path/network and any service [1]. It allows massive IoT devices such as low-power wireless sensors to access the wireless communication networks and communicate with each other. The limited lifetime of IoT devices is a fundamental problem for implementing IoT deployment. Motivated by this, simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) is proposed and devoted to the solution of this problem. On the other hand, relaying technology is highly beneficial in wireless communications in terms of the communication range, the energy efficiency, and the system capacity [2, 3]. However, when the relaying technology is employed in IoT networks, the IoT devices are unwilling to be a relay in order to avoid the extra energy consumption since these devices usually have limited battery capacity. Thus, integrating SWIPT and relaying is a viable option to strike a tradeoff between information processing and power supply and gains much attention recently [46]. In this field, the design of energy harvesting (EH) scheme, which instructs the relay either to switch the received radio frequency (RF) signal in the time domain or to split the received RF signal in the power domain to provide signal processing and power transfer, is one of the most important issues.

Until now, there have been many reports [414] regarding how to design an appropriate EH scheme for SWIPT based relay systems. The works [4, 7] studied the effects of power-splitting (PS) ratio and time-switching (TS) ratio on the amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) relay systems by deriving the expressions for outage probability and ergodic capacity. In [8], both the PS ratio and TS ratio were optimized to maximize the system transmission rate in DF relay systems, where the relay has a certain amount of remaining energy. By combining both TS and PS, a hybrid scheme was proposed and further optimized in [9]. The authors of [10] designed two optimal PS schemes with full and partial channel state information (CSI) to minimize the system outage probability in an AF relay system. Assuming the availability of source-destination link, the optimal PS ratio was designed and the diversity gains for the relay and the destination were analyzed [11]. By means of the stochastic geometry, the authors proposed a dynamic PS scheme in a DF relay system with a random number of transmitter-receiver pairs and investigated its outage probability [12]. Recognizing the advantages of nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in spectrum efficiency, a novel cooperative SWIPT-NOMA system was integrated [13], and an optimal PS scheme was further proposed [14].

These works [414] were based on a linear EH model, in which the RF-to-direct current (DC) power conversion efficiency is a fixed constant and independent of the input power of the energy harvester. As pointed out by [1517], the practical energy harvester operates in a nonlinear mode and the linear EH model may not characterize the properties of practical EH harvesters well. Further, the optimal PS schemes based on the linear EH model may not be optimal for the practical scenario. As a result, the existing schemes based on a linear EH model may need to be redesigned to avoid the mismatch caused by the resource allocation under the linear EH model, and ever-increasing attention has been paid into the study of nonlinear EH model in wireless communications (see [1830] and references therein). References [1825] introduced the nonlinear EH model into the wireless powered communication networks, the SWIPT-NOMA system, and the cognitive radio networks with SWIPT, where the resource allocation scheme, including the transmit power of the transmitter, and the PS/TS ratio, is concentrated. The studies revealed that a higher system capacity could be achieved by designing the EH scheme based on the nonlinear EH model instead of the conventional linear one. Apart from the aforementioned networks, the researchers have also studied the design of EH scheme in nonlinear EH relay systems [2630]. For example, the authors of [26, 27] focused on the design of PS scheme for nonlinear EH two-way relay systems. Since the low complexity of hardware is very vital to energy-constrained relay systems, the researches on one-way relay systems have attracted a lot of interests [2830]. In particular, the works [28, 29] derived the outage probability of a PS enabled nonlinear EH relay system. Considering the perfect/imperfect CSI at the relay, an optimal PS scheme was developed to minimize the outage probability [30] in an AF nonlinear EH relay system. These aforementioned works have laid the foundation for the design of EH scheme in one-way relay systems. After careful analysis of the existing works [2830], it can be found that a simple two-piecewise linear EH model was employed, and that the employed two-piecewise linear model cannot provide sufficient precision compared with the existing nonlinear EH models based on the logistic function and the inverse proportional function. Therefore, there still remains a large gap to be filled regarding the design of EH scheme for nonlinear EH one-way relay systems.

Motivated by this observation, this paper is devoted to the design of PS schemes for an AF relay system with direct link in terms of system capacity, where the nonlinear EH models proposed in [16, 18] are used to characterize the properties of practical EH circuits. Our contributions are as follows.(i)We optimize the PS scheme to maximize the system capacity under the nonlinear EH model based on a logistic function. We prove that the objective function is unimodal and the optimal solution is obtained by the golden section search method.(ii)Employing the nonlinear EH model based on an inverse proportional function instead of the logistic function, a closed-form expression for the optimal PS ratio is derived to maximize the system capacity. Compared with the PS scheme optimized for the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function, the PS scheme optimized for the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional enjoys a lower computational complexity with the near-optimal performance.

It is worth pointing out that energy efficiency (EE) is also an important performance metric. Since the EE is defined as the ratio of system capacity to power consumption [31], the optimization of EE is equivalent to the optimization of system capacity for a fixed transmit power. Thus, our derived optimal solution of this paper is the same as the optimal solution to maximize EE. If the transmit power is adjustable and smaller than a maximum power transmit, we should optimize both PS ratio and transmit power simultaneously. In this case, the solution to maximize EE is different from the derived results of this paper, while how to obtain the optimal PS ratio and optimal transmit power is beyond the scope of this paper.

2. System Model and Working Flow

As shown in Figure 1, we consider a SWIPT based AF relay system, composed of a source node , an energy-constrained relay node , and a destination node . To be general, we assume that there exists a direct link between the source and the destination. All nodes operate in a half-duplex mode and are equipped with single antenna. It is assumed that both the source and the destination are equipped with fixed power supply, and that both “harvest-then-forward” scheme and the PS scheme are employed to encourage the relay to be cooperative with the source’s transmission. Let and denote the channel coefficients between and in a quasistatic fading model. Let denote the transmit power of the source. All the channel state information (CSI) is available at the relay in order to investigate the system performance limits of the PS scheme. Moreover, we ignore the processing energy required by the transmit/receive circuitry at the relay [414].

Figure 1: An illustration of PS scheme.
2.1. Energy Harvesting Model

Since the conventional linear EH model may not be accurate for modelling the practical energy harvester due to the nonlinearity of the diodes, inductors, and capacitors, by fitting over real measurement data based on the logistic function, the authors of [18] proposed an accurate nonlinear EH model, given bywhere denotes the amount of harvested energy; is the input power of the energy harvester; and are the parameters determined by the resistance, capacitance, and so on; is the maximum harvestable power when the circuit becomes saturated and .

Recently, using the inverse proportional function instead of the logistic function to fit over real measurement data, Chen et al. in [16] proposed a more mathematically tractable nonlinear EH model, given aswhere , and are the fixed parameters. The comparison between the above two nonlinear models will be presented in Section 4.

2.2. Working Flow

In the first time slot, broadcasts information to and with a transmit power . Then the received signals at the relay and the destination node are given bywhere and is the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and .

For the destination , the received signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be calculated as

For the relay , after receiving the signal from the source , the relay splits it into two parts: for harvesting energy and for information processing, where is the PS ratio at the relay. Thus, the received RF power used for energy harvesting, , and the signal used for amplification, , are given bywhere is the additive white baseband Gaussian noise.

If the energy harvesting is completed, the total harvested energy is given bywhere is the output power of the energy harvester and

In the second time slot, amplifies the signal by using the harvested energy and forwards the amplified signal to . Hence, the received signal at is given bywhere is the amplifier gain at and is the AWGN at .

Then the received SNR from to is given bywhere .

By implementing the maximal ratio combining (MRC) scheme at the destination , the overall system capacity is given by

3. Optimal Power-Splitting Scheme

3.1. Nonlinear EH Model Based on the Logistic Function

In this subsection, we design an optimal PS scheme to maximize the overall system capacity for an AF relay system with SWIPT based on the nonlinear EH model in [18].

Substituting (1) into (11), the received SNR from to under the nonlinear EH model, in (1), iswhere , , and .

Then the system capacity in this case can be computed as

Based on (14), the optimization problem can be formulated asIt is obvious that the optimization problem of maximizing the overall system capacity is equivalent to maximizing the received SNR from to , which can be reformulated as

By taking the first-order derivative of the objective function with respect to , we havewhere

Let and we have . Since always holds, is equivalent to . Further, taking the first-order derivative of , we haveThus, increases with the increasing of . Since both and are satisfied, there exists a unique for .

Let denote the solution to . Then is also the solution to . Based on the expression of , increases with increasing when and decreases with increasing for . Therefore, is a unimodal function and is the optimal solution to . Here, the value of can be determined by means of the golden section search method. The details of this method are summarized in Algorithm 1. According to [21], the computational complexity of this algorithm can be computed as , where is the precision.

Algorithm 1: Golden section search algorithm.
3.2. Nonlinear EH Model Based on the Inverse Proportional Function

In this subsection, we design an optimal PS scheme to maximize the overall system capacity for an AF relay system with SWIPT based on the nonlinear EH model in [16]. Based on (2), the received SNR from to under the nonlinear EH model, in (2), is given by

Then the optimization problem can be formulated aswhere . Similar to , can be reformulated as

According to (20), the first-order derivative of with respect to iswhere , , , and .

Based on (2), we haveTherefore, always holds for any value of .

Let and we have . Thus, we need to obtain the solutions to to achieve the optimal PS ratio.

According to the expression of , there are two cases for the solutions to , which are Case 1:  ; Case 2:  .

Case 1. Based on , we have . Then the solution to is given by and . Since increases with increasing when and decreases with increasing for , the optimal solution to is and .

Case 2. Let . When both and are satisfied, always holds and holds for any value of . Therefore, increases with the increasing of and the optimal PS ratio is 1.

When is satisfied, the solutions to are given byLet and .

For the case with , we have and . (i) If is satisfied, increases with , decreases with , and then increases with . The maximum can be obtained by . Since holds, the optimal PS ratio is given by . (ii) If is satisfied, is a monotonic increasing function and the optimal solution to is . (iii) If is satisfied, increases with and decreases with . In this case, the optimal PS ratio is given by .

For the case with , we have and . (i) If is satisfied, always holds for . increases with the increasing of and the optimal PS ratio is given by . (ii) If is satisfied, increases with and decreases with . In this case, the optimal PS ratio is given by .

Thus, the optimal solution to is summarized as Proposition 1.

Proposition 1. The optimal PS ratio for is given by

4. Numerical Results and Discussions

In this section, we evaluate the performance of the designed PS schemes based on two nonlinear EH models: the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function and the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function, respectively. The basic parameters throughout the simulations, unless otherwise specified, are as follows. We consider the path model to be ( or ), where is the distance, denotes the small-scale fast fading, and is the path loss exponent. Further, we assume that and follow the quasi-static Rayleigh fading with unit variance, and that follows the Rician fading with the Rician factor . We set meters, meters, , , and . The channel noise power is set to be , , and dBm, respectively.

Figure 2 compares the experimental data in [15] with the two nonlinear EH models and the conventional linear EH model. The parameters of the nonlinear model based on the logistic function are , , and W. The parameters for the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function are , , and . For the linear EH model, the conversion efficiency is set to be . As shown in this figure, compared with the linear EH model, the nonlinear models in [16, 18] are more accurate when modelling the practical RF-DC circuits. The root mean squared errors of the nonlinear model based on the logistic function, the nonlinear model based on the inverse proportional function, and the linear model are W, W, and W, respectively. The results show that the nonlinear model in [18] is the most accurate among them, and that the nonlinear model in [16] is also able to provide sufficient precision.

Figure 2: Comparison between the harvested powers among the nonlinear EH models in [16, 18], the linear EH model, and the experimental data from [15].

Figure 3 demonstrates the convergence of the Algorithm 1 for different sets of the transmit powers. The maximum tolerance is set to be 0.0001. From this figure, we can see that the optimal PS ratio always converges to the optimal value within a limited number of iterations. For example, for the case with mW, the optimal PS ratio is obtained when the number of iterations is 11. Another observation is that the optimal PS ratio decreases with the increasing of . The reason is as follows. With a given PS ratio, the input power of the energy harvester increases with the increasing of the transmit power. When the transmit power is large enough, the energy harvester is always saturated and more energy will be wasted. As a result, the optimal PS ratio decreases with the increasing to avoid the waste of energy.

Figure 3: Convergence of Algorithm 1 under different sets of .

The PS schemes used for comparing are as follows: the proposed PS scheme with the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function where the optimal PS ratio is obtained by Algorithm 1; the proposed PS scheme with the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function where the optimal PS ratio is determined by Proposition 1; baseline scheme where the conventional linear EH model is employed. For convenience, we denote the proposed PS scheme with the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function as LFPS and the proposed PS scheme with the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function as IPFPS. Since the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function is closest to the practical EH circuit in [15], we use it to model the practical EH circuit. The optimal PS ratios obtained by LFPS, IPFPS, and baseline scheme will be applied to the practical EH circuit to investigate the performance of LFPS, IPFPS, and baseline schemes under the practical EH circuit. On this basis, the corresponding system capacities can be determined.

Figure 4 presents the overall system capacity achieved by the LFPS, IPFPS, and baseline schemes varying with the transmit power. It can be observed that, for all considered schemes, the system capacity increases monotonically as we increase the transmit power at the source. Both LFPS and IPFPS schemes outperform the baseline scheme and LFPS can achieve a higher system capacity than IPFPS. This is because of the fact that the mismatches between the EH models and the practical EH circuits will lead to resource allocation mismatches which will bring a poor performance. The more accurate the energy harvesting model, the better the performance the PS scheme can achieve. These results also match the results in Figure 2 perfectly. Besides, we can also see that the performance gain between LFPS and IPFPS or baseline scheme increases with the increasing of . This is due to the fact that, with the increasing of , the gap between the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function or the linear EH model and the practical energy harvester becomes larger, leading to a worse performance.

Figure 4: System capacity versus the transmit power .

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have developed the optimal PS schemes for an AF relay system with direct link to maximize the system capacity, where both the nonlinear EH model based on the logistic function and the nonlinear EH model based on the inverse proportional function are employed to model the practical energy harvester. Through simulations, three insights were obtained as follows: the PS schemes based on the nonlinear models can achieve superior performance than the one based on the linear model; the PS scheme optimized for the former nonlinear EH model can achieve the best performance, while an extra computational complexity to obtain the optimal solution is incurred; for the case with the latter nonlinear EH model, the PS scheme can achieve near-optimal performance with low computational complexity.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Program of Education Bureau of Shaanxi Province (17JK0699), Shaanxi Industrial Science and Technology Key Project (2017GY-039), and 2017 China Textile Industry Federation Science and Technology Guidance Project (2017067).

References

  1. Z. Chu, F. Zhou, Z. Zhu, R. Q. Hu, and P. Xiao, “Wireless Powered Sensor Networks for Internet of Things: Maximum Throughput and Optimal Power Allocation,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 310–321, Feb, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. L. Fan, X. Lei, N. Yang, T. Q. Duong, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Secure Multiple Amplify-and-Forward Relaying with Cochannel Interference,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1494–1505, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Fan, X. Lei, N. Yang et al., “Secrecy cooperative networks with outdated relay selection over correlated fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 7599–7603, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. A. Nasir, X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and R. A. Kennedy, “Relaying protocols for wireless energy harvesting and information processing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3622–3636, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Ye, Y. Li, D. Wang, F. Zhou, R. Q. Hu, and H. Zhang, “Optimal Transmission Schemes for DF Relaying Networks Using SWIPT,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–8, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Ye, Y. Li, Z. Wang, X. Chu, and H. Zhang, “Dynamic Asymmetric Power Splitting Scheme for SWIPT-Based Two-Way Multiplicative AF Relaying,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1014–1018, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Nasir, X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and R. A. Kennedy, “Throughput and ergodic capacity of wireless energy harvesting based DF relaying network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '14), pp. 4066–4071, Sydney, Australia, June 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Ju, K.-M. Kang, K.-S. Hwang, and C. Jeong, “Maximum transmission rate of PSR/TSR protocols in wireless energy harvesting DF-based relay networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2701–2717, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Atapattu and J. Evans, “Optimal energy harvesting protocols for wireless relay networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 5789–5803, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Hu, C. Zhang, and Z. Ding, “Dynamic power splitting policies for AF relay networks with wireless energy harvesting,” in Proceedings of the 2015 ICC - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), pp. 2035–2039, London, UK, June 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Lee, C. Song, S. Choi, and I. Lee, “Outage probability analysis and power splitter designs for swipt relaying systems with direct link,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 648–651, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. I. Krikidis, “Simultaneous information and energy transfer in large-scale networks with/without relaying,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 900–912, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Liu, Z. Ding, M. Elkashlan, and H. V. Poor, “Cooperative Non-orthogonal Multiple Access with Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 938–953, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Ye, Y. Li, D. Wang, and G. Lu, “Power splitting protocol design for the cooperative NOMA with SWIPT,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–5, May 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Le, K. Mayaram, and T. Fiez, “Efficient far-field radio frequency energy harvesting for passively powered sensor networks,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1287–1302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Chen, N. Zhao, and M. Alouini, “Wireless Energy Harvesting Using Signals From Multiple Fading Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 5027–5039, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. R. Valenta and G. D. Durgin, “Harvesting wireless power: survey of energy-harvester conversion efficiency in far-field, wireless power transfer systems,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 108–120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Boshkovska, D. W. K. Ng, N. Zlatanov, and R. Schober, “Practical non-linear energy harvesting model and resource allocation for SWIPT systems,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2082–2085, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Mishra, S. De, and D. Krishnaswamy, “Dilemma at RF Energy Harvesting Relay: Downlink Energy Relaying or Uplink Information Transfer?” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 4939–4955, Aug, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Zhou, Z. Chu, H. Sun, R. Q. Hu, and L. Hanzo, “Artificial Noise Aided Secure Cognitive Beamforming for Cooperative MISO-NOMA Using SWIPT,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1–1, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Shi, L. Zhao, K. Liang, X. Chu, G. Wu, and H. Chen, “Profit maximization in wireless powered communications with improved non-linear energy conversion and storage efficiencies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–6, May, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Niu, D. Guo, Y. Huang, and B. Zhang, “Robust Energy Efficiency Optimization for Secure MIMO SWIPT Systems With Non-Linear EH Model,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2610–2613, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Q. Yao, T. Q. S. Quek, A. Huang, and H. Shan, “Joint Downlink and Uplink Energy Minimization in WET-Enabled Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6751–6765, Oct, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Zhou, Y. Wu, and H. Zhou, “Resource allocation in wireless powered cognitive radio networks based on a practical non-linear energy harvesting model,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 17618–17626, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  25. J.-M. Kang, I.-M. Kim, and D. I. Kim, “Mode Switching for SWIPT over Fading Channel with Nonlinear Energy Harvesting,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 678–681, Oct, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Wang, M. Xia, K. Huang, and Y. Wu, “Wirelessly Powered Two-Way Communication With Nonlinear Energy Harvesting Model: Rate Regions Under Fixed and Mobile Relay,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 8190–8204, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Wang, G. Lu, Y. Ye, and Y. Ren, “Dynamic Power Splitting Strategy for SWIPT Based Two-Way Multiplicative AF Relay Networks with Nonlinear Energy Harvesting Model,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2018, Article ID 1802063, 9 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Cvetkovic and V. Blagojevic, “Performance Analysis of Nonlinear Energy-Harvesting DF Relay System in Interference-Limited Nakagami-m Fading Environment,” ETRI Journal, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 803–812, Dec, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Zhang and G. Pan, “Outage Analysis of Wireless-Powered Relaying MIMO Systems with Non-Linear Energy Harvesters and Imperfect CSI,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 7046–7053, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Ye, and H. Zhang, “Dynamic Power Splitting Schemes for Non-Linear EH Relaying Networks: Perfect and Imperfect CSI,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5, Sept, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. L. Wei, R. Q. Hu, Y. Qian, and G. Wu, “Energy efficiency and spectrum efficiency of multihop device-to-device communications underlaying cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 367–380, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus