Review Article

Past Results, Present Trends, and Future Challenges in Intrabody Communication

Table 6

Comparison of galvanic intrabody communication systems developed using discrete components.

Institution Authors Year Coupling amplitude Carrier frequency Modulation Data rate
b/s
Power consumption Application Reference

Waseda University, Japan Handa et al. 1997 20 μA 70 kHz PWM 0.9 k 8 μW ECG monitoring [90]
University of California, USA Lindsey et al. 1998 3 mA 37 kHz FM Communication with implantable transducers [91]
ETH Zurich, Switzerland Oberle 2002 4 mA 60 kHz CPFSK 4.8 k Low-power biomedical communication [92]
Wegmüller 2007 1 mA 256 kHz BPSK 64 k 20 mW On-body monitoring sensors, wireless implant communication [93, 94]
Victoria University, Australia Seyedi et al.2014 650 mV 0.5–17.5 MHz 4-PPM, 8-PPM 1.56 M 2.0 mW (1.28 nJ/b) Biomedical applications [95, 96]