Research Article
A Comparative Analysis of Different Outlier Detection Techniques in Cognitive Radio Networks with Malicious Users
Table 4
Percent decrease in the error probabilities for the proposed AND HDF scheme.
| | Decision schemes | SNR values | | -26 dB | -22 dB | -18 dB | -14 dB | -10 dB |
| | Proposed AND vs. mean AND | 0.19% | 5.71% | 24.2% | 49.7% | 64.7% | | Proposed AND vs. GESD AND | 0.19% | 5.71% | 23.5% | 46.7% | 59.7% | | Proposed AND vs. Grubbs AND | 0.19% | 5.5% | 24.2% | 48.5% | 60.8% | | Proposed AND vs. quartile AND | 0.19% | 5.7% | 22.5% | 32.9% | 22% |
|
|
