Research Article

Air Pollution Concentration Forecast Method Based on the Deep Ensemble Neural Network

Table 3

The accuracy comparisons between NN, RNN, LSTM, and EN with different numbers of neurons.

ModelThe number of neurons of dense layersMAEMAPE

Group 1NN56.9919.59%
RNN57.2320.17%
LSTM56.6320.01%
GRU56.7320.23%
EN1 (NN+RNN){5, 5}7.1920.31%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){5, 5}6.6219.65%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){5, 5}6.5919.35%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){5, 5, 5}6.7319.61%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){5, 5, 5, 5}6.7219.60%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){5, 5, 5}6.6019.99%
Group 2NN106.8919.17%
RNN106.5718.70%
LSTM108.2725.43%
GRU107.2319.88%
EN1 (NN+RNN){10, 10}6.5418.30%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){10, 10}7.0220.76%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){10, 10}6.8420.68%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){10, 10, 10}6.6519.49%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){10, 10, 10, 10}6.6719.23%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){10, 10, 10}6.3517.36%
Group 3NN157.1119.89%
RNN156.5716.77%
LSTM156.4517.34%
GRU156.5619.84%
EN1 (NN+RNN){15, 15}6.4217.68%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){15, 15}6.4917.06%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){15, 15}6.2216.25%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){15, 15, 15}6.2616.64%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){15, 15, 15, 15}6.2516.56%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){15, 15, 15}6.1916.20%
Group 4NN206.9519.19%
RNN207.2318.49%
LSTM206.4816.79%
GRU206.6017.25%
EN1 (NN+RNN){20, 20}6.5717.39%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){20, 20}6.2016.42%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){20, 20}6.4616.57%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){20, 20, 20}6.2416.28%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){20, 20, 20, 20}6.2016.56%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){20, 20, 20}6.2816.46%
Group 5NN257.0019.96%
RNN257.7923.55%
LSTM257.1421.04%
GRU257.0819.39%
EN1 (NN+RNN){25, 25}7.1020.87%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){25, 25}6.7119.56%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){25, 25}7.1321.57%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){25, 25, 25}6.8620.37%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){25, 25, 25, 25}6.8820.22%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){25, 25, 25}6.8019.78%
Group 6NN307.2120.29%
RNN307.0219.74%
LSTM306.9118.65%
GRU307.0219.56%
EN1 (NN+RNN){30, 30}6.9019.41%
EN2 (NN+LSTM){30, 30}6.6618.51%
EN3 (RNN+LSTM){30, 30}6.5718.34%
EN4 (NN+RNN+LSTM){30, 30, 30}6.6018.48%
EN5 (NN+RNN+LSTM+GRU){30, 30, 30, 30}6.5618.23%
EN (RNN+LSTM+GRU){30, 30, 30}6.4717.80%