Research Article
Anomaly Detection Collaborating Adaptive CEEMDAN Feature Exploitation with Intelligent Optimizing Classification for IIoT Sparse Data
Table 4
Detection efficiency comparisons between traditional ABC-OCSVM and PSO-OCSVM anomaly detection classifiers.
| Attack power | ABC-OCSVM | IABC-OCSVM | Training accuracy | Test accuracy | Test time | Training accuracy | Test accuracy | Test time |
| 1 | 96.0% | 86.5% | 0.0079 s | 96.0% | 86.5% | 0.0076 s | 2 | 93.5% | 88.0% | 0.0079 s | 92.0% | 88.5% | 0.0080 s | 3 | 91.0% | 90.0% | 0.0090 s | 91.0% | 90.5% | 0.0081 s | 4 | 96.5% | 87.0% | 0.0076 s | 95.0% | 88.0% | 0.0079 s | 5 | 98.5% | 93.5% | 0.0086 s | 98.5% | 95.5% | 0.0089 s | Average | 95.10% | 89.00% | 0.0082 s | 94.50% | 89.80% | 0.0081 s |
|
|