Research Article
An Efficient and Secure Malicious User Detection Scheme Based on Reputation Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing VANET
Table 1
Comparison of research literatures.
| Research categories | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Cryptography [20–22] | The credibility of user is guaranteed. | The sensing data quality cannot be guaranteed; the overhead is too large. | Incentive mechanism [23–26] | The credibility of user and effective evaluation of data are guaranteed. | The user fairness cannot be guaranteed; the practicality of the scheme is poor. | Reputation mechanism [27–31] | The reputation of user is evaluated from multiple aspects. | The historical reputation is not fully considered; the user fairness and the accuracy of detection methods cannot be guaranteed. |
|
|