Research Article

Towards Enabling Multihop Wireless Local Area Networks for Disaster Communications

Table 1

Comparative analysis of various existing schemes.

TechniqueAdvantagesLimitations

Decode-and-Forward (DF) [16]Increases coverage area without expanding the transmission power of source nodeRelaying transmission caters to enhance the latency
Truncated Decode and Forward (TDF) [17]Improves spectral efficiency while minimizing delayIncreases total latency due to retransmission
Adaptive Relay Transmission Selection (ARTS) [18]Selects relay transmission with minimum latencyMore affected by overhead with relay transmission
Information theoretic approach [19]If relay channels are strong and robust, then AF and DF attain less latencyIf uplink and downlink are weak channels, then AF and DF cater negative impact on latency
Information theoretic technique [20]While considering more number of hops, DF performs better than AFAt each hop, latency increases by amplifying noise signals
Joint power and bandwidth allocation strategies [21]Particular to channel conditions, joint optimization methods yield higher transmission rates as compared to single power optimization schemeChannel capacity enhancement has not been discussed in these studies
Feasible solution construction (FSC) algorithm [22]Joint optimization problem of flow routing and relay node assignment for concurrent sessions to improve capacity of wireless networksIt is hard to solve the computational complexity of this algorithm
AP coverage adjustment problem (ACAP) and user association optimization problem (UAOP) [23]Provides optimal solutions for large-scale networks quickly with low overheadGap between AP utilization increases by increasing the traffic demands
-bounded approximation [24]Executes both upper and lower bound tight solutions quickly without finding maximal independent setsHowever, is still system control parameter
Heuristic-based approach [25]Examined good fairness index per user, average hop count, and less number of MR handover eventsThe average hop count is increased as compared to HWMP method
Load balancing algorithm [26]Provides better performance with reference to network throughput and data dropped in WLANAssociation and reassociation of load with access points increase the switching delay
Frequency allocation scheme [27]Reduces the number of operational gateways comparatively to the fixed allocation methodDigital channelizer degrades the SINR due to the imbalance received power