Research Article  Open Access
Tayebeh Taheri, Rickard Nilsson, Jaap van de Beek, "The Potential of MassiveMIMO on TV Towers for Cellular Coverage Extension", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2021, Article ID 8164367, 14 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8164367
The Potential of MassiveMIMO on TV Towers for Cellular Coverage Extension
Abstract
Because of low potential revenue, network operators have mainly focused on providing connectivity in urban areas rather than in rural areas resulting in technology improvement in favour of urban areas; and consequently, most of remote areas suffer from poor or lack of connectivity. In this paper, we present the potential of massiveMIMO to provide connectivity to sparse areas. We show that we can cover large rural areas with radius of tens of km using massiveMIMO mounted on existing infrastructure of TV towers. We also show that, in contrast with common belief, higher frequencies, e.g., 3500 MHz rather than 700 MHz, can reach farther utilizing massiveMIMO, provided that the antenna area is the same.
1. Introduction
By the evolution of cellular devices from Nordic mobile telephony (NMT) to nowadays 5G cellular devices, connectivity has improved in many aspects but not in signal range (signal power). In 1981, the first fully automatic cellular phone systems, NMT, with the frequency range of 450 MHz were introduced. Highpower NMT transmission could cover large areas. Demand for a higher bitrate in all parts of the network has been increased during years. To provide higher datarate to the users, which are located mostly in urban areas, GSM, 3G, and 4G focused more on higher and higher frequencies and smaller cell size. Even though the lowfrequency bands have been used in all generations, this usage has not been developed enough to provide demanded connectivity to far distances including sparse areas. Wireless systems have tackled the coverage problem by building more and more base stations and splitting large areas into small cells (smaller areas). The focus has been mainly on urban areas, roads, and railways, since building base stations or dig fibre to cover the sparse areas is too expensive.
By the end of 2020, more than eight billion devices will be connected to 5G technology [1], where most of the subscribers are in urban and suburban areas. Even though connectivity is part of social justice, it is one of the significant impairments in the United Nation’s sustainable development goals (SDG) [2, 3]. Because of low potential revenue, network operators have been reluctant to invest in providing connectivity to rural areas resulting in technology improvement, in favour of the urban areas leaving the remote areas without connectivity.
In recent years, the demand for connectivity in remote areas has been shifting from endconsumers to industry and society. The European Commission has declared the goal that all EUcitizens will have access to the internet speed of 30 Mbits/s by the year 2020. However, just in Sweden, 710 percent of citizens, mainly live in rural and sparse areas in the north, do not have access to it yet [4]. It means over 700,000 people in Sweden are potentially excluded.
Several solutions have been proposed to provide internet connectivity to rural areas, to mention some, Google balloons [5, 6], unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [7, 8], satellite [9], and very recently, using sectorized antennas located on TV towers [10].
Google has proposed the use of balloons called as Loon project to cover radius of around 20 km in rural areas [6]. Base station equipments as well as solar panels to provide energy and a lithium battery to save the solar energy are mounted on each balloon. Not only use of solar panels is critical especially in wintertime in northern countries such as Sweden, each balloon needs physical maintenance such as caring the envelope or replacing the gas cylinder, which controls the altitude, every now and then. A Loon balloon can work only 100 days [6]. There are two types of communication in Loon balloons, balloon to balloon and balloon to ground. Multiple balloons need to get connected to each other in a chain to deliver the connectivity to faraway users (balloon to balloon communication). Moreover, since balloons are moving constantly, each user has to track the balloons continuously [5]. With all being said, continuous connection is challenging by Loon balloons.
Another proposed solution to provide connectivity to rural areas is to use base stations carried by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) [7, 8]. The use of UAVs is limited in terms of time, required planning algorithm, and energy consumption and is also challenging in sophisticated and violated environments. UAVs are promising in temporary use such as emergency situations, but it fails in providing the permanent connectivity to households in sparse areas.
A very recent study proposes using a stack of sector antennas on a TV tower and designs the antennas in order to make a high power narrow beam which can reach farther away [10].
Some studies have suggested to use satellite communication for hardtoreach areas [9]. Satellite communication is another promising technology for obtaining full coverage, but it is beyond the scope of this paper to compare with this technology.
MassiveMIMO is usually used in urban scenarios to increase the capacity in urban small cells. The mentioned solutions for rural connectivity including UAVs and sector antennas have been investigated in the literature to some extent. Complementary to these studies, the potential of terrestrial networks to serve large rural areas needs further investigation since such networks, equipped with the latest emerging antenna technologies potentially could provide lowcost economically attractive alternatives. In this paper, we study the feasibility of providing connectivity to sparse areas utilizing massiveMIMO. We use the existing infrastructure of TV towers, see Figure 1, to avoid the costly building of new infrastructure (building of new base stations or optical fibres). We show that we can cover a radius of 70 km around a TV tower with the speed of 30 Mbits/s using massiveMIMO technology. We also show that higher speed and/or larger areas coverage is possible under some assumptions such as antenna diversity or dropping the worst conditioned users. The proposed solution is scalable and deploys minimum infrastructure. We also show that, in contrast with the common belief that a lower frequency is more proper for reaching far distances, higher frequencies provide larger area coverage, provided that the antenna array area is the same.
In this paper, we follow the approach in [11, 12] and assume that antenna elements experience independent Rayleigh fading channels. Even though this assumption is optimistic but gives us the analytical expression needed to find the upper bound results.
The paper continues as follows. In Section II, we introduce the system model and notation. In Section III, we discuss the base station antenna array area as the main cost to provide connectivity. We evaluate the requirements to achieve the target uplink and downlink throughput in Section IV. We also discuss the impact of dropping the worst conditioned users on the system throughput. Finally, Section V concludes the paper.
2. System Model
In this paper, for simplicity, we assume a single cell and we investigate the maximum area we can cover using a single TV tower. However, for full coverage, more cells and towers are required. This is beyond the scope of this paper and is a subject of future research.
We consider a singlecell base station with number of antennas serving user and look at the transmitted and received signals both on the uplink and downlink. We assume the noise samples, both in uplink and downlink, are i.i.d. Gaussian distributed .
In this paper, we assume omnidirectional antenna elements, both at the transmitter and receiver sides. The use of other types of antennas such as directive antennas may reduce the number of required antenna elements. In this paper, we assume the subscribers are static (households); however, the use of omnidirectional antennas enables the proposed structure to be extended to provide connectivity to mobile users in a simpler way rather than using other types of antennas.
In this paper, we consider time division duplex (TDD) systems where the uplink and downlink use the same frequency spectrum but different time slots. Channel is estimated on uplink transmission from received pilot signals from U users. The channel estimated at the base station in the uplink is used to form the transmit signal in the downlink.
2.1. Uplink
In the uplink, terminals weight their respective symbols, , by power coefficient () asand then synchronously send them to the base stationwhere is the normalized transmitted signal vector, , is the diagonal matrix with the elements of on its diagonal, and is the uncorrelated data symbol with zero mean and unit variance, .
At the base station, the received signal vector, , iswhere , is the receiver noise vector and denotes the average uplink signaltonoise ratio (SNR). Matrix represents the channel propagation matrix between the base station antennas and the users,where is scalar and represents the channel coefficient between the th user and th BS antenna.
Later received signal is decoded at the base station,where represents the decoder. In massiveMIMO linear processing such as ZeroForcing (ZF) and MaximumRatio (MR) are near optimal for decoding the uplink received signal, , [11].
2.2. Downlink
The downlink transmit vector, , is generated by first scaling the date symbols using the downlink power control coefficients, (), and then, in order to avoid multiuserinterference and increase the capacity of the MIMO system, the downlink transmit signal is precoded at the base station using a size precoding matrix [11].where is the th column of . Received signal on terminal , , iswhere is the th receiver noise, , and denotes the average downlink SNR. In the downlink, the channel matrix is which is the transpose of the uplink channel matrix in (4); this is because of the reciprocity assumption in the massiveMIMO systems, where is the receiver noise vector and denotes the average downlink SNR. In (7), channel matrix is the transpose of the uplink channel matrix in (4); this is because of the reciprocity assumption in the massiveMIMO systems.
In downlink massiveMIMO, similar to uplink, linear processing such as ZF and MR is near optimal for the downlink precoding [11].
Throughout this paper, we assume ZF linear processing for both uplink decoding and downlink precoding. On the downlink, we choose and on the uplink we choose , where
2.3. Channel Assumptions
Every channel matrix elements in (4) captures components of channel response via a large scale fading coefficient, and a smallscale fading coefficient, as
We assume that smallscale fading is independent Rayleigh, is i.i.d . This is an optimistic assumption which allows us to borrow the analytical expression from [11, 12]. The study of other channels with different distributions is a subject for future investigations. Considering independent Rayleigh fading channel gives us the upper bound results. Owing to ZF processing the effect of disappears (channel hardening) [11].
Large scale fading coefficient () includes the pathloss and shadow fading. There are several pathloss Models in the literature, including Ericsson 9999 [13] and Hata [14]. In particular, here, we look at the Ericsson 9999 rural model. Ericsson 9999 model is an extension of Hata model (frequency range of 1501500 MHz) for higher frequencies; and in the literature, it has been used for frequencies of up to 3.5 GHz [13]. In Ericsson 9999 model, pathloss, in dB, on th user iswhere is the distance between the th user and the base station in km, is the base station tower height in meter, is the user’s antenna height in meter, and is the carrier frequency in MHz.
On top of pathloss, we consider the lognormal shadow fading effect, . The large scale fading coefficient, becomeswhere represents the shadow fading on th user’s antenna.
The large scale fading coefficient, , is assumed to be constant over a timefrequency block called coherence block [11]. The timefrequency resources are divided into blocks of size Hz and s, with the purpose of making each user channel approximately frequencyflat and static within a block. Hence, the bandwidth is selected to be smaller or equal to the anticipated channel coherence bandwidth among the users, while is smaller or equal to the anticipated channel coherence time of the users. Each block is referred to as a coherence block. Due to the NyquistShannon sampling theorem, the number of transmission symbols that fit into a coherence block is given by
Coherence bandwidth, , can be calculated aswhere is the rms delay spread. In rural area, median rms delay spread is around 0.1 [15]; however, in this paper, we use a more conservative value of kHz.
Coherence time, , is a function of user speed as [16]where is the maximum Doppler shift, is the light speed, is the user speed, and is the carrier frequency. In this paper, we aim at providing connectivity to fixed households; however, in our evaluations in Section IV, we use a more conservative value of km/hr.
In massiveMIMO, the coherence block is split in three portions of uplink payload , uplink pilot sequence , and downlink payload as shown in Figure 2.
2.4. Spectral Efficiency and Throughput
The effective rigorous signaltointerferenceplusnoise ratio (SINR) for the th terminal, SINR, in case of independent Rayleigh fading channel and assuming ZF processing is [11]where is the meansquare of the channel estimate. is the uplink power control coefficient satisfying , and is the downlink power control coefficient satisfying and ; and are calculated using link budget calculation considering .
The effective SINR values in (15) and (16) determine the lower bounds on (ergodic) sum capacity, , aswhere represents the instantaneous capacity on th user. Sum capacity, (17), is only used in the optimization process in Section IV to find the minimum number of required antennas.
The (ergodic) sum spectral efficiency iswhere on the uplink and on the downlink . Here, is the total available samples in the coherence block, and and represent the number of samples in the coherence block used, respectively, for uplink and downlink data transmission. Sum throughput is calculated aswhere is the available bandwidth.
2.5. Power Control Coefficients
In this paper, we assume maxmin fairness power control, meaning maximizing the worst terminal performance and having the same SINR on all terminal. The maxmin fairness results in the following optimization problem [11, 12]:where is the average SINR. Power control coefficients become [11, 12]:
Coherence block in a rural area is large which accommodates a long pilot sequence duration,. It means enough resource is available to accurately estimate the channel, and thus, we assume the channel estimates are very accurate . Therefore, (15) and (16) become
Later, in Section IV, we use the uplink and downlink SINR expressions in (22) and (23) to evaluate the system performance.
3. Antenna Array Area
It is usually believed that a lower carrier frequency is a better choice for communication in rural area due to lower pathloss and therefore, higher signal range [17]. While this is a fact in oneantenna systems, in massiveMIMO system, one of the major limiting factors is the effective area dedicated to an antenna array and not the carrier frequency. It is shown in [18] that as long as the effective antenna area is fixed, the overall pathloss effect is frequency independent. Moreover, the cost of an antenna array is an economical factor and will be further reduced by advancing the technology over time; however, the antenna area is a physical limitation that we have to always deal with. Thus, in this work, we fix the antenna array area size, , and fill it with the maximum possible number of omnidirectional antennas that can fit within for each carrier frequency.
Omnidirectional antennas come in different sizes. In this paper, we assume that the size of an antenna operating in wavelength of is where
where is the light speed and is the carrier frequency. Considering dualpolarized antenna elements in the array which enables doubling the number of antenna elements on a physical area, we can calculate the maximum possible number of base station antennas, , filling the fixed antenna array area, , for a certain carrier frequency. Here, we assume a cylindrical array with radius of m. This radius allows for 58, 150, and 293 columns of arrays operating in carrier frequency of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHz, respectively. Table 1 shows the number of antennas in each column where the antenna array area is 40, 100, and 125 m^{2}. In this paper, the element spacing is chosen to be the half of the wavelength, and antenna elements are assuming to be omnidirectional. Figure 3 shows one of the possible configurations where antenna elements, in neighboring bins, do not touch each other. The impact of massive MIMO antenna topologies of cylindrical and rectangular is negligible [19]. In this paper, we assume omnidirectional antennas. Other types of antennas may reduce the number of antennas needed, for example, if users use directive antennas. In the evaluations in Section IV, we assume a cylindrical antenna array with m^{2} as in Figure 4.

There are some studies on the required antenna separation in rural areas, for instance [21, 22]. These studies show that antenna distance depends on the channel correlation. In this paper, we assume the distance of onehalf wavelength between antenna elements in the array [12]. This element spacing can be used in some real antenna arrays, e.g., linear arrays with dipole elements. But, e.g., in microstrip patch antenna arrays, the distance between the elements is typically larger than the half of the wavelength.
4. Simulations
In this paper, we consider a TV tower located 250 m above the ground. We assume HPUEclass (high power user with a radiated power of 31 dBm). Each subscriber is equipped with one antenna, 8 m height with gain of 6 dBi. Later, we also investigate the antenna diversity by assuming two uncorrelated antennas at the user side which provide best of two diversity for shadow fading. Spectral bandwidth is MHz. Table 2 summarizes the parameters used in our design.

The density of households (users) is assumed to be 0.15 households/km^{2}. We assume uniform distribution of users, and the results are averaged over large number of random realizations. In our simulation, we only consider the ZF operation. Assuming the highquality channel estimation , the maxmin fairness power control is applied meaning ensuring all terminals experience the same SINR which is equal to the average SINR, see (22) and (23).
In our evaluation, we use (18) and (19) for spectral efficiency and throughput, respectively. We limit the uplink pilot overhead to the number of terminals and assume that each terminal is assigned to a unique orthogonal pilot sequence, . The pilot overhead leaves of coherence block for data transmission. We split the resources for uplink and downlink transmission as . The goal is to provide each rural subscriber within the radius of 70 km with downlink throughput of 30 Mbits/s (spectral of sufficiency of 3/2 bits/s/Hz for each subscriber) and uplink throughput of 15 Mbits/s (spectral of sufficiency of 3/4 bits/s/Hz for each subscriber).
With spectrum congestion in recent years, it is important to find a proper bandwidth to use for rural connectivity.
Here, we look at three different frequencies of 700 MHz, available due to shifting from analogue to digital TV [23], 1800 MHz, and 3500 MHz. We also assume that the system works on TDD mode.
Figure 5 shows the probability of all users experience the uplink throughput of 15 Mbits/s within different radius, , operating on three carrier frequencies of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHz. The antenna array is fixed to a cylinder with radius of 2 m and height of 10 m as depicted in Figure 4, m^{2}. Based on the results in Figure 5 with probability of 85 percent, we can deliver the target uplink spectral efficiency of 3/4 bits/s/Hz (equivalently throughput of 15 Mbits/s) to each terminal within maximum radius of 50 km (1360 households), 60 km (1900 households), and 70 km (2500 households), operating, respectively, on carrier frequency of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHZ. For a fixed antenna array area, , spectral efficiency is higher in higher frequencies, and thus, we can deliver a certain spectral efficiency to farther distance using higher carrier frequencies. The reason is that more number of antennas increases the beamforming degrees of freedom, shaping the transmitted beams more precisely. Thus, while, the overall effect of pathloss is the same for all frequencies (since antenna array area is kept the same for all frequencies); in a higher frequency, beams have more power and can reach farther away.
Figure 6 shows the probability histogram of different spectral efficiency for 10000 realization of user distribution within the radius of km operating at carrier frequency of 1800 MHz. Figure 6, similar to the result from Figure 5, shows that in 85 percent of realizations uplink throughput is at least 15 Mbits/s/terminal.
To ensure that more subscribers will experience the target throughput more antennas, therefore, a larger antenna area is required. Figure 7 examines the uplink throughput of 15 Mbits/s/terminal in a given radius of 50 km (1360 households), 60 km (1900 households), and 70 km (2500 households) for carrier frequencies of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHz, respectively (the points specifically shown in Figure 5). Figure 7 shows that by utilizing m^{2}, in only around 85 percent of the situations (realizations), the uplink throughput is at least 15 Mbits/s; while more antenna array area is needed to ensure the target throughput in higher percentage of the situations.
Now, we look at the downlink and the target downlink throughput is considered as 30 Mbits/s on all terminals. Figure 8 shows the probability of all users experience the downlink throughput of, at least, 30 Mbits/s within different radius, , operating on three carrier frequencies of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHz, m^{2}. We see that with probability of 85 percent, we can deliver the target uplink spectral efficiency of 3/2 bits/s/Hz (equivalently throughput of 30 Mbits/s) to each terminal within maximum radius of 65 km (2190 households), 78 km (3010 households), and 88 km (3670 households), operating, respectively, on carrier frequency of 700, 1800, and 3500 MHz. Figure 9 implies that, similar to uplink, more antenna array area than m^{2} is needed to ensure the target throughput in more than 85 percent of situations; however, compared to uplink, the radius of coverage is larger in the downlink.
Moreover, on the downlink, we have the possibility of using high downlink power to achieve a high throughput, and thus, higher downlink power can compensate for small antenna array area as it is depicted in Figure 10. Figure 10 shows the required antenna array area for the target downlink throughput of 30 Mbits/s within the radius of 70 km and MHz, for three downlink power of 50, 51.7, and 53 dBm.
Comparing the presented results of uplink and downlink shows that the system is uplink limited. The antenna array area, which is considered as the cost in this paper, is the common means to achieve the target uplink and downlink throughput. Therefore, the minimum required antenna array area size is , where and are the minimum required antenna area to meet, respectively, the uplink and downlink target throughput within a certain radius. Since the system is uplink limited, .
In our simulations in this paper, we assume that all subscribers are always communicating with maximum bitrate (fullbuffer). However, traffic may be lower at certain time and/or for some subscribers. Considering the lower required traffic, the achievable maximum bitrate will be higher, or alternatively, we can serve more users and increase the radius of coverage.
Figures 11 and 12 compare the fullbuffer condition to halfbuffer where only half of the subscribers with maximum bitrate are communicating.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
One way to improve the communication and reduce the effect of shadow fading is to use more than one antenna at each household (user). Here, we consider a diversity of two uncorrelated antennas. Even though full independence of two antennas is not a realistic assumption, here, we assume the maximum improvement that can happen.
By assuming diversity of best of two, meaning, choosing the better choice of shadow fading effect out of two installed antennas for each user, in (11) becomeswhere and represent the lognormal shadow fading on two possible user’s antennas.
By introducing the two uncorrelated antenna diversity, the achievable spectral efficiency within a certain radius increases. Comparing Figures 7 and 13 shows that the introduced diversity reduces the required antenna area to ensure that in almost all situations, we find the maxmin fairness solution. In other words, the limitation due to bad conditioned users in terms of shadow fading is decreased.
Adding antenna diversity not only improves the uplink throughput but also improves the downlink throughput. Figure 14 depicts the improvement of average downlink spectral efficiency in the case of twoantenna users over oneantenna user scenario.
In Figure 14, we assume that the two antennas of each user are totally uncorrelated. However, the actual improvement is in between oneantenna diversity curves and twoantenna diversity curves depending on the amount of correlation between antennas.
Maxmin fairness power control aims to maximize the minimal throughput; therefore, a very bad conditioned user, for instance, a user with a large shadow fading coefficient, may hugely decrease the performance of the system. Several subscribers may be in hardtoreach conditions (relatively large ) that makes the maxmin fairness power control fail to find a solution. To maintain the quality of the service, we can consider to drop some of the worst conditioned users and enhance the quality of the service to the rest of the user terminals. Figure 15 shows that both on uplink and downlink, by dropping some worst users, the average spectral efficiency is improved. The improvement is relatively larger at the beginning when the very worst users are neglected (curves in Figure 15 are steeper at lower percentage).
(a) Uplink
(b) Downlink
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we show the feasibility of providing high speed connectivity of 30 Mbits/s to sparse areas, utilizing massiveMIMO. The proposed solution uses the existing infrastructure of high TV towers and can cover radius of 70 km. The system is uplink limited and can be improved by dropping the worst users or equipping users with more than one antenna. The antenna array can be built by stacking column antenna arrays next to each other. For a fixed antenna array area, the number of feasible antennas is larger in higher frequencies giving the opportunity of shaping the beams more precisely; therefore, high frequencies such as 3500 MHz can cover larger areas compared to lower frequencies such as 700 MHz.
Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge funding by Sweden’s innovation agency, Vinnova. The research reported here was carried with support by the fullcoverage project.
References
 “Ericsson website,” Tech. Rep., November 2019, https://www.ericsson.com/en/mobilityreport/reports/june2019/mobilesubscriptionsoutlook. View at: Google Scholar
 “United nations sustainable development goals,” December 2019, https://www.https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Wu, S. Guo, H. Huang, W. Liu, and Y. Xiang, “Information and communications technologies for sustainable development goals: stateoftheart, needs and perspectives,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2389–2406, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Beek, M. Bollen, A. Larsson, and M. Eriksson, Can Solar Power Help Providing Broadband Cellular Coverage in ExtremeRural Sweden? Lulea° tekniska universitet, 2016.
 “Loon for all,” November 2019, http://www.google.com/loon/. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Katikala, “Google project loon,” InSight: Rivier Academic Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Amorosi, L. Chiaraviglio, F. d’Andreagiovanni, and N. BlefariMelazzi, “Energyefficient mission planning of uavs for 5g coverage in rural zones,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environmental Engineering (EE), pp. 1–9, Milan, Italy, March 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Sharma, K. Srinivasan, H.C. Chao, K.L. Hua, and W.H. Cheng, “Intelligent deployment of UAVs in 5G heterogeneous communication environment for improved coverage,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 85, pp. 94–105, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Todd, D. Linton, G. Stafford, and T. Huang, “Multiband reflector antenna for improved satellite communications in rural areas,” in 2010 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference, pp. 469–472, Loughborough, UK, November 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Lun, P. Frenger, A. Furuskar, and E. Trojer, “5G new radio for rural broadband: how to achieve longrange coverage on the 3.5 GHz band,” in 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019Fall), pp. 1–6, Honolulu, HI, USA, September 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. L. Marzetta, Fundamentals of Massive MIMO, Cambridge University Press, 2016. View at: Publisher Site
 H. Yang and T. L. Marzetta, “Massive mimo with maxmin power control in lineofsight propagation environment,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4685–4693, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Milanović, S. RimacDrlje, and I. Majerski, “Radio wave propagation mechanisms and empirical models for fixed wireless access systems,” Tehnički vjesnik, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 T. S. Rappaport, “Mobile radio propagation: largescale path loss,” in Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, pp. 107–110, Apprentice Hall, 2nd edition, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Asplund, K. Larsson, and P. Okvist, “How typical is the “typical urban” channel model?” in VTC Spring 2008IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 340–343, Singapore, Singapore, May 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Clarke, “A statistical theory of mobileradio reception,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 957–1000, 1968. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Mathew, B. Issac, and T. C. Eng, “A communication architecture using low frequency signals,” in 2014 International Conference on Data Science Engineering (ICDSE), pp. 188–193, Kochi, India, August 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Björnson, J. Hoydis, and L. Sanguinetti, “Massive mimo networks: spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,” Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, vol. 11, no. 34, pp. 154–655, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. T. Neil, M. Shafi, P. J. Smith, and P. A. Dmochowski, “On the impact of antenna topologies for massive mimo systems,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 2030–2035, London, UK, June 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 “Statistics Sweden website,” February 2020, https://www.scb.se. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Pinchera, M. Migliore, F. Schettino, and G. Panariello, “Antenna arrays for lineofsight massive mimo: half wavelength is not enough,” Electronics, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 57, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Chandhar, D. Danev, and E. G. Larsson, “On ergodic rates and optimal array geometry in lineofsight massive mimo,” in 2016 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), pp. 1–6, Edinburgh, UK, July 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Khalil, J. Qadir, O. Onireti, M. A. Imran, and S. Younis, “Feasibility, architecture and cost considerations of using tvws for rural internet access in 5G,” in 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN), pp. 23–30, Paris, France, March 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Tayebeh Taheri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.