Research Article
Air Quality Prediction Model Based on Spatiotemporal Data Analysis and Metalearning
Table 4
Comparison of mean prediction results by different methods among 36 monitoring stations in Beijing (RMSE, MAE, ACC).
| Methods | +6 h | +12 h | +24 h | +48 h | RMSE | MAE | ACC | RMSE | MAE | ACC | RMSE | MAE | ACC | RMSE | MAE | ACC |
| ARIMA | 53.3 | 40.7 | 0.622 | 70.7 | 59.2 | 0.432 | 94.1 | 68.2 | 0.321 | 104.3 | 78.2 | 0.201 | LSTM | 48.2 | 34.5 | 0.723 | 57.3 | 47.3 | 0.582 | 71.2 | 55.1 | 0.473 | 85.7 | 66.3 | 0.367 | ST-DNN | 35.6 | 23.8 | 0.761 | 52.2 | 37.1 | 0.67 | 63.2 | 49.3 | 0.546 | 70.4 | 57.7 | 0.474 | GAT-LSTM | 28.5 | 20.1 | 0.799 | 47.9 | 34.8 | 0.698 | 55.7 | 45.2 | 0.621 | 65.8 | 48.9 | 0.501 |
|
|