Review Article

An Overview on Deployment Strategies for Global Quantum Key Distribution Networks

Table 1

Pros and cons of terrestrial, free-space, and satellite QKD.

Deployment strategiesTerrestrial QKD via optical fibersFree-space QKD on groundFree-space QKD ground-to-airSatellite QKD (trusted relay)Satellite QKD (untrusted relay)

AttenuationFiber absorptionDiffraction
Turbulence
Weather
Absorption
Same as ground-based QKD plus
Misalignment
Vibration
Diffraction
Turbulence
Weather
Diffraction
Turbulence
Weather

Interferences from classical channelsSpontaneous Raman scattering noiseNoNoNoNo

Channel lossHigh, scale exponentially with fiber lengthHigh, scale exponentially with distanceLow
Scale quadratically with distance

Distance~100 km in fields without relay
Unlimited distance with trusted relay
MDI-QKD:
404 km in the lab [40]
200 km in fields [35]
TF-QKD:
>500 km in lab [45, 46, 48]
428 km in fields [47]
144 km in experiments [82]
<10 km in real fields
96 km in experiments [84]Satellite to the ground distance over 1200 km [90]
Unlimited distance between ground stations
1200 km between ground stations for a 500-km altitude LEO satellite
Longer for MEO/GEO

Compatibility to P2MP topologyP2MPP2MPP2P at a timeP2P at a timeSatellite to two ground stations

Line of sightNoYesYesYesSimultaneous LoS with both ground stations

Time windowWhole dayOnly night
Need special care for daytime operation
Short window in the clear night

DeploymentLow cost
Dedicated fiber or reuse existing ones
Low cost
Simple and fast installation
No fiber trenching
Expensive and slow
Synergy with satellite laser communication in space

Application scenariosMetro, accessLast few miles of access networksLong haul