Abstract and Applied Analysis

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 349156, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/349156

## On the -Bernstein Polynomials of Unbounded Functions with

Department of Mathematics, Atilim University, Incek, 06836 Ankara, Turkey

Received 8 January 2013; Accepted 19 February 2013

Academic Editor: Yuriy Rogovchenko

Copyright © 2013 Sofiya Ostrovska and Ahmet Yaşar Özban. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present new results related to the -Bernstein polynomials of unbounded functions in the case and to illustrate those results using numerical examples. As a model, the behavior of polynomials is examined both theoretically and numerically in detail for functions on satisfying as , where and are real numbers.

#### 1. Introduction

In 1912, precisely a century ago, Bernstein [1] published his famous proof of the Weierstrass approximation theorem by introducing polynomials, known today as the *Bernstein polynomials*. Later, it was found that these polynomials possess many remarkable properties, which made them an area of intensive research with wide range of applications. See, for example [2, 3]. The importance of the Bernstein polynomials led to the discovery of their numerous generalizations aimed to provide appropriate tools for various areas of mathematics, such as approximation theory, computer-aided geometric design, and the statistical inference.

Due to the speedy development of the -calculus, recent generalizations based on the -integers have emerged. A. Lupaş was the person who pioneered the work on the -versions of the Bernstein polynomials. In 1987, he introduced (cf. [4]) a -analogue of the Bernstein operator and investigated its approximation and shape-preserving properties. See also [5]. Subsequently, another generalization, called the -Bernstein polynomials, was brought into the spotlight by Phillips [6] and was studied afterwards by a number of authors from different perspectives.

To define these polynomials, let us recall some notions related to the -calculus. See, for example, [7], Ch. 10. Let . For any nonnegative integer , the *-integer * is defined by
and the *-factorial * is defined by

For integers with , the *-binomial* coefficient is defined by
We also use the following standard notations:

*Definition 1. *Let . The *-Bernstein polynomial* of is
where the *-Bernstein basic polynomials * are given by

Polynomials , and form the -*Bernstein basis* in the linear space of the polynomials of degree at most .

Note that for , is the classical Bernstein polynomial . Conventionally, the name -*Bernstein polynomial*s is reserved for the case .

Over the past years, the -Bernstein polynomials have remained under intensive study, and new researches concerning not only the properties of the -Bernstein polynomials, but also their various generalizations are constantly coming out (see, e.g., papers [8–14]). A detailed review of the results on the -Bernstein polynomials along with the extensive bibliography has been provided in [10].

The popularity of the -Bernstein polynomials is attributed to the fact that they are closely related to the -binomial and the -deformed Poisson probability distributions; see [15]. The -binomial distribution plays an important role in the -boson theory, providing a -deformation for the quantum harmonic formalism. More specifically, it has been used to construct the binomial state for the -boson. Meanwhile, its limit form called the -deformed Poisson distribution defines the distribution of energy in a -analogue of the coherent state; see [16].

It has been known that the -Bernstein polynomials inherit some of the properties of the classical Bernstein polynomials. For example, they possess the following endpoint interpolation property: and have linear functions as their fixed points:

The latter follows from the identity:

Nevertheless, the convergence properties of the -Bernstein polynomials for are essentially *different* from those of the classical ones. What is more, the cases and in terms of convergence are not similar to each other. See, for example [10]. This lack of similarity stems from the fact that while for , the -Bernstein operators given by
are *positive* linear operators on ; this is no longer valid for . In addition, the case is aggravated by the rather irregular behavior of basic polynomials (6), which, in this case, combine the fast increase in magnitude with the sign oscillations. For details see [17], where it has been shown that the norm increases rather rapidly in both and , namely,

In the present paper, the -Bernstein polynomials in the case are studied for unbounded functions—a problem which has not been considered before. The approximation of unbounded functions by the classical Bernstein polynomials was investigated by Lorentz in [2] and, recently, by Weba in [18].

Throughout the paper, is assumed to be fixed. In presenting the results, the notation is used for the time scale:

First, we prove that for a certain class of unbounded functions on , their sequence of the -Bernstein polynomials is approximating on . Further, the behavior of has been considered for functions which are continuous on and satisfy where and . Previously, the -Bernstein polynomials with of the power functions , where , were studied in [19]. There, it was proved that in the case uniformly on if and only if .

Numerical examples are used both to illustrate Theorems 3 and 6 and also to discuss the significance of the assumptions therein. All the numerical results have been calculated in a Maple 8 environment.

#### 2. The -Bernstein Polynomials of Unbounded Functions

It has been known that for , all functions continuous on are approximated by their -Bernstein polynomials on the time scale . Here, it will be proved that this fact remains true for functions which are continuous from the left at all points of .

For and , we set

Lemma 2. *Let be bounded on , where , and let . Then, for large enough, the following estimate holds:*

*Proof. *For , the statement is obvious due to the endpoint interpolation property (7). Therefore, it is assumed that .

First, it should be noticed that with for , and that, by virtue of (9), . Then, for , the following equality is true:
Then
for large enough to satisfy . Since
the first term can be estimated as follows:
To estimate the second term, one can write
By virtue of the inequality , which is satisfied for all , it follows that

With the help of Lemma 2, the following result can be derived easily.

Theorem 3. *If is continuous from the left at and bounded on , then as .*

*Proof. *The statement follows immediately from estimate (15). Indeed, since is continuous from the left at , and since .

Corollary 4. *If is continuous from the left at every , , then as for all .*

*Remark 5. *The conditions of the theorem are essential and cannot be left out entirely, as it will be shown by Example 8. Furthermore, it is not difficult to see that if is bounded on , then the condition
is necessary for the approximation at .

The power functions supply a natural family of functions discontinuous at satisfying the conditions of Theorem 3 for all . Therefore, it is interesting to consider the -Bernstein polynomials of functions whose behavior at is similar to that of the power functions. The next theorem investigates the behavior of the -Bernstein polynomials of such functions on the set .

Theorem 6. *Let so that and . Then, for ,
*

*Proof. *We set with . It can be readily seen that
where
Since, if and as , it suffices to prove that whenever . Let . Then, it is not difficult to see that
and that by the ratio test, . Hence, by the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem,
Obviously, if , and it is left to show that
Consider
Consequently,

The grouping of terms is justified, because the series is absolutely convergent.

As a result, one concludes that when , and the proof is complete.

#### 3. Numerical Examples

In this section, we provide the results of some numerical experiments to exemplify the validity of the theoretical results through a few test examples performed using high-precision computations with Maple 8. All of these computations are performed with 1000 digits so as to minimize the round-off errors, and 3 or 8 digits are used in showing the results in the tables.

*Example 7. *Let be defined by
The graphs of and for , are exhibited in Figure 1. Similarly, Figure 2 represents the graphs of and for , over the subintervals , , and , respectively.

In addition, in Table 1, the values of the *error function * with at some points are presented. These points are taken both in and in . It can be observed from the table that for , the values of the error function at the points of are close to , while, at the points in between, they become rather large in magnitude, as it can be noticed from the upper part of Table 1. On the other hand, if with , then . The bottom part of the table refers to this case. Finally, the middle part of the table shows the transition between the two cases.

In general, if a function does not satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3, then neither the approximation on nor the divergence of for all is guaranteed. This fact is illustrated by the following example.

*Example 8. *Consider the function defined by
Then, for large enough,
Therefore,
Consequently, for the error function , one has
If , the limit does not exist. Figure 3 exhibits the graphs of and for , , while Figure 4 provides those of and for , over the subintervals and . In addition, in Table 2, the values of the error function with at some points which are taken both in and in are presented.

It can be observed from the first three rows that as increases, the values of the error function become very large—a trend which reflects its behavior on . At the point , the values approach 6 from below, whereas for the remaining part of the table, the values of error function come close to zero as increases, which is in full agreement with the limit given by (35).

#### Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Mr. P. Danesh from Atilim University Academic Writing & Advisory Centre for his help in the preparation of the paper.

#### References

- S. N. Bernstein, “Démonstration du théorème de Weierstrass fondée sur la calcul des probabilités,”
*Communications de la Societe Mathematique de Charkow*, vol. 2, no. 13, pp. 1–2, 1912. View at Google Scholar - G. G. Lorentz,
*Bernstein Polynomials*, Chelsea, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1986. View at MathSciNet - V. S. Videnskii,
*Bernstein Polynomials*, Leningrad State Pedagocical University, Leningrad, Russia, 1990. - A. Lupaş, “A $q$-analogue of the Bernstein operator,” in
*Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus*, vol. 87, pp. 85–92, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj, Romania, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - O. Agratini, “On certain $q$-analogues of the Bernstein operators,”
*Carpathian Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus - G. M. Phillips, “Bernstein polynomials based on the $q$-integers,”
*Annals of Numerical Mathematics*, vol. 4, no. 1–4, pp. 511–518, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy,
*Special Functions*, vol. 71, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999. View at MathSciNet - N. Mahmudov, “The moments for $q$-Bernstein operators in the case $0<q<1$,”
*Numerical Algorithms*, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 439–450, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - I. Ya. Novikov, “Asymptotics of the roots of Bernstein polynomials used in the construction of modified Daubechies wavelets,”
*Mathematical Notes*, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 239–253, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Ostrovska, “The first decade of the $q$-Bernstein polynomials: results and perspectives,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Approximation Theory*, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - P. Sabancıgil, “Higher order generalization of $q$-Bernstein operators,”
*Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications*, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 821–827, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - V. S. Videnskii, “On some classes of $q$-parametric positive operators,”
*Operator Theory: Advances and Applications*, vol. 158, pp. 213–222, 2005. View at Google Scholar - H. Wang, “Properties of convergence for $\omega ,q$-Bernstein polynomials,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 1096–1108, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - Z. Wu, “The saturation of convergence on the interval [0, 1] for the $q$-Bernstein polynomials in the case $q>1$,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 137–141, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus - C. A. Charalambides, “The $q$-Bernstein basis as a $q$-binomial distribution,”
*Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference*, vol. 140, no. 8, pp. 2184–2190, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - S. C. Jing, “The $q$-deformed binomial distribution and its asymptotic behaviour,”
*Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General*, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 493–499, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - S. Ostrovska and A. Y. Özban, “The norm estimates of the $q$-Bernstein operators for varying $q>1$,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 4758–4771, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - M. Weba, “On the approximation of unbounded functions by Bernstein polynomials,”
*East Journal on Approximations*, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 351–356, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Ostrovska, “The approximation of power function by the $q$-Bernstein polynomials in the case $q>1$,”
*Mathematical Inequalities & Applications*, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 585–597, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet