Advances in Agriculture

Advances in Agriculture / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7836379 |

James Adebayo Ojo, Adebayo Amos Omoloye, "Development and Life History of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Cereal Crops", Advances in Agriculture, vol. 2016, Article ID 7836379, 8 pages, 2016.

Development and Life History of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Cereal Crops

Academic Editor: Kassim Al-Khatib
Received25 Jun 2016
Revised17 Aug 2016
Accepted19 Sep 2016
Published13 Oct 2016


The maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is one of the most destructive pests of stored cereals. Knowledge of the life history and biology is important to the development of an integrated pest management program. Investigation was carried out on developmental biology of S. zeamais on four main cereal crops, maize, rice, sorghum, and millet, under laboratory conditions. Egg incubation, oviposition periods, and larval instar development were not different significantly among the food hosts. Number of eggs laid varied significantly among the cereal grains; mean fecundity was highest on maize () and lowest on millet (). Number of immature (larva and pupa) and adult stages varied significantly among the cereal grains. There exist four larval instars with a varied mean head capsule width, with a mean total instar larval developmental period of 23.1, 22.2, 22.2, and 21.6 d on maize, rice, sorghum, and millet, respectively. There was linear relationship and significant correlation between the stages of larval development and head capsule width. The mean developmental period from egg to adult varied, being highest on maize (34.7 d) and lowest on sorghum (33.5 d).

1. Introduction

The maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is one of the most destructive stored product pests of grains, cereals, and other processed and unprocessed stored products in sub-Saharan Africa [14]. S. zeamais causes qualitative and quantitative damage to stored products, with grain weight loss ranging between 20 to 90% for untreated stored maize [57], and the severity of damage depends on factors which include storage structures and physical and chemical properties of the produce. Heavy infestation of adults and larvae of maize weevil which cause postharvest losses have become increasingly important constraints to storage entomology [8] and food security in the tropics. The common control methods for this pest are the use of chemical insecticides, biological control, and botanical insecticides [911] among others. There cannot be a realistic success in applied ecology and pest monitoring and management without a better understanding of the phenology and dynamics of insects’ life cycle [12]. Several studies have been conducted on the reproductive biology of maize weevil on maize or modified maize diet [1315]. However, there is a paucity of information on developmental biology on preferred food substrate [1, 16]. Therefore, this study seeks to investigate the developmental biology of S. zeamais under laboratory conditions on four main stored cereals in other to elucidate some important aspects of its life history.

2. Material and Methods

A culture was established of maize weevils, S. zeamais, using a modified method as described by Ojo and Omoloye [17] that were first collected from cultures in the Entomology Research Laboratory, Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Twenty five pairs of one-week-old S. zeamais were introduced into 100 g grains of maize in 4.5 kg capacity Kilner jars covered with mesh lids, replicated five times (). Weevils were allowed to feed, mate, and oviposit for 7 days and then removed. Culture arenas were observed daily until new progenies emerged; they were removed and sexed using morphological characters described by Halstead [18]. This stock culture was used as source of Sitophilus zeamais throughout the period this study was conducted in 2013.

Presterilized samples (200 g), each of maize (var. TZPB-SW-R), rice (var. ITA 306), sorghum (var. samsorg 17), and millet (local variety), were weighed and placed in Kilner jars with mesh lids. To each jar containing grain, 200 unsexed adult S. zeamais were added from the laboratory culture for a total of five replicates per grain type (). Grain jars with adult S. zeamais were kept under ambient temperature of 25–28°C, 60–70% relative humidity, and 12-hour photophase. A daily examination and dissection of the infested grains started on eighth day following weevil removal. Grain was carefully removed to allow for study of the grains for eggs and larval development of S. zeamais. Acid fuchsin stain was used by adding 3.5 g acid fuchsin and 250 mL glacial acetic acid to 750 mL of distilled water. The staining of egg plugs was determined following procedures of Pedersen [19]. Infested grains were first stained with acid fuchsin solution to locate and study the egg plug on individual cereal grain and to track egg maturation. A total of 20–30 infested grains were dissected daily for vertex measurement under binocular microscope fitted with a graticule and/or digital microscope when necessary. Daily observations and measurement of larval instars continued until pupae development was observed. To determine the fecundity and longevity, five pairs () of S. zeamais were introduced into 20 g grains each of maize, rice, sorghum, and millet and replicated 3 times (). The grains were replaced every three days and the eggs laid were determined following standard procedures as described earlier and adult longevity was determined when all weevils exhibited morbidity. Measurement of vertex width [20] and duration was used in the determination of stages of larval instars; this procedure was also adopted by Ojo and Omoloye [17]. t-test for larval instar conformity to Dyar’s rule was carried out using vertex width measurement.

3. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using analysis of variance and descriptive statistics. The means were separated using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (Tukey’s HSD) test at 5% level of probability. A t-test was used to estimate conformity of growth rate of S. zeamais’ larval instar to Dyar’s rule. Regression analysis was used to determine relationship between the head capsule widths of larval instars and duration of instars.

4. Results

Variation was observed in the developmental biology and description of Sitophilus zeamais cultured on the selected cereal grains. S. zeamais has seven life stages comprising egg (), four larval instars (), prepupa/pupa (), and adult (). No significant difference ( > 0.05, F = 0.56, and DF = 3; > 0.05, F = 0.17, and DF = 3) were observed in maize weevil oviposition and egg incubation period across the maize, rice, sorghum, and millet tested. The oviposition period ranged from 9 to 29 d, with the lowest and highest mean oviposition period of 20.3 and 22.2 d on millet and maize, respectively (Table 1). The egg incubation period ranged between 3 and 7 d; the lowest mean was recorded on rice with 5.1 d and the highest was observed on millet with 5.4 d. Total average number of eggs laid was not significantly varied ( > 0.05, F = 1.22, and DF = 3) among the cereal grains, with the highest and lowest mean fecundity being found on maize () and millet (), respectively. Also, there was significant different ( < 0.05, F = 3.99, and DF = 3) adult longevity found among the cereals used; adult maize weevil significantly lived longest on maize and millet (  and   d) than on rice and sorghum (  and  .07 days), respectively (Table 1).

Oviposition period (ns)Egg incubation period (ns)Fecundity (ns) Adult longevity

Maize22.21 ± 0.50
5.25 ± 0.19
67.2 ± 3.16
122.3 ± 1.87
Rice21.1 ± 2.75
5.14 ± 0.05
57.3 ± 4.68
120.3 ± 3.24
Sorghum21.72 ± 0.42
5.22 ± 0.21
63.1 ± 3.23
117.6 ± 2.07
Millet20.28 ± 0.71
5.38 ± 0.17
53.8 ± 0.17
126 ± 3.20
Coefficient of variation 5.731.950.671.26

Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (, Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test). Range is in parenthesis.
ns = no significant difference.

Adult S. zeamais burrows into cereal grains with the aid of its strong rostrum, creating a cavity into which it lays a single egg. The eggs are oval in shape, whitish in colour, and rounded at the bottom. Female S. zeamais will then cover the egg with a gelatinous egg plug which she deposits. Egg plugs were, on average,  mm wide and  mm long. Eggs hatch into a creamy white apodous larva with a sclerotized light brown head. The immature stages of maize weevil varied in relation to the grains on which it is cultured. The developmental period and body measurements of first instar larvae were not significantly different ( > 0.05, F = 0.84, and DF = 3; > 0.05, F = 1.73) from one another regardless of the cereal grains tested. A significant difference ( < 0.05, F = 1.45, and DF = 3) was observed from third instar larval onward, although, at 2nd instar stage, there were significant ( < 0.05, F = 1.99, and DF = 3) shortest developmental days on sorghum, rice, and millet (5.5 and 5.7 days), the longest developmental period recorded being on maize (6.5 days). The newly hatched 1st instar larva (0.54 mm long) remained inside the grain, feeding voraciously until the end of the 4th instar when it hatched into prepupa/pupa. The developmental period of 3rd instar larvae on rice was significantly ( < 0.05, F = 3.75) longer (6.5 days) and shortest on millet (5.3 days), whereas it was significantly ( < 0.05, F = 44) longest on maize at 4th instar stage and shortest on rice and sorghum (4.7 days). There was significant difference ( < 0.05, F = 10.7; < 0.05, F = 0.93) in the average body measurement at 3rd and 4th instar stage; weevil cultured on maize had the longest body length and width compared to those cultured on millet (body length  mm, width  mm) while the shortest body measurement was observed on weevil cultured on millet (length  mm, width ). The body measurement of 4th instar was not significantly ( > 0.05; F = 9.17) longer between immature weevils on maize, rice, and sorghum ( mm,  mm,  and   mm), respectively, but significantly longer than weevil body length on millet. Basically, first instar larvae had an approximate developmental period of 5 days regardless of the food host used; second instar larva had 6.5, 5.7, 5.7, and 5.5 days on maize, rice, millet, and sorghum, respectively. The mean developmental period for third larval instar was 6.5, 5.7, 5.7, and 5.3 days on rice, maize, sorghum, and millet, respectively, whereas, at fourth larval stage, it was 4.7, 5.6, 5.7, and 5.3 days on rice, maize, sorghum, and millet. The mean total instar larval developmental period of maize weevil was 23.1 22.2, 22.2, and 21.6 days on maize, rice, sorghum, and millet, respectively, showing that weevil larvae develop faster on millet than other cereals. The fourth instar larva transformed into white, oval, and slender head prepupa which molted into pupa few hours later. The pupa is exarate and the wings and legs are glued to the body. The pupa stage ranged between 6 and 7 days. There was significant difference ( < 0.05; F = 0.93) on the developmental period of maize weevil on food hosts, longest being recorded on both rice and sorghum (6.7 days) which was longer than the value obtained from millet and maize (6.5 and 6.3 days), respectively. Food host also influenced the body measurement of maize weevil pupa, with longest body length and width being recorded on maize ( mm  and   mm) and the shortest being observed on millet ( mm  and   mm). The food hosts significantly influenced emerging body measurements of adult maize weevil. The adult male maize weevil was significantly ( < 0.05, F = 1.73) bigger on maize ( mm long  and   mm wide) and shortest on rice ( mm long  and   mm wide) although not bigger than body measurement of weevil on millet ( mm long  and   mm wide). Regardless of food host, female maize weevil was markedly bigger than its male counterpart (Table 2).

 1st instar 2nd instar 3rd instar 4th instar Prepupa/pupa Adult ♂ Adult ♀
Length (mm)Width (mm)Developmental period (days)Length (mm)Width (mm)Developmental period (days)Length (mm)Width (mm)Developmental period (days)Length (mm)Width (mm)Developmental period (days)Length (mm)Width (mm)Developmental period (days)Length (mm)Width (mm)Length (mm)Width (mm)

Maize0.54 ± 0.220.28 ± 0.055.3 (4–6)0.59 ± 0.120.47 ± 0.026.5
0.8 ± 0.050.64 ± 0.045.7
1.67 ± 0.071.06 ± 0.025.6
3.81 ± 0.041.13 ± 0.026.3
4.11 ± 0.011.13 ± 0.014.18 ± 0.011.14 ± 0.01
Rice0.54 ± 0.220.28 ± 0.055.3 (4–6)0.59 ± 0.120.45 ± 0.025.7
0.81 ± 0.050.6 ± 0.046.5
1.63 ± 0.051.02 ± 0.024.7
3.33 ± 0.050.93 ± 0.026.7
3.34 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.013.7 ± 0.011.01 ± 0.01
Sorghum0.53 ± 0.220.28 ± 0055.3 (4–6)0.59 ± 0.120.46 ± 0.025.5
0.78 ± 0.050.61 ± 0.045.7
1.59 ± 0.070.96 ± 0.024.7
3.41 ± 0.041.04 ± 0.026.7
3.7 ± 0.031.05 ± 0.033.94 ± 0.011.07 ± 0.38
Millet0.54 ± 0.120.28 ± 0.155.3 (4–6)0.59 ± 0.170.47 ± 0.025.7
0.72 ± 0.070.54 ± 0.045.3
1.55 ± 0.130.91 ± 0.035.3
3.12 ± 0.060.99 ± 0.066.5
3.45 ± 0.030.99 ± 0.323.94 ± 0.011.07 ± 0.38

Means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different (, Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference test).

The measurement of head capsule width of larval instars daily showed four frequency peaks as confirmed by Dyar’s rule representing four larval instars (Table 3 and Figure 2). The head capsule width increased with successive instars regardless of food hosts (Table 3). The growth ratio (Dyar’s ratio) varied across the larval instar stages ranging from 1.2 to 1.5, with the mean growth ratio of 1.3. The relationship between the larval developmental period and mean head capsule width was regular, and perfect geometric larval growth was observed in each instar across the food host when mean head capsule width was plotted against larval instar stage (Table 3 and Figure 1). Linear regression analysis depicted significant relationship between larval instars and head capsule width from all the food hosts (Figure 1).

Instar Maize Rice Sorghum Millet
Observed average (mm)Growth ratioCalculated averageDifferencesObserved average (mm)Growth ratioCalculated averageDifferencesObserved average (mm)Growth ratioCalculated averageDifferencesObserved average (mm)Growth ratioCalculated averageDifferences

Mean growth ratio1.
Average difference (d)0.00330.00330.00670.0033
Standard deviation of differences 0.0260.01530.01530.01

Reject Ho if calculated > tabulated.
Decision: do not reject Ho; growth ratio conforms to Dyar’s rule.
Note: growth ratio—the mean head capsule width of a succeeding instar divided by the mean head capsule width of a preceeding instar.
Calculated average—observed mean head width of a preceeding instar multiplied by the mean growth ratio.

5. Discussion

The egg incubation period of five days observed among food hosts was similar to what was obtained in other related coleopterans, three to four days for S. rugicollis [21] and five days for S. oryzae when it was cultured on maize grains [22], whereas it was three days for S. linearis cultured on tamarind [17] and four days for Conotrachelus psidii [23]. There was variation in mean egg laid by mated female S. zeamais in relation to food hosts (range between 54 and 67 eggs) with more eggs laid on maize over a period of almost 22 days. S. zeamais could live for 117 to 126 days on cereals, with longest duration occurring on millet, maize, rice, and sorghum in that order. This variation could be a result of food hosts used and prevailing environmental conditions. The developmental biology of S. zeamais could be influenced by this moderate fecundity and oviposition, shorter larval period, and ability to breed easily on any cereal crop.

Regardless of the food hosts, this study showed that there were four larval instars of S. zeamais when the larval head capsule width was measured with successive instars and frequency distribution of head capsule multimodal curves which show four modal peaks. There was a distinct difference between the values of head capsule width for the successive larval instars. Body measurement is usually assumed to be normally distributed from insect of the same morphogenetic stage [24, 25]; this supports four peaks observed in the study. The ratio varied from 1.2 to 1.5 across the four food hosts with a mean growth ratio of 1.3 on all the cereal crops used; these values showed that growth progresses at a constant rate in each molt which is relatively close to the constant Dyar’s ratio of 1.4 for lepidopterous insects although it has been adopted for other insect orders [26, 27]; the slightest difference observed could be because S. zeamais is a coleopteran. Nevertheless, mean growth ratios obtained in this study were similar to what was obtained in other curculionids: 1.4 for Conotrachelus psidii [23]; 1.3 for Dendroctonus valens [28]; and 1.3 for Sitophilus linearis [17]. A linear relationship obtained between head capsule width and a high regression coefficient of 0.92 (on maize), 0.94 (on rice), 0.94 (on sorghum), and 0.98 (on millet) attested to the fact that no stadium was overlooked. The total larval developmental period was 23.1 days (on maize), 22.2 days (on rice), 22.2 days (on sorghum), and 21.6 days (on millet), and a prepupa/pupa developmental period was six to seven days which was different from what was obtained in other curculionids: 16 days for Conotrachelus psidii [23], 9.5 days for Hypothenemus hampei [29], and 14 to 16 days for Sitophilus linearis [17]. The prepupa/pupa period of 6.3 to 6.7 days observed across the food hosts used is relatively similar to what was obtained in other curculionids: 10 days for D. valens [28], 8 days for S. linearis [17], and 7.95 days for H. hampei [29]. Factors like food host conditions, type of insect species, geographical locations, and experimental conditions could play significant role in the developmental study of maize weevil. This study also showed that the comparative biological cycle of S. zeamais from egg to adult was 34.7 days (on maize), 34 days (on rice), 34.1 days (on sorghum), and 33.5 days (on millet); this was similar to the S. zeamais mean developmental period obtained by other researchers using this insect species: 31–37 days [14], 35 days [2], and 34.8 days [4]. The significant variation in sizes between adult S. zeamais could be a result of the type of food crops used; also female maize weevil was observed to be bigger than their male counterpart regardless of the food host. S. zeamais bred on maize was bigger (4.11 mm long for male and 4.18 mm long for female) than those bred on other cereals, with a relative smallest body size recorded on both rice (3.34 mm long for male and 3.7 mm long for female) and millet (3.45 mm long for male and 3.94 mm long for female). Therefore, kind of food host coupled with the prevailing environmental condition played a significant role in maize weevil body size, as basic nutrients influenced the metabolic activities in insect. The results obtained in this study on S. zeamais comparative phenology and dynamics of its life cycle on different main cereals provide a base for researcher for proper understanding of maize weevil ontogeny and bioecology which are needed in formulation of sustainable pest management practices and approach, as maize has been field to store pest of economic importance attacking different kinds of processed and unprocessed crop products worldwide.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.


The authors wish to acknowledge Adeniyi Aderinokun and Emmanuel Nnodim for their technical assistance in the laboratory.


  1. J. E. Throne, “Life history of immature maize weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on corn stored at constant temperatures and relative humidities in the laboratory,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1459–1471, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. P. Rees, Insects of Stored Products, CSIRO Publishing, 2004.
  3. R. Plarre, “An attempt to reconstruct the natural and cultural history of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (Coleoptera: Curculionidae),” European Journal of Entomology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Ojo and A. A. Omoloye, “Rearing the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, on an artificial maizecassava diet,” Journal of Insect Science, vol. 12, article 69, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. P. Giga, S. Mutemerewa, G. Moyo, and D. Neeley, “Assessment and control of losses caused by insect pests in small farmers' stores in Zimbabwe,” Crop Protection, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 287–292, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Muzemu, J. Chitamba, and B. Mutetwa, “Evaluation of Eucalyptus tereticornis, Tagetes minuta and Carica papaya as stored maize grain protectants against Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae),” Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 196–201, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. N. Nukenine, B. Monglo, L. Awason, L. S. T. Ngamo, F. F. N. Tchuenguem, and M. B. Ngassoum, “Farmer's percppection on some aspects of maize production, and infestation levels of stored maize by Sitophilus zeamais in the Ngaoundere region of Cameroon,” Cam. J. Biol. Biochem. Sci, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. R. H. Markham, N. A. Bosque-Perez, C. Borgemeister, and W. Meikle, “Developing pest management strategies for Sitophilus zeamais and Prostephanus truncatus in the tropics,” FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 97–116, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Akob and F. K. Ewete, “The efficacy of ashes of four locally used plant materials against Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Cameroon,” International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. W. Phillips and J. E. Throne, “Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 55, pp. 375–397, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Holzmann, “Latest developments in the registration of SPP chemicals in Germany and Europe. International European Symposium. Stored Product Protection. ‘Stress on chemical products’,” Julius-Kühn-Archiv, vol. 429, pp. 89–93, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. Merville, A. Vallier, S. Venner et al., “Determining the instar of a weevil larva (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using a parsimonious method,” European Journal of Entomology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 567–573, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. T. Arbogast, “Beetles: coleopteran,” in Ecology and Management of Food Industry Pests, J. R. B. Gorham, Ed., pp. 133–150, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlinghton, Va, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. P. Haines, Insects and Arachnids of Tropical Stored-Products: Their Biology and Identification, Natural Resources Institute, Gillingham, UK, 2nd edition, 1991.
  15. M. Danho, C. Gaspar, and E. Haubruge, “The impact of grain quantity on the biology of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Oviposition, distribution of eggs, adult emergence, body weight and sex ratio,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 259–266, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. W. Howe, “The biology of the rice weevil, Calandra oryzae (L.),” Annals of Applied Biology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 168–180, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. A. Ojo and A. A. Omoloye, “Life history of the tamarind weevil, Sitophilus linearis (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), on tamarind seed,” Journal of Insects, vol. 2015, Article ID 429579, 5 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. G. Halstead, “External sex differences in stored-products Coleoptera,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 119–134, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. R. Pedersen, Selection of oviposition sites on wheat kernels by Sitophilus spp.: effect of moisture, temperature and kernel size [Ph.D. thesis], Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kan, USA, 1979.
  20. S. Sharifi and R. B. Mills, “Radiographic studies of Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) in wheat grains,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 7, pp. 195–206, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  21. V. Choubey, R. Bhandari, and N. Kulkarni, “Life history and morphology of seed weevil, Sitophilus rugicollis Casey (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infesting sal seeds in Madhya Pradesh,” Journal of Entomological Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 259–267, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  22. K. C. Narayana, G. P. Swamy, E. Mutthuraju, E. Jagadeesh, and G. T. Thirumalaraju, “Biology of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored maize grains,” Current Biotica, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 76–81, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  23. O. E. Bailez, A. M. Viana-Bailez, J. O. G. de Lima, and D. D. O. Moreira, “Life-history of the guava weevil, Conotrachelus psidii Marshall (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), under laboratory conditions,” Neotropical Entomology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 203–207, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. A. Logan, B. J. Bentz, J. C. Vandygriff, and D. L. Turner, “General program for determining instar distributions from headcapsule widths: example analysis of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytide) data,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 555–563, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Hunt and R. E. Chapman, “Evaluating hypotheses of instar-grouping in arthropods: a maximum likelihood approach,” Paleobiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 466–484, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. G. Dyar, “The number of moults of lepidopterous larvae,” Psyche, vol. 5, no. 175-176, pp. 420–422, 1890. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. L. Taylor, “On ‘Dyar's rule’ and its application to sawfly larvae,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 451–466, 1931. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Z. Liu, B. Xu, and J. Sun, “Instar numbers, development, flight period, and fecundity of Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in China,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 152–157, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Gómez, B. Y. Chávez, A. Castillo, F. J. Valle, and F. E. Vega, “The coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): how many instars are there?” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 311–315, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 James Adebayo Ojo and Adebayo Amos Omoloye. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.