Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Volume 2019, Article ID 4308462, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4308462
Review Article

An Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of the Ponseti Method in Clubfoot Treatment

1Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, Oxford University, UK
2Department of Materials, Oxford University, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Murtaza Kadhum; ku.ca.xo.icsdem@muhdak.azatrum

Received 6 November 2018; Accepted 14 January 2019; Published 25 March 2019

Academic Editor: Jose Merodio

Copyright © 2019 Murtaza Kadhum et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Congenital clubfoot is a complex pediatric foot deformity, occurring in approximately 1 in 1000 live births and resulting in significant disability, deformity, and pain if left untreated. The Ponseti method of manipulation is widely recognized as the gold standard treatment for congenital clubfoot; however, its mechanical aspects have not yet been fully explored. During the multiple manipulation-casting cycles, the tendons and ligaments on the medial and posterior aspect of the foot and ankle, which are identified as the rate-limiting tissues, usually undergo weekly sequential stretches, with a plaster of Paris cast applied after the stretch to maintain the length gained. This triggers extracellular matrix remodeling and tissue growth, but due to the viscoelastic properties of tendons and ligaments, the initial strain size, rate, and loading history will affect the relaxation behavior and mechanical strength of the tissue. To increase the efficiency of the Ponseti treatment, we discuss the theoretical possibilities of decreasing the size of the strain step and interval of casting and/or increasing the overall number of casts. This modification may provide more tensile stimuli, allow more time for remodeling, and preserve the mechanical integrity of the soft tissues.

1. Background

Congenital clubfoot or congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is a complex pediatric foot deformity (Figure 1). It consists of four complex foot abnormalities with varying degrees of rigidity, namely, midfoot cavus, forefoot adductus, hindfoot varus, and hindfoot equinus [1, 2]. The incidence is widely reported as 1 in 1000 live births in the UK with males being affected about twice as often as females [1, 3]. In almost half of affected infants, both feet are involved. To date, the causes of clubfoot are poorly understood and regarded as idiopathic; however, genetic factors and associated conditions such as spinal bifida, cerebral palsy, and arthrogryposis have been reported [1, 3, 4].

Figure 1: Bilateral clubfeet in a newborn infant. Image taken from CURE International with permission.

If left untreated, clubfoot inevitably leads to significant long-term disability, deformity, and pain [2]. Although various surgical techniques are used to correct clubfoot, such as soft tissue releases or bony procedures in older children, currently, conservative management is the preferred option. Some surgical techniques have been shown to pose a greater risk of pain, stiffness, avascular necrosis, infection, overcorrection, poor long-term ankle range of movement, weakened mechanical strength, and arthritis than if treated conservatively [58]. Interestingly, some studies have also reported a correlation between the extent of release surgery and degree of functional impairment [6]. To date, surgical options are mainly employed to manage resistant cases and recurrence or if unable to achieve complete correction of the deformity.

Currently, the optimal treatment utilizes the Ponseti method, developed by Ignacio in the 1940s [5, 9]. This technique consists of two distinct stages of manipulation and maintenance. The manipulation phase involves identifying the head of talus to use as a fulcrum, supinating the forefoot to eliminate the cavus deformity, and then abducting the forefoot. This manipulation is then followed up by application of a plaster cast, holding the foot in the corrected position and providing sufficient time for soft tissue remodeling. This manipulation-casting sequence is repeated on a weekly basis for an average of six weeks, until a 50-degree abduction of the foot around the tibia is achieved. An Achilles tenotomy may then be required to eliminate any residual equinus and is followed up by three weeks in a cast to aid healing in the lengthened position [1, 5, 911]. The maintenance phase then involves holding the foot in an abduction brace for 23 hours per day for 3 months, helping to reduce recurrence rates [10, 11]. Zionts et al. [12] reported that due to the increased use of the Ponseti method, the estimated percentage of clubfoot treated with surgical release has dropped from 72% in 1996 to 12%.

2. Main Text

2.1. Clubfoot Abnormalities

Due to the deformities, the dimension, structure, and mechanical properties of most soft tissues in a clubfoot are different to those of a normal foot. The presence of shortened, thickened, and fibrotic tissues at the medial and posterior aspect of the clubfoot has been reported in several studies [13, 14]. This includes thickening and shortening of the posterior tibial tendon, Achilles tendon, tibionavicular ligament (deltoid ligament), and plantar calcaneonavicular ligament. In addition, a fibrous matrix was also seen in the posterior fibulotalar and deltoid ligaments.

To our knowledge, no work on measuring the mechanical properties of the tendons and ligaments in a clubfoot by direct mechanical testing has been conducted. Masala et al. [15] investigated the difference in mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon between a clubfoot and a normal foot by real-time sonoelastography (RTSE). The results show lower mean elasticity values from the Achilles tendons of the clubfeet compared to normal feet (unilateral clubfoot patients), demonstrating that the Achilles tendon is stiffer in a clubfoot. Hattori et al. [16] compared the moduli of soft tissue on the medial, lateral, and posterior aspects of a clubfoot by a scanning acoustic microscope (SAM). They discovered higher Young’s modulus for the calcaneofibular ligament compared to the deltoid ligament. This result implies that the lateral soft tissue contracture could also be responsible for some of the clubfoot deformities. However, the tissue samples used in this study were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde before measurement, thus leading to excess crosslinking in the ligaments that would result in higher stiffness values. To note, in both of these studies [15, 16], the measurement of soft tissue elasticity was performed on patients undergoing or already treated with the Ponseti method. More information about the mechanical properties of the soft tissues in untreated clubfeet is needed for comparison.

2.2. Rate-Limiting Tissue: Tendon and Ligament

During the manipulation process of the Ponseti method, the soft tissues responding (or resisting) to stretching include the following: (1) skin, (2) capsule, and (3) tendons and ligaments. To investigate the main tissue that is restricting the foot from reaching the improved position during stretching, the stress values generated from the skin (), capsule (), and tendons and ligaments () due to the mechanical stretch are required. To date, the stress values and elastic moduli (, , and ) in these soft tissues in response to stretching via the Ponseti method have not been studied.

First, consider a simple model simulating hindfoot dorsiflexion to correct the equinus deformity (Figure 2) in which a tendon tissue (red curve) and a skin tissue (blue curve) are located at distances of and , respectively, from the fulcrum (). To introduce deformations of the tendon () and skin () by Ponseti manipulation, an angular change from to with respect to is generated. Examining only the differences in the distance to the manipulation fulcrum between the two tissues, the forces needed on the tissues will be different to create the same angular change (or torque value). Based on the principle of leverage, a larger force is exerted on the tendon compared to the skin as the tendon is located closer to the fulcrum.

Figure 2: (a) Illustrative model of the deformations of the two different tissues (tendon and skin) due to a stretch with respect to a common fulcrum to correct equinus. The size of the force exerted to deform individual tissue is inversely proportional to the distance between the tissue and the fulcrum. (b) Diagram of the medial side of a foot with the red line indicating the talus-Achilles length and blue line indicating the talus-skin length.

Second, the resistance of the tissues to stretch (stiffness) should also be considered. The general constitutive stress-strain relation can be described with the following:

By calculating the product of Young’s modulus of the tissue and the strain value produced by the stretch, the stress value required for manipulation can be acquired. A single stretch from a manipulation and casting will generate strain values (, , and ) in each tissue. Typically, and will have approximately the same value, while will be much smaller than and in any given stretch; hence, here we consider only tendons and ligaments and skin in our comparison. Young’s moduli of human tendons and ligaments and human skin at the ankle from existing studies are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Elastic moduli of different human tendons, ligaments, and skin.

As Young’s moduli of the tendons (lowest: 50 MPa) are larger than those of the skin (highest: 2 MPa) with almost similar tissue-fulcrum distances, larger stresses (or resistance) are generated from the tendons during the Ponseti treatment. Tendons and ligaments, therefore, are the rate-limiting soft tissues in the treatment of clubfoot.

3. Tendon and Ligament Mechanical Properties

3.1. Stress-Strain Curve

A typical stress-strain curve for a tensile test on a tendon or a ligament is demonstrated in Figure 3. The graph shows three distinct regions [28, 29]. Initially, the collagen crimps are stretched out, and an increasing number of collagen fibers and fibrils become aligned to the loading axis. This region is known as the “toe” region, and it normally extends to approximately 2% elongation [28]. The toe region lies within the elastic limit, and thus, the tissue will return to its original length when unloaded. Further straining brings the tissue into the “linear” region which exhibits constant Young’s modulus. The stress-strain response mainly comes from elongating the aligned fibers and fibrils. Further straining induces plastic deformation by interfibrillar and interfiber sliding, and consequently, the tissue does not return to the original length and structure after unloading. In the last region (yield and failure region), in which macroscopic defects occur, yielding begins as the slope of the curve decreases, with inevitable tissue failure occurring with further load [28, 29].

Figure 3: A typical stress-strain curve of a tendon or a ligament. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) is the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being tensile loaded. Arbitrary values.

In the Ponseti treatment, the stretch caused by manipulation as aimed at producing sufficient plastic deformation of the tendons and ligaments to encourage tissue remodeling and lengthening. This deformation will normally lie within the middle part of the linear region (red bracket in Figure 3), as excess deformation would be painful and risk entering the yield and failure region, and insufficient deformation would prove ineffective. Notably, the total deformation needed to correct a clubfoot is greater than the failure strain in a single stretch, as displayed in Figure 4, proving that multiple stretches and castings are required in the Ponseti method. This factor is also clinically important, avoiding excess pain to the patient that may be generated in larger single stretches.

Figure 4: Comparison between a single tensile stretch (blue curve) and a Ponseti manipulation-casting sequence (red curve; sequential stress relaxation). Arbitrary values.
3.2. Ponseti’s Loading: Stress Relaxation

A tendon or a ligament displays a time-dependent mechanical behavior known as viscoelasticity, which means it possesses both elastic and viscous properties [30]. Due to the viscoelastic behavior, tendons and ligaments display three characteristics: hysteresis, creep, and stress relaxation.

Creep describes the continuous increase in strain or deformation under constant loading force. The shape of the deformation-time curve during a creep test is dependent on the loading history (loading force, loading rate, and force increments) [31, 32]. Wren et al. reported that the time to failure decreases with increasing applied stress and increasing initial strain [33].

A stress relaxation, demonstrated in Figure 5, describes the continuous decrease in stress over time under constant strain. The relaxation rate of the stress is believed to be faster with a higher initial peak stress [3436]. Under different strain rates applied to reach the initial strain, the tendon or ligament will display different relaxation profiles. With a higher strain rate, the corresponding peak stress will be higher, resulting a faster relaxation [31, 37].

Figure 5: A typical stress-time curve of a single stress relaxation. Arbitrary values.

It is worth highlighting that stress relaxation is an important event in the Ponseti method. As the clubfoot is held at an improved position by casting after manipulation, a constant strain or deformation is applied, and consequently, stress relaxation occurs in the strained soft tissues. The exponential relaxation is controlled by two events occurring in the tissues: (1) the microstructure rearrangement and (2) tissue growth. When stress relaxation begins, in response to the constant strain, the collagen fibers and fibrils start to reorganize themselves through interfiber and interfibrillar sliding controlled by the matrix molecules (proteoglycans). At the same time, recognizing these microstructural deformations, tissue remodeling causes subtle tissue growth, which in turn also contributes to the stress relaxation. The existing work of in vitro stress relaxation on tendons and ligaments only assesses the effect of microstructure rearrangement, without assessing the effect of tissue growth. It is thus reasonable to predict that the in vivo stress relaxation during a Ponseti stretch would be faster than the in vitro tests.

Multiple manipulation-casting cycles are required in the Ponseti method for effective clubfoot treatment, representing sequential stress relaxations on a stress-strain curve (Figure 4). To further study or improve the Ponseti method, measurements should be made to quantify the amount of the strain generated, the strain rate, and the corresponding peak stress in each casting. Rossetto et al. [38] discovered that both (1) a higher initial strain and (2) a longer relaxation duration would result in lower tensile strength (tested right after relaxation) in bovine calcaneal tendons. The relaxation rate was also faster in the higher initial strain group. Therefore, by introducing a smaller strain (smaller correction) or a shorter cast period for each casting phase, the stretched tendons and ligaments should be able to maintain stronger mechanical strength. Since the correction strain in each cast is smaller, the required number of casts has to increase in this modification. In ex vivo studies [36, 3941], the time to plateau (relaxation time) for tendons is within an hour (2 minutes–1 hour). However, these experiments excluded the soft tissue remodeling (adaptation) which will occur in vivo during the treatment. In sum, the determination of the optimum cast-maintaining time needs consideration of the initial stain size, strain rate, relaxation time, and sufficient tissue remodeling.

3.3. Strain Rate Sensitivity

The mechanical response of the tissue is dependent on the strain rate. In general, a faster loading results in a higher elastic modulus [4245], as typically exhibited by polymers. Pioletti et al. [46] demonstrated that the bovine ACL displayed higher elastic moduli when stretched under higher strain rates (0.1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40% s-1); in addition, the corresponding stress at the same strain value showed a positive correlation with strain rate as well. Woo et al. [47] and Danto and Woo [42] studied this effect under wider ranges of strain rates on medial collateral ligaments (0.011-222% s-1) and rabbit patellar tendons (0.016-135% s-1), respectively, and both showed the same positive correlation between elastic modulus and strain rate. According to the results from Bonner et al. [48], by plotting elastic modulus against strain rate, we can see a logarithmic relation between them (Figure 6). Hence, when a strain below a critical value of strain rate is applied, the mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments show stronger strain rate sensitivity. This critical rate could vary depending on the specific tendon or ligament tested, patient demographics, and comorbidities.

Figure 6: (a) Elastic modulus plotted against strain rate. (b) Elastic modulus plotted against the logarithm of strain rate [48].

The increase in ultimate tensile strength (UTS)/failure stress and decrease in strain at UTS ()/failure strain with increased strain rate were also reported (Table 2) [4850]. These differences in mechanical response according to different strain rates can be seen in Figure 7.

Table 2: Existing work demonstrating the strain rate sensitivity of tendons and ligaments.
Figure 7: Stress-strain curves of a tendon or ligament stretched under a slow strain rate (blue) and a fast strain rate (red). Arbitrary values.

An in situ X-ray study on rat tail tendons conducted by Bailey et al. [51] showed that the deformation of tendon is always larger than that of the individual fibrils, which suggests additional deformation in the ground substance matrix. In addition, the ratio of fibril deformation to tendon deformation increased as the strain rate increased in their experiment, i.e., the matrix becomes stiffer under higher strain rates. This phenomenon is believed to be caused by the decreased time for effective fluid flow, energy dissipation, and structural matrix rearrangement of the interfibrillar ground substance at higher strain rates [52], resulting in a smaller deformation of ground substance and a higher modulus tendon. Hence, further tension under high loading rates would cause the disruption of matrix-fibril bonding and poor transmission of stress between fibrils, which then lead to uncontrolled interfibrillar sliding and macroscopic failure [48, 51].

These studies on strain rate sensitivity of tendons and ligaments may help us understand and predict the stress-strain response in the biological system. For example, when a clubfoot is manipulated or stretched under a certain force, the expected strain or deformation of a tendon or a ligament can be designed by altering the strain rate. Furthermore, high strain rates, which are known to cause injuries (>50% s-1) and low (Table 2) [48, 49, 53, 54], should be avoided.

3.4. Mechanical Adaptation

Unlike synthetic materials, biological materials including tendons and ligaments are capable of adapting to chemical and physical stimuli. The cells in a tendon or a ligament, which express a fibroblastic phenotype, are responsible for responding to stimuli by producing growth factors [55], synthesizing collagen and ground substance of the ECM [56], and remodeling old ECM by releasing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [57].

Mechanical loading or straining is a key stimulus which generates a series of signals responsible for maintaining, repairing, and modifying the ECM in tendons and ligaments. Fibroblast proliferation, morphology, alignment, and gene expression have been reported to be influenced by mechanical stimuli [5860]. In terms of ECM synthesis and remodeling, studies have shown that cyclic tension on fibroblasts can increase collagen type I and collagen type III mRNA expression [60, 61]. These changes cause the number, diameter, and concentration of collagen fibrils to increase, thus increasing the stiffness of the tissue [62, 63]. By contrast, compression loading is believed to induce the synthesis of proteoglycans and type II collagen and, in some cases, a decrease in collagen type I [6466]. This change in composition results in the formation of fibrocartilaginous matrix [64]. The adaptation of a tendon or a ligament is dependent on the type of loading, strain magnitude, strain rate, and number of cycles. It is worth mentioning that most existing studies on the effect of mechanical stretching on tissue adaptation applied short-term cyclic straining rather than static straining to the tissue [5861, 67]. On the other hand, under a consistent strain rate or sequential stress relaxations for a longer period of time, the tissue response and adaptation will be different.

The Ponseti method utilizes a static stretch to a certain strain value during manipulation, followed by stress relaxation during casting. This stretch-casting sequence is repeated several times (sequential stress relaxations), thus generating a stepwise strain profile (Figure 8). Recent studies [68, 69] have shown that clubfeet with more severe deformities can be treated by increasing the number of castings. Nevertheless, the effect of the number of casts on the efficiency and correction rate of Ponseti treatment has not yet been investigated. In 2008, Screen [70] compared a single stress relaxation with sequential stress relaxations to the same amount of strain on rat tail tendons. Higher levels of interfiber relaxation, interfibrillar relaxation, and stress relaxation were observed in the single-step strained tendon. Lacking previous strain steps to reorganize the collagen structure, these single-step strained tendons are believed to have a higher risk of additional damage or loss of mechanical integrity.

Figure 8: Incremental strain steps over time illustrating the sequential stretches in the Ponseti method performed in 1 step (red), 2 steps (blue), 10 steps (yellow), and infinite steps (green). Arbitrary values.

By decreasing the size of the strain step and increasing the numbers of steps (castings), the overall strain-time profile shown in Figure 8 appears to display decreasing slopes, i.e., a lower strain rate profile. This low strain-rate profile may provide the total correction process a larger (Figure 7). Furthermore, when more straining steps are applied, the overall stress-time profile shows higher stresses throughout compared with a single straining step [70]. A longer period of higher stresses maintained can be seen as “additional” tensile stimuli without overstretching the tissue. These gradual strain steps may also help the cells to “catch up” and remodel the ECM before considerable defects or ruptures occur. Figure 9 compares the stress-strain curves between a normal Ponseti method and a modified version with more castings. In Figure 8, as the number of steps increases, the profile becomes comparable to a constant strain rate stretching. Although this approach would require more attendances by patients and shorter intervals between manipulations, it might improve the efficiency of the treatment. Kalson et al. [71] experimented the effect of static stretching on adaptation by slow stretching (0.25%/day) a tendon-like construct seeded with embryonic tendon cells for 4 days. The result showed increased collagen fibril diameter, fibril length, fibril number, and mechanical stiffness. The increase in the collagen fibril length and number is a promising indication of tendon growth or lengthening which is expected and desired in the Ponseti treatment. There are therefore possible potential benefits to treating clubfoot with a larger number of smaller, more frequent corrections.

Figure 9: Illustrative stress-strain profiles of normal Ponseti sequential stretches (red), and a modified sequence (blue) with smaller strain steps, shorter casting duration, and a higher number of casts. Arbitrary values.

The efficiency of the treatment could also be improved by lowering the strain rate of the stretch before casting (first region before initial stress in Figure 5). As shown in Figure 10, under a lower strain rate during stretching, a smaller peak stress is generated in response to the same value of strain. Since the peak stress is lowered, the time required for stress relaxation (plateau) is also shortened, thus reducing the time interval between each cast. This modification allows the surgeon to produce the same degree of correction while reducing the casting period. However, some limitations do exist in this study. This paper is theoretical in nature and utilises arbitrary values derived from the literature. Some of these values were extrapolated from work investigating human adults, cadavers, or animal models. The recommendations derived from our model will require clinical correlation, which may be best achieved via a randomised controlled study.

Figure 10: Stress-time profile comparing a standard Ponseti stress relaxation (blue) and a slow straining stress relaxation (red). Arbitrary values.

4. Conclusions

The Ponseti method is widely recognized as the gold standard treatment for congenital clubfoot. During the multiple manipulation-casting series, the tendons and ligaments at the ankle, which are identified as the rate-limiting tissues, will undergo sequential stress relaxations. In each cast, the stretch brings the tendons and ligaments to the linear region of the stress-strain curve (Figure 3) generating sufficient plastic deformation and mechanical stimuli. Consequently, tissue growth or lengthening takes place by remodeling the extracellular matrix in response to the stretch. The main benefit of multiple castings (sequential stress relaxations) is the capability of reaching a high final strain (corrected foot) which is impossible to achieve in a single stretch (Figure 4). This additional tolerance of strain is attributed to the tissue adaptation process during the immobilization by casting.

Due to the viscoelastic properties of tendons and ligaments, the initial strain size, strain rate, and loading history will affect the relaxation behavior and mechanical strength of the tissue. Ideally, the manipulation should be performed as slowly as possible as under a lower strain rate shown in Figures 6 and 7, the tendon or ligament shows lower resistance due to lower elastic modulus and higher tolerance of strain (higher ). To increase the efficiency of the Ponseti treatment, we suggest consideration of decreasing the size of the strain step and interval of casting and/or increasing the overall number of casts. This modification may produce a lower overall strain rate profile (Figure 8), provide more tensile stimuli, allow more time for remodeling, and preserve the mechanical integrity of the soft tissues.

Consent

All authors have consented for submission and publication of this paper.

Disclosure

MK and MHL are considered co-first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicting interests.

Authors’ Contributions

The idea for this project was conceived by CL. MHL and MK contributed to the writing of the first draft of this work. JC and CL reviewed and critically appraised the work. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was produced in the Academic Foundation Programme: https://www.ndorms.ox.ac.uk/globalsurgery/education/academic-foundation-programme.

References

  1. Y. Liu, D. Zhao, L. Zhao, H. Li, and X. Yang, “Congenital clubfoot: early recognition and conservative management for preventing late disabilities,” The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 1266–1274, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Gray, V. Pacey, P. Gibbons, D. Little, and J. Burns, “Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot),” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 8, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. J. Cooke, B. Balain, C. C. Kerin, and N. T. Kiely, “Clubfoot,” Current Orthopaedics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Garg, “Update on club foot,” Paediatrics and Child Health, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 257–260, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. B. Dobbs and C. A. Gurnett, “Update on clubfoot: etiology and treatment,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 467, no. 5, pp. 1146–1153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. B. Dobbs, R. Nunley, and P. L. Schoenecker, “Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 986–996, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Faldini, F. Traina, A. Di Martino, M. Nanni, and F. Acri, “Can selective soft tissue release and cuboid osteotomy correct neglected clubfoot?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 471, no. 8, pp. 2658–2665, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Kocaoglu, L. Eralp, A. C. Atalar, and F. E. Bilen, “Correction of complex foot deformities using the Ilizarov external fixator,” The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. V. Ponseti and E. N. Smoley, “The classic: congenital club foot: the results of treatment,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 467, no. 5, pp. 1133–1145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. R. Jowett, J. A. Morcuende, and M. Ramachandran, “Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 93-B, no. 9, pp. 1160–1164, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Radler, “The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1747–1753, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. E. Zionts, G. Zhao, K. Hitchcock, J. Maewal, and E. Ebramzadeh, “Has the rate of extensive surgery to treat idiopathic clubfoot declined in the United States?” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 882–889, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. B. Howard and M. K. D. Benson, “Clubfoot: its pathological anatomy,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 654–659, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Ippolito and I. Ponseti, “Congenital club foot in the human fetus. A histological study,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 8–22, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Masala, G. Manenti, M. Antonicoli, D. Morosetti, G. Claroni, and G. Simonetti, “Real time evaluation of monolateral clubfoot with sonoelastography. Preliminary results,” Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Hattori, H. Sano, Y. Saijo et al., “Measurement of soft tissue elasticity in the congenital clubfoot using scanning acoustic microscope,” Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics Part B, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 357–362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. B. Walker Jr., E. H. Harris, and J. V. Benedict, “Stress-strain relationship in human cadaveric plantaris tendon: a preliminary study,” Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. N. Maganaris and J. P. Paul, “In vivo human tendon mechanical properties,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 521, no. 1, pp. 307–313, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. Liao, S. Kemp, G. Corner, R. Eisma, and Z. Huang, “Elastic properties of Thiel-embalmed human ankle tendon and ligament,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 917–924, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Kongsgaard, C. H. Nielsen, S. Hegnsvad, P. Aagaard, and S. P. Magnusson, “Mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon, in vivo,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 772–777, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Ji, X. Tang, Y. Li, W. Xu, and W. Qiu, “Analysis of 3-dimensional finite element after reconstruction of impaired ankle deltoid ligament,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3913–3916, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Siegler, J. Block, and C. D. Schneck, “The mechanical characteristics of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint,” Foot & Ankle International, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 234–242, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. An, C. Ji, Y. Li, J. Wang, X. Zhang, and Y. Huang, “In vivo measurements of human neck skin elasticity using MRI and finite element modeling,” Medical Physics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1402–1407, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Sutradhar and M. J. Miller, “In vivo measurement of breast skin elasticity and breast skin thickness,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. e191–e199, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Khatyr, C. Imberdis, P. Vescovo, D. Varchon, and J. M. Lagarde, “Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 96–103, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Pailler-Mattei, S. Bec, and H. Zahouani, “In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 599–606, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Zahouani, C. Pailler-Mattei, B. Sohm, R. Vargiolu, V. Cenizo, and R. Debret, “Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests,” Skin Research and Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. B. Martin, D. B. Burr, N. A. Sharkey, and D. P. Fyhrie, “Mechanical properties of ligament and tendon,” in Skeletal Tissue Mechanics, pp. 175–225, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. N. Maganaris and M. V. Narici, “Mechanical properties of tendons,” in Tendon Injuries, N. Maffulli, P. Renström, and W. B. Leadbetter, Eds., pp. 14–21, Springer, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Özkaya, D. Leger, D. Goldsheyder et al., “Mechanical properties of biological tissues,” in Fundamentals of Biomechanics, pp. 361–387, Springer International Publishing, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. D. L. Butler, E. S. Grood, F. R. Noyes, and R. E. Zernicke, “Biomechanics of ligaments and tendons,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 125–182, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  32. S. L.-Y. Woo, R. E. Debski, J. Zeminski, S. D. Abramowitch, S. S. Chan Saw, MS, and J. A. Fenwick, “Injury and repair of ligaments and tendons,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 83–118, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. T. A. L. Wren, D. P. Lindsey, G. S. Beaupré, and D. R. Carter, “Effects of creep and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties and failure of human Achilles tendons,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 710–717, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Z. Paxton and K. Baar, “Tendon mechanics: the argument heats up,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 423-424, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. J. Wu, “Quantitative constitutive behaviour and viscoelastic properties of fresh flexor tendons,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 852–857, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H. S. Gupta, J. Seto, S. Krauss, P. Boesecke, and H. R. C. Screen, “In situ multi-level analysis of viscoelastic deformation mechanisms in tendon collagen,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Pal, “Mechanical properties of biological materials,” in Design of Artificial Human Joints & Organs, pp. 23–40, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. N. P. Rossetto, I. M. D. Fabbro, and S. R. Piedade, “How does static stretching influence the tendons mechanical response?” Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 258–261, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Babaei, A. J. Velasquez-Mao, S. Thomopoulos, E. L. Elson, S. D. Abramowitch, and G. M. Genin, “Discrete quasi-linear viscoelastic damping analysis of connective tissues, and the biomechanics of stretching,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 69, pp. 193–202, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. J. F. Kahn, X. Wang, and R. Rahouadj, “Nonlinear model for viscoelastic behavior of Achilles tendon,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 132, no. 11, pp. 111002–111008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. R. Piedade, I. M. Dal Fabbro, M. M. Mischan, C. Piedade Jr, and N. Maffulli, “Static tensioning promotes hamstring tendons force relaxation more reliably than cycling tensioning,” The Knee, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 775–781, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. I. Danto and S. L.-Y. Woo, “The mechanical properties of skeletally mature rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon over a range of strain rates,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 58–67, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. N. Theis, A. A. Mohagheghi, and T. Korff, “Method and strain rate dependence of Achilles tendon stiffness,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 947–953, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Kosters, H. P. Wiesinger, J. Bojsen-Moller, E. Muller, and O. R. Seynnes, “Influence of loading rate on patellar tendon mechanical properties in vivo,” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 323–329, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. B. Svensson, T. Hassenkam, P. Hansen, and S. Peter Magnusson, “Viscoelastic behavior of discrete human collagen fibrils,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 112–115, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. P. Pioletti, L. R. Rakotomanana, and P. F. Leyvraz, “Strain rate effect on the mechanical behavior of the anterior cruciate ligament-bone complex,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 95–100, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. L.-Y. Woo, R. H. Peterson, K. J. Ohland, T. J. Sites, and M. I. Danto, “The effects of strain rate on the properties of the medial collateral ligament in skeletally immature and mature rabbits: a biomechanical and histological study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 712–721, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. J. Bonner, N. Newell, A. Karunaratne et al., “Strain-rate sensitivity of the lateral collateral ligament of the knee,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 41, pp. 261–270, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. M. Shaw and G. Lewis, Eds.“Tensile properties of human Achilles tendon,” in Proceedings of the 1997 16 Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference, K. M. Shaw and G. Lewis, Eds., pp. 338–341, Biloxi, Mississippi, USA, April 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. G. Lewis and K. M. Shaw, “Tensile properties of human tendo Achillis: effect of donor age and strain rate,” The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 435–445, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. J. Bailey, J. Macmillan, P. R. Shrewry et al., “Viscoelastic properties of collagen: synchrotron radiation investigations and structural model,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 357, no. 1418, pp. 191–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. Davis, J. Clemmer, J. Liao, M. F. Horstemeyer, and L. N. Williams, “Strain rate effects on structure-property relationship in the rabbit patellar tendon,” in ASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Parts A and B, pp. 675-676, Lake Tahoe, California, USA, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. R. Noyes and E. S. Grood, “The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and rhesus monkeys,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1074–1082, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. De Vita and W. S. Slaughter, “A structural constitutive model for the strain rate-dependent behavior of anterior cruciate ligaments,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1561–1570, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Halper, “Advances in the use of growth factors for treatment of disorders of soft tissues,” Progress in Heritable Soft Connective Tissue Diseases, J. Halper, Ed., Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Chiquet, L. Gelman, R. Lutz, and S. Maier, “From mechanotransduction to extracellular matrix gene expression in fibroblasts,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1793, no. 5, pp. 911–920, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. P. Riley, V. Curry, J. DeGroot et al., “Matrix metalloproteinase activities and their relationship with collagen remodelling in tendon pathology,” Matrix Biology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. A. Park, I. A. Kim, Y. J. Lee et al., “Biological responses of ligament fibroblasts and gene expression profiling on micropatterned silicone substrates subjected to mechanical stimuli,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 402–412, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. D. R. Henshaw, E. Attia, M. Bhargava, and J. A. Hannafin, “Canine ACL fibroblast integrin expression and cell alignment in response to cyclic tensile strain in three-dimensional collagen gels,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 481–490, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. Yang, R. C. Crawford, and J. H.-C. Wang, “Proliferation and collagen production of human patellar tendon fibroblasts in response to cyclic uniaxial stretching in serum-free conditions,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1543–1550, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. G. Kim, T. Akaike, T. Sasagawa, Y. Atomi, and H. Kurosawa, “Gene expression of type I and type III collagen by mechanical stretch in anterior cruciate ligament cells,” Cell Structure and Function, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 139–144, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. N. D. Reeves, C. N. Maganaris, and M. V. Narici, “Effect of strength training on human patella tendon mechanical properties of older individuals,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 548, Part 3, pp. 971–981, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. H. Michna and G. Hartmann, “Adaptation of tendon collagen to exercise,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 161–165, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. W. Shim and S. H. Elder, “Influence of cyclic hydrostatic pressure on fibrocartilaginous metaplasia of Achilles tendon fibroblasts,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 247–252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. T. Majima, L. L. Marchuk, P. Sciore, N. G. Shrive, C. B. Frank, and D. A. Hart, “Compressive compared with tensile loading of medial collateral ligament scar in vitro uniquely influences mRNA levels for aggrecan, collagen type II, and collagenase,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 524–531, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. R. Buckley, E. B. Evans, P. E. Matuszewski et al., “Distributions of types I, II and III collagen by region in the human supraspinatus tendon,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 374–379, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. H. B. Sun, Y. Li, D. T. Fung, R. J. Majeska, M. B. Schaffler, and E. L. Flatow, “Coordinate regulation of IL-1β and MMP-13 in rat tendons following subrupture fatigue damage,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 466, no. 7, pp. 1555–1561, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Agarwal and N. Gupta, “Does initial Pirani score and age influence number of Ponseti casts in children?” International Orthopaedics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 569–572, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Awang, A. R. Sulaiman, I. Munajat, and M. E. Fazliq, “Influence of age, weight, and Pirani score on the number of castings in the early phase of clubfoot treatment using Ponseti method,” The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 40–43, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  70. H. R. C. Screen, “Investigating load relaxation mechanics in tendon,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. N. S. Kalson, D. F. Holmes, A. Herchenhan, Y. Lu, T. Starborg, and K. E. Kadler, “Slow stretching that mimics embryonic growth rate stimulates structural and mechanical development of tendon-like tissue in vitro,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 240, no. 11, pp. 2520–2528, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus