Research Article
A Full-Scale Field Study on Bearing Characteristics of Cast-in-Place Piles with Different Hole-Forming Methods in Loess Area
Table 1
Comparison of all 3 types of cast-in-place piles.
| Type | Tool | Applicable condition | Advantage | Disadvantage |
| Rotary drilling pile (RDP) | Rotary drilling rig | Clay, silty soil, sand, artificial filled soil | The hole-forming speed is fast and the quality is high; construction site is clean. | The weight of the equipment is large and the construction ground needs to be treated; need to keep the head pressure in the hole. |
| Manual digging pile (MDP) | Man, spade | The bearing stratum is above the groundwater level, and the pile diameter is 800–2000 mm. | Strong bearing capacity of a single pile; easy to clear holes and check hole formation. | It is difficult to make holes below the groundwater level; there is a great danger in the process of digging holes. |
| Impact drilling pile (IDP) | Impact drilling rig | Clay, silty soil, sand layer, and gravel soil layer | Strong applicability; lower platform requirements and lower costs. | The drilling efficiency is low; it is difficult to make a circular hole; accidents are easy to occur; the depth and diameter of the hole are small. |
|
|