Research Article
Effects of Focus Geometry on the Hard Rock-Cutting Performance of an Abrasive Waterjet
Table 1
Experimental study cases and details.
| Water pressure (MPa) | 320 | Standoff distance (mm) | 10 | Traverse speed (mm/s) | 8.4 | | Effects of water and abrasive flow rates |
| Orifice diameter (mm) | 0.15 | 0.254 | 0.33 | Water flow rate (mL/s) | 10.67 | 29.50 | 50.00 | Abrasive flow rate (g/s) | 3.3–14.2 | 4.0–24.0 | 4.4–29.0 |
| | Effect of focus diameter (focus length 76.2 mm) | Focus diameter (mm) | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | — | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| | Effect of focus length (focus diameter 1.02 mm) | Focus length (mm) | 76.2 | 76.2 | 76.2 | 101.6 | 101.6 | 101.6 | 152.4 | 152.4 | 152.4 |
|
|