Advances in Hematology

Advances in Hematology / 2010 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 760402 |

Ethan A. Natelson, David Pyatt, "Temozolomide-Induced Myelodysplasia", Advances in Hematology, vol. 2010, Article ID 760402, 5 pages, 2010.

Temozolomide-Induced Myelodysplasia

Academic Editor: Maria R. Baer
Received23 Jul 2009
Revised17 Nov 2009
Accepted13 Jan 2010
Published04 Mar 2010


A patient who had received temozolomide (TMZ) as a single agent in treatment of malignant glioma developed therapy-induced myelodysplasia (T-MDS). TMZ is an orally active imidazotetrazine which methylates guanine residues in DNA, ultimately causing single and double-strand DNA breaks leading to apoptotic cell death. TMZ does not chemically cross-link DNA and is considered a nonclassical alkylating agent, similar in structure and activity to dacarbazine. Observations on this patient, and on similarly treated others, suggest that the cumulative dose threshold (CDT) for TMZ that predisposes to T-MDS and which may potentially lead to acute myeloid leukemia (T-AML) is around 18000 to 20000 mg/sq m. Although the incidence of T-MDS and the predisposing CDT of TMZ may differ from that of other potentially leukemogenic compounds currently and formerly used as chemotherapeutic agents, all alkylating agents, including TMZ, should be considered potentially leukemogenic when administered long term.

1. Introduction

Most instances of myelodysplasia (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are de novo or primary illnesses, and occur without known exogenous or environmental cause and at an increasing incidence with advancing age [13]. Failure of DNA repair mechanisms and the physiologic requirement for programmed DNA fracture and chromosome reassembly during normal hematopoiesis are possible endogenous causes [1].

Secondary forms of MDS/AML are less common and may occur in the setting of pre-existing hematological or systemic disorders, after exposure to environmental toxins, or consequent to treatment of malignancy or circumstances requiring prolonged immunosuppression [47]. More and more cases of event-related or therapy-induced MDS/AML are being recognized. Recent studies suggest that individuals with this subset of secondary MDS/AML may have particular predisposing genetic loci [8, 9]. It is generally believed that secondary forms of MDS/AML are more refractory to therapy than are de novo illnesses, and as recently reported, even with equivalent low-risk chromosome aberrations [1012]. The bone marrow histopathology of T-MDS more often shows multilineage dysplasia, fibrosis and hypoplasia than is observed in de novo forms of MDS making comparable classification difficult along guidelines designed for de novo MDS [12, 13]. This seems particularly true of examples of secondary MDS consequent to excessive occupational exposures to benzene, an obsolete chemotherapy drug [2, 1417].

Alkylating agent-induced MDS/AML was first described after treatment of multiple myeloma with melphalan [18]. Many subsequent observations suggested that MDS/AML after therapy with alkylating agents was not idiosyncratic, but directly related to their cumulative dose, regardless of mode of administration [19]. The clinical features of such secondary AML syndromes include a MDS phase in as many as 70% of cases [2, 4, 5]. By contrast, de novo AML typically begins abruptly without a period of MDS. There also appears to be a latency period and a window of opportunity, from exposure to onset of hematologic neoplasm, generally described as between 2 and 10 years after a potentially leukemogenic CDT is reached [5]. Certain cytogenetic aberrations in bone marrow cells are also more likely to occur after exposure to alkylating agents. Such aberrations involve variable losses of genetic material from chromosomes 5 and 7 in as many as 50–70% of cases [25, 10]. Moreover, some alkylating agents may be far more leukemogenic than others, and the CDT for each compound varies considerably [6, 7, 19, 20]. Expanded use of a newer alkylating agent, TMZ, developed to facilitate central nervous system drug penetration in patients with cerebral neoplasms, has become a standard of care [21, 22]. Unfortunately, its mechanism of action suggests major efficacy only for central nervous system tumors bearing specific genetic markers [23, 24]. The increasing reports of MDS/AML syndromes following the use of TMZ serve as a reminder that alkylating agents cannot be safely used continuously and long-term unless the intent is palliation, rather than cure.

2. Case Report

A 64-year-old previously healthy right-handed man experienced the sudden onset of grand mal seizures. Cranial CT scans demonstrated a small left temporal lobe lesion. Microscopic examination after its excision showed histology consistent with astrocytoma, and clear tumor margins. He received postoperative radiation therapy, along with small oral doses of TMZ as a radiosensitizer. This drug was then continued at 200 mg/sq m/day, 5 days each month, for 18 courses (total dose, approximately 20,000 mg/sq m or 40,000 mg). Pretreatment blood counts gave entirely normal values. Transient leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred during chemotherapy, but the patient did not require use of hematological growth promoting factors or blood component transfusion. His blood counts returned to normal, but several months after completion of all therapy, a mild pancytopenia became evident, and gradually worsened. Three years after treatment, the peripheral blood film demonstrated macrocytosis and typical bilobed Pelger-Huet granulocytes [25]. The bone marrow examination at that time showed normal total cellularity but demonstrated 3% blast forms and trilineage dysplasia. Conventional cytogenetics and FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) probes confirmed isolated monosomy 7 in 80% of the marrow metaphases and no alterations in chromosome 5. A diagnosis of high-risk MDS was evident. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation was contemplated, but 5 months after his diagnosis of MDS, recurrence of the brain tumor was identified in the left frontal lobe behind the optic nerve. Re-biopsy confirmed astrocytoma, and he received additional radiation therapy along with a course of azacitidine for his MDS. This latter treatment resulted in a severe pancytopenia, but eight months later, his blood counts were considerably improved from those obtained at the time of his bone marrow examination, and he was essentially asymptomatic. He died from progression of the cerebral neoplasm 43 months following its initial diagnosis without conversion from MDS to AML.

3. Discussion

Kyle, in 1970, first called attention to the leukemogenic potential of the alkylating agent, melphalan, when used in the treatment of multiple myeloma [18]. The importance of a CDT among alkylating agents as a cause of secondary AML was soon appreciated with analysis of studies reporting the incidence of AML following increasing cycles of MOPP (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma [19]. Greene emphasized the duration of treatment and the total dose administered as predictive of a greater leukemic risk following administration of cyclophosphamide, perhaps the alkylating agent most thoroughly studied in regard to secondary AML [26]. The potentially leukemogenic cumulative dose for cyclophosphamide has been estimated at 20,000 mg and is about ten-fold that seen with another well-studied alkylating agent, chlorambucil [19]. The alkylating agent/CDT concept in leukemogenesis has been reconfirmed in a more recent study demonstrating the appearance of, and abrupt rise in, the incidence of secondary AML in patients treated for breast cancer and receiving cyclophosphamide in doses above 8,000 mg/sq m along with other agents [6]. This increased risk of T-MDS/AML was not observed in patients treated with lower doses. For other types of chemotherapeutic agents that may cause secondary AML/MDS, such as topoisomerase II inhibitors, the mean latency is shorter, and different chromosome aberrations such as balanced translocations are common [4]. The existence of a CDT is probable but less well-defined since these agents are often used in combination chemotherapy. Additionally, a prodrome of MDS is far less common [2, 4, 5, 7, 11].

TMZ is a novel chemotherapy drug that is structurally related to dacarbazine. It has the advantage of a rapid absorption following oral administration with almost 100% bioavailability. Moreover, drug levels in the central nervous system are 30–40% of TMZ plasma concentrations [27, 28]. As such, this drug has gained much attention as front-line therapy for malignant gliomas, for which effective therapy remains poor. TMZ does not undergo significant liver metabolism and hydrolyzes rapidly to form the active alkylating metabolite in plasma.

TMZ is considered a non-classical alkylating agent in that it does not cross-link DNA strands. Its metabolites methylate DNA, particularly on guanine sites. The formation of O6-methylguanine generates single and/or double strand DNA breaks when the affected cell line attempts to repair this alteration via mismatch repair mechanisms and apoptosis results. O6 –methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) plays a critical role in protecting cells from alkylating agents that target O6-guanine, including TMZ [29, 30]. This enzyme transfers the inappropriate methyl group from the guanine to a cysteine residue which signals for its proteasome-mediated degradation destruction via an ubiquitination pathway [31]. Thus, TMZ mediated apoptosis appears to be especially effective in MGMT negative tumors or in tumors with a hypermethylated MGMT promoter [28, 31]. For this reason knowledge of the MGMT promoter status provides clinically useful information regarding the potential efficacy to TMZ and other alkylating agents in a variety of tumor systems [30]. Additional studies report that TMZ also induces cell cycle arrest at the G2-M checkpoint and /or disrupts tubulin formation [32, 33].

Lacking ability to cross-link DNA, TMZ has less direct toxicity to hematopoietic progenitor cells than classical alkylating agents. As a result, myelosuppression is relatively mild and not often dose-limiting. However, scattered reports describe prolonged myelosuppression and even aplastic anemia, in addition to the delayed syndromes of T-MDS/AML following therapy with TMZ [3436]. Hypermethylation-induced gene silencing is a feature of MDS and secondary AML, in comparison with de novo AML and may have something to do with the lack of response to standard chemotherapy in these syndromes and could also favor the induction of T-MDS/AML [37].

Currently, TMZ is used in treatment of various types of gliomas, typically in concert with radiation therapy and as a radiosensitizing agent [38]. In more recent reports, it has been combined with other agents with different mechanisms of action in an attempt to find a more potent treatment advantage over radiation alone following debulking neurosurgery [39, 40]. TMZ has also been studied as a chemotherapeutic agent in melanoma and other solid tumors and in hematological disorders but little clinical data as yet exists.

The patient reported here received TMZ at a total dose of 20,000 mg/sq m prior to the diagnosis of T-MDS. In another instance where TMZ was used primarily as a single agent, the total dose administered before onset of T-MDS was quite similar, at 18,750 mg/sq m [41]. In a series of 7 patients with gliomas, all of whom received TMZ and who later developed alkylating agent-induced MDS, 2 were treated with TMZ alone at doses of 24,000 and 28,000 mg/sq m prior to T-MDS/AML. The median dose of TMZ in this cohort was 18,000 mg/sq m, but 5 of the 7 patients had also received substantial therapy with other chemotherapeutic agents [21]. In the patient reported here, and in the 3 additional patients previously reported who developed T-MDS following TMZ alone, MDS was confirmed 28 to 36 months following treatment. Additional occurrences of T-MDS/AML in patients receiving TMZ in the treatment of gliomas have been described, but the use of multiple chemotherapy drugs in these patients prevents any conclusions about the contributions of individual compounds [42, 43].

Benzene is an obsolete chemotherapeutic agent briefly used in the early approach to treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia [1]. It continues to be of major scientific interest because it is a well-known potential cause of secondary MDS/AML via occupational exposures at high cumulative dose levels [1, 2, 4447]. Its mechanism of action is unknown, but it has been termed a radiomimetic compound because of the similarity in the myeloid cell chromosome aberrations it may produce to those identified after both therapeutic radiation exposure and following treatment with alkylating agents. Some of the metabolites of benzene also exhibit anti-topoisomerase II activity, the importance of which in terms of its mechanism of leukemogenesis is debated [4446]. Regulatory agencies, epidemiological studies and peer-reviewed medical literature typically cite cumulative benzene exposures in excess of 40 ppm years as the minimum exposure required to potentially cause secondary MDS/AML [2, 47, 48]. However, exposure levels well in excess of these values may not result in a statistically significant excess incidence of AML [49, 50].

In order to compare potentially leukemogenic doses of benzene with those of other chemicals, the typical exposure metric of ppm-years must be converted to the more clinically relevant mg/sq m. An estimate of the mg absorbed dose of benzene given a constant 1 ppm (32 mg/m3 1 ppm) inhalation over an 8 hour daily work schedule during a 250 day work year and continuing over a 40 year period employing standard measurements for respiratory rate, tidal volume and absorbed dose, would yield a value around 92,000 mg. Assuming the worker measured 2 sq m in body surface area, this would suggest that the minimum CDT necessary to predispose to secondary MDS/AML would be about 46,000 mg/sq m. With controls on the amount of benzene allowable as a trace contaminant in modern solvents, it has become more difficult to achieve the cumulative dose levels required to initiate leukemogenesis in workers in developed countries [51]. The wide range of the estimated CDT necessary to predispose to secondary MDS/AML for selected and well-studied modern chemotherapeutic agents including TMZ and in comparison with benzene is shown in Table 1 [6, 7, 1820, 26, 47].

CompoundActivityCDT (mg/sq m)Latency to MDS/AML (yrs)

Temozolamidealkylating agent18–20,0000.75–3
Cyclophosphamidealkylating agent8–10,0002–10
Alkeranalkylating agent 802–10
Mechlorethaminealkylating agent 602–10
Etoposidetopo II inhibitor 2,0001–4
Mitoxantronetopo II inhibitor 600.50–5
Benzeneunknown 46,0002–10

Most individuals receiving exceptionally large doses of alkylating agents over an extended period do not develop T-MDS/AML. This also is true in patients receiving TMZ [22]. However, considering the limited survival of those with malignant gliomas, in comparison with the wide range of latency in alkylating agent-induced MDS/AML, it is understandable why more examples of this hematological complication have not been described. This relatively short survival interval also makes it more difficult to compare the incidence of leukemogenesis from TMZ with that caused by alkylating agents commonly used in the treatment of neoplasms which are associated with a long survival, such as Hodgkin’s lymphoma, testicular cancer and breast cancer. Nevertheless, patients and their physicians should be aware that prolonged use of TMZ as a single agent is not innocuous and carries the potential to cause T-MDS/AML. The CDT that predisposes to these hematological syndromes estimated on limited case material appears to be around 18,000 to 20,000 mg/sq m. Based on the extensive medical literature on the subject, any alkylating agent in long-term administration must always be considered potentially leukemogenic.


This work is funded by The Methodist Hospital Department of Medicine Annual 2009 Budget. This manuscript has previously been submitted to Advances in Hematology.


  1. M. A. Lichtman, “Battling the hematological malignancies: the 200 years' war,” Oncologist, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 126–138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. A. Natelson, “Benzene-induced acute myeloid leukemia: a clinician's perspective,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 826–830, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. Deschler and M. Lübbert, “Acute myeloid leukemia: epidemiology and etiology,” Cancer, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 2099–2107, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Leone, L. Mele, A. Pulsoni, F. Equitani, and L. Pagano, “The incidence of secondary leukemias,” Haematologica, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 937–945, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. A. Larson and M. M. Le Beau, “Therapy-related myeloid leukaemia: a model for leukemogenesis in humans,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 153-154, pp. 187–195, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Praga, J. Bergh, J. Bliss et al., “Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 4179–4191, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Kollmannsberger, J. Beyer, J.-P. Droz et al., “Secondary leukemia following high cumulative doses of etoposide in patients treated for advanced germ cell tumors,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3386–3391, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. A. Knight, A. D. Skol, A. Shinde et al., “Genome-wide association study to identify novel loci associated with therapy-related myeloid leukemia susceptibility,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 22, pp. 5575–5582, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Bolufer, M. Collado, E. Barragán et al., “Profile of polymorphisms of drug-metabolising enzymes and the risk of therapy-related leukaemia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 590–596, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Rund, S. Krichevsky, S. Bar-Cohen et al., “Therapy-related leukemia: clinical characteristics and analysis of new molecular risk factors in 96 adult patients,” Leukemia, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1919–1928, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Borthakur, E. Lin, N. Jain et al., “Survival is poorer in patients with secondary core-binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia compared with de novo core-binding factor leukemia,” Cancer, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 3217–3221, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. N. Singh, D. Huo, J. Anastasi et al., “Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome: morphologic subclassification may not be clinically relevant,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Orazi, “Histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases,” Pathobiology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 97–114, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. D. Irons, L. Lv, S. A. Gross et al., “Chronic exposure to benzene results in a unique form of dysplasia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1371–1380, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. D. Irons, S. A. Gross, X. Q. Wang et al., “Integrating WHO 2001–2008 criteria for the diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): A case-case analysis of benzene exposure,” Chemico-Biological Interactions. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. A. Ruiz, L. G. S. Augusto, J. Vassallo, A. C. Vigorito, I. Lorand-Metze, and C. A. Souza, “Bone marrow morphology in patients with neutropenia due to chronic exposure to organic solvents (benzene): early lesions,” Pathology Research and Practice, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 151–154, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. S. Linet, S.-N. Yin, L. B. Travis et al., “Clinical features of hematopoietic malignancies and related disorders among benzene-exposed workers in China,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 104, supplement 6, pp. 1353–1364, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. A. Kyle, R. V. Pierre, and E. D. Bayrd, “Multiple myeloma and acute myelomonocytic leukemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 283, no. 21, pp. 1121–1125, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  19. F. E. Van Leeuwen, “Risk of acute myelogenous leukaemia and myelodysplasia following cancer treatment,” Baillière's Clinical Haematology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 57–85, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Ellis and M. Boggild, “Therapy-related acute leukaemia with Mitoxantrone: what is the risk and can we minimise it?” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 505–508, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. C. Chamberlain and J. Raizer, “Extended exposure to alkylator chemotherapy: delayed appearance of myelodysplasia,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 229–232, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Khasraw, D. Bell, and H. Wheeler, “Long-term use of temozolomide: could you use temozolomide safely for life in gliomas?” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 854–855, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. E. Hegi, A.-C. Diserens, T. Gorlia et al., “MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 10, pp. 997–1003, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Dunn, A. Baborie, F. Alam et al., “Extent of MGMT promoter methylation correlates with outcome in glioblastomas given temozolomide and radiotherapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 124–131, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. M. Cunningham, M. M. Patnaik, D. E. Hammerschmidt, and G. M. Vercellotti, “Historical perspective and clinical implications of the Pelger-Huet cell,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 116–119, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. H. Greene, R. C. Young, J. M. Merrill, and V. T. DeVita, “Evidence of a treatment dose response in acute nonlymphocytic leukemias which occur after therapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1891–1898, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  27. G. V. Koukourakis, V. Kouloulias, G. Zacharias et al., “Temozolomide with radiation therapy in high grade brain gliomas: pharmaceuticals considerations and efficacy,” Molecules, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1561–1577, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Chakravarti, M. G. Erkkinen, U. Nestler et al., “Temozolomide-mediated radiation enhancement in glioblastoma: a report on underlying mechanisms,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 4738–4746, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. J. Hansen, R. Nagasubramanian, S. M. Delaney, L. D. Samson, and M. E. Dolan, “Role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in protecting from alkylating agent-induced toxicity and mutations in mice,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1111–1116, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. B. Kaina, M. Christmann, S. Naumann, and W. P. Roos, “MGMT: key node in the battle against genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and apoptosis induced by alkylating agents,” DNA Repair, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1079–1099, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. D. Adema, K. van der Born, R. J. Honeywell, and G. J. Peters, “Cell cycle effects and increased adduct formation by temozolomide enhance the effect of cytotoxic and targeted agents in lung cancer cell lines,” Journal of Chemotherapy, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 338–346, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  32. Y. Hirose and H. Sano, “Molecular pharmacology on DNA methylating agent temozolomide,” Neurological Surgery, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 117–129, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  33. G. Viola, L. Cecconet, A. Leszl et al., “Pyrrolotetrazinones deazaanalogues of temozolomide induce apoptosis in Jurkat cell line: involvement of tubulin polymerization inhibition,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1235–1251, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Singhal, S. Selva-Nayagam, and M. P. Brown, “Prolonged and severe myelosuppression in two patients after low-dose temozolomide treatment—case study and review of literature,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 229–230, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Villano, C. A. Collins, E. E. Manasanch, C. Ramaprasad, and K. van Besien, “Aplastic anaemia in patient with glioblastoma multiforme treated with temozolomide,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 436–438, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. J. George, J. B. Eichinger, T. J. Richard et al., “A rare case of aplastic anemia caused by temozolomide,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 974–976, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  37. M. E. Figueroa, L. Skrabanek, Y. Li et al., “MDS and secondary AML display unique patterns and abundance of aberrant DNA methylation,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 16, pp. 3448–3458, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. W. J. Kil, D. Cerna, W. E. Burgan et al., “In vitro and in vivo radiosensitization induced by the DNA methylating agent temozolomide,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 931–938, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. E. Fadul, L. S. Kingman, L. P. Meyer et al., “A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Tentori and G. Graziani, “Recent approaches to improve the antitumor efficacy of temozolomide,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 245–257, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Noronha, N. Berliner, K. K. Ballen et al., “Treatment-related myelodysplasia/AML in a patient with a history of breast cancer and an oligodendroglioma treated with temozolomide: case study and review of the literature,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 280–283, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. R. Perry, M. T. Brown, and J. P. Gockerman, “Acute leukemia following treatment of malignant glioma,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Y.-W. Su, M.-C. Chang, M.-F. Chiang, and R.-K. Hsieh, “Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome after temozolomide for recurrent high-grade glioma,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 315–318, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Whysner, M. V. Reddy, P. M. Ross, M. Mohan, and E. A. Lax, “Genotoxicity of benzene and its metabolites,” Mutation Research, vol. 566, no. 2, pp. 99–130, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. J. Morgan and C. L. Alvares, “Benzene and the hemopoietic stem cell,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 153-154, pp. 217–222, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. W. S. Stillman, M. Varella-Garcia, and R. D. Irons, “The benzene metabolite, hydroquinone, selectively induces 5q31− and −7 in human CD34+CD19 bone marrow cells,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Wilbur, S. Keith, O. Faroon et al., Toxicological Profile for Benzene, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2007.
  48. R. D. Brunning, A. Orazi, U. Germing et al., “Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms, overview,” in World Health Organization: Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, S. H. Swerdlow et al., Ed., pp. 88–93, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 4th edition, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  49. G. M. H. Swaen, T. Scheffers, J. De Cock, J. Slangen, and H. Drooge, “Leukemia risk in caprolactam workers exposed to benzene,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. S. Constantini, M. Quinn, D. Consonni, and M. Zappa, “Exposure to benzene and risk of leukemia among shoe factory workers,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  51. P. R. Williams, J. M. Panko, K. Unice, J. L. Brown, and D. J. Paustenbach, “Occupational exposures associated with petroleum-derived products containing trace levels of benzene,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 565–574, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Ethan A. Natelson and David Pyatt. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.